Abstract
A new approach to the multidimensional assessment of research organizations is introduced. Based on the use of quantitative data, various types of research and development results are considered in the approach.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, Annual Report 2014: The Creative Power of Light, Munchen: Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft, 2015.
CNRS. Rapport d’activite du CNRS 2014, Paris: Center National de la Recherche Scientifique, 2015.
Murata, N., Evaluation System for National University Corporations in Japan: Its Research Aspect, Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 2009.
Abramo, G. and D’Angelo, C.A., The VQR, Italy’s second national research assessment: Methodological failures and ranking distortions, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 2015, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 2202–2214.
Ancaiani, A., Anfossi, A.F., Barbara, A., Benedetto, S., Blasi, B., Carlett, V., and Costantini, M., Evaluating scientific research in Italy: The 2004–10 research evaluation exercise, Res. Eval., 2015, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 242–255.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © G.N. Kuzmin, K.S. Fursov, 2017, published in Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2: Informatsionnye Protsessy i Sistemy, 2017, No. 11, pp. 10–15.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuzmin, G.N., Fursov, K.S. Scientometric Methods for Identifying Scientific Leaders: New Mathematical Models. Autom. Doc. Math. Linguist. 51, 244–249 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510551706005X
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S000510551706005X