Abstract
Eighty-two mothers and 46 fathers of emotionally disturbed youth in a day treatment program completed the Family Assessment Device (FAD) at time of intake. Interviews with therapists enabled classification of families into three groups: those whose client (the youth) had been sexually abused, those where sexual abuse was suspected but not confirmed, and those without a sexual abuse history. All cases of abuse were non-incestuous. Comparisons of the confirmed abuse and non-abuse groups were made, using three types of analyses. ANOVA of parental responses to the FAD by group yielded significance for mothers but not for fathers, with mothers of abused children reporting more family dysfunction in problem-solving and roles than mothers of non-abused children. Second, significant differences between parents according to group were found in the abused sample in problem-solving, communication, and general functioning, but not in the non-abused sample; mothers reported significantly greater pathology in their families than did fathers. Third, comparison of differences between mothers and their children within families yielded a greater number of differences in the non-abused group. Significance was obtained in affective responsivity and behavior control in both samples. Additionally, however, significant differences in communication and roles were obtained in the non-abused group. Caution in differentiating between incestuous and non-incestuous families is suggested. Implications of this research for family interventions, especially with regard to mother/child perceptual congruence, are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alexander, P. C., & Lupfer, S. L. (1987). Family characteristics and long-term consequences associated with sexual abuse.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 16, (3), 235–345.
Anthony, E. J., & Cohler, B. J., (1987).The invulnerable child, New York: Guilford Press.
Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9 (2), 171–180.
Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Baldwin L. M. (1982). McMaster model of family functioning: A view of the normal family. In F. Walsh (Ed.)Normal family processes. New York: Guilford Press.
Finkelhor, D. (1979).Sexually victimized children. New York: The Free Press.
Finkelhor, D. (1984).Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: The Free Press.
Finkelhor, D., & Hotaling, G. (1984). Sexual abuse in the National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect: An appraisal.,Child Abuse and Neglect, 8, 15–24.
Gordon, L., & O'Keefe, P. (1984). Incest as a form of family violence: Evidence from historical case records.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 27–34.
Herman, J. (1981).Father-daughter incest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hoagwood, K., & Stewart, J. (1989). Sexually abused children's perceptions of family functioning.Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 6 (2), 139–149.
Meiselman, K. (1978).Incest. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moos, R. (1981).Family environment scale manual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. Palo Alto, CA.
Moos, R., & Brownstein, R. (1977).Environment and utopia: A synthesis. New York: Plenum Press.
Pelletier, P. C., & Lupfer, S. L. (1987). Family characteristics associated with sexual abuse.archives of Sexual Behavior, 16 (3), 235–245.
Ryan, W. (1976).Blaming the victim. New York: Vintage.
Saunders, B. E., Murphy, S. M., & McClure, S. M. (1987, March).Assessment of family structure variables of cases in intra-familial child sexual abuse. Paper presented at the American Orthopsychiatric Association Conference, Washington, D.C.
Wassac, B. (August, 1989).Three approaches to early childhood intervention, American Psychological Association Annual Convention, New Orleans, LA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoagwood, K. Parental functioning and child sexual abuse. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 7, 377–387 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00756377
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00756377