Abstract
The problems of response bias in longitudinal studies of college students are examined. An extensive follow-up questionnaire was sent to 1,253 college seniors who had participated in a similar survey as freshman four years earlier. Careful measure of student responsiveness in relation to various techniques designed to increase the proportion of responders (e.g., postcard, telephone contact) were kept.
The less responsive groups were significantly different from their more responsive counterparts on nearly a dozen variables representing a wide variety of content areas, including academic achievement, self-concept, alcohol consumption, social deviance, and major choice preferences. Controlling for sex and socioeconomic status served to reduce, but not eliminate, these biases. Overall, the results indicate that researchers cannot account for follow-up nonresponse bias by making statistical adjustments according to data available at initial testing. The results are discussed in light of identifying the reasons for nonresponse, and attempting to develop categories of nonresponders who may be motivated to cooperate by different types of follow-up techniques.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Astin, A. W. The methology of research on college impact, part two.Sociology of Education 1970,43 451–458.
Astin, A. W. and Panos, R. J. The educational and vocational development of students. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1969.
Bachman, J. G., et al.Youth in transition, Vol. 1. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1967.
Bebbington, A. C. The effect of nonresponse in the sample survey with an example.Human Relations 1970,23 169–180.
Cox, E. P., III A cost/benefit view of prepaid monetary incentives in mail questionnaires.Public Opinion Quarterly 1976,40 101–104.
DeYoung, A. The social ecology of university student living units and its effect on selected behavioral, subjective, and performance variables. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1975.
Donald, M. N. Implications of nonresponse for the interpretation of mail questionnaire data.Public Opinion Quarterly 1960,24 99–114.
Feldman, K. A. and Newcomb, T. M.The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.
Filion, F. L. Estimating bias due to nonresponse in mail surveys.Public Opinion Quarterly 1975,39 482–492.
Hearn, J., and Moos, R. Subject matter and classroom climate: a test of Holland's environmental propositions.American Educational Research Journal 1978,15 111–124.
Holland, J.Making vocational choices: a theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Hollingshead, A. B.Two factor index of social position. New Haven, Connecticut: A.B. Hollingshead, 1957.
Kish, L., and Hess, I. A replacement procedure for reducing the bias of nonresponse.The American Statistician 1959,13 17–19.
Linsky, A. S. Stimulating responses to mailed questionnaires: A review.Public Opinion Quarterly 1975, 39, 82–101.
Mayer, C. S., and Pratt, R. W., Jr. A note on nonresponse in a mail survey.Public Opinion Quarterly 1966,30 637–646.
Moos, R. H., and Bliss, F. Difficulty to follow-up and alcoholism treatment outcome.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1978, in press.
Moos, R. H., DeYoung, A., and Van Dort, B. Differential impact of university student living groups.Research in Higher Education 1976,5 67–82.
Schewe, C. D., and Cournoyer, N. G. Prepaid vs. promised monetary incentives to questionnaire response: Further evidence.Public Opinion Quarterly 1976,40 105–107.
Thistlethwaite, D. L., and Wheeler, N. Effects of teacher and peer subcultures upon student aspirations.Journal of Educational Psychology 1965,57 35–47.
Wayne, I. Nonresponse, sample size, and the allocation of resources.Public Opinion Quarterly 1976,40 557–562.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nielsen, H.D., Moos, R.H. & Lee, E.A. Response bias in follow-up studies of college students. Res High Educ 9, 97–113 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977392
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00977392