Summary
This paper focuses on the sustainability and solvency issues of the public sector. Tests for sustainability heavily rely on the time-series properties of the debt-to-GDP ratio, whereas solvency test focus on the deficit inclusive of interest payments. Sustainability and solvency tests are applied first on 8 ERM countries during the period 1970–1994. Subsequently, we concentrate on historical evidence (from 1870 onwards) for the Belgian central government. This long-term view allows for a more accurate time-series analysis. On the one hand, we find historical support for the hypothesis that high and persistent deficits for some periods can be consistent with the present-value budget constraint (solvency), provided that policies are changed eventually. On the other hand, the much stronger requirement of sustainability is not fulfilled since we do not find a tendency of the debt ratio to return to a constant long-run equilibrium level.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abel, A.B., N.G. Mankiw, L.H. Summers and R.J. Zeckhauser (1989), ‘Assessing Dynamic Efficiency: Theory and Evidence,’Review of Economic Studies, 56, pp. 1–20.
Bohn, H. (1991), ‘Budget Balance through Revenue or Spending Adjustments? Some Historical Evidence for the United States,’Journal of Monetary Economics, 27, pp. 333–359.
Caporale, G.M. (1992), ‘Fiscal Solvency in Europe: Budget Deficits and Government Debt under European Monetary Union,’National Institute of Economic Review, May 1992, pp. 69–77.
Corsetti, G. (1991), ‘Testing for Solvency of the Public Sector. An Application to Italy,’Economic Notes, 20, pp. 581–599.
Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger (1987), ‘Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing,’Econometrica, 55, pp. 251–276.
Fase, M.M.G. and A.H.E.M. Wellink (1990), ‘The Relative Stability of the Private and the Public Sector,’De Economist, 138, pp. 397–427.
Gros, D. (1989), ‘Seigniorage in the EC: The Implications of the EMS and Financial Market Integration,’IMF Working Paper, No. 7.
Haan, J. de and C.L.J. Siermann (1993), ‘The Intertemporal Government Budget Constraint: A Review and Application for the Netherlands,’ University of Groningen,Research Memorandum, No. 556.
Hakkio, C.S. and M. Rush (1991), ‘Is the Budget Deficit “Too Large?“,’Economic Inquiry, 29, pp. 429–445.
Hamilton, J.D. and M.A. Flavin (1986), ‘On the Limitations of Government Borrowing: A Framework for Empirical Testing,’American Economic Review, 76, pp. 808–819.
Kremers, J.J.M. (1988), ‘Limits on the US Federal Debt,’Economics Letters 28, pp. 259–262.
Kremers, J.J.M. (1989), ‘U.S. Federal Indebtedness and the Conduct of Fiscal Policy,”Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, pp. 219–238.
Kwiatkowski, D., P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and S. Yongcheol (1992), ‘Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root,’Journal of Econometrics, 54, pp. 159–178.
MacDonald, R. and A.E.H. Speight (1986) ‘The Intertemporal Government Budget Constraint in the UK, 1961–1986,’The Manchester School, 58, pp. 329–347.
MacDonald, R. (1992), ‘Some Tests of the Government's Intertemporal Budget Constraint Using US Data,’Applied Economics, 24, pp. 1287–1292.
MacKinnon J.G. (1991), ‘Critical Values for Cointegration Tests,’ in: R.F. Engle and C.W.J. Granger (eds.),Long-run Economic Relationships. Readings in Cointegration, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 267–276.
Maddison, A. (1991),Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development. A Long-run Comparative View, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Scholliers, P. (1978), ‘Koopkracht en indexkoppeling. De Brusselse levensstandaard tijdens en na de eerste wereldoorlog, 1914–1925,’Belgische Tijdschrift voor Nieuwste Geschiedenis, No. 3–4, pp. 333–382.
Spaventa, L. (1987), ‘The Growth of Public Debt: Sustainability, Fiscal Rules, and Monetary Rules,’IMF Staff Papers, 34, pp. 374–399.
Trehan, B. and C.E. Walsh (1988), ‘Common Trends, the Government's Budget Constraint, and Revenue Smoothing,’Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, pp. 425–444.
Van der Rest, P. (1933), ‘Les finances de l'état et al conjoncture en Belgique de 1830 à 1913,’Bulletin de l'Institut des Sciences Economiques, No. 1, pp. 63–109.
Vanhorebeek, F. (1994), ‘The Unbearable Lightness of Maastricht for the Belgian Budget,’Documentatieblad Ministerie van Financiën, No, 3, pp. 105–138.
Wilcox, D.W. (1989), ‘The Sustainability of Government Deficits: Implications of the Present-value Borrowing Constraint,’Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 21, pp. 291–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Previous versions of this paper were written while F. Vanhorebeek was a research assistant at the Department of Economics, Catholic University of Leuven. We are grateful to W. Asma; G. de Bruyne, N. Demeester and two anonymous referees for their comments regarding the paper's methodology. We have also benefited from useful conversations with E. Buyst and P. Clement on the subject of this paper, as well as from their help in obtaining historical data. Remaining errors are ours. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the authors and should not be attributed to any other person affiliated with the Planning Bureau or the University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Rompuy, P. Solvency and sustainability of fiscal policies in the EU. De Economist 143, 457–473 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384910
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384910