Abstract
This study advances the claim that Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, which drew its inspiration and guidelines from Cicero's De Natura Deorum, fulfills four basic elements of Michel Meyer's theory of problematology. In doing so, it is argued, the Dialogues contribute importantly to our understanding of the question-answer pair, and to the notion of rhetoric as a way of knowing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Bibliography
Battersby, Christine: 1979, ‘The Dialogues as Original Imitation: Cicero and the Nature of Hume's Scepticism’, in David F. Norton, Nicholas Capaldi and Wade L. Robison (eds). McGill Hume Studies, Austin Hill Press, San Diego.
Burton, John H.: 1846, Life and Correspondence of David Hume, 2 vols., William Tait, Edinburgh.
Chappell, V. C.: 1963, The Philosophy of David Hume, The Modern Library, New York.
Cicero: 1960, De Fato, H. Rackham (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Cicero: 1979, De Natura Deorum, H. Rackham (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Golden, James L. and David L. Jamison: 1988, ‘Michel Meyer's Theory of Problematology’, Questioning Exchange 2, 149–163.
Greig, J. Y. T.: 1931, David Hume, Oxford University Press, New York.
Greig, J. Y. T. (ed.): 1932, The Letters of David Hume, 2 vols., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Hendel, Charles W.: 1925, Studies in the Philosophy of David Hume, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Hume, David: 1898, A Treatise of Human Nature, 2 vols., T. H. Green and T. H. Grose (eds.), Longman, Green, and Co., New York.
Hurlbutt, Robert H.: 1988, ‘The Carless Sceptic — The “Pamphilian” Ironies in Hume's Dialogues’, Hume Studies 14, 209–248.
Huxley, Thomas H.: 1896, Hume, D. Appleton and Company, New York.
Klibansky, Raymond and Ernest C. Mossner (eds.): 1954, New Letters of David Hume, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Laing, B. M.: 1932, David Hume, Oxford University Press, London.
Locke, John: 1760, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 2 vols., D. Browne et al., London.
Meyer, Michel: 1980, ‘Science as a Questioning Process: A Prospect for a New Type of Rationality’, Reveu Internationale de Philosophie 131–132, 49–89.
Meyer, Michel: 1980, ‘Dialectic and Questioning: Socrates and Plato’, American Philosophical Quarterly 17, 281–289.
Meyer, Michel: 1981, Langue Française 52, 80–99.
Meyer, Michel: 1982, ‘Argumentation in Light of a theory of Questioning’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 15, 81–103.
Meyer, Michel: 1983, Meaning and Reading, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
Meyer, Michel: 1986, ‘Problematology and Rhetoric’, in James L. Golden and Joseph J. Pilotta (eds.), Practical Reasoning in Human Affairs: Studies in Honor of Chaïm Perelman, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
Meyer, Michel: 1986, De La Problématologie, Pierre Mardaga, Brussels.
Mossner, Ernest C.: 1977, ‘Hume and the Legacy of the Dialogues’, in G. P. Morice (ed.), David Hume: Bicentary Papers, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Nelson, John O.: 1988, ‘The Role of Part XII in Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion’, Hume Studies 14, 347–366.
Penelhum, Terence: 1979, ‘Hume's Skepticism and the Dialogues’, in Norton, Capaldi and Robison (eds.), McGill Hume Studies, Austin Hill Press, San Diego.
Price, John V.: 1965, The Ironic Hume, University of Texas Press, Austin.
‘Review of Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion’, The Monthly Review: 1779, 61, 343–355.
Schmitz, Robert M.: 1948, Hugh Blair, King's Crown Press, Morningside Heights.
Selbe-Bigge, L. A. (ed.): 1936, Enquiries Concerning the human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals by David Hume, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Smith, Norman Kemp (ed.): 1947, Hume: Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Indianapolis.
Stephen, Leslie: 1876, History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century, 2 vols., Smith, Elder, & Co., London.
Wandia, P. S.: 1979, ‘Philo Confounded’, in Norton, Capaldi, and Robison (eds.), McGill Hume Studies, Austin Hill Press, San Diego.
White, Richard: 1988, ‘Hume's Dialogues and the Comedy of Religion’, Hume Studies 14.
Yandell, Keith E.: 1976, ‘Hume on Religious Belief’, in Donald W. Livingston and James T. King (eds.), Hume: A Re-Evaluation, Fordham University Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Golden, J.L. An application of Michel Meyer's Theory of problematology to David Hume's Diaologues concerning natural religion . Argumentation 5, 69–89 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058419
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058419