Abstract
In this experimental study, various foreign bodies were inserted into fresh bovine eyes, in different localizations. Twenty-one magnetic and non-magnetic foreign bodies, dimensions of which varied from 1.5 × 1.5 × 2 mm to 3.5 × 6 × 7 mm, were tried to detect by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. In addition, further dissections were applied to check the ocular damage attributable to movement of the foreign bodies. Ferromagnetic foreign bodies have been shown to move in the eye and the risk of torsional forces being applied to the ferromagnetic foreign body seemed to cause intraocular complications during MRI scanning. All of the foreign bodies that were implanted in bovine eyes were recognized on CT scanning, except intraocular lenses. As a general rule, metallic foreign bodies produced beamhardening artifacts, but these artifacts did not cause any problem in detecting the localizations of foreign bodies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Slamovits TL, Gardner TA. Neuroimaging in neuro-ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 555–68.
Green BF, Kraft SP, Carter KD, Bunic JR, Nerad JA, Armstrong D. Intraorbital wood: Detection by magnetic resonance imaging. Ophthalmology 1990; 97 (5): 608–11.
New PFJ, Rosen BR, Brady TJ et al. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1983; 147: 139–48.
Williamson TH, Smith FW, Forrester JV. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraocular foreign bodies. Br J Ophthalmol 1989; 73: 555–58.
Williams S, Char DH, Dillon WP, Lincoff N, Moseley M. Ferrous intraocular foreign bodies and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105: 398–401.
Kelly WM, Paglen PG, Pearson JA, San Diego AG, Solaman MA. Ferromagnetism of intraocular foreign body causes unilateral blindness after MR study. ANJR 1986; 7: 243–45.
Lagouros PA, Langer BG, Peyman GA, Mafee MF, Spigos DG, Grisolano J. Magnetic resonance imaging and intraocular foreign bodies. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 551–53.
Weisman RA, Savino PJ, Schut L, Schatz NJ. Computed tomography in penetrating wounds of the orbit with retained foreign bodies, Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109: 265–68.
Roberts CW, Haik BG, Cahill P. Magnetic resonance imaging of metal loop intraocular lenses (Letter). Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 104: 427.
Zheutlin JD, Thomson JT, Shofner RS. The safety of magnetic resonance imaging with intraorbital metallic objects after retinal detachment surgery or trauma (Letter). Am J Ophthalmol 1987; 103: 831.
Weiss RA, Saint-Louis LA, Haik BG, McCord CD, Taveras JL. Mascara and eyelining tattoos: MRI artefacts. Ann Ophthalmol 1989; 21: 129–31.
Zinreich SJ, Miller NR, Aguayo JB, Quinn C, Hadfield R, Rosenbaum AE. Computed tomographic three dimensional localisation and compositional evaluation of intraocular and orbital foreign bodies. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104 (10): 1477–82.
Henrikson GC, Mafee MF, Flanders AE, Kriz RJ, Peyman GA. CT evaluation of plastic intraocular foreign bodies. AJNR 1987; 8 (2): 378–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gunenc, U., Maden, A., Kaynak, S. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the detection and localization of intraocular foreign bodies. Doc Ophthalmol 81, 369–378 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169098
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00169098