Abstract
This essay argues that Plato's “Gorgias,” a dialogue lauding dialectic over rhetoric, uses a question-and-answer format as a heuristic of argument. Specific observations are advanced to explain the implications of Plato's techniques and to provide a more sensitive understanding of the process by which sought to gain the adherence of his readers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Bibliography
Cicero, De Oratore.
Enos, R. L.: 1976, ‘The Epistomology of Gorgias' Rhetoric: A Re-examination’, Southern Speech Communication Journal 42, 35–51.
Enos, R. L.: 1987, ‘Aristotle, Empedocles and the Notion of Rhetoric’, in J. Hammerback and R. Jensen (eds.), In Search of Justice: The Indiana Tradition in Speech Communication, Rodopi, Amsterdam.
Friedlander, P.: 1958, Plato: An Introduction, trans. H. Meyerhoff, Harper & Row, New York.
Friedlander, P.: 1979, Plato, trans. H. Meyerhoff. Reprinted in K. Erickson (ed.), Plato: True and Sophistic Rhetoric, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 91–127.
Havelock, E. A.: 1982, Preface to Plato, second printing, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Hyland, D. A.: 1968, ‘Why Plato Wrote Dialogues’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 1, 38–50.
Johnstone, Jr., H. W.: 1978, Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument: An Outlook in Transition, The Dialogue P of Man & World, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Kaufer, D. S.: 1978, ‘The Influence of Plato's Developing Psychology on His Views of Rhetoric’, Quarterly Journal of Speech 64, 63–78.
Kauffman, C.: 1979, ‘Enactment as Argument in the Gorgias,’ Philosophy and Rhetoric, 12, 114–129.
Lentz, T. M.: 1989, Orality and Literacy in Hellenic Greece, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
Levi, A. W.: 1976, ‘Philosophy as Literature: The Dialogue’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 9, 1–20.
Meyer, M.: 1980, ‘Dialectic and Questioning: Socrates and Plato’, American Philosophical Quaterly 17, 281–289.
Meyer, M.: 1980, ‘The Nature of Problematic Knowledge’, in M. Meyer (ed.), Questions and Questioning, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.
Murray, James S.: 1988, ‘Disputation Deception and Dialectic: Plato on the True Rhetoric’ (Phaedrus, 261–266), Philosophy and Rhetoric 21, 279–289.
Perelman, C.: 1982, The Realm of Rhetoric, Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame.
Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, trans. J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, Notre Dame University Press, Notre Dame.
Plato, Gorgias: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, editor and commentator, E. R. Dodds, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Plato, ‘Meno’.
Plato, ‘Protagoras’.
Quimby, R. W.: 1974, ‘The Growth of Plato's Perception of Rhetoric’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 7, 71–79.
Rendall, S.: 1977, ‘Dialogue, Philosophy, and Rhetoric: The Example of Plato's Gorgias’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 10, 165–179.
Sesonske, A.: 1979, ‘To Make the Weaker Argument Defeat the Stronger’, in K. V. Erickson (ed.), Plato: True and Sophistic Rhetoric, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 71–90.
Skousgaard, S.: 1979, ‘Genuine Speech vs. Chatter: A Socratic Problematic’, in K. V. Erickson (ed.), Plato: True and Sophistic Rhetoric, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 375–383.
Stewart, D. C.: 1984, ‘The Continuing Relevance of Plato's Phaedrus’, in R. J. Connors, L. S. Ede, and A. Lunsford (eds.), Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
Welch, K. E.: 1988, ‘The Platonic Paradox: Plato's Rhetoric in Contemporary Rhetoric and Composition Studies’, Written Communication 5, 3–21.