Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alfonso, R.J., & Goldsberry, L. (1982). Colleagueship in supervision. In T.J. Sergiovanni (Ed.).,Supervision of teaching (pp. 90–104). Virginia: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Blase, J.J. (1990). Some negative effects of principals' control-oriented and protective political behaviour.American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 727–743.
Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T.E. (1992). Leading and managing: Effects of context, culture, and gender.Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 314–329.
Brauchle, P.E., McLarty, J.R., & Parker, J. (1989). A portfolio approach to using student performance data to measure teacher effectiveness.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3(1), 17–30.
Cogan, M.L. (1973).Clinical supervision, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cousins, J.B. (1988)Factors influencing knowledge utilization: Principals' use of data concerning their own performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Cousins, J.B., (1991). Using profiles of teacher growth for teacher supervision.Canadian Educational Leadership Network News, 2(2), 4–8.
Cousins, J.B., & Earl, L. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 397–418.
Cousins, J.B., Ross, J.A., & Maynes, F.J. (1994). The reported nature and consequences of teachers' joint work in three exemplary schools.Elementary School Journal. 94(4), 441–465.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Sclan, E. (1992). Policy and supervision. In C.D. Glickman (Ed.).Supervision in transition, 1992 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, (pp. 7–29). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A.E., & Pease, S.R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature.Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328.
Duke, D.L. (1990). Developing teacher evaluation systems that promote professional growth.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4(2), 131–144.
Duke, D.L., & Gansneder, B. (1990). Teacher empowerment: The view from the classroom.Educational Policy, 4(2), 145–160.
Duke, D.L., Showers, B.K., & Imber, M. (1982). Teachers and shared decision making: The costs and benefits of involvement.Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(1), 93–106.
Duke, D.L., & Stiggins, R.J., (1990). Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.),The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 116–132). Newbury Park: Sage.
Eagly, A.H., Karau, S.J., & Johnson, B.T. (1992). Gender leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis.Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(1), 76–102.
Erffmeyer, E.S., & Martray, C.R. (1990). A quantified approach to the evaluation of teacher professional growth and development and professional leadership through the goal-setting process.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3(3), 275–300.
Firestone, W.A., & Herriott, R.E. (1982). Prescriptions for effective elementary schools don't fit secondary schools.Educational Leadership, 40(3), 51–53.
Garman, N.B., Glickman, C.D., Hunter, M., & Haggerson, N.L. (1987). Conflicting conceptions of clinical supervision and the enhancement of professional growth and renewal: Point and counterpoint.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(2), 152–177.
Glasman, N.S., (1974). Personnel evaluation research: Implications for instruction improvement.The Canadian Administrator, 13(6), 29–33.
Glasman, N.S., & Paulin, P.J. (1982). Possible determinants for teacher receptivity to evaluation.Journal of Educational Administration, 20(2), 148–171.
Goldhammer, R. (1969).Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Good, T.L., & Mulryan, C. (1990). Teacher ratings: A call for teacher control and self-evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.),The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. (pp. 191–215). Newbury Park: Sage.
Greene, M.L. (1992). Teacher supervision as professional development: Does it work?Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(2), 131–148.
Haefele, D.L. (1992). Evaluating teachers: An alternative model.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5, 335–345.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1987). Instructional leadership in the school context. In W. Greenfield (Ed.),Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies. (pp. 179–203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Herriott, R.E., & Firestone, W.A. (1984). Two images of schools as organizations: A refinement and elaboration.Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(4), 41–57.
Hickcox, E.S. (1990). Ideas for performance appraisal: Breaking the mould.Canadian School Executive, 10(3), 11–13.
Housego, I.E., (1989, September). Principals' evaluation of teachers in a British Columbia school district: Are the reports professional or bureaucratic documents?The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 35(3), 196–216.
Huberman, M. (1988). Teacher careers and school improvement.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(2), 119–132.
Hunter, M. (1988). Effecting a reconciliation between supervision and evaluation: A reply to Popham.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 275–279.
Iwanicki, E.F. (1990). Teacher evaluation for school improvement. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.),The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. (pp. 158–171). Newbury Park, CA: Saga.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1988).The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Newbury Park: Sage.
Kauchak, D., Peterson, K., & Driscoll, A. (1985). An interview study of teachers' attitudes toward teacher evaluation practices.Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19(1), 32–37.
Kilbourn, B. (1990).Constructive feedback: Learning the art. Ioronto: OISE Press.
Lawton, S.B., Hickcox, E.S., Leithwood, K.A., & Musella, D.F. (1986).Development and use of performance appraisal of certificate education staff in Ontario school boards. Vol. I: Technical Report. Toronto: The Queen's Printer for Ontario.
Leithwood, K.A. (1991). The principal's role in teacher development. In B. Joyce (Ed.),Changing school culture through staff development. (pp. 71–107). Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Leithwood, K.A., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(4), 249–280.
Marczely, B. (1992). Teacher evaluation: Research versus practice.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5, 279–290.
McGreal, T.L. (1990). The use of rating scales in teacher evaluation: Concerns and recommendations.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 41–58.
McGreal, T.L. (1982). Effective teacher evaluation.Educational Leadership, 39(4), 303–305.
McLaughlin, M.W. (1984). Teacher evaluation and school improvement.Teachers College Record, 86(1), 193–207.
McLaughlin, M.W. (1990). Embracing contraries: Implementing and sustaining teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.),The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. (pp. 403–415). Newbury Park: CA: Sage.
McLaughlin, M.W., & Pfeifer, R.S. (1988a).Teacher evaluation: Improvement, accountability, and effective learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
McLaughlin, M.W., & Pfeifer, R.S. (1988b). Teacher evaluation: Organizational change, accountability, and improvement. In E.S. Hickcox, S.B. Lawton, K.A. Leithwood, & D.F. Musella (Eds.),Making a difference through performance appraisal. (pp. 113–140). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Press.
Medley, D.M., Coker, H., & Soar, R.S. (1984).Measurement-based evaluation of teacher performance: An empirical approach. New York: Longman.
Murphy, J. (1987). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive framework for supervisors.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(2), 157–180.
Murphy, J. (1991).Restructuring schools: Capturing and assessing the phenomena. New York: Teachers College Press.
Natriello, G. (1984). Teachers' perceptions of the frequency of evaluation and assessments of their effort and effectiveness.American Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 579–595.
Natriello, G. (1990). Intended and unintended consequences: Purposes and effects of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.),The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. (pp. 35–45). Newbury Park: Sage.
Natriello, G., & Dornbusch, S, (1980/81). Pitfalls in the evaluation of teachers by principals.Administrator's Notebook, 29(6), The University of Chicago.
Peterson, K.D. (1987). Teacher evaluation with multiple and variable lines of evidence.American Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 311–317.
Peterson, K.D. (1990). Assistance and assessment for beginning teachers. In J. Millman, & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.).The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. (pp. 104–115). Newbury Park: Sage.
Peterson, P.L., & Comeaux, M.A. (1990). Evaluating the systems: Teachers' perspectives on teacher evaluation.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(1), 3–24.
Popham, W.J. (1988a). Juagment-based teacher evaluation. In S.J. Stanley & W.J. Popham,Teacher evaluation: Six prescriptions for success. (pp. 56–77). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Popham W.J. (1988b). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 269–273.
Riner, P.S. (1992). A comparison of the criterion validity of principals' judgments and teachers' self-ratings on a high-inference rating scale.Journal of Currieulum and Supervision, 7(2), 149–169.
Rothberg, R.A., & Buchanan, L.L. (1981). Teacher perceptions of teacher assessment.Phi Delta Kappan, 62(7), 527.
Ryan, D.W., & Hickcox, E.S. (1980).Redefining teacher evaluation: An analysis of practices, policies, and teacher attitudes. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Press.
Sandell, M., Sullivan, K. (1992, June). Teacher disillusionment and supervision as a part of professional development.The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 38(2), 133–140.
Sarason, S.B. (1990).The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Scriven, M. (1987). Validity in personnel evaluation.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(1), 9–23.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (1992). Moral authority and the regeneration of supervision. In C.D. Glickman (Ed.),Supervision in transition, 1992 Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (pp. 203–214). Alexandria VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). The gender gap in research in educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 324–337.
Smylie, M.A. (1992) Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 53–67.
Smylie, M.A., & Brownlea-Conyers, J. (1992). Teacher leaders and their principals: Exploring the development of new working relationships.Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 150–184.
Smylie, M.A., & Denny, J.W. (1990). Teacher leadership: Tensions and ambiguities in organizational perspective.Educational Administrative Quarterly, 26(3), 235–259.
Stark, J.S., & Lowther, M.A. (1984). Predictors of teachers' preferences concerning their evaluation.Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(4), 76–106.
Stiggins, R.J. (1989). A commentary on the role of student achievement data in the evaluation of teachers.Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3(1), 7–15.
Stiggins, R.J., & Bridgeford, N.J. (1985). Perlormance assessment for teacher development.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(1), 85–97.
Stiggins, R.J., & Duke, D. (1988).The case for commitment to teacher growth. Albany: SUNY Press.
Stodlosky, S.S. (1984). Teacher evaluation: The limits of looking.Educational Researcher, 13(9), 11–18.
Tabin, Y. (1991). Joining the old boy's club? Women's careers as school principals in British Columbia.CELN News, 3(1), 10–13.
Thies-Sprinthall, L., & Sprinthall, N.A. (1987). Experienced teachers: Agents for revitalization and renewal as mentors and teacher educators.Journal of Educational, 19(1), 65–79.
Tracy, S.J., & MacNaughton, R.H. (1989). Clinical supervision and the emerging conflict between the neotraditionalists and the neo-progressives.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(3), 245–256.
Weiss, C.H., Cambone, J., & Wyeth, A. (1992). Tronble in paradise: Teacher conflicts in shared decision making.Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 350–367.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cousins, J.B. Using collaborative performance appraisal to enhance teachers' professional growth: A review and test of what we know. J Pers Eval Educ 9, 199–222 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972638
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972638