Abstract
Recently, bionic signals have been used to achieve covert underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) with high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) over transmission systems. A high SNR allows the attackers to proceed with their mischievous goals and makes transmission systems vulnerable against malicious attacks. In this paper we propose an improved Merkle hash tree based secure scheme that can resist current underwater attacks, i.e., replay attack, fabricated message attack, message-altering attack, and analyst attack. Security analysis is performed to prove that the proposed scheme can resist these types of attacks. Performance evaluations show that the proposed scheme can meet UWAC limitations due to its efficiency regarding energy consumption, communication overhead, and computation cost.
摘要
近来,在传输系统中仿生信号已用于实现具有高信噪比的隐蔽水声通信。高信噪比使得攻击者能实行恶意计划,导致传输系统易受恶意攻击。提出一种基于改进Merkle哈希树的安全方案,能够抵御当前水下攻击,具体包含重放攻击、伪造消息攻击、消息篡改攻击和分析攻击。进行安全性分析,证明所提方案能够抵抗这些类型的攻击。性能评估表明,该方案在能量消耗、通信开销和计算开销方面的效率可满足水声通信的限制要求。
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahmed M, Salleh M, Channa MI, 2017. Routing protocols based on node mobility for underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN): a survey. J Netw Comput Appl, 78:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjnca.2016.10.022
Dai W, 2019. Crypto++ 5.6.2 Benchmark13. http://www.cryptopp.com/
Diffie W, Hellman M, 1976. New directions in cryptography. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 22(6):644–654. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1976.1055638
Falahati A, Woodward B, Bateman SC, 1991. Underwater acoustic channel models for 4800 b/s QPSK signals. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 16(1):12–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/48.64881
Ferguson N, Schroeppel R, Whiting D, 2001. A simple algebraic representation of Rijndael. Proc 8th Annual Int Workshop on Selected Areas in Cryptography, p.103–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45537-X_8
Han GJ, Jiang JF, Sun N, et al., 2015. Secure communication for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag, 53(8):54–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7180508
Han X, Yin JW, Du PY, et al., 2014. Experimental demonstration of underwater acoustic communication using bionic signals. J Appl Acoust, 78:7–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.10.009
Huang Y, Zhou SL, Shi ZJ, et al., 2016. Channel frequency response-based secret key generation in underwater acoustic systems. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 15(9): 5875–5888. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2016.2572106
Jia YC, Liu GJ, Zhang LH, 2015. Bionic camouflage underwater acoustic communication based on sea lion sounds. Int Conf on Control, Automation and Information Sciences, p.1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAIS.2015.7338688
Jiang SM, 2019. On securing underwater acoustic networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor, 21(1):729–752. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2864127
Li H, He YH, Cheng XZ, et al., 2015. Security and privacy in localization for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag, 53(11):56–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7321972
Liu SZ, Qiao G, Yu Y, et al., 2013a. Biologically inspired covert underwater acoustic communication using high frequency dolphin clicks. IEEE Conf on Oceans, p.1–5. https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2013.6741138
Liu SZ, Qiao G, Ismail A, 2013b. Covert underwater acoustic communication using dolphin sounds. J Acoust Soc Am, 133(4):EL300–EL306. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4795219
Liu SZ, Ma TL, Gang Q, et al., 2016. Bionic communication by dolphin whistle with continuous-phase based on MSK modulation. Proc IEEE Int Conf on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing, p.1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSPCC.2016.7753725
Luo Y, Pu L, Peng Z, et al., 2016. RSS-based secret key generation in underwater acoustic networks: advantages, challenges, and performance improvements. IEEE Commun Mag, 54(2):32–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.7402258
Merkle RC, 1980. Protocols for public key cryptosystems. IEEE Symp on Security and Privacy, p.122–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.1980.10006
Mobasseri BG, Lynch RS, 2016. Information embedding in sonar by modifications of time-frequency properties. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 41(1):139–154. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2015.2390734
Mosavi MR, Kaveh M, 2018. Covert and secure underwater acoustic communication using Merkle hash tree and dolphin whistle. J Electron Cyber Def, 6(2):135–146.
Mosavi MR, Kaveh M, Khishe M, et al., 2016. Design and implementation a sonar data set classifier by using MLP NN trained by improved biogeography-based optimization. Proc 2nd National Conf on Marine Technology, p.1–6.
Mosavi MR, Kaveh M, Khishe M, et al., 2018. Design and implementation a sonar data set classifier using multi-layer perceptron neural network trained by elephant herding optimization. Iran J Mar Technol, 5(1):1–12.
Rivest RL, Shamir A, Adleman L, 1978. A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Commun ACM, 21(2):120–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/359340.359342
van Walree PA, Otnes R, 2013. Ultrawideband underwater acoustic communication channels. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 38(4):678–688. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2013.2253391
Yang TC, Yang WB, 2008. Performance analysis of direct-sequence spread-spectrum underwater acoustic communications with low signal-to-noise-ratio input signals. J Acoust Soc Am, 123(2):842–855. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2828053
Zielinski A, Yoon YH, Wu LX, 1995. Performance analysis of digital acoustic communication in a shallow water channel. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 20(4):293–299. https://doi.org/10.1109/48.468243
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Masoud KAVEH and Abolfazl FALAHATI designed the research. Masoud KAVEH did the simulations and processed the data. Masoud KAVEH and Abolfazl FALAHATI verified the protocol, drafted the manuscript, and revised and finalized the paper.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Compliance with ethics guidelines
Masoud KAVEH and Abolfazl FALAHATI declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaveh, M., Falahati, A. An improved Merkle hash tree based secure scheme for bionic underwater acoustic communication. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng 22, 1010–1019 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2000043
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2000043