Abstract
Skinner (1981) proposed that selection by consequences, such as is represented by natural selection on a biological level and operant selection on the level of individual behaviors, plays a significant role in the change dynamics and adaptation of systems in the physical world. He suggested that there might be a third level of selection by consequences—cultural-level selection—that might complement the other two selection processes he explicated. The metacontingency was proposed as a process that might describe such a cultural-level of selection. In the present article, two competing definitions (a three-term definition and a five-term definition) of the metacontingency are compared and contrasted, and several criticisms of the metacontingency are considered. Proponents of the metacontingency have argued that it is an emergent process, possessing characteristics that differ substantively from phenomena at lower-levels of analysis, while critics of the metacontingency have argued that there are more parsimonious theories that account for everything that the metacontingency is intended to address. Theorists have claimed four particular areas of emergence for the metacontingency, each of which is examined through comparison of metacontingent selection with a similar, albeit behavioral-level phenomenon—the production of a complex product via a chain of behaviors performed by a single individual—concluding that the claims of emergence do not appear to be substantiated.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 161–179.
Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27, 133–151.
Glenn, S. S. (2010). Metacontingencies, selection, and OBM: Comments on “Emergence and metacontingency”. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 79–85.
Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. E. (2004a). Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 89–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.378
Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. E. (2004b). Rules and metacontingencies: Reply to Sandakar. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 146. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.27
Hayes, L. J., & Houmanfar, R. (2004). Units and measures: A response to Glenn and Malott. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 107–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.379
Hobbs, S. (2006). The present and future of cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 11–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.341
Houmanfar, R., & Rodrigues, N. J. (2006). The metacontingency and the behavioral contingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 13–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.342
Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., and Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 53–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3065
Lindsley, O. R. (1966). Experimental analysis of cooperation and competition. In T. Verhave (Ed.), The experimental analysis of behavior: Selected readings (pp. 470–501). New York, CT: Appleton-Century-Croft.
Malott, M. E., and Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 31–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.344
Marr, J. (1996). A mingled yarn. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 19–33.
Marr, J. (2006). Behavior analysis and social dynamics: Some questions and concerns. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 57–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.345
Mattaini, M. A. (2004). Systems, metacontingencies, and cultural analysis: Are we there yet? Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 124–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.20
Mattaini, M. A. (2006). Will cultural analysis become a science? Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 68–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.380
Morford, Z. H., & Cihon, T. M. (2013). Developing an experimental analysis of metacontingencies: Considerations regarding cooperation in a four-person prisoner’s dilemma game. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 5–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4207
Rachlin, H. (1976). Introduction to modern behaviorism. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Sampaio, A. A. S., Araújo, L. A. S., Gonçalo, M. E., Ferraz, J. C., Filho, A. P. A., Brito, I. S., Barros, N. M., Calado, J. I. F. (2013). Exploring the role of verbal behavior in a new experimental task for the study of metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 87–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4180
Sandaker, I. (2004). Commentary on complexity and selection. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 145. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.26
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1981/1986). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649
Skinner, B. F. (1984). Author’s response: Some consequences of selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 502–509.
Skinner, B. F. (1989). Recent issues in the analysis of behavior. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
Smith, G. S, Houmanfar, R., & Louis, S. J. (2011). The participatory role of verbal behavior in an elaborated account of metacontingency: From conceptualization to investigation. Behavior and Social Issues, 20, 122–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v20i0.3662
Todorov, J. C. (2010). Schedules of cultural selection: Comments on “Emergence and metacontingency.” Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 86–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3221
Todorov, J. C. (2013). Conservation and transformation of cultural practices through contingencies and metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 64–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4812
Ulman, J. D. (1998). Toward a more complete science of human behavior: Behaviorology plus institutional economics. Behavior and Social Issues, 8, 195–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v8i2.329
Ulman, J. D. (2006). Macrocontingencies and institutions: A behaviorological analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 95–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.348
Vichi, C., Andery, M. A. P. A., & Glenn, S. S. (2009). A metacontingency experiment: The effects of contingent consequences on patterns of interlocking contingencies of reinforcement. Behavior and Social Issues, 18, 41–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v18i1.2292
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krispin, J.V. What is the Metacontingency? Deconstructing Claims of Emergence and Cultural-Level Selection. Behav. Soc. Iss. 25, 28–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6186
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6186