Summary
Meyer and Wilson's (1990) 12S rRNA phylogeny unites lungfish and tetrapods to the exclusion of the coelacanth. These workers also provide a list of morphological features shared in common between modern lungfish and tetrapods, and they conclude that these traits were probably present in their last common ancestor. However, the exquisite fossil records of the abundant extinct lungfishes and rhipidistians show that at least 13 out of Meyer and Wilson's 14 supposed ancestral traits were not present in the last common ancestor of lungfishes and tetrapods. Using extant taxa to infer ancestral morphologies is fraught with difficulties; just like molecular sequences, ancestral character states of morphological traits may be severely overprinted by subsequent modifications. Modern lungfish are air-breathing nonmarine forms, yet their Devonian forebears were marine fish that did not breathe air. Fossils dating from the time of origin of tetrapods in the Devonian offer the only hope of understanding the morphological innovations that led to tetrapods; morphological analysis of the “living fossils,” the coelacanth and lungfish, only lends confusion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahlberg P (1991) Tetrapod or near-tetrapod fossils from the Upper Devonian of Scotland. Nature 354:298–301
Arratia G, Schultze H-P (1991) Palatoquadrate and its ossifications: development and homology within osteichthyans. J Morphol 208:1–81
Bemis WE (1987) Feeding systems of living Dipnoi: anatomy and function. J Morphol Suppl 1:249–275
Bing R, Burckhardt R (1905) Das Zentralnervensystem von Ceratodus forsteri. In: Semon R (ed) Zoologische Forschungsreisen in Australien and dem Malayischen Archipel. Denkschr Med-Naturwiss Ges Jena 4, 1. Ceratodus, pp 511–584
Burggren WW, Johansen K (1987) Circulation and respiration in lungfishes (Dipnoi). J Morphol Suppl 1:217–236
Campbell KSW, Barwick RE (1982) The neurocranium of the primitive dipnoan Dipnorhynchus sussmilchi (Etheridge). J Vertebr Paleontol 2:286–327
Campbell KSW, Barwick RE (1984) The choana, maxillae, premaxillae and anterior palatal bones of early dipnoans. Proc Linn Soc NSW 107:147–170
Campbell KSW, Barwick RE (1987) Paleozoic lungfishes—a review. J Morphol Suppl 1:93–131
Campbell KSW, Barwick RE (1988) Geological and palaeontological information and phylogenetic hypotheses. Geol Mag 125:207–277
Chang M-M (1991) “Rhipidistians”, dipnoans, and tetrapods. In: Schultze H-P, Trueb L (eds) Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods. Controversy and consensus. Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY, pp 3–28
Chang M-M, Yu X (1984) Structure and phylogenetic significance of Diabolichthys speratus gen. et sp. nov., a new Dipnoan-like form from the Lower Devonian of Eastern Yunnan, China. Proc Linn Soc NSW 107:171–184
Cloutier R (1992) Phylogenetic status, basal taxa, and interrelationships of lower sarcopterygian groups. Zool J Linn Soc (in press)
Coates MI, Clark JA (1991) Fish-like gills and breathing in the earliest known tetrapod. Nature 352:234–236
Dorn E (1955) Der Saccus vasculosus. In: Möllendorf W, Bargmann W (eds) Handbuch der mikroskopischen Anatomie des Menschen 4(2):140–195
Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA, Gauthier J, Kluge AG (1989) The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:431–460
Forey PL (1980) Latimeria: a paradoxical fish. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 208:369–384
Forey PL (1987) Relationships of lungfishes. J Morphol Suppl 1:75–91
Forey PL (1991) Blood lines of the coelacanth. Nature 351: 347–348
Forey PL, Gardiner GB, Patterson C (1991) The lungfish, the coelacanth, and the cow revisited. In: Schultze H-P, Trueb L (eds) Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods. Controversy and consensus. Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY, pp 145–172
Fritsch B (1987) Inner ear of the coelacanth fish Latimeria has tetrapod affinities. Nature 327:153–154
Gardiner BG (1980) Tetrapod ancestry: a reappraisal. In: Panchen AL (ed) The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates. Syst Assoc Spec Vol 15:177–185
Gardiner BG (1984) The relationships of the palaeoniscid fishes, a review based on new specimens of Mimia and Moythomasia from the Upper Devonian of Western Australia. Bull Brit Mus (Nat Hist), Geol 37:173–428
Gauthier J, Kluge AG, Rowe T (1988) Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4:105–208
Gee H (1990) Fossil fishes and fashion. Nature 348:194–195
Gorr T, Kleinschmidt T, Fricke H (1991) Close tetrapod relationships of the coelacanth Latimeria indicated by haemoglobin sequences. Nature 351:394–397
Griffiths M (1938) Studies on the pituitary body. II. Observations on the pituitary in Dipnoi and speculations concerning the evolution of the pituitary. Proc Linn Soc NSW 63: 89–94
Hennig W (1983) Stammesgeschichte der Chordaten. P. Parey, Hamburg, Berlin
Holmes EB (1985) Are lungfishes the sister group of tetrapods? Biol J Linn Soc 25:379–397
Holmgren N, van der Horst CJ (1925) Contribution to the morphology of the brain of Ceratodus. Acta Zool Stockholm 6:59–165
Jarvik E (1942) On the structure of the snout of crossopterygians and lower gnathostomes in general. Zool Bidr Upps 21:235–675
Jarvik E (1980) Basic structure and evolution of vertebrates, vol 1. Academic Press, London
Lagios MD (1979) The coelacanth and the Chondrichthyes as sister groups: a review of shared apomorph characters and a cladistic analysis and reinterpretation. Occas Pap Calif Acad Sci 134:25–44
Long JA (1990) Heterochrony and the origin of tetrapods. Lethaia 23:157–166
Maisey JG (1986) Heads and tails: a chordate phylogeny. Cladistics 2:201–256
Marshall CR (1987a) A list of fossil and extant dipnoans. J Morphol Suppl 1:15–23
Marshall CR (1987b) Lungfish: phylogeny and parsimony. J Morphol Suppl 1:151–162
Matty AJ (1985) Fish endocrinology. Croom Helm, London
Meyer A, Dolven SI (1992) Molecules, fossils, and the origin of tetrapods. J Mol Evol 35:102–113
Meyer A, Wilson AC (1990) Origin of tetrapods inferred from their mitochondrial DNA affiliation to lungfish. J Mol Evol 31:359–364
Meyer A, Wilson AC (1991) Coelacanth's relationships. Nature 353:19
Miles RS (1975) The relationships of the Dipnoi. Colloq Int CNRS 218:133–148
Miles RS (1977) Dipnoan (lungfish) skulls and the relationships of the group: a study based on new species from the Devonian of Australia. Zool J Linn Soc 61:1–328
Normark BB, McCune AR, Harrison RG (1991) Phylogenetic relationships of neopterygian fishes, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 8:819–834
Northcutt RG (1987) Lungfish neural characters and their bearing on sarcopterygian phylogeny. J Morphol Suppl 1:277–297
Panchen AL, Smithson TR (1987) Character diagnosis, fossils and the origin of tetrapods. Biol Rev 62:341–438
Rosen DE, Forey PL, Gardiner BG, Patterson C (1981) Lungfishes, tetrapods, paleontology, and plesiomorphy. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 167:159–276
Säve-Söderbergh G (1952) On the skull of Chirodipterus wildungensis Gross, an Upper Devonian dipnoan from Wildungen. K Sven Vetenskaps akad Handl(4)3:1–29
Schultze H-P (1969) Die Faltenzähne der rhipidistiiden Crossopterygier, der Tetrapoden und der Actinopterygier-Gattung Lepisosteus. Palaeontogr Ital 65:63–136
Schultze H-P (1970) Folded teeth and the monophyletic origin of tetrapods. Am Mus Novit 2408:1–10
Schultze H-P (1977) The origin of the tetrapod limb within the rhipidistian fishes. In: Hecht MK, Goody PC, Hecht BM (ed) Major patterns in vertebrate evolution. NATO Adv Stud Inst Ser 14:541–544
Schultze H-P (1981) HENNIG and der Ursprung der Tetrapoda. Palaeontol Z 55:71–86
Schultze H-P (1987) Dipnoans as Sarcopterygians. J Morphol Suppl 1:39–74
Schultze H-P (1991) Der Ursprung der Tetrapoden-ein lebhaft diskutiertes altes Problem. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 84:135–151
Schultze H-P (1992) The origin of tetrapods—a hotly debated old problem. Syst Biol (in press)
Schultze H-P, Arsenault M (1985) The panderichthyid fish Elpistostege: a close relative of tetrapods? Palaeontology 28: 293–309
Schultze H-P, Campbell KSW (1987) Characterization of the Dipnoi, a monophyletic group. J Morphol Suppl 1(1986):2537
Sharp PM, Loyd AT, Higgins DG (1991) Coelacanth's relationships. Nature 353:218–219
Smith MM, Chang M-M (1990) The dentition of Diabolepis speratus Chang and Yu, with further consideration of its relationships and the primitive dipnoan dentition. J Vertebr Paleontol 10: 420–433
Stock DW, Swofford DL (1991) Coelacanth's relationships. Nature 353:217–218
Thomson KS, Campbell KSW (1971) The structure and relationships of the primitive dipnoan lungfish Dipnorhynchus sussmilchi (Etheridge). Bull Peabody Nat Hist 38:1–VI + 1109
Waehneldt TV, Malotka J (1989) Presence of proteolipid protein in coelacanth brain myelin demonstrates tetrapod affinities and questions a chondrichthyan association. J Neurochem 52:1941–1943
Wahlert G von (1968) Latimeria and die Geschichte der Wirbeltiere. Fischer, Stuttgart
Wake MH (1987) Urogenital morphology of dipnoans, with comparisons to other fishes and to amphibians. J Morphol Suppl 1:199–216
Wiedersheim R (1904) Ueber das Vorkommen eines Kehlkopfes bei Ganoiden und Dipnoern Bowie fiber die Phylogenie der Lunge. Zool Jahrb Suppl 7:1–66
Young GC, Barwick RE, Campbell KSW (1989) Pelvic girdles of lungfishes (Dipnoi). In: LaMaitre RW (ed) Pathways in geology essays in honour of Edwin Sherbon Hills. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Melbourne, pp 59–75
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marshall, C., Schultze, HP. Relative importance of molecular, neontological, and paleontological data in understanding the biology of the vertebrate invasion of land. J Mol Evol 35, 93–101 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183220
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00183220