Abstract
This paper studies changes in the relationship between household car ownership and income by household type. Ordered response probit models of car ownership are estimated for a sample of households repeatedly at six time points to track the evolution of income elasticities of car ownership over time. Elasticities of car ownership are found to change over time, questioning the existence of a unique equilibrium point between demand and supply that is implicitly assumed in traditional cross-sectional discrete choice car ownership models. Moreover, different household types and households that underwent household type transitions showed differing patterns of change in elasticities. Observed trends in car ownership and income clearly show behavioral asymmetry where the elasticity of procuring an additional car is greater than that of disposing a car. This too shows the inadequacy of traditional cross-sectional models of car ownership which tend to predict symmetry in behavior. The study suggests the importance of incorporating dynamic trends into the forecasting process, which can be accomplished through the use of longitudinal data.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Geinzer J & Daly A (1981) Suidvleugel Study — Report 9, Models of Car Ownership and License Holding. The Hague, The Netherlands: Cambridge Systematics Europe, b.v.
Golob TF, van Wissen LJG & Meurs H (1986) A dynamic model of travel demand.Transportation Research A 20A: 401–414.
Hildenbrand W & Kirman AP (1988) Equilibrium Analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V.
Jansson JO (1990) Car ownership entry and exit propensities of different generations — a key factor for the development of the total car fleet. In: Jones P (ed.)New Developments in Dynamic and Activity Based Approaches to Travel Demand Analysis (pp. 417–435). Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.
Kanafani AK (1983) Transportation Demand Analysis. New York: McGraw Hill.
Kawashima T (1988) Driver's license ownership in Japan: Towards cohort analysis for car ownership forecasting. Paper presented at the Oxford Conference on Travel and Transportation: New Developments in Dynamic and Activity Based Approaches. Oxford University, England. July.
Kitamura R (1989) The asymmetry of the change in household car ownership and utilization: A panel analysis. In: International Association for Travel Behavior (ed.)Travel Behavior Research (pp. 186–197). Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.
Kitamura R (1990) Summary of technical workshop: Dynamic modeling. In: Jones P (ed.)New Developments in Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Demand Analysis (pp. 439–442). Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.
Kitamura R & Bunch DS (1990) Heterogeneity and state dependence in household car ownership: A panel analysis using ordered-response probit models with error components. In: Koshi M (ed.)Transportation and Traffic Theory (pp. 477–496). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V.
Kitamura R & Kostyniuk LP (1986) Maturing motorization and household travel: The case of nuclear family households.Transportation Research A 20A(3): 245–260.
Kostyniuk LP & Kitamura R (1986) Changing effects of car-ownership on household travel patterns.Transportation Research Record 1085: 27–33. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC.
Lerman SR and Ben-Akiva ME (1976) Disaggregate behavioral demand model of automobile ownership.Transportation Research Record 569: 34–51. Transportation Research Board. National Research Council, Washington DC.
Maddala GS (1983)Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Madre JL (1990) Long term forecasting of car ownership and car use. In: Jones P (ed.)New Developments in Dynamic and Activity Based Approaches to Travel Demand Analysis (pp. 406–416). Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing.
McFadden D (1981) Econometric models of probablistic choice. In: Manski C & McFadden D (eds.)Structural Analysis of Discrete Data With Econometric Applications (pp. 198–272). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Ortuzar JD de & Willumsen LG (1990)Modeling Transport. New York: Wiley.
Rosenbloom S (1989) The transportation needs of single salaried mothers: A critical analysis.Specialized Transportation Planning and Practice 3(3).
Stopher PR & Meyburg AH (1975)Urban Transportation Modeling and Planning. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
Train K (1980) A structural logit model of auto ownership and mode choice.Review of Economic Studies 47(2) No. 147: 357–370.
van Wissen LJG & Meurs HJ (1989) The Dutch mobility panel: Experiences and evaluation.Transportation 16(2): 99–119.
Winston C (1981) A disaggregate model of the demand for intercity freight transportation.Econometrica 49(4): 981–1006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pendyala, R.M., Kostyniuk, L.P. & Goulias, K.G. A repeated cross-sectional evaluation of car ownership. Transportation 22, 165–184 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099438
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099438