1 INTRODUCTION

The selective photoionization of lutetium isotopes through the scheme 5d6s2 2D3/2 – 5d6s6p4\(F_{{5/2}}^{{\text{o}}}\) – 5d6s7s4D3/2 – (53 375 cm–1\()_{{1/2}}^{{\text{o}}}\) using narrow-band tunable dye lasers (DLs) pumped by copper vapor lasers can be used to obtain the 177Lu radionuclide applied in medicine. In [1, 2], we experimentally demonstrated the possibility of reaching high selectivity and efficiency of the photoionization separation of the 176Lu and 177Lu isotopes and the 177mLu isomer. Various effects beyond the incoherent description of photoionization using rate equations and effective transition cross sections were simultaneously detected. Two of these effects are the splitting of transition lines (Autler–Townes effect [3]) and the strong influence of two-photon processes on the selectivity of photoionization. These effects can be explained within the coherent description of laser photoexcitation processes using the density matrix formalism with steady-state oscillations of the populations of the intermediate levels of the photoionization scheme.

Selective multistep photoionization used to separate an isotope from a mixture was theoretically described in [4–6]. The most consistent study focused on the coherent description of the laser photoionization of lutetium through this scheme was reported in [4], where numerical calculations within the density matrix formalism to describe the interaction of atoms with laser radiation were presented. The dynamics of the populations was described taking into account the hyperfine structure of transitions and the effect of the spectral width, pulse shape, and intensity of laser radiation on the efficiency and selectivity of photoionization was examined. The influence of the Doppler effect was analyzed in application to the laser photoionization separation of the 176Lu isotope from the natural mixture (the natural concentration of 176Lu is 2.59%).

The main results obtained in [4] are important for the general development of the laser method and, in particular, for the separation of lutetium isotopes; some of them require direct experimental confirmation. This primarily concerns the calculations of two-dimensional (in frequencies of the laser radiation in the first and second steps) photoionization spectra of the natural 175Lu and 176Lu isotopes.

The photoionization schemes for 175Lu and 176Lu are presented in Fig. 1. The hyperfine splitting of the levels in these schemes are usually much larger than the spectral width of the laser radiation (100–150 MHz). Correspondingly, at a certain tuning of wavelengths, photoionization can be carried out only through a single channel, i.e., with a certain combination of the components of the hyperfine structure of the ground state, first and second excited states, and autoionization states (F0F1F2F3). Taking into account the selection rules in the total angular momentum FF = 0, ±1) for transitions, 44 photoionization channels are possible. The two-step photoionization in this scheme was considered in [4], whereas the interaction with the laser radiation in the third step was treated as nonresonant and this transition was included in the description as the decay to an isolated state, which cannot be left by particles. This variant occurs in practice in the case of photoionization to continuum at a significant detuning of the laser radiation from the autoionization resonance in the third step. In this case, the number of the possible photoionization channels decreases to 28.

Fig. 1.
figure 1

Optical photoionization schemes for 175Lu (I = 7/2) and 176Lu (I = 7); numbers next to arrows are vacuum wavelengths of the corresponding transitions in angstrom [1].

The efficiency of photoionization was calculated in [4] as a function of the wavelengths of the lasers in the first and second step (DL1 and DL2 lasers) with an intensity of 10 W/cm2 and a spectral width of 100 MHz separately for the 175Lu and 176Lu isotopes. The calculations show that photoionization is possible not only through 28 channels allowed by the selection rules but also through channels where the initial state of the second transition differs from the final state of the first transition. In particular, when the laser radiation in the first step is tuned to the F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 9.5 transition in the 176Lu isotope, the photoionization peak is observed at the tuning of the wavelength of the DL2 laser to the F1 = 9.5 → F2 = 8.5 transition (8.5 → 9.5 → 8.5 → continuum channel). However, photoionization peaks comparable in intensity are also observed then the DL2 laser is tuned to the F1 = 8.5 → F2 = 8.5 transition and even to the F1 = 7.5 → F2 = 8.5 transition. Calculations for the tuning of the DL1 laser to the other components of the first transition in 176Lu and for the 175Lu isotope give similar results.

We note that the 8.5 → 9.5 → 8.5 → 7.5 photoionization channel is the most important for the separation of the 176Lu isotope from the natural mixture because it allows reaching high selectivity and efficiency. The author of [4] attributes the possibility of side channels to the population of the F1 = 8.5 and F1 = 7.5 components of the first excited state due to the laser radiation from the spectral wing of the laser line when the DL1 laser is tuned to the F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 9.5 transition. In this case, the F0 = 7.5 → F1 = 8.5, F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 8.5 and F0 = 6.5 → F1 = 7.5, F0 = 7.5 → F1 = 7.5, F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 7.5 transitions whose frequencies are separated from the frequency of the F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 9.5 transition by 5 to 13 GHz are excited. The possibility of such a «long-range» influence of the spectral contour significantly affects the formation of the selectivity of photoionization and requires direct experimental proof.

2 EXPERIMENT

Photoionization spectra of transitions in the first and second steps of the 5d6s2 2D3/2 – 5d6s6p4\(F_{{5/2}}^{{\text{o}}}\) – 5d6s7s4D3/2 – (53 375 cm–1\()_{{1/2}}^{{\text{o}}}\) photoionization scheme for 176Lu were studied using laser resonance ionization mass spectroscopy (LRIMS). For the resonant excitation and ionization of atoms, we used the radiation from three single-mode pulsed dye lasers pumped by the radiation from copper vapor lasers. The spectral FWHM of dye lasers was 100–150 MHz, the FWHM duration of pulses was 20 ns, and the pulse repetition frequency was 10 kHz. The pulses of all three lasers were linearly polarized in the same direction and were time synchronized with zero delay, which ensured the simultaneous action of laser fields of all three photoionization steps on atoms. A commercial quadrupole mass spectrometer MS-7302 was used to detect photoions, and experiments were carried out with a collimated atomic beam (Doppler width of the atomic line was ~150 MHz). The technical parameters and features of the experimental setup were described in detail in [7, 8]. The DL1 laser was tuned to resonance with the first transition. The radiation from the DL3 laser, which was detuned from the wavelength of the autoionization transition 1 Å, induced the photoionization of atoms from the second excited state to continuum. The average radiation power densities in the first, second, and third steps were 5, 3, and 2500 mW/cm2, respectively, which correspond to peak intensities of 25, 15, and 1.25 × 104 W/cm2, respectively.

3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The dependence of the photoion signal from 176Lu on the wavelength of the DL2 laser when the DL1 laser is tuned to the resonance with the first F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 9.5 (5403.9660 Å) transition is shown in Fig. 2. The intense peak corresponds to the second-step F1 = 9.5 → F2 = 8.5 (5350.6566 Å) transition. The scanning of the wavelength of the DL2 laser demonstrated the absence of additional photoionization peaks predicted in [4] both in the region of the second F1 = 8.5 → F2 = 8.5 (5350.5871 Å) transition and in the region of the F1 = 7.5 → F2 = 8.5 (5350.5285 Å) transition. Two photoion signals separated by about ±2 GHz from the (5350.6566 Å) resonance are due to weak side longitudinal modes in the spectrum of the DL2 laser. A similar three-peak picture of photoionization was observed when the DL1 laser was tuned to resonance with the F0 = 5.5 → F1 = 4.5 (5404.1915 Å) transition and the wavelength of the DL2 laser was scanned around the F1 = 4.5 → F2 = 5.5 (5350.5760 Å) transition. Since the F1 = 9.5 → F2 = 8.5 transition was saturated, the ratio of the signals from side modes to the resonance peak was significantly larger than the fraction of the intensity contained in side longitudinal modes (~10–3). Thus, the sensitivity of the study to possible additional photoionization resonances was 10–3.

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Photoion signal of 176Lu in the 8.5 → 9.5 → 8.5 → continuum channel at the scanning of the wavelength of the DL2 laser near the F1 = 9.5 → F2 = 8.5 (5350.6566 Å) resonance.

Another significant difference of our experimental results from calculations in [4] is in the degree of influence of two-photon transitions on photoionization compared to the effect of one-photon transitions. Figure 3 presents results of the scanning of the wavelength of the DL2 laser around the F1 = 4.5 → F2 = 5.5 (5350.5760 Å) resonance at different detunings of the DL1 laser from the F0 = 5.5 → F1 = 4.5 (5404.1915 Å) resonance. It is seen that the spectra include not only the resonance peak but also an additional signal at the frequency spacing from the resonance that increases with the detuning of the wavelength of the DL1 laser from the F0 = 5.5 → F1 = 4.5 resonance so that the sum of the energies of the photons from the DL1 and DL2 lasers does not change and is equal to the energy of the second excited state. Consequently, this peak corresponds to the two-photon transition from the ground state to the second excited state. According to the experimental results, the probability of two-photon transitions in the case of nonzero detuning is noticeably higher than the probability of several-step one-photon transitions. Similar results were obtained in [9], where the selective photoionization of calcium was studied. Two-photon transitions were presented in the form of diagonal ridges on two-dimensional maps calculated in [4], but their amplitudes were much lower than the amplitudes of one-photon transitions. It is noteworthy that calculations in [4] were performed for the laser radiation in the first and second steps with an intensity of 10 W/cm2, whereas the intensity of the DL1 laser in our experiment was higher, 135 W/cm2, which corresponds more to the working intensity of practical selective photoionization. A higher intensity of the laser radiation in the first step can change the relation between probabilities of resonance and two-photon transitions so that the probability of the latter transitions increases.

Fig. 3.
figure 3

Photoion signal of 176Lu at the scanning of the wavelength of the DL2 laser near the F1 = 4.5 → F2 = 5.5 (5350.5760 Å) resonance and at different detunings of the wavelength of the DL1 laser from the F0 = 5.5 → F1 = 4.5 (5404.1915 Å) resonance. The radiation from the DL3 laser is in resonance with the F2 = 5.5 → F3 = 6.5 (6180.0215 Å) transition. The intensities of the laser radiation in the first, second, and third steps are 135, 10, and 140 W/cm2, respectively.

Figure 4 presents the dependences of the photoion signal on the detuning of the laser radiation in the first step at the frequency of the DL2 laser in resonance with the F1 = 4.5 → F2 =5.5 transition and on the simultaneous frequency detuning of the radiation from the DL1 and DL2 lasers so that the sum of the energies of two photons does not change. These dependences clearly characterize the relation between the effects of two-photon and step processes on photoionization and are of particular significance for the selective photoionization of lutetium. The hyperfine structures of the levels of the 176Lu and 175Lu isotopes are such that the frequencies of almost all lines of 176Lu are higher in the first step and lower in the second step than the frequencies of the nearest lines of 175Lu. In particular, if the difference between the frequencies of the first F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 9.5 transition in the 176Lu isotope and the nearest F0 = 5 → F1 = 6 transition in the 175Lu isotope is 2.8 GHz, the difference between the frequencies of the F1 = 9.5 → F2 = 8.5 transition in the 176Lu isotope in the second step and the nearest F1 = 6 → F2 = 5 transition in the 175Lu isotope is –1.1 GHz. Thus, the difference between the sums of frequencies of the first and second transitions decreases to 1.7 GHz, increasing the probability of the two-photon excitation of the isotope. This effect is particularly pronounced in the photoionization of the 177Lu and 177mLu radionuclides, where the suppression of two-photon processes by means of the delay of the second- and third-step laser pulses with respect to the first-step pulses significantly increases the selectivity [1].

Fig. 4.
figure 4

Photoion signal of 176Lu versus (circles) the frequency detuning of the DL1 laser from the F0 = 5.5 → F1 = 4.5 (5404.1915 Å) resonance at the frequency of the DL2 laser in resonance with the F1 = 4.5 → F2 = 5.5 (5350.5760 Å) transition and (triangles) the simultaneous detuning of the radiation from the DL1 laser and the DL2 laser from resonances with the conservation of the sum of the energies of two photons, as well as (solid line) the Lorentz contour with the FWHM ΔνL = 30 MHz. The intensities of the laser radiation in the first, second, and third steps are 135, 10, and 140 W/cm2, respectively; the frequency of the DL3 laser is in resonance with the F2 = 5.5 → F3 = 6.5 (6180.0215 Å) transition.

Figure 4 shows the dependence of the photoion signal at the detuning of the wavelength of the DL1 laser from the resonance. It is seen that the experimental data at a detuning larger than 500 MHz correspond well to the Lorentz contour with a FWHM of 30 MHz. Thus, the joint effect of the natural broadening of the atomic line, contour of the laser line, and oscillations of the populations with the Rabi frequency far from the resonance on the efficiency of photoionization is described by a homogeneous contour with a width of 30 MHz. In this case, the tuning of the DL1 laser to resonance with the F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 9.5 transition in the 176Lu isotope results in the excitation weaker by a factor of 104 of the undesired 175Lu isotope on the F0 = 5 → F1 = 6 transition, which is separated by 2.8 GHz from the F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 9.5 transition in the 176Lu isotope, which ensures the selectivity of photoexcitation in the first step of 104. Taking into account that the excited states with F1 = 7.5 and 8.5 are separated from the F0 = 8.5 → F1 = 9.5 resonance by 5 and 7 GHz, respectively, the photoionization of the 176Lu isotope at the tuning of the DL2 laser to the second F1 = 7.5 → F2 = 8.5 and F1 = 8.5 → F2 = 8.5 transitions is 5.6 × 10–5 and 1.8 × 10–5, respectively, of the photoionization through the 8.5 → 9.5 → 8.5 continuum channel and is beyond an experiment sensitivity of 10–3.

The contour of the spectrum of the dye lasers measured by the confocal scanning interferometer is the result of averaging over 104–105 pulses. It is obvious that a change in the length of the cavity of a dye laser (mechanical vibrations, fluctuations of the flux density and the temperature of the dye solution, etc.) broadens the contour, and the spectral width in each single generation pulse is smaller. Figure 5 shows the spectral contour of the radiation from the dye laser, which is approximated by the Voigt function with an inhomogeneous width of 120 MHz and a homogeneous width of 25 MHz. The contour of the laser line far from the resonance is determined by the homogeneous width 25 MHz, which is in agreement with the photoionization spectrum in the first step (Fig. 4).

Fig. 5.
figure 5

(Circles) Experimental points of the contour of the spectrum of the dye laser and (solid line) the Voigt contour with a FWHM of 145 MHz, which is the sum of the homogeneous (25 MHz) and inhomogeneous (120 MHz) widths.

Significant differences between our experimental results and calculations in [4] can possibly be explained as follows. The Rabi frequency Ω characterizing oscillations of the populations of the levels involved in photoionization is given by the formula

$$\Omega = 2\sqrt {\frac{{3g\gamma {{\lambda }^{3}}}}{{8\pi hc}}} \sqrt {(2F + 1)(2F'\, + 1)} \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} J&1&{J{\kern 1pt} '} \\ {F{\kern 1pt} '}&I&F \end{array}} \right\}\sqrt I ,$$
(1)

where g is the statistical weight of the upper level; γ is the transition strength; λ is the wavelength of the transition; h is the Planck constant; c is the speed of light; J and F (J' and F') are the quantum numbers of the lower (upper) state; I is the intensity of the laser radiation, and

$$\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} J&1&{J{\kern 1pt} '} \\ {F{\kern 1pt} '}&I&F \end{array}} \right\}$$

is the Wigner 6j symbol. The corresponding formula in [4] is proportional to the factor 3gγλ3/(8πhc) rather than to its square root as Eq. (1). This factor overestimates the Rabi frequency by several orders of magnitude and can be responsible for errors in calculations.

4 CONCLUSIONS

The photoionization spectra in the first and second steps of the three-step scheme of lutetium photoionization to continuum at the detuning of the wavelength of the dye laser in the third step from the autoionization resonance have been studied experimentally. The measurement of the second-step photoionization spectrum of natural lutetium isotopes at the tuning of the first-step laser to resonance with the first transition in the case of photoionization to continuum has shown the absence (within an accuracy of 10–3) of additional photoionization peaks predicted in [4]. The second-step spectra recorded at different detunings of the first-step dye laser from the resonance have indicated that two-photon processes noticeably prevail over several-step resonant processes and can significantly affect the selectivity of photoionization.

The study of the photoionization spectrum in the first step has shown that the spectral wing in the case of the detuning of the dye laser from the resonance by more than 500 MHz corresponds to a homogeneous Lorentz contour with a width of 30 MHz, which is in good agreement with the contour of the line of the dye laser. The intensities of photoionization peaks predicted in [4] have been estimated at (2–6) × 10–5 of the amplitude of the main peak.