Abstract
We review the schemes which have been implemented, in order to achieve quantum non-demolition (QND) measurements in the optical domain. The simplest schemes can be obtained using the optical Kerr effect, which yields a crossed-phase modulation coupling between two light beams. Other schemes use either independently generated squeezed light, or coupled-mode parametric amplifiers. These various schemes can be characterized using three criteria, which describe, respectively, the quality of the quantum measurement, the non-destruction of the signal, and the conditional variance of the output signal beam, given the output “meter” beam (quantum-state preparation criterion). We show that quantitative limits can be defined with respect to these criteria, delimiting “classical” and “quantum” domains of operation. Then we present in more detail a new experimental implementation of QND measurements, using three-level atoms inside a doubly-resonant optical cavity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C.M. Caves, K.S. Thorne, R.W.P. Drever, V.D. Sandberg, M. Zimmermann: Rev. Mod. Phys. 52, 341 (1980)
P. Meystre, M.O. Scully (eds.): Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravitation and Measurement Theory (Plenum, New York 1983)
V.B. Braginsky: Sov. Phys. Usp. 31, 836 (1988);
V.B. Braginsky, Y.I. Vorontsov, K.S. Thome: Science 209, 547 (1980)
M.D. Levenson, R.M. Shelby, M. Reid, D.F. Walls: Phys. Rev. Lett 57, 2473 (1986)
A. LaPorta, R.E. Slusher, B. Yurke: Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 28 (1989)
P. Grangier, J.F. Roch, G. Roger: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1418 (1990)
B. Yurke: J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2, 732 (1985)
J.H. Shapiro: Opt. Lett. 5, 351 (1980)
G.J. Milburn, D.F. Walls: Phys. Rev. A 28, 2065 (1983)
N. Imoto, H.A. Haus, Y. Yamamoto: Phys. Rev. A 32, 2287 (1985)
P. Grangier, J.F. Roch, S. Reynaud: Opt. Commun. 72, 387 (1989)
P. Grangier, J.F. Roch: Quantum Opt. 1, 17 (1989)
P. Grangier, J.F. Roch: Opt. Commun. 83, 269 (1991)
paper. Also, Eq. (12) of Ref. 14 is equivalent to N eq s N eq m =1 for earized limit, the measurement error Δ=〈(n meas−n in)2〉/〈n in〉 introduced in this reference is related to the measurement equivalent input noise N eq m defined here (see Sects. 2 and 5 of the present paper. Also. Eq. (12) of Ref. 14 is equivalent to N eq s N eq m =1 for a beamsplitter (see eq. 25 and 27 of the present paper).
M.J. Holland, M.J. Collett, D.F. Walls, M.D. Levenson: Phys. Rev. A 42, 2995 (1990)
C.A. Blockley, D.F. Walls: Opt. Commun. 79, 241 (1990)
J.M. Courty, P. Grangier, L. Hilico, S. Reynaud: Opt. Commun. 83, 251 (1991)
MinXiao, Ling-An Wu, H.J. Kimble: Opt. Lett. 13, 476 (1988)
N. Imoto, S. Watkins, Y. Sasaki: Opt. Commun. 61, 159 (1987)
H.A. Bachor, M.D. Levenson, D.F. Walls, S.H. Perlmutter, R.M. Shelby: Phys. Rev. A 38, 180 (1988)
R.M. Shelby, M.D. Levenson: Opt. Commun. 64, 553 (1987)
S.F. Pereira, H.J. Kimble, P. Alsing, D.F. Walls: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 24 (1987)
A. LaPorta, R.E. Slusher: Phys. Rev. A 44, 2013 (1991)
M. Dance, M.J. Collett, D.F. Walls: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1115 (1991)
J.P. Poizat, M.J. Collett, D.F. Walls: Phys. Rev. A 45, 5171 (1992)
P. Grangier, J.M. Courty, S. Reynaud: Opt. Commun. 89, 99 (1992)
M. Brune, S. Haroche, V. Lefevre, J.M. Raimond, N. Zagury: Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 976 (1990)
Y. Yamamoto: IEEE Trans. E 73, 1598 (1990)
K.M. Gheri, P. Grangier, J.P. Poizat, D.F. Walls: to appear in Phys. Appl. A (1992)
J.F. Roch: Ph. D. Thesis, Université Paris XI (1992) (unpublished)
C.M. Caves: Phys. Rev. D 26, 1817 (1982)
M.D. Levenson, M.J. Holland, D.F. Walls, P.J. Manson, P.T.H. Fisk, H.A. Bachor: Phys. Rev. A 44, 2023 (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roch, J.F., Roger, G., Grangier, P. et al. Quantum non-demolition measurements in optics: a review and some recent experimental results. Appl. Phys. B 55, 291–297 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325017
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325017