Summary
DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA analyses have not been used in combination to study relatedness in natural populations. We present an approach that involves defining the mean fingerprint similarities among individuals thought to be unrelated because they have different mtDNA genotypes. Two classes of related individuals are identified by their distance in standard errors above this mean value. The number of standard errors is determined by analysis of the association between fingerprint similarity and relatedness in a population with a known genealogy. We apply this approach to gray wolf packs from Minnesota, Alaska, and the Northwest Territories. Our results show that: (1) wolf packs consist primarily of individuals that are closely related genetically, but some packs contain unrelated, non-reproducing individuals; (2) dispersal among packs within the same area is common; and (3) short-range dispersal appears more common for female than male wolves. The first two of these genetically-based observations are consistent with behavioral data on pack structure and dispersal in wolves, while the apparent sex bias in dispersal was not expected.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Burke T (1989) DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success. Trends Ecol Evol 4:139–144
Clarkson P, Liepens I (1989) Inuvialuit wildlife studies: western arctic wolf research project progress report, 1988-1989. Northwest Territories Wildlife Management Advisory Council Technical Report No. 7
Dietz EJ (1983) Permutation tests for association between two distance matrices. Syst Zool 32:21–26
Fritts SH, Mech LD (1981) Dynamics, movements, and feeding ecology of a newly protected wolf population in northwestern Minnesota. Wildl Monogr 80:1–79
Fuller TK (1989) Population dynamics of wolves in north-central Minnesota. Wildl Monogr 105:1–41
Gese EM, Mech LD (1991) Dispersal of wolves (Canis lupus) in northeastern Minnesota, 1969–89. Can J Zool 69:2946–2955
Gilbert DA, Lehman N, O'Brien SJ, Wayne RK (1990) Genetic fingerprinting reflects population differentiation in the California Channel Island Fox. Nature 344:764–767
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52
Harrington FH, Ryon J, Fentress JC (1982) Monogamy in wolves: a review of the evidence. In: Harrington FH, Paquet PC (eds) Wolves in the world. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, pp 209–222
Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Them SL (1985) Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67–73
Kleiman DG, Eisenberg J (1973) Comparison of canid and felid social systems from an evolutionary perspective. Am in Behav 21:637–659
Lehman N, Eisenhawer A, Hansen K, Mech LD, Peterson RO, Gogan PIP, Wayne RK (1991) Introgression of coyote mitochondrial DNA into sympatric North American gray wolf populations. Evolution 45:104–119
Lynch M (1988) Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biol Evol 5(5):584–599
Lynch M (1990) The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biol Evol 7(5):478–484
Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York
Macdonald DW, Moehlman PD (1982) Cooperation, altruism, and restraint in the reproduction of carnivores. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer P (eds) Perspectives in Ethology. Plenum Press, New York, pp 433–467
Mech LD (1966) The wolves of Isle Royale. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.
Mech LD (1970) The Wolf: Ecology and behavior of an endangered species. Doubleday, New York
Mech LD (1973) Wolf numbers in the Superior National Forest of Minnesota. U.S.D.A. Forest Service Research Paper NC-97:1–10
Mech LD (1977) Productivity, mortality and population trends of wolves in northeastern Minnesota. J Mammal 58:559–574
Mech LD (1986) Wolf population in the central Superior National Forest, 1967–1985. U.S.D.A. North Central Forest Experiment Station Research Paper NC-270:1–6
Mech LD (1987) Age, season, distance, direction, and social aspects of wolf dispersal from a Minnesota pack. In: Chepko-Sade BD, Halpin ZT (eds) Mammalian dispersal patterns. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 55–74
Mech LD, Nelson ME (1990) Non-family wolfpacks. Can Field Nat 104:482–483
Murie A (1944) The wolves of Mt. McKinley. US Natl Park Serv, Fauna Ser 5:1–238
Packard JM, Mech LD, Seal US (1983) Social influences on reproduction in wolves. In: Carbyn LN (ed) Wolves in Canada and Alaska. Canadian Wildlife Service Report Series No. 45, pp 78–85
Packer C, Gilbert DA, Pusey AE, O'Brien SJ (1991) A molecular genetic analysis of kinship and cooperation in African lions. Nature 351:562–565
Peterson RO (1977) Wolf ecology and prey relationships on Isle Royale. US Natl Park Serv Sci Monogr 11:1–210
Rothman RJ, Mech LD (1979) Scent marking in lone wolves and newly formed pairs. Anim Behav 27:750–760
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2 edn. W.H. Freeman, New York
Van Ballenberghe V (1983) Extraterritorial movements and dispersal of wolves in south central Alaska. J Mammal 64:168–171
Van Ballenberghe V, Erikson AW, Byman D (1975) Ecology of the timber wolf in northeastern Minnesota. Wildl Monogr 43:1–43
Wayne RK, Gilbert DA, Lehman N, Hansen K, Eisenhawer A, Girman D, Peterson RO, Mech LD, Gogan PJP, Seal US, Krumenaker RJ (1991) Conservation genetics of the endangered Isle Royale gray wolf. Conserv Biol 5(1):41–51
Wetton JH, Carter RE, Parkin DT, Walters D (1987) Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 327:147–149
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
USA Offprint requests to: N. Lehman at the present address
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehman, N., Clarkson, P., Mech, L.D. et al. A study of the genetic relationships within and among wolf packs using DNA fingerprinting and mitochondrial DNA. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30, 83–94 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173944
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173944