Summary
Fourteen mammalian pancreatic ribonucleases of known amino acid sequence were compared by 1 or more of 3 different immunological methods: standard quantitative micro-complement fixation, spot-plate micro-complement fixation, and inhibition of phage inactivation. It was found that, while the results obtained by the 3 techniques were correlated with one another, the standard microcomplement fixation procedure was most versatile, economical of materials, and easiest to execute. The standard MC′F technique was more sensitive than the spotplate technique to differences in amino acid sequence. The inhibition of phage inactivation method was more sensitive than the standard method for measuring differences among closely related RNases but proved impractical for amino acid differences over 15%; the MC′F method could be extended to at least 30% sequence differences. The standard method, moreover, readily detected the single amino acid difference between dromedary and camel RNases.
A linear relationship was found between immunological distance (y) in the MC′F test and percent sequence difference (x) which fit the equationy=7x. The strength of the correlation between immunological distance and percent sequence difference is consistent with the proposal that a large fraction of the evolutionary substitutions of amino acids in ribonuclease are immunologically detectable. This could be explained either by a multideterminant hypothesis or by a pauci-determinant hypothesis which says that substitutions occurring outside determinants produce small conformational changes influencing determinant reactivity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atassi, M.Z. (1975). Immunochemistry12, 423–438
Baynes, J.W., Wold, F. (1976). J. Biol. Chem.251, 6016–6024
Beintema, J.J., Gaastra, W., Lenstra, J.A., Welling, G.W., Fitch, W.M. (1977). J.Mol. Evol.10, 49–71
Beintema, J.J., Gaastra, W., Scheffer, A.J., Welling, G.W. (1976). Eur. J. Biochem.63, 441–448
Beintema, J.J., Gruber, M. (1967). Biochim. Biophys. Acta147, 612–614
Brown, R.K., Tacey, B.C., Anfinsen, C.B. (1960). Biochim. Biophys. Acta39, 528–530
Casey, H.L. (1965). Pub. Health Monograph No. 74, p. 31. Wash., D.C.: U.S. Gov't. Printing Off.
Champion, A.B., Prager, E.M., Wachter, D., Wilson, A. C. (1974). Microcomplement fixation. In: Biochemical and immunological taxonomy of animals, C. A. Wright, ed., p. 397. London: Academic Press
Champion, A.B., Soderberg, K.L., Wilson, A.C., Ambler, R.P. (1975). J. Mol. Evol.5, 291–305
Emmens, M., Welling, G.W., Beintema, J.J. (1976). Biochem. J.157, 317–323
Fainaru, M., Wilson, A.C., Arnon, R. (1974). J. Mol. Biol.84, 635–642
Gaastra, W., Groen, G., Welling, G.W., Beintema, J.J. (1974). FEBS Lett.41, 227–232
Groen, G., Welling, G.W., Beintema, J.J. (1975). FEBS Lett.60, 300–304
Ho, C.Y.-K., Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C., Osuga, D.T., Feeney, R.E. (1976). J. Mol. Evol.8, 271–282
Jackson, R.L., Hirs, C.H.W. (1970). J. Biol. Chem.245, 637–653
Jollès, J., Schoentgen, F., Jollès, P., Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C. (1976). J. Mol. Evol.8, 59–78
Kuper, H., Beintema, J.J. (1976). Biochim. Biophys. Acta446, 337–344
Lee, B., Richards, F.M. (1971). J. Mol. Biol.55, 379–400
Leijenaar-van den Berg, G., Beintema, J.J. (1975). FEBS Lett.56, 101–107
Lenstra, J.A., Hofsteenge, J., Beintema, J.J. (1977). J. Mol. Biol.109, 185–193
Migchelsen, C., Beintema, J.J. (1973). J. Mol. Biol.79, 25–38
Morris, D. (1965). The mammals. New York: Harper and Row
Nei, M. (1977). J. Mol. Evol.9, 203–211
Oosterhuis, S., Welling, G.W., Gaastra, W., Beintema, J.J. (1977). Biochim. Biophys. Acta490, 523–529
Prager, E.M., Brush, A.H., Nolan, R.A., Nakanishi, M., Wilson, A.C. (1974). J. Mol. Evol.3, 243–262
Prager, E.M., Fowler, D.P., Wilson, A.C. (1976). Evolution30, 637–649
Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C. (1971). J. Biol. Chem.246, 5978–5989
Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C. (1975). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA72, 200–204
Prager, E.M., Wilson, A.C. (1976). J. Mol. Evol.9, 45–57
Putnam, F.W. (1975). Transferrin. In: The plasma proteins. Structure, function, and genetic control. 2nd edit., Vol. I, F.W. Putnam, ed., p. 265. New York: Academic Press
Russchen, F., De Vrieze, G., Gaastra, W., Beintema, J.J. (1976). Biochim. Biophys. Acta427, 719–726
Scheffer, A.J., Beintema, J.J. (1974). Eur. J. Biochem.46, 221–233
Smyth, D.G., Stein, W.H., Moore, S. (1963). J. Biol. Chem.238, 227–234
Van den Berg, A., Van den Hende-Timmer, L., Beintema, J.J. (1976). Biochim. Biophys. Acta453, 400–409
Wang, A.C., Shuster, J., Epstein, A., Fudenberg, H.H. (1968). Biochem. Genet.1, 347–358
Waugh, A.E. (1943). Elements of statistical method. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.
Welling, G.W., Groen, G. (1976). Biochim. Biophys. Acta446, 331–335
Welling, G.W., Groen, G., Beintema, J.J. (1975a). Biochem. J.147, 505–511
Welling, G.W., Groen, G., Beintema, J.J., Emmens, M., Schröder, F.P. (1976a). Immunochemistry13, 653–658
Welling, G.W., Leijenaar-van den Berg, G., Van Dijk, B., Van den Berg, A., Groen, G., Gaastra, W., Emmens, M., Beintema, J.J. (1975b). BioSystems6, 239–245
Welling, G.W., Mulder, H., Beintema, J.J. (1976b). Biochem. Genet.14, 309–317
Welling, G.W., Scheffer, A.J., Beintema, J.J. (1974). FEBS Lett.41, 58–61
Wierenga, R.K., Huizinga, J.D., Gaastra, W., Welling, G.W., Beintema, J.J. (1973). FEBS Lett.31, 181–185
Wilson, A.C., Carlson, S.S., White, T.J. (1977). Annu. Rev. Biochem.46, 573–639
Wilson, A.C., Prager, E.M. (1974). Antigenic comparison of animal lysozymes. In: Lysozyme, E.F. Osserman, R.E. Canfield, S. Beychok, eds., p. 127. New York: Academic Press
Zwiers, H., Scheffer, A.J., Beintema, J.J. (1973). Eur. J. Biochem.36, 569–574
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (DEB74-11866A01) and the National Institutes of Health (GM-21509) to A.C.W. and a Fulbright-Hays grant to G.W.W. Part of this work was carried out under the auspices of the Netherlands Foundation for Chemical Research (S.O.N.) and with financial aid from the Netherlands Organisation for the Advancement of Pure Research (Z.W.O.). The followingabbreviations are used in this work: RNase=ribonuclease; MC′F=micro-complement fixation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prager, E.M., Welling, G.W. & Wilson, A.C. Comparison of various immunological methods for distinguishing among mammalian pancreatic ribonucleases of known amino acid sequence. J Mol Evol 10, 293–307 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734219
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01734219