Abstract
Considerable debate exists as to whether the qualities of muscle function exist as general or specific physiological capacities. If there is a generality of muscle function then strong relationships would exist between various measures of function for the same muscle(s), independent of the test contraction, mode or velocity. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between isometric and dynamic measures of muscle function to determine the existence of generality or specificity. A group of 22 men, experienced in weight training, were tested for lower and upper body dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength. The changes in these measures consequent to a resistance training programme were also investigated. The results of this study indicated that whilst isometric and dynamic measures of strength did significantly correlate (r=0.57-0.61), the relationship was below that required to denote statistical generality. More important, the changes in isometric and dynamic strength consequent to a dynamic heavy resistance training programme were unrelated (r=0.12-0.15). Thus the mechanisms that contribute to enhanced dynamic strength appearred unrelated to the mechanisms that contribute to enhanced isometric strength. Measures of dynamic and isometric speed-strength were unrelated, as were the changes in these measures resulting from training. The results of this study demonstrated that a generality of muscle function did not exist and that modality specific results were observed. Consequently this study calls into question the validity of isometric tests to monitor dynamically induced training adaptations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baratta R, Solomomow M, Zhou B, Letson D, Chuinard R, D'Ambrosia R (1988) Muscular co-activation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am J Sports Med 16:113–122
Caldwell G, Jamison J, Lee S (1993) Amplitude and frequency measures of surface electromyography during dual task elbow torque production. Eur J Appl Physiol 66:349–356
Clarke D, Clarke H (1970) Research processes in physical education, recreation and health. Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, N.J., pp 370
Costill D, Miller S, Myers W, Kehoc F, Hoffman W (1968) Relationship among selected tests of explosive strength and power. Res Q 39:785–787
Draganich L, Jaeger R, Krajl A (1989) Coactivation of the hamstrings and quadriceps during extension of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 71:1075–1081
Duchateau J, Hainut K (1984) Isometric or dynamic training: differential effects on mechanical properties of a human muscle. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 52:296–301
Hakkinen K, Komi PV (1983) Electromyographic changes during strength training and detraining. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15:455–460
Hakkinen K, Komi PV (1985) Changes in electrical and mechanical behaviour of leg extensor muscles during heavy resistance strength training. Scand J Sports Sci 7:55–64
Hakkinen K, Alen M, Komi PV (1985a) Changes in isometric force- and relaxation-time, electromyographic and muscle fiber characteristics of human skeletal muscle during strength training and detraining. Acta Physiol Scand 125:573–583
Hakkinen K, Alen M, Komi PV (1985b) Effects of explosive type strength training on isometric force- and relaxation-time, electromyographic and muscle fiber characteristics of leg extensor muscles. Acta Physiol Scand 125:587–600
Henneman E, Clamann H, Gillies V, Skinner R (1974) Rank order of motoneurons within a pool: law of combination. Neurophysiology 37:1338–1349
Hortobagyi T, LaChance P, Katch F (1987) Prediction of 1 repetition maximum using free weights for bench press and squat from maximum force and power measured during fast and slow speed hydraulic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19: S88–363
Hortobagyi T, Katch F, LaChance P (1989) Interrelationships among various measures of upper body strength assessed by different contraction modes. Eur J Appl Physiol 58:749–755
Howard J, Enoka R (1987) Interlimb interactions during maximal efforts (abstract). Med Sci Sports Exerc 19:53
Knapik J, Ramos M (1980) Isokinetic and isometric torque relationships in the human body.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 61:64–67
Knuttgen E, Kraemer W (1987) Terminology and measurement in exercise performance. J Appl Sports Sci Res 1:1–10
LaChance P, Hortobagyi T, Katch F, Janney C (1987) Effects of free weight and hydraulic resistance training evaluated by free weights and hydraulic and isokinetic tests. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19: S88–524
Nakazawa K, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T, Yano H, Miyashita M (1993) Differences in activation patterns in elbow flexor muscles during isometric, concentric and eccentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 66:214–220
Olson V, Smidt G, Johnston, R (1972) The maximum torque generated by the eccentric, isometric and concentric contractions of the hip abductor muscles. Phys Ther 52:149–157
Osternig L, Bates B, James S (1977) Isokinetic and isometric torque force relationships. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 58:254–257
Otis J (1976) Relationship of isometric and isokinetic torques. J Biomech 9:488
Person R (1974) Rhythmic activity of a group of human motoneurons during voluntary contraction of a muscle. Electroencaphogr Clin Neurophysiol 36:585–595
Rasch P (1957) Relationship between maximum isometric tension and maximum isotonic elbow flexion. Res Q 28:85
Rutherford OM, Jones DA (1986) The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 55:100–105
Sale D, Norman R (1982) Testing strength and power. In: MacDougall J, Wenger H, Green H (eds) Physiological testing of the elite athlete. Mouvement Publications, Ithaca, N.Y., pp 734
Sale D, Martin J, Moroz D (1992) Hypertrophy without increased isometric strength after weight training. Eur J Appl Physiol 64:51–55
Sargent D (1924) The physical test of man. Am Phy Ed Rev 26:188–194
Schmidtbleicher D, Buehrle M (1987) Neuronal adaptations and increase of cross-sectional area studying different strength training methods. In: Jonsson B (ed) Biomechanics X-B. Human Kinetics, Champagne, Ill., pp 615–620
Stone M, O'Bryant H, Garhammer J (1981) A hypothetical model for strength training. J Sports Med 21:342–351
Ter Haar Romeny B, Denier van der Gon J, Gilen C (1982) Changes in recruitment order of motor units in the human biceps muscle. Exp Neurol 78:360–368
Ter Haar Romeny B, Denier van der Gon J, Gilen C (1984) Relation between location of a motor unit in the human biceps brachii and its critical firing levels for different tasks. Exp Neurol 85:631–650
Thorstensson A, Hulten B, Karlsson J (1976) Effects of strength training on enzyme activities and fibre characteristics in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 96:392–398
Wagman I, Pierce D, Burges R (1965) Propioceptive influence in volitional control of individual motor units. Nature 207:957–958
Wilson G, Elliott B, Wood G (1991a) The effect on performance of imposing a delay during a stretch-shorten cycle movement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:363–370
Wilson G, Wood G, Elliott B (1991b) The performance augmentation achieved from the use of the stretch-shorten cycle: The neuromuscular contribution. Aust J Sci Med Sport 23:97–101
Wilson G, Elliott B, Wood G (1992) Stretch shorten cycle performance enhancement through flexibility training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24:403–407
Young W, Bilby G (1993) The effect of voluntary effort to influence speed of contraction on strength, muscular power and hypertrophy development. J Strength Cond Res 7:172–178
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, D., Wilson, G. & Carlyon, B. Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 68, 350–355 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571456
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571456