Abstract
Natural rubber latex (NRL) and rubber accelerators are well-known causes of occupational skin diseases. The latest epidemiological data on rubber allergy show that rubber additives are still among the allergens most strongly associated with occupational contact dermatitis, however, a decrease in NRL allergy has been confirmed. A review of recent publications on rubber allergens based on the Pubmed database is presented. New glove manufacturing processes have been developed, such as low-protein natural rubber gloves, vulcanisation accelerator-free gloves, or specific-purpose gloves containing antimicrobial agents or moisturisers. Several websites provide information on allergens found in gloves and/or glove choice according to occupation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Berthelot K, Lecomte S, Estevez Y, Peruch F. Hevea brasiliensis REF (Hev b 1) and SRPP (Hev b 3): an overview on rubber particle proteins. Biochimie 2014; 106: 1–9.
Carøe TK, Ebbehøj N, Agner T. A survey of exposures related to recognized occupational contact dermatitis in Denmark in 2010. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70: 56–62.
Clemmensen KBC, Carøe TK, Thomsen SF, et al. Two-year follow-up survey of patients with allergic contact dermatitis from an occupational cohort. Is the prognosis dependent on the omnipresence of the allergen? Br J Dermatol 2014; 170: 1100–5.
Pesonen M, Jolanki R, Larese Filon F, et al. Patch test results of the European baseline series among patients with occupational contact dermatitis across Europe–analyses of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network, 2002-2010. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 72: 154–63.
Geier J, Lessmann H, Uter W, Schnuch A, & Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Occupational rubber glove allergy: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 1995-2001. Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 39–44.
Hansson C, Pontén A, Svedman C, Bergendorff O. Reaction profile in patch testing with allergens formed during vulcanization of rubber. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70: 300–8.
Pontén A, Hamnerius N, Bruze M, et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by sterile non-latex protective gloves: clinical investigation and chemical analyses. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 68: 103–10.
Geier J, Lessmann H, Mahler V, et al. Occupational contact allergy caused by rubber gloves–nothing has changed. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 67: 149–56.
Bhargava K, White IR, White JML. Thiuram patch test positivity 1980-2006: incidence is now falling. Contact Dermatitis 2009; 60: 222–3.
Uter W, Hegewald J, Pfahlberg A, et al. Contact allergy to thiurams: multifactorial analysis of clinical surveillance data collected by the IVDK network. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2010; 83: 675–81.
Knudsen B, Lerbaek A, Johansen JD, Menné T. Reduction in the frequency of sensitization to thiurams. A result of legislation? Contact Dermatitis 2006; 54: 170–1.
Warburton KL, Urwin R, Carder M, et al. UK rates of occupational skin disease attributed to rubber accelerators, 1996-2012. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 72: 305–11.
Cao LY, Taylor JS, Sood A, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis to synthetic rubber gloves: changing trends in patch test reactions to accelerators. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146: 1001–7.
Palosuo T, Antoniadou I, Gottrup F, Phillips P. Latex medical gloves: time for a reappraisal. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011; 156: 234–46.
Blaabjerg MSB, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C, Mortz CG. Decrease in the rate of sensitization and clinical allergy to natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73: 21–8.
Stocks SJ, McNamee R, Turner S, et al. Assessing the impact of national level interventions on workplace respiratory disease in the UK: part 1–changes in workplace exposure legislation and market forces. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70: 476–82.
Creytens K, Swevers A, De Haes P, Goossens A. Airborne allergic contact dermatitis caused by disulfiram. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 72: 405–7.
Pföhler C, Körner R, Müller CSL, Vogt T. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis of the ears caused by thiurams in a headset. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 65: 242–3.
Landeck L, Uter W, John SM. Patch test characteristics of patients referred for suspected contact allergy of the feet–retrospective 10-year cross-sectional study of the IVDK data. Contact Dermatitis 2012; 66: 271–8.
Baeck M, Cawet B, Tennstedt D, Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by latex (natural rubber)-free gloves in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 68: 54–5.
Dahlin J, Bergendorff O, Vindenes HK, et al. Triphenylguanidine, a new (old?) rubber accelerator detected in surgical gloves that may cause allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 71: 242–6.
Hamnerius N, Pontén A, Persson C, Bergendorff O. Factors influencing the skin exposure to diphenylguanidine in surgical gloves. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70: 59–60.
Ramzy AG, Hagvall L, Pei MN, et al. Investigation of diethylthiourea and ethyl isothiocyanate as potent skin allergens in chloroprene rubber. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 72: 139–46.
Samuelsson K, Bergström MA, Jonsson CA, et al. Diphenylthiourea, a common rubber chemical, is bioactivated to potent skin sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 2011; 24: 35–44.
Poreaux C, Penven E, Langlois E. Occupational contact dermatitis at the zoo. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70: 51.
Ghys K, Goossens A. Diethylthiourea, also a contact allergen in a young sporty child. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70: 91.
Liippo J, Ackermann L, Lammintausta K. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by diethylthiourea in a neoprene handle of a cleaning trolley. Contact Dermatitis 2011; 64: 359–60.
Reckling C, Sheraz A, Engfeldt M, Bruze M. Occupational nitrile glove allergy to pigment blue 15. Br J Dermatol 2014; 171: 132.
Vanden Broecke K, Zimerson E, Bruze M, Goossens A. Severe allergic contact dermatitis caused by a rubber glove coated with a moisturizer. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 71: 117–9.
Ohata C, Yoneda M. Allergic contact dermatitis due to dazomet absorbed by agricultural rubber boots. Acta Derm Venereol 2013; 93: 81–2.
Ebo DG, Hagendorens MM, De Knop KJ, et al. Componentresolved diagnosis from latex allergy by microarray. Clin Exp Allergy 2010; 40: 348–58.
Canonica GW, Ansotegui IJ, Pawankar R, et al. A WAO–ARIA–GA2LEN consensus document on molecular-based allergy diagnostics. World Allergy Organ J 2013; 6: 17.
Luengo O, Cardona V. Component resolved diagnosis: when should it be used? Clin Transl Allergy 2014; 4: 28.
Werfel T, Asero R, Ballmer-Weber BK, et al. Position paper of the EAACI: food allergy due to immunological cross-reactions with common inhalant allergens. Allergy 2015; 70: 1079–90.
Quercia O, Stefanini GF, Scardovi A, Asero R. Patients monosensitised to Hey b 8 (Hevea brasiliensis latex profilin) may safely undergo major surgery in a normal (non-latex safe) environment. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 41: 112.
Gabriel MF, Tavares-Ratado P, Peixinho CM, et al. Evaluation and comparison of commercially available latex extracts for skin prick tests. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2013; 23: 478–86.
Ansell white paper on gloves NRL allergen contents. Available at: http://www.anselleurope.com/medical/downloads/NRL_allergen_white_paper.pdf [cited 19th June 2015].
Cleenewerck M-B. Update on medical and surgical gloves. Eur J Dermatol 2010; 20: 434–42.
Assadian O, Kramer A, Ouriel K, et al. Suppression of surgeons’ bacterial hand flora during surgical procedures with a new antimicrobial surgical glove. Surg Infect 2013; 15: 43–9.
WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. Available at: http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/tools/9789241597906/en/ [cited 1st June 2015].
Mischke C, Verbeek JH, Saarto A, et al. Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 3: CD009573.
Palu S. Allergie au latex d’Hévéa, développement de la production d’un latex naturel non allergique à partir du guayule (Parthenium argentatum Gray) en remplacement du latex d’Hevea brasiliensis (projet européen EU-PEARLS). In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie. Montpellier: John Libbey Eurotext, 2011, p. 71–88.
Cornish K. Assessment of the risk of type I latex allergy sensitization or reaction during use of products made from latex derived from guayule and other alternative rubber producing species. Rubber Sci 2012; 25: 139–55.
Siler DJ, Cornish K, Hamilton RG, et al. Absence of cross-reactivity of IgE antibodies from subjects allergic to Hevea brasiliensis latex with a new source of natural rubber latex from guayule (Parthenium argentatum). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996; 98: 895–902.
Stumpf DK, Ray DT, Schloman WW. Identification of a contact allergen in guayule latex and formulated guayule latex products. J Am Oil Chem Soc 2001; 78: 217–8.
Rodriguez E, Reynolds GW, Thompson JA. Potent contact allergen in the rubber plant guayule (Parthenium argentatum). Science 1981; 211: 1444–5.
Nouveau guide sur les normes européennes en matière de protection des mains. Available at: http://www.anselleurope.com/industrial/pdf/en_guide/ENFR.pdf [cited 16th June 2015].