Abstract
In this paper I discuss recent debates concerning etiological theories of functions. I defend an etiological theory against two criticisms, namely the ability to account for malfunction, and the problem of structural “doubles”. I then consider the arguments provided by Bigelow and Pargetter (1987) for a more “forward looking” account of functions as propensities or dispositions. I argue that their approach fails to address the explanatory problematic for which etiological theories were developed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alcock, J.: 1987, “Ardent Adaptationist”.Natural History 96, 4.
Armstrong, D.: 1969, “Dispositions are Causes”,Analysis,30, 23–26.
Ayala, F.: 1970, “Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology”,Philosophy of Science,37, 1–15.
Bigelow, J. and Pargetter, R.: 1987, “Functions”,Journal of Philosophy,LXXXIV,4, 181–196.
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J.: 1991, “Culture and Co-operation”, in R.A. Hinde and J. Groebel (eds,);Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior, Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–48.
Brandon, R.: 1978, “Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory”,Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science IX, 3: 181–206.
Brandon, R. and Beatt, J.: 1984, “Discussion: The Propensity Interpretation of ‘Fitness’ — No Interpretation is No substitute”,Philosophy of Science 51, 342–347.
Brower, J. (1960) “Experimental Studies of Mimicry”,American Naturalist 44, 271–83.
Brower, L. 1988 “Avian Predation on the Monarch Butterfly and its Implications for Mimicry Theory”, in L. Brower (ed.),Mimicry and the Evolutionary Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 4–6.
Cartwright, N.: 1986, “Two Kinds of Teleological Explanation”, in A. Donagan, A.N. Perovich, Jr. and M. V. Wedin (eds.),Human nature and Natural Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 201–210.
Clutton-Brock, T. H. and Harvey, P. H.: 1977, “Primate Ecology and Social Organization”.Journal of Zoology London 183, 1–39.
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H. and Rudder, B.: 1977, “Sexual Dimorphism, Socioeconomic Sex Ratio and Body Weight in Primates”,Nature 269, 797–800.
Cummins, R.: 1975, “Functional Analysis”,Journal of Philosophy 72, 741–765.
Darwin, C.: 1871,The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, Princeton University Press, Princeton (1981).
Godfrey-Smith, P: 1994, “A Modern History Theory of Function”,Nous XXVIII:3, 344–62.
Gould, S. J.: 1987a, “Freudian Slip”,Natural History 92, 14–21.
Gould, S. J.: 1987b, “Stephen Jay Gould Replies”,Natural History 96, 4–6.
Guildford, T.: 1988, “The Evolution of Conspicuous Coloration”, in L. Brower (ed.), pp. 7–21.
Hempel, C. G.: 1959, “The Logic of Functional Analysis”, in L. Gross (ed.),Symposium on Sociological Theory, Harper and Row, New York. Reprinted in C. G. Hempel, 1965,Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York, pp. 297–330.
Horan, B. L.: 1989, “Functional Explanations in Sociobiobiology”,Biology and Philsophy 4, 131–158.
Hull, D.: 1987, “On Human Nature”,PSA 1986, Volume 2, Philosophy of Science Association, 3–13.
Kitcher, P.: 1981, “Explanatory Unification”,Philosophy of Science,48, 507–531.
Millikan, R. G.: 1984,Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
Millikan, R. G.: 1989, “In Defense of Proper Functions”,Philosophy of Science 56, 288–302.
Mills, S. and Beatty J.: 1979, “The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness”,Philosophy of Science 46, 263–286.
Mitchell, S. D.: 1987,“Why Functions (in Evolutionary Biology and Cultural Anthropology)”, unpublished Ph. D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh, microfilm no. 8808338, U. M. I., Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Mitchell, S. D.: 1989, “The Causal Background for Functional Explanations”,International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3, 213–230.
Mitchell, S. D.: 1992, “On Pluralism and Competition in Evolutionary Explanations”,American Zoologist 32.
Mitchell, S. D.: 1993, “Comments and Criticism: Dispositions or Etiologies? A Comment on Bigelow and Pargetter”The Journal of Philosophy XC, 249–259.
Nagel, E.: 1977, “Teleology Revisited”,Journal of Philosophy 74, 261–301.
Neander, K.: 1991, “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst's Defense”,Philosophy of Science,58, 168–184.
Nordmann, A.: 1990, “Persistent Propensities: Portrait of a Familiar Controversy”,Biology and Philosophy 5, 379–399.
Prior, E.: 1985,Dispositions, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.
Prior, E., Pargetter, R. and Jackson, F.: 1982, “Three Theses about Dispositions”,American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 252.
Rappaport, R.: 1968,Pigs for the Ancestors, Yale University Press.
Resnik, D.: 1988, “Survival of the Fittest: Law of Evolution or Law of Probability?”,Biology and Philosophy 3, 349–362.
Rosenberg, A.: 1982, “Discussion: On the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness”,Philosophy of Science 49, 268–273.
Rosenberg, A.: 1985,The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Selander, R. K.: (1972), “Sexual Selection and Dimorphism in Birds”, in B. G. Campbell (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 180–230.
Sober, E.: 1984a,The Nature of Selection, The MIT press, Cambridge.
Sober, E.: 1984b, “Force and Disposition in Evolutionary Theory”, in C. Hookway (ed.),Minds, Machines and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 43–61.
Soltis, J., Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J.: 1991, “Can Group-Functional Behaviors Evolve by Cultural Group Selection? An Empirical Test”,Preprint Series of the Research Group on Biological Foundations of Human Culture (1991/92), at the Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Bielefeld, Germany.
Thornhill, R.: 1979, “Review ofInsect Behavior, by R. W. Matthews and J. R. Matthews”,Quarterly Review of Biology 54, 365–6.
Vayda, A.: 1974, “Warfare in Ecological Perspective”,Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5, 183–93.
Vayda, A.: 1989, “Explaining Why Marings Fought”,Journal of Anthropological Research,45, No. 2, 159–77.
Waters, K.: 1986, “Natural Selection without Survival of the Fittest”,Biology and Philosophy,1, 207–225.
Wickler, W.: 1968Mimicry in Plants and Animals. McGraw Hill.
Williams, G. C.: 1966,Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Wimsatt, W. C.: 1972, “Teleology and the Logical Structure of Function Statements”,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3, 1–80.
Wouters, A (forthcoming) “Viability Explanation”,Biology and Philosophy.
Wright, L.: 1973, “Functions”,Philosophical Review LXXXII, 2, 139–168.
Wright, L.: 1976,Teleological Explanations, University of California Press, Los Angeles.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An early version of this paper was presented at the International Society for History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology, in London, Ontario, July 1989. See also Mitchell (1993) for related arguments against Bigelow and Pargetter (1987). I wish to thank the anonymous reviewer for detailed, helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitchell, S.D. Function, fitness and disposition. Biol Philos 10, 39–54 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00851986
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00851986