Abstract
The impact of child abuse on the developmental functioning of infants was investigated. Thirty verified cases of physically abused children were compared to a reference group of 30 nonabused children matched for age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status. Abused children scored significantly lower in terms of cognitive and motor development as measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Developmental delays on three of the four sectors of the Denver Developmental Screening Test, personal-social, language, and gross motor, were also found in the abused children. There were, however, relatively few item differences between the two groups on the 30 more general behavioral variables constituting the Bayley Infant Behavior Record. Results appear to confirm clinical observation of abused children as developmentally retarded with specific delays in the language and gross motor areas. Although methodologically complex, longitudinal studies are clearly indicated to assess the stability and/or reversibility of the present findings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference notes
Hollingshead, A. B.Two-factor index of social position. Unpublished manuscript, 1957. (Available from 1965 Yale Station, New Haven, Connecticut.)
Kempe, R. S.Treatment of children. Paper delivered at the seventh annual symposium on the battered child, Denver, Colorado, 1975.
References
Bayley, N. Comparisons of mental and motor test scores for ages 1–15 months by sex, birth order, race, geographical location, and education of parents.Child Development, 1965,36, 379–411.
Bayley, N.Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1969.
Brandwein, H. The battered child: A definite and significant factor in mental retardation.Mental Retardation, 1973,11, 50–51.
Frankenburg, W. K., Camp, B. W., & Van Natta, P. A. Validity of the Denver Developmental Screening Test.Child Development, 1971,42, 475–485.
Frankenburg, W. K., Camp, B. W., Van Natta, P. A., Demersseman, J. A., & Voorhees, S. F. Reliability and stability of the Denver Developmental Screening Test.Child Development, 1911,42, 1315–1325.
Frankenburg, W. K., Dodds, J. B., & Fandal, A.Manaul for the Revised Denver Developmental Screening Test. Denver: University of Colorado Press, 1970.
Heifer, R. E., & Kempe, C. H. (Eds.).The battered child (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
King, W. L., & Seegmiller, B. Performance of 14- to 22-month-old black firstborn male infants on two tests of cognitive development: The Bayley Scales and the Infant Psychological Development Scale.Developmental Psychology, 1973,8 (3), 317–326.
Martin, H. P., & Beezley, P. Prevention and the consequences of child abuse.Journal of Operational Psychiatry, 1974,4, 68–77.
Martin, H. P., Beezley, P., Conway, E. F., & Kempe, C. H. The development of abused children.Advances in Pediatrics, 1914,21, 25–73.
Matheny, A. P., Dolan, A. B., & Wilson, R. S. Bayley's Infant Behavior Record: Relations between behaviors and mental test scores.Developmental Psychology, 1974,10 (5), 696–702.
Morse, W., Sanler, O. J., & Friedman, S. B. A three-year followup study of abused and neglected children.American Journal of Diseases of Children, 1970,120, 439–446.
Ounsted, C., Oppenheimer, R., & Lindsay, J. Aspects of bonding failure: The psychopathology and psychotherapeutic treatment of families of battered children.Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1914,16, 447–456.
Overall, J. E., & Klett, C. J.Applied multivariate analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.
Pollock, C. B., & Steele, B. F. A therapeutic approach to the parents. In C. H. Kempe & R. E. Helfer (Eds.),Helping the battered child and his family. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company, 1972.
Sandgrund, A., Gaines, R. W., & Green, A. H. Child abuse and mental retardation: A problem of cause and effect.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1974,79 (3), 327–330.
Williams, J., & Scott, R. Growth and development of Negro infants. IV: Motor development and its relationship to child rearing practices in two groups of Negro infants.Child Development, 1953,24, 103–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author is indebted to John E. Overall for statistical analysis of the data, and to Drs. Joan Hebeler, Margaret McNeese, Manon Brenner, and Sally Robinson for their invaluable assistance in obtaining children for this study, and to the M. D. Anderson Foundation for their support of this project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Appelbaum, A.S. Developmental retardation in infants as a concomitant of physical child abuse. J Abnorm Child Psychol 5, 417–423 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00915089
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00915089