Abstract
From January to June 1994, we operated conventionally on 121 consecutive herniated lumbar disc patients as part of a prospective study. We analysed general data, case histories, neurological findings on admission and all data from imaging investigations and therapy. In addition, all patients received a questionnaire based on the Low Back Outcome Score. Most of the patients (93%) were followed-up for 1 year postoperatively in the same manner. On the Prolo Scale, we obtained a good result in 70%; 76% had a good Low Back Outcome Score. Predictive factors are different for different outcome scales. The preoperative duration of pain, the preoperative duration of paresis and smoking seem to be general predictive factors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abramowitz JN, Neff RS (1991) Lumbar disc surgery: results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of the Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Neurosurgery 29:301–308
Dauch WA, Fasse A, Brucher K, Bauer BL (1994) Pradiktoren des Behandlungserfolges nach mikrochirurgischer Operation lumbaler Bandscheibenvorfälle. Zentralbl Neurochir 55: 144–155
Davis RA (1994) A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated hemiated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 80: 415–421
Dunnett CW (1964) New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20:482–491
Dvorak J, Gauchat MH, Valach L (1988a) The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. 1. A 4–17 years' follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects. Spine 13: 1418–1422
Dvorak J, Valach L, Fuhrimann P, Heim E (1988b) The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. 11. A 4–17 years' follow-up with emphasis on psychosocial aspects. Spine 13:1423–1427
Frymoyer JW, Gordon SL (1989) Research perspectives in low-back pain. Report of 1988 workshop. Spine 14: 1384
Games PA, Howell JF (1976) Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal n's and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study. J Ed Stat 1: 113–125
Greenough CG (1993) Results of treatment of lumbar spine disorders. Effects of assessment techniques and confounding factors. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 251:126–129
Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 17: 36–41
Howe J, Frymoyer JW (1985) The effects of questionnaire design on the determination of end results in lumbar spinal surgery. Spine 10: 804–805
Hurme M, Alaranta H (1987) Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 12:933–938
Musson B (1993) Patient-related factors predicting the outcome of decompressive surgery. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 251:69–70
Junge A, Dvorak J, Ahrens ST (1995) Predictors of bad and good outcomes of lumbar disc surgery. Spine 20: 460–468
Lewis PJ, Weir BK, Broad RW, Grace MG (1987) Long-term prospective study of lumbosacral discectomy. J Neurosurg 67:49–53
Manniche C, Asmussen KH, Vinterberg H, Rose-Hansen EB, Kramhøft J, Jordan A (1994) Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson's and modified Spengler's score system. Dan Med Bull 41: 110–115
Nygaard ØP, Rommer B, Trumpy JH (1994) Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 128: 53–56
Pappas CT, Harrington T, Sonntag VK (1992) Outcome analysis in 654 surgically treated lumbar disc herniations. Neurosurgery 30:862–866
Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M (1986) Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 11: 601–606
Soerensen LV, Mors O (1989) A twoyear prospective follow-up study of the outcome after surgery in patients with slipped lumbar disk operated upon for the first time. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 96:94–99
Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8: 131–140
Weir BKA (1979) Prospective study of 100 lumbosacral discectomies. J Neurosurg 50:283–289
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woertgen, C., Holzschuh, M., Rothoerl, R.D. et al. Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery?. Eur Spine J 6, 173–180 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301432
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01301432