Abstract
The influence of physician judgment on the disclosure, competency, understanding, voluntariness, and decision aspects of informed consent for bone marrow transplantation are described. Ethical conflicts which arise from the amount and complexity of the information to be disclosed and from the barriers of limited time, patient anxiety and lack of prior relationship between patient and physician are discussed. The role of the referring physician in the decision-making is considered. Special ethical issues which arise with use of healthy related bone marrow donors are discussed, as is the physician's discretion in raising questions of competency. It is concluded that in this setting, regardless of the theoretical goals of the physician, patients appear to utilize informed consent discussions to assess their capacity to trust the physician rather than as a time to weigh the large amount of relevant data. The conscientious physician best serves the patient with recommendation of the best medical alternative rather than with attempts to remain neutral.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alfidi, R. J.: 1971, ‘Informed Consent: A Study of Patient Reaction’, Journal of the American Medical Association 216, p. 1325.
Epstein, L. C. and Lasagna, L.: 1969, ‘Obtaining Informed Consent: Form or Substance’, Archives of Internal Medicine 123, p. 682.
Faden, R. R., Lewis, C., Beeker, C., Faden, A. I. and Freeman, J.: 1981, ‘Disclosure Standards and Informed Consent’, Journal of Health, Politics, Policy and Law 6, p. 255.
Leydhecker, W., Gramer, E. and Krieglstein, G. K.: 1980, ‘Patient Information Before Cataract Surgery’, Ophthalmologica Base 180, p. 241.
Lindblom, C. and Cohen, D.: 1979, Usable Knowledge, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 10 and 12.
McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C. and Tversky, A.: 1982, ‘On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies’, New England Journal of Medicine 306, p. 1259.
Meisel, A. and Roth, L. H.: 1983, ‘Toward an Informed Discussion of Informed Consent: A Review and Critique of the Empirical Studies’, Arizona Law Review 25, p. 265.
Novack, Plumer, R., Smith, R. L., Ochitill, H., Morrow, G. R. and Bennett, J. M.: 1979, ‘Physicians' Attitudes Toward Telling the Cancer Patient’, Journal of the American Medical Association 241, p. 897.
Oken, D.: 1961, ‘What to Tell Cancer Patients: A Study of Medical Attitudes’, Journal of the American Medical Association 175, p. 1120.
Schwartz, R. and Grubb, A.: 1985, ‘Why Britain can't afford informed consent’, Hastings Center Report 15, p. 20.
Silberstein, E. B.: 1974, ‘Extension of Two-Part Consent Forms’, New England Journal of Medicine 291, p. 155.
Taub, S.: 1982, ‘Cancer and the Law of Informed Consent’, Law, Medicine and Health Care 10, p. 61.
Weithorn, L. A. and Campbell, S. B.: 1982, ‘The Competency of Children and Adolescents to Make Informed Treatment Decisions’, Child Development 53, p. 1589.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patenaude, A.F., Rappeport, J.M. & Smith, B.R. The physician's influence on informed consent for bone marrow transplantation. Theor Med Bioeth 7, 165–179 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489228
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00489228