Abstract
Hope is experienced when there is enjoyment in delaying the resolution of uncertainty. The main objective of this article is to identify the phenomenon of hope. In addition, we empirically test several axiomatic theories of temporal preferences which have implications for attitudes toward the timing of uncertainty resolution. Overall, the data support the extension of recursive expected utility specification to incorporate a weighted utility model of attitude toward future uncertainty. We find that the instances where hopefulness are more prevalent tend to be associated with a small probability of occurrence of a large gain. Interestingly, the degree of hopefulness is not correlated with risk attitude.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allais, Maurice. (1953). “Le Comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine,”Econometrica 21, 503–546.
Becker, G. (1968). “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Analysis,”Journal of Political Economy 78, 526–536.
Chambers, Anne E., and S. H. Penman. (1984). “Timeliness of Reporting and the Stock Price Reaction to Earnings Announcement,”Journal of Accounting Research 22, 21–47.
Chew, S. H. (1983). “A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox,”Econometrica 51, 1065–1092.
Chew, S. H. (1989). “Axiomatic Utility Theories with Betweenness Property,”Annal of Operatives: Research: Choice under Uncertainty 90, 273–298.
Chew, S. H., and L. G. Epstein. (1989). “The Structure of Preferences and Attitudes Towards the Timing of the Resolution of Uncertainty,”International Economic Review 30, 103–117.
Chew, S. H., and K. R. MacCrimmon. (1979). “Alpha Utility Theory, Lottery Compositions and the Allais Paradox.” Working paper, University of British Columbia.
Chew, S. H., and W. S. Waller. (1986). “Empirical Tests of Weighted Utility Theory,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 30, 55–72.
Clofelter, C. T., and P. J. Cook. (1989).Selling Hope: State Lotteries in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Conlisk, J. (1979). “Three Variants of the Allais Example,”American Economic Review 69, 392–407.
Dekel, E. (1986). “An Axiomatic Characterization of Preferences under Uncertainty,”Journal of Economic Theory 40, 304–318.
Dixit, A. (1992). “Investment and Hysteresis,”Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 107–132.
Dreze, J. H. (1972). “Consumption Decisions under Uncertainty,”Journal of Economic Theory 5, 308–335.
Epstein, L. G. (1990). “Behavior Toward Risk: Recent Development in Theory and Application.” Working paper, University of Toronto.
Epstein, L. G., and S. E. Zin. (1989). “Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework,”Econometrica 57, 937–969.
Epstein, L. G., and S. E. Zin. (1991). “Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: An Empirical Analysis,”Journal of Political Economy 99, 263–286.
Fishburn, P. (1983). “Transitive Measurable Utility,”Journal of Economic Theory 31, 293–317.
Fishburn, P. (1988).Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Friedman, M., and L. J. Savage. (1958). “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk,”Journal of Political Economy 56, 279–304.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica 47, 263–291.
Keller, L. R. (1985). “Testing of the ‘Reduction of Compound Alternatives’ Principle,”Omega 13, 349–358.
Kreps, D. M., and E. L. Porteus. (1978). “Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory,”Econometrica 46, 185–200.
Lowenstein, G., and R. H. Thaler. (1989). “Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice,”Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 181–193.
Machina, M. (1987). “Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved,”Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 121–154.
Markowitz, H. M. (1959).Portfolio Selection: Efficient diversification of investments. New York: Wiley.
Ronen, J. (1971). “Some Effects of Sequential Aggregation in Accounting on Decision-Making,”Journal of Accounting Research 9, 307–332.
Rosen, S. (1985). “Implicit Contract: A Survey,”Journal of Economic Literature 23, 1144–1175.
Schopenhauer, A. (1893).Studies in Pessimism. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.
Segal, U. (1990). “Two-State Lotteries Without the Reduction Axiom,”Econometrica 58, 349–377.
Snowball, D., and C. Brown. (1979). “Decision Making Involving Sequential Events: Some Effects of Disaggregated Data and Dispositions Toward Risk,”Decision Science 10, 527–546.
Spence, M., and R. Zeckhauser. (1972). “The Effect of the Timing of Consumption Decisions and the Resolution of Lotteries on the Choice of Lotteries,”Econometrica 40, 401–403.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. (1992). “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323.
Weil, P. (1990). “Nonexpected Utility in Macroeconomics,”Quarterly Journal of Economics 105(February), 29–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chew, S.H., Ho, J.L. Hope: An empirical study of attitude toward the timing of uncertainty resolution. J Risk Uncertainty 8, 267–288 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064045
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064045