Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Morton, A.: 1982, ‘Frege and His Rivals’, Review article, London Review of Books, 19 Aug.–2 Sept. 1982, 12–13.
Manin, Yu.: 1979, ‘A Digression of Proof’, The Mathematical Intelligencer 2, 17–18.
Davis, Ph. J. and R. Hersh: 1981, The Mathematical Experience, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Kitcher, Ph.: 1983, The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
Brouwer, L. E. J.: 1905, Leven, Kunst en Mystiek, J. Waltman Jr., Delft.
Abelson, R. P.: 1973, ‘The Structure of Belief Systems’, in R. C. Schank and K. M. Colby (eds.), Computer Models of Thought and Language, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 287–339.
Schank, R. and R. P. Abelson: 1977, Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.
Bickerton, D.: 1981, Roots of Language, Karoma Publishers, Ann Arbor.
Lloyd, G. E. R.: 1966, Polarity and Analogy, Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Nelson, L.: 1970, Progress and Regress in Philosophy: from Hume and Kant to Hegel and Fries, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. English translation by H. Palmer of: Sämtliche Werke VII: Fortschritte und Rückschritte der Philosophie. Von Hume und Kant bis Hegel und Fries, posthumous publication edited by J.Kraft, Felix Meiner, Hamburg, 1962.
Beth, E. W.: 1959, The Foundations of Mathematics — A Study in the Philosophy of Science, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1959. Reprinted 1966 as paperback by Harper and Row, New York (2 vols.).
Barth, E. M.: 1981, ‘Reconstruction of Hegelian and Other Idealist Logic in Germany Around 1810’, in W. Becker and W. K. Essler (eds.), Konzepte der Dialektik, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
Pollock, J. L.: 1982, Language and Thought, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J.
Barth, E. M.: 1972, Evaluaties, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue — A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
Barth, E. M.: 1982, ‘Finite Debates About the Infinite’ in E. M. Barth and J. L. Martens (eds.), Argumentation — Approaches to Theory Formation. Containing the Contributions to the Groningen Conference on the Theory of Argumentation, October 1978, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barth, E.M. A new field: Empirical logic bioprograms, logemes and logics as institutions. Synthese 63, 375–388 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485602
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485602