Abstract
Objectives
Obesity is thought to be one of the conditions in which the impedance cardiographic method is less reliable for estimating stroke volume (SV). This led to the introduction of a weight correction factor, σ, into the equation according to Sramek and Bernstein. However, no scientific evidence has been published to support the use of this factor. The objectives of the present study are to evaluate the influence of body weight on the accuracy of impedance cardiography and to validate Bernstein's weight correction factor by comparison with thermodilution in patients after coronary bypass surgery.
Design
Prospective clinical study.
Setting
A surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital.
Patients
37 consecutive patients 24–36 h after coronary bypass surgery, sub-divided into a normalweight group (n=24), patients whose weight deviated less than 15% from their ideal weight, and an obese group (n=13), patients whose weight deviated more than 15% from their ideal weight.
Measurements
Kubicek's impedance cardiographic method and Sramek and Bernstein's method to assess SV are applied and compared to thermodilution. In order to study the validity of σ, the results are compared between 24 patients with normal weight and 13 obese patients.
Results
A significant correlation between miscalculation of SV by impedance cardiography and the degree of obesity for Sramek and Bernstein's method is found when σ is not included in the equation (r=−0.55,p<0.05). This relation, however, remained significant when σ was included in the equation (r=−0.40,p<0.05). Kubicek's method shows no significant correlation for this relation (r=−0.30). Besides this, Sramek and Bernstein's method underestimates SV significantly in the obese group, independent of the use of σ in the equation. These results are explained as being intrinsic to the equation, according to Sramek and Bernstein. In the whole group the impedance-derived SV did not significantly differ from SV as measured by means of thermodilution, independent of the method used to calculate SV. However, a considerably better correlation and agreement (mean difference ±2 standard deviations is found when Kubicek's method is applied (r=0.90, 0.5±17.1 ml vs 0.64, −4.9±31.8 ml for Sramek and Bernstein's method).
Conclusions
Weight significantly influences Sramek and Bernstein's method of impedance cardiography, whereas Kubicek's method is not biased by this factor.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balasubramanian V, Mathew OP, Behl A, Teware SC, Hoon RS (1978) Electrical impedance cardiogram in derivation of systolic time intervals. Br Heart J 40: 268–275
Sheps DS, Petrovick ML, Kizakcvich PN, Wolfe C, Craige E (1982) Continuous noninvasive monitoring of left ventricular function during exercise by thoracic impedance cardiography-automated deviation of systolic time intervals. Am Heart J 103:519–524
Goldstein DS, Cannon RO, Zimlichman R, Keiser HR (1976) Clinical evaluation of impedance cardiography. Clin Physiol 1986; 6: 235–251
Denniston JC, Maher JT, Reeves JT, Cruz JC, Cymerman A, Grover RF (1976) Measurement of cardiac output by electrical impedance at rest and during exercise. J Appl Physiol 40: 91–95
Donovan KD, Geoffrey J, Dobb GJ, Woods WPD (1986) Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output. Crit Care Med 14: 1038–1044
Bernstein DP (1986) Continuous noninvasive real time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Crit Care Med 14: 898–901
Young JD, McQuillan P (1993) Comparison of thoracical electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution for measurement of cardiac index in patients with severe sepsis. Br J Anaesth 70: 58–62
Thomas AN, Ryan J, Doran BRH, Pollard BJ (1991) Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery. Intensive Care Med 17: 383–386
Lamberts R, Visser KR, Zijlstra WG (1984) Impedance cardiography. van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands
Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe BA, Mattson R (1966) Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerospace Med 37: 1208–1212
Kubicek WG, Patterson RP, Wisoe DA (1970) Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive method of monitoring cardiac function and other parameters of the cardiovascular system. Ann NY Acad Sci 170: 724
Sramek BB, Rose DM, Miyamoto A (1983) Stroke volume equation with a linear base impedance model and its accuracy as compared to thermodilution and magnetic flowmeter techniques in humans and animals. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Electr Bioimp, Zadar, Yugoslavia, p 38
Bernstein DP (1986) A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale. Crit Care Med 14: 904–909
Gotshall RW, Wood VC, Miles DS (1990) Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 17: 806–811
DeMey C, Enterling D (1988) Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by impedance cardiography: disagreement between two equations to estimate stroke volume. Aviat Space Environ Med 59: 57–62
Rasmussen JP, Eriksen J, Andersen J (1970) Evaluation of impedance cardiography during anaesthesia in extremely obese patients. Acta Anaesth Scand 21: 342–345
Woltjer HH, van der Meer BJM, Bogaard HJ, de Vries PMJM (1995) Comparison between spot and band electrodes and between two equations for calculation of stroke volume by means of impedance cardiography. Med Biol Eng Comput 33: 330–334
Woltjer HH, Arntzen BWGJ, Bogaard HJ, de Vries PMJM (1995) Optimalization of the spot electrode array in impedance cardiography. Med Biol Eng Comput 34: 1–4
Lababidi Z, Emhke DA, Durnin RE, Leaverton PE, Lauer RM (1970) The first derivative thoracic impedance cardiogram. Circulation 41: 615–618
Kim DW, Song CG, Lee MH (1992) A new ensemble averaging technique in impedance cardiography for estimation of stroke volume during treadmill exercise. Front Med Biol Eng 4: 179–188
Doerr BM, Miles D, Frey BMA (1981) Influence of respiration on stroke volume determined by impedance cardiography. Aviat Space Environ Med 52: 394–398
Souza WM, Panerai RB (1981) Variability of thoracic impedance cardiograms in man. Med Biol Eng Comput 19: 411–415
Geddes LA, Sadler C (1973) The specific resistance of blood at body temperature. Med Biol Eng Comput 11: 336–339
Hill DW, Thompson FD (1975) The importance of blood resistivity in the mesurement of cardiac output by the thoracic impedance method. Med Biol Eng Comput 3: 187–190
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I: 307–310
Nyboer J, Dreider M, Hannapel L (1950) Electrical impedance plethysmography. Circulation 2: 811–821
Shimazu H, Yamakoshi K, Togawa T, Gukuoka M, Ito H (1982) Evaluation of the parallel conductor theory for measuring human limb blood flow by electrical admittance plethysmography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 29: 1–7
Visser KR, Lamberts R, Zijlstra WG (1987) Investigation of the parallel conductor model of impedance cardiography by means of exchange transfusion with stroma free haemoglobin solution in the dog. Cardiovasc Res 21: 637–645
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woltjer, H.H., Bogaard, H.J., van der Spoel, H.I. et al. The influence of weight on stroke volume determination by means of impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 22, 766–771 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709519
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709519