Abstract
Due to the increasing popularity of unilateral dynamizable external fixators for treating tibial shaft fractures, many new devices are being introduced onto the market. Especially in such half-frame fixators, the choice of any particular device depends above all on the stability of its construction. This study compares the biomechanical stability of three systems tested in axial compression, torsion, and both anterior-posterior and medial-lateral bending. In terms of the nondynamized phase, the AO/ASIF tubular fixator (as a one-plane, double-tube, unilateral frame) and the Martin Mono-Dynafix are, in general, less stable than the Orthofix fixator. After dynamization, the AO/ASIF system becomes particularly weak and offers low resistance especially to torque and any force that is perpendicular to the plane of assembly. The other two tested devices evinced much more stability; the Orthofix fixator seems superior to the Dynafix due to the different diameter of its screws.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aro HT, Kelly PJ, Lewallen DG, Chao EY (1990) The effects of physiologic dynamic compression on bone healing under external fixation. Clin Orthop Rel Res 256:260–273
Chao EY, Hein TJ (1988) Mechanical performance of the standard Orthofix external fixator. Orthopedics 11:1057–1069
Chao EYS, Aro HT, Lewallen DG, Kell PJ (1989) The effect of rigidity on fracture healing in external fixation. Clin Orthop Rel Res 241:24–35
De Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi Brivio L (1984) The treatment of fractures with a dynamic axial fixator. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 66-B:538–545
Egkher E (1985) Theoretische und experimentelle Studien zur Technologie der externen Knochenbruchstabilisierung. Wien Klin Wochenschr 97 [Suppl 158]
Evans M, Spencer M, Wang Q, White SH, Cunningham JL (1990) Design and testing of external fixator bone screws. J Biomed Engl 2:457–462
Goodship AE, Kenwright J (1990) The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 67-B:650
Heitemeyer U, Claes L, Hierholzer G, Korber (1990) Significance of postoperative stability for bony reparation of comminuted fractures. An experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 109:144–149
Huiskes R, Chao EY (1986) Guidelines for external fixation frame rigidity and stresses. J Orthop Res 4:68–75
Lewallen DG, Chao EY, Kasman RA, Kelly PJ (1984) Comparison of the effects of compression plates and external fixators on early bone healing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66-A:1084–1091
Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H (1991) Manual of internal fixation. Techniques recommended by the AO-ASIF group, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Ralston JL, Brown TD, Nepola JV, Williams DR, Marsh JL (1990) Mechanical analysis of the factors affecting dynamization of the Orthofix dynamic axial fixator. J Orthop Trauma 4:449–457
Schatzker J, Horne JG, Sumner-Smith G (1977) The reaction of cortical bone to compression by screw threads. Clin Orthop Rel Res 111:248–252
Williams EA, Rand JA, An KN, Chao EY, Kelly PJ (1987) The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one-plane or two-plane external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69-A:355–365
Wu JJ, Shyr HS, Chao EY, Kelly PJ (1984) Comparison of osteotomy healing under external fixation devices with different stiffness characteristics. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66-A:1258–1264
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaskulka, R.A., Egkher, E. & Wielke, B. Comparison of the mechanical performance of three types of unilateral, dynamizable external fixators. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113, 271–275 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443816
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443816