Summary
In hybrid breeding programs, testcross evaluation of lines can be done during the early stages of selfing (early testing) or delayed until the lines are near-homozygous. To evaluate the usefulness of early testing, the expected genetic and phenotypic correlations between testcross performance at different selfing generations were examined. The genetic correlation (r GnGn′ ) between testcross performance of S n and S n′ , (n′>n) individuals or lines is equal to the square root of the ratio of their testcross genetic variances, and it is a function of the inbreeding coefficients (F) at the two selfing generations, i.e., r GnGn′=[(1+F n )/(1+F n )]0.5. The genetic correlation between testcross performance of lines and their directly descended homozygous (n′=∞) lines is 0.71 for S1; 0.87 for S2, 0.93 for S3, 0.97 for S4, 0.98 for S5, and 0.99 for S5 lines. The effectiveness of early testing is limited mainly by nongenetic effects. The square root of testcross heritability at generation n sets the upper limit on the correlation between phenotypic value at generation n and genotypic value at homozygosity. The probabilities of correctly retaining S n individuals or lines that have superior testcross performance at homozygosity (n′=∞) indicate that early testing should be effective in identifying lines with above- and below-average combining ability. However, the risk of losing lines with superior combining ability is high if strong (best 10%) selection pressure is applied during early testing. If only a small proportion of lines is retained based on testcross performance and/or if the heritability of the trait is low, selfing for two or three generations prior to testcrossing may be desirable to increase the likelihood of retaining lines that perform well at homozygosity. The theoretical results in this study support the testcross evaluation procedures for grain yield used by most maize (Zea mays L.) breeders.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bauman LF (1981) Review of methods used by breeders to develop superior inbreds. Proc Corn Sorghum Industry Res Conf 36:199–208
Cockerham CC (1961) Implications of genetic variances in a hybrid breeding program. Crop Sci 1:47–52
Hallauer AR (1990) Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 35:1–16
Hallauer AR, Lopez-Perez E (1979) Comparisons among testers for evaluating lines of corn. Proc. Corn Sorghum Industry Res Conf 34:57–75
Hallauer AR, Miranda JO (1981) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames/IA
Jenkins MT (1935) The effect of inbreeding and of selection within inbred lines of maize upon the hybrids made after successive generations of selfing. Iowa State Coll J Sci 3:429–450
Jensen SD, Kuhn WE, McConnell RL (1983) Combining ability studies in elite U.S. maize germ plasm. Proc Corn Sorghum Industry Res Conf 38:87–96
Lonnquist JH (1950) The effect of selecting for combining ability within segregating lines of corn. Argon J 42:503–508
Melchinger AE (1988) Means, variances, and covariances between relatives in hybrid populations with disequilibrium in the parent populations. In: Weir BS, Eisen EJ, Goodman MM, Namkoong G (ed) Proc 2nd Int Conf Quantit Genet. Sinnauer. Sunderland/Ma, pp 400–415
Payne KT, Hayes HK (1949) A comparison of combining ability in F3 and F2 lines of corn. Agron J 41:383–388
Rawlings JO, Thompson DL (1962) Performance level as criterion for the choice of maize testers. Crop Sci 2:217–220
Richey FD (1945) Isolating better foundation inbreds for use in corn hybrids. Genetics 30:455–471
Sprague GF (1946) Early testing of inbred lines of corn. J Am Soc Argon 38:108–117
U.S. National Bureau of Standards (1959) Tables of the bivariate normal distribution function and related functions. US Govt Printing Office, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by A. R. Hallauer
A contribution from Limagrain Genetics, a Groupe Limagrain company
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bernardo, R. Correlation between testcross performance of lines at early and late selfing generations. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 82, 17–21 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231272
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231272