Summary
Trigeminal receptors can respond to a wide variety of chemical stimuli, but it is unknown whether these receptors mediate discrimination between chemical stimuli matched for equal perceptual intensity. The present electrophysiological and behavioral experiments address this issue using tiger salamanders, Ambystoma tigrinum, and four compounds (amyl acetate, cyclohexanone, butanol, and d-limonene). In addition, the relative sensitivities of the trigeminaland olfactory systems to these compounds are compared. In electrophysiological cross-adaptation experiments (amyl acetate vs cyclohexanone; butanol vs d-limonene), there was complete cross adaptation such that only concentrations above the background (crossa-dapting) stimulus concentration elicited responses, suggesting that chemical stimuli may stimulate trigeminal receptors nonspecifically. In behavioral experiments (amyl acetate vs cyclohexanone; butanol vs d-limonene), only animals with intact olfactory nerves could discriminate between perceptually equivalent concentrations, that is concentrations that elicited the same level of responding. Both electrophysiologically and behaviorally, the trigeminal system exhibited higher thresholds than the olfactory system. We conclude that trigeminal chemoreceptors, at least in salamanders, are unable to discriminate between these two pairs of compounds when matched for equal perceptual intensity, and that trigeminal chemoreceptors are less sensitive than olfactory receptors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- AA :
-
amyl acetate
- CH :
-
cyclohexanone
- LI :
-
d-limonene
- BU :
-
butanol
- EOG :
-
electro-olfactogram
- ISI :
-
interstim-ulus interval
- ONX :
-
olfactory nerve cut
- ppm :
-
parts per million (1 μl of compound in vapor phase/1l of air=1 ppm)
References
Arzt AH, Silver WL, Mason JR, Clark L (1986) Olfactory responses of aquatic and terrestrial tiger salamanders to airborne and waterborne stimuli. J Comp Physiol A 158:479–487
Baylin F, Moulton DG (1979) Adaptation and cross adaptation to odor stimulation of olfactory receptors in the tiger salamander. J Gen Physiol 74:37–55
Bojsen-Møller F (1975) Demonstration of terminalis, olfactory, trigeminal and perivascular nerves in the rat nasal septum. J Comp Neurol 159:245–256
Cain WS (1974) Contribution of the trigeminal nerve to perceived odor magnitude. Ann NY Acad Sci 237:28–34
Cain WS (1976) Olfaction and the common chemical sense: some psychophysical contrasts. Sensory Proc 1:57–67
Cain WS, Murphy C (1980) Interaction between chemoreceptive modalities of odour and irritation. Nature 284:255–257
Caprio J, Byrd RP (1984) Electrophysiological evidence for acidic, basic, and neutral amino acid olfactory receptor-sites in the catfish. J Gen Physiol 84:403–422
Doty RL, Brugger WE, Jurs PC, Orndorff MA, Snyder PF, Lowry LD (1978) Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: Psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans. Physiol Behav 20:175–187
Engen TG (1972) Psychophysics II: Scaling methods. In: Kling JW, Riggs LH (eds) Experimental psychology, vol 1. Holt, Rinehardt and Winston, New York, pp 47–79
Ito K (1968) Electrophysiological studies on the peripheral olfactory nervous system in mammalia. Kitahanto J Med Sci 18:405–417
Keele CA (1962) The common chemical sense and its receptors. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 139:547–557
Kiyohara S, Tucker D (1978) Activity of new receptors after transection of the primary olfactory nerve in pigeons. Physiol Behav 21:987–994
Lawless H, Gillette M (1985) Sensory responses to oral chemical heat. In: Bills DD, Mussinan CJ (eds) ACS Symposium Series No 289. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp 26–42
Mason JR, Silver WL (1983) Trigeminally mediated odor aversions in starlings. Brain Res 269:196–199
Mason JR, Stevens DA (1981) Behavioral discrimination of thresholds for n-butyl acetate and n-butyl alcohol by tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum). Chem Senses 6:189–195
Mason JR, Stevens DA, Rabin MD (1980) Instrumentally conditioned avoidance by tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum) to reagent grade odorants. Chem Senses 5:99–105
Mason JR, Meredith M, Stevens DA (1981) Odorant discrimination by tiger salamanders after combined olfactory and vomeronasal nerve cuts. Physiol Behav 27:125–132
Murphy C (1987) Olfactory psychophysics. In: Finger TE, Silver WL (eds) Neurobiology of taste and smell. Wiley, New York, pp 251–273
Parker GH (1912) The relations of smell, taste and the common chemical sense in vertebrates. J Acad Sci Philadelphia 15:221–234
Silver WL (1982) Electrophysiological responses from the peripheral olfactory system of the American eel,Anguilla rostrata. J Comp Physiol 148:379–388
Silver WL (1987) The common chemical sense. In: Finger TE, Silver WL (eds) Neurobiology of taste and smell. Wiley, New York, pp 65–87
Silver WL, Moulton DG (1982) Chemosensitivity of rat nasal trigeminal receptors. Physiol Behav 28:927–931
Silver WL, Mason JR, Marshall DA, Maruniak JA (1985) Rat trigeminal, olfactory, and taste responses after capsaicin desensitization. Brain Res 333:45–54
Tucker D (1963) Olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptor response to odorants. In: Zotterman Y (ed) Olfaction and taste. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 45–69
Tucker D (1971) Nonolfactory responses from the nasal cavity: Jacobson's organ and the trigeminal system. In: Beidler LM (ed) Chemical senses, olfaction. Handbook of sensory physiology, vol IV/1. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 151–181
Walker JC, Tucker D, Smith JC (1979) Odor sensitivity mediated by trigeminal nerve in pigeon. Chem Senses Flav 4:107–116
Walker JC, Walker DB, Tambiah CR, Gilmore KS (1986) Olfactory and nonolfactory odor detection in pigeons: elucidation by a cardiac acceleration paradigm. Physiol Behav 38:575–580
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silver, W.L., Arzt, A.H. & Mason, J.R. A comparison of the discriminatory ability and sensitivity of the trigeminal and olfactory systems to chemical stimuli in the tiger salamander. J. Comp. Physiol. 164, 55–66 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612718
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00612718