Abstract
The topics is a theory of argumentation based upon topoi or in Latin loci. The medieval logicians used works by Aristotle and Boethius as their sources for this doctrine, but they developed it in a rather original way. The topics became a higher-level analysis of arguments which are non-valid from a purely formal point of view, but where it is none the less legitimate to infer the conclusion from the premiss(es). In this connection the topics give rise to a number of discussions about the form and the matter of arguments. Further the topic contribute to the elaboration of the important doctrine of the second intentions, i.e. higher-level concepts of the particular things. In some respects the topics may be said to form a link between formal and informal logic. The topics vanished as a part of logic at the end of the Middle Ages, perhaps because the medieval logicians never got rid of Boethius' claim to have compiled a complete list of the loci, which was an unlucky one. The topics does not have an exact parallel in modern formal logic, but some reflections on non-formal argumentation by recent authors contain certain resemblances to it.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aristotle, Topics: Ed. David Ross, Oxford Classical Texts, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1958 and later).
Boethius, De differentiis topicis: Ed. Migne, Patrologia Latina, vol. 64, 1773C–1216D, Paris 1847 (and reprints) — cf. Stump 1978.
De Pater, W. A.: 1965, Les Topiques d'Aristote et la Dialectique Platonicienne. Thomas studien 10, Paulusverlag, Fribourg.
Ebbsen, St.: 1981, Commentators and Commentaries on Aistotle's Sophistic Elenchi. Corpus Latinum Commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum, VII, vol. 1, Brill, Leiden.
Green-Padersen, N. J.: 1976, ‘The Summulae of John Buridan. Tractatus VI de locis’, in J. Pinborg (ed.), The Logic of John Buridan, Museum Tusculanum, Copenhagen, pp. 121–138.
Green-Pedersen, N. J.: 1984, The Tradition of the Topics in the Middle Ages, Philosophia, München.
Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: 1958, Traité de l'Argumentation. La Nouvelle Rhétorique, 3. éd., Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.
Pinborg, J.: 1969, ‘Topik und Syllogistiks’, in Sapienter Ordinare. Festgabe für Erich Kleineidam, St. Benno, Leipzig, pp. 157–178. — Reprint in Pinborg, Medieval Semantics, Variorum Reprints, London 1984 (unpaginated).
Strecker, K.: 1925, Die Lieder Walters von Chatillon in der Handschrift 351 von St. Omer, Weidmann, Berlin (reprint 1964 and later).
Strecker, K.: 1929, Moralisch-Satirische Gedichte Walters von Chatillon, Carl Winter, Heidelberg.
Stump, E.: 1978, Boethius's De topicis differentiis Translated with Notes and Essays on the Text, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
Stump, E.: 1982, ‘Topics: Their Development and Absorption into Consequences’, in N. Kretzmann, A. Kenny, J. Pinborg (eds.), The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 273–299.
Toulmin, St.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Green-Pedersen, N.J. The topics in medieval logic. Argumentation 1, 407–417 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209737
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209737