Summary
We investigated ascorbic acid therapy for cystinuria in a study of seven healthy control persons and seven cystinuric patients. The study lasted 9 days. During the first period, we collected 24-h urine specimens from all subjects on 3 consecutive days. Starting on day 4, all were given 5 g ascorbic acid/day for a period of 6 days. On the last 3 days, 24-h urine specimens were again collected. Quantitative amino acid determination was performed using an HPLC method described elsewhere. During ingestion of ascorbic acid, the mean excretion of cysteine by the control group increased from 134.1 to 159 μmol/ day, whereas the excretion of cystine decreased from 107.1 to 82 μmol/day. The corresponding values for the cystinuric patients increased from 352.4 to 452.1 μmol/ day for cysteine and decreased from 4,131.6 to 3,663.2 μmol/day for cystine. Thus, ascorbic acid seems to have only mild reducing properties in respect to cystine.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asper R, Schmucki O (1982) Cystinurietherapie mit Ascorbinsäure. Urol Int 37:91
Asper R, Schmucki O, Eggli R, Rosenmund H (1979) Die medikamentöse Beeinflussung des Cystein/Cystin-Verhältnisses im Urin: eine neue Cystinurie-Therapie? Fortschr Urol Nephrol 14:417
Birwé H, Hesse A (1990) Determination of cysteine and cystine by HPLC. Fresenius J Anal Chem 337:62
Classen A, Hesse A (1987) Measurement of urinary oxalate: an enzymatic and an ion chromatographic method compared. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 25:95
Hesse A, Bach D (1982) Harsteine; Pathobiochemie und klinisch-chemische Diagnostik. Thieme, Stuttgard, p 62
Robertson WG, Scurr DS (1984) Prevention of ascorbic acid interference in the measurement of oxalic acid in urine by ion-chromatography. Clin Chim Acta 140:97
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birwé, H., Schneeberger, W. & Hesse, A. Investigations of the efficacy of ascorbic acid therapy in cystinuria. Urol. Res. 19, 199–201 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303750
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303750