Abstract
The higher proportion of repeated DNA sequences in the garden pea (Pisum sativum) than in the mung bean (Vigna radiata), as well as other differences between these legume genomes, are consistent with a higher rate of sequence amplification in the former. This hypothesis leads to a prediction that repeated sequence families inPisum are mostly heterogeneous, as defined by Bendich and Anderson (1977), whileVigna families are homogeneous. An assay developed by these authors to distinguish between the two types of families, by comparison of reassociation rates at different temperatures, was utilized. The results forVigna defied the predictions of the assay for either homogeneous or hetereogeneous model. Evaluation of the kinetic data in light of the great diversity of repeated family copy numbers in both genomes enabled an interpretation of the results as consistent with hetereogenous families inPisum and homogeneous families inVigna. These tentative conclusions were supported by the results of a thermal denaturation (melting) assay described in the accompanying paper.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- Cot:
-
the product of molar concentration of DNA nucleotides and time of incubation (mol s/L)
- ECot:
-
equivalent
- Cot:
-
the value after correction to standard reassociation conditions (120 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 60°C)
- (Et)4NCl:
-
tetraethylammonium chloride
- Tm :
-
the temperature at which half of the nucleotides in solution are unpaired
References
Bendich AJ, Anderson RS (1977) Biochem J 16:4655–4663
Bendich AJ, McCarthy BJ (1970) Genetics 65:545–565
Britten RJ, Cetta A, Davidson EH (1978) Cell 15:1175–1186
Britten RJ, Kohne DE (1968) Science 161:529–540
Chang CT, Hain TC, Hutton JR, Wetmur JG (1974) Biopolymers 13:1847–1858
Cuellar RE, Ford GA, Briggs WR, Thompson WF (1978) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:6026–6030
Flavell RB, Bedbrook J, Jones J, O'Dell M, Gerlach WL, Dyer TA, Thompson RD (1980) In: Davies DR, Hopwood DA (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth John Innes Symposium. The Plant Genome and Second International Haploid Conference. John Innes Inst, Norwich, UK, p 15
Flavell RB, Rimpau J, Smith DB (1977) Chromosoma 63:205–222
Kiper M, Herzfeld F (1978) Chromosoma 65:335–351
Kolodner R, Tewari KK (1975) Biochim Biophys Acta 402:372–390
McDonell MW, Simon MN, Studier FW (1977) J Mol Biol 110:119–146
Marsh JL, McCarthy BJ (1974) Biochem J 13:3382–3388
Melchior WB, Von Hippel PH (1973) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:298–302
Murray MG, Cuellar RE, Thompson WF (1978) Biochem J 17:5781–5790
Murray MG, Palmer JD, Cuellar RE, Thompson WF (1979) Biochem J 18:5259–5266
Murray MG, Thompson WF (1977) Carnegie Inst Washington Yearb 76:259–262
Palmer JD, Murray MG, Thompson WF (1979) Carnegie Inst Washington Yearb 78:226–231
Pearson WR, Davidson EH, Britten RJ (1977) Nucleic Acids Res 4:1727–1735
Preisler RS, Thompson WF (1978) Carnegie Inst Washington Yearb 77:323–330
Rau DC, Klotz LC (1975) J Chem Phys 62:2354–2365
Rau DC, Klotz LC (1978) Biophys Chem 8:41–51
Smith MJ, Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1975) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:4805–4809
Thompson WF, Murray MG (1980a) In: Davies DR, Hopwood DA (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth John Innes Symposium. The Plant Genome and Second International Haploid Conference. John Innes Inst, Norwich, UK, p 31
Thompson WF, Murray MG (1980b) In: Marcus A (ed) The Biochemistry of Plants: A Comprehensive Treatise VI. Academic Press, New York (in press)
Ullman JS, McCarthy BJ (1973) Biochim Biophys Acta 294:416–424
Wetmur JG (1976) Ann Rev Biophys Bioeng 5:337–361
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is Carnegie Institution of Washington Department of Plant Biology Publication No. 708 and is based on a portion of a dissertation submitted by R.S.P. in partial fulfillment of the Ph.D. requirements at Stanford University
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Preisler, R.S., Thompson, W.F. Evolutionary sequence divergence within repeated DNA families of higher plant genomes. J Mol Evol 17, 78–84 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732677
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01732677