Abstract
We studied antipredatory responses of lotic mayfly (Baetis) nymphs in a factorial experiment with four levels of fish presence: (1) a freely foraging fish (the European minnow,Phoxinus phoxinus), (2) a constrained fish, (3) water from a fish stream, (4) water from a fishless stream. LargeBaetis nymphs drifted mainly during night-time in treatments involving either the chemical or actual presence of fish, whereas no diel periodicity was observed when the water was not conditioned with fish odour. The response was strongest when the fish was uncaged, which suggests that visual or hydrodynamic cues are needed in addition to chemical ones for an accurate assessment of predation risk. Fish presence had no effect on the drift rates of small nymphs. Instead, they increased their refuge use in the presence of a live fish. Chemical cues alone did not have any effect on the refuge use of any of theBaetis size classes. Our results indicate active drift entry by mayfly nymphs. Because predation pressure is spatially and temporally variable, nymphs must sample the environment in order to locate predator-free areas or areas with low predation risk. Drifting should be the most energy-saving way to do this. To avoid the risk from visually feeding fish, large individuals can sample safely (i.e. enter drift) only at night-time, while the small ones can also do this safely during the day. We suggest that, contrary to some earlier assumptions, mayfly drift is not a fixed prey response. Instead,Baetis nymphs are able to assess the prevailing predation pressure, and they adjust their foraging behaviour accordingly.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allan JD (1978) Trout predation and the size composition of stream drift. Limnol Oceanogr 23: 1231–1237
Allan JD (1982) The effects of reduction in trout density on the invertebrate community of a mountain stream. Ecology 63: 1444–1455
Allan JD (1984) The size composition of invertebrate drift in a Rocky Mountain stream. Oikos 43: 68–76
Allan JD, Feifarek BP (1989) Distances travelled by drifting mayfly nymphs: factors influencing return to the surface. J North Am Benthol Soc 8: 322–330
Allan JD, Flecker AS, McClintock NL (1986) Diel epibenthic activity of mayfly nymphs, and its nonconcordance with behavioural drift. Limnol Oceanogr 31: 1057–1065
Andersen TH, Friberg N, Hansen HO, Iversen TM, Jacobsen D, Kröjgaard L (1993) The effects of introduction of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) onGammarus pulex L. drift and density in two fishless Danish streams. Arch Hydrobiol 126: 361–371
Andersson KG, Brönmark C, Herrmann J, Malmqvist B, Otto C, Sjöström P (1986) Presence of sculpins (Cottus gobio) reduces drift and activity ofGammarus pulex (Amphipoda). Hydrobiologia 133: 209–215
Bouskila A, Blumstein DT (1992) Rules of thumb for predation hazard assessment: predictions from a dynamic model. Am Nat 139: 161–167
Brittain JE, Eikeland TJ (1988) Invertebrate drift: a review. Hydrobiologia 166: 77–93
Corkum LD, Pointing PJ, Ciborowski JJH (1977) The influence of current velocity and substrate on the distribution and drift of two species of mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Can J Zool 55: 1970–1977
Cowan CA, Peckarsky BL (1994) Diel feeding and positioning periodicity of a grazing mayfly in a trout stream and a fishless stream. Can J Fish Aq Sci 51: 450–459
Crowder MJ, Hand DJ (1990) Analysis of repeated measures. Monographs on statistics and applied probability no. 41. Chapman and Hall, Bury St. Edmonds
Crowley PH (1992) Resampling statistics: computation-intensive methods in ecology and evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23: 405–447
Culp JM, Scrimgeour GJ (1993) Size-dependent diel foraging periodicity of a mayfly grazer in streams with and without fish. Oikos 68: 242–250
Culp JM, Glozier NE, Scrimgeour GJ (1991) Reduction of predation risk under the cover of darkness: avoidance responses of mayfly larvae to a benthic fish. Oecologia 86: 163–169
Dill LM (1987) Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour. Can J Zool 65: 803–811
Elliott JM (1968) The daily activity patterns of mayfly nymphs (Ephemeroptera). J Zool 155: 201–221
Feltmate BW, Williams DD (1991) Evaluation of predator-induced stress on field populations of stoneflies (Plecoptera). Ecology 72: 1800–1806
Flecker AS (1992) Fish predation and the evolution of invertebrate drift periodicity: evidence from neotropical streams. Ecology 73: 438–448
Fraser DF, Huntingord FA (1984) Feeding and avoiding predation hazard: the behavioural response of the prey. Ethology 73: 56–68.
Holomuzki JR, Short TM (1988) Habitat use and fish avoidance behaviors by the stream-dwelling isopodLirceus fontinalis. Oikos 52: 79–86
Jackson JK, Resh VH (1992) Variation in genetic structure among populations of the caddisflyHelicopsyche borealis from three streams in northern California, U.S.A. Freshwater Biol 27: 29–42.
Keefe M (1992) Chemically mediated avoidance behavior in wild brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis: the response to familiar and unfamiliar predaceous fishes and the influence of fish diet. Can J Zool 70: 288–292
Kohler SL (1985) Identification of stream drift mechanisms: an experimental and observational approach. Ecology 66: 1749–1761
Kohler SL, McPeek MA (1989) Predation risk and the foraging behaviour of competing stream insects. Ecology 70: 1811–1825
Lancaster J (1990) Predation of drift of lotic macroinvertebrates. Oecologia 85: 48–56
LaTour SA, Miniard PW (1983) The misuse of repeated measures analysis in marketing research. J Market Res 20: 45–57
Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and a prospectus. Can J Zool 68: 619–640
Malmqvist B (1988) Downstream drift in Madeiran levadas: tests of hypotheses relating to the influence of predators on the drift of insects. Aquatic Insects 10: 141–152
Malmqvist B (1992) Stream grazer responses to predator odour—an experimental study. Nordic J Freshw Res 67: 27–34
Malmqvist B, Sjöström P (1987) Stream drift as a consequence of disturbance by invertebrate predators: field and laboratory experiments. Oecologia 74: 396–403
Malmqvist B, Rundle S, Brönmark C, Erlandsson A (1991) Invertebrate colonization of a new, man-made stream in southern Sweden. Freshwater Biol 26: 307–324
Mittelbach GG, Chesson PL (1987) Predation risk: indirect effects on fish populations. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation. Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, N.H., pp 315–332
Müller K (1973) Circadian rhythms of locomotor activity in aquatic organisms in the subarctic area. Aquilo Ser Zool 14: 1–18
Peckarsky BL (1980) Predator-prey interactions between stoneflies and mayflies: behavioural observations. Ecology 61: 932–943
Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A (1987) Predator-prey interactions among fish and laryal amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav 35: 420–425
Poff NL, DeCino RD, Ward JV (1991) Size-dependent drift responses of mayflies to experimental hydrologic variation: active predator avoidance or passive hydrodynamic displacement? Oecologia 88: 577–586
Potvin C, Lechowitz MJ, Tardif S (1990) The statistical analysis of ecophysiological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measures. Ecology 71: 1389–1400
Robinson CT, Reed LM, Minshall GW (1992) Influence of flow regime on life history, production, and genetic structure ofBaetis tricaudatus (Ephemeroptera) andHesperoperla pacifica (Plecoptera). J North Am Benthol Soc 11: 278–289
SAS Institute Inc (1989) SAS-STAT users guide version 6, 4th ed, vol 2. Cary, N.C.
Sih A (1987) Predators and prey life-styles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation. Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, N.H., pp 203–224
Sih A (1992) Prey uncertainty and the balancing of antipredator and feeding needs. Am Nat 139: 1052–1069
Sih A, Kats LB, Moore RD (1992) Effects of predatory sunfish on the density, drift, and refuge use of stream salamander larvae. Ecology 73: 1418–1430
Soluk DA, Collins NC (1988) Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 52: 94–100
Stein RA (1979) Behavioral responses of prey to fish predators. In: Stroud RH, Clepper H (eds) Predator-prey systems in fisheries management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, D.C., pp. 343–353
Turcotte P, Harper PP (1982) Drift patterns in a high Andean stream. Hydrobiologia 89: 141–151
Wahle RA (1992) Body-size dependent anti-predator mechanisms of the American lobster. Oikos 65: 52–60
Wallace JB, Vogel DS, Cuffney TF (1986) Recovery of a headwater stream from an insecticide-induced community disturbance. J North Am Benthol Soc 5: 115–126
Waters TF (1972) The drift of stream insects. Annu Rev Entomol 17: 253–272
Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15: 393–425
Wiley MJ, Kohler SL (1981) An assesment of biological interactions in an epilithic stream community using time-lapse cinematography. Hydrobiologia 78: 183–188
Williams DD (1986) Factors influencing the microdistribution of two sympatric species of Plecoptera: an experimental study. Can J Fish Aq Sci 43: 1005–1009
Williams DD (1990) A field study of the effects of water temperature, discharge and trout odour on the drift of stream invertebrates. Arch Hydrobiol 119: 167–181
Williams DD, Moore KA (1985) The role of semiochemicals in benthic community relationships of the lotic amphipod Gammarus pseudolimnaeus. Oikos 44: 280–286
Wilzbach M (1990) Nonconcordance of drift and benthic activity inBaetis. Limnol Oceanogr 35: 945–952
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tikkanen, P., Muotka, T. & Huhta, A. Predator detection and avoidance by lotic mayfly nymphs of different size. Oecologia 99, 252–259 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627737
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627737