Abstract
The management of natural and seminatural systems often leads to disturbance associated with the appearance of non-native species. The spread of these species is increasing due to global environmental changes combined with local management interventions. These non-native species may establish self-sustaining populations influencing ecosystem functions, including the habitat use of native species. Here we explore the response of diplopods, spider and ant assemblages and the activity-density of individual species to the establishment of the non-native plant species, Asclepias syriaca in a disturbed poplar forest in Hungary. The relationship between the species richness of spiders and ants and the structural features of A. syriaca was weak. We found a significant relationship between the structural features of A. syriaca stands and the density and activity of the diplopod Megaphyllum unilineatum. We explain this relationship by the modified microclimate and litter quality of the habitats invaded by A. syriaca. The species composition of ant and spider assemblages was sensitive to A. syriaca. Asclepias syriaca had a negative local effect on the abundance of two spider species which were common in the studied forest. However, A. syriaca positively influenced the abundance of two ant species, most probably via indirect trophic relationships, as they feed on aphids living on A. syriaca. Our study shows that invasive plants can have mixed effects on local invertebrate assemblages. It is therefore crucial to understand how native assemblages respond to these changes in order to better manage these novel ecosystems and maximize their biodiversity benefits.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abdala-Roberts L., Agrawal A.A. & Mooney K.A. 2012. Ant — aphid interactions on Asclepias syriaca are mediated by plant genotype and caterpillar damage. Oikos 121 (11): 1905–1913. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20600.x
Alvarado M. 2000. Habitat correlates of ant assemblages in different forests of the South Pannonian Plain. Tiscia 32: 35–42.
Andersen A.N. 1991a. Sampling communities of ground-foraging ants: Pitfall catches compared with quadrat counts in an Australian tropical savanna. Aust. J. Ecol. 16 (3): 273–279. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1442-9993.1991.tb01054.x
Andersen M. 1991b. An ant-aphid interaction: Formica fusca, and Aphthargelia symphoricarpi on Mount St. Helens. Am. Midl. Nat. 125 (1): 29–36.
Arnan X., Gracia M., Comas L. & Retana J. 2009. Forest management conditioning ground ant community structure and composition in temperate conifer forests in the Pyrenees Mountains. Forest Ecol. Manag. 258 (2): 51–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.029
Bagi I. 2008. Common milkweed Asclepias syriaca L., pp. 151–159. In: Botta-Dukat Z. & Balogh L. (eds), The Most Important Invasive Plants in Hungary, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Vácrátót, 255 pp. ISBN: 9638391421, 9789638391421
Balogh L., Dancza I. & Király G. 2007. Preliminary report on the grid-based mapping of invasive plants in Hungary. In: Rabitsch W., Essl F. & Klingenstein F. (eds), Biological Invasions — from Ecology to Conservation. Neobiota 7: 105–114.
Borgelt A. & New T.R. 2006. Pitfall trapping for ants (Hy-menoptera, Formicidae) in mesic Australia: what is the best trapping period? J. Insect Conserv. 10 (1): 75–77. DOI: 10.1007/sl0841-005-7549-0
Branquart E., Kime R.D., Dufrene M., Tavernier J. & Wauhty G. 1995. Macroarthropod — habitat relationships in oak forest in South Belgium. Pedobiologia 39 (3): 243–263.
Buchar J. & Ruzicka V. 2002. Catalogue of Spiders of the Czech Republic. Peres Publishers, Praha, Czech Republic, 352 pp. ISBN: 80-86-360-25-3
Bultman T.L. & DeWitt D.J. 2008. Effect of an invasive ground-cover plant on the abundance and diversity of a forest floor spider assemblage. Biol. Invas. 10 (5): 749–756. DOI: 10.1007/sl0530-007-9168-z
Cerda X., Arnan X. & Retana J. 2013. Is competition a significant hallmark of ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) ecology. Myrmecol. News 18: 131–147.
Chien S.A. & Morse D.H. 1998. The role of prey and flower quality in the choice of hunting sites by adult male crab spiders Misumena vatia Araneae, Thomisidae. J. Arachnol. 26: 238–243.
Csontos P., Bózsing E., Cseresnyés I. & Penksza K.2009. Reproductive potential of the alien species Asclepias syriaca Asclepiadaceae in the rural landscape. Pol. J. Ecol. 57 (2): 383–388.
Crawley M.J. 2007. Mixed-Effects Models, pp. 627–685. In: The R Book, Wiley, New York, 1076 pp. ISBN: 978-0-470-97392-9
David J.F. & Handal. T. 2010. The ecology of saprophagous macroarthropods millipedes, woodlice in the context of global change. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 85 (4): 881–895. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00138.x.
Entling W., Schmidt M.H., Bacher S., Brandland R. & Nen-twig W. 2007. Niche properties of Central European spiders: shading, moisture and the evolution of the habitat niche. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 16 (4): 440–448. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1466-8238.2006.00305.x
Ernst C.M. & Cappuccino N. 2005. The effect of an invasive alien vine, Vincetoxicum, rossicum, Asclepiadaceae, on arthropod populations in Ontario old fields. Biol. Invas. 7 (3): 417–425. DOI: 10.1007/sl0530-004-4062-4
Foelix R. 2010. Biology of Spiders. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, USA, 432 pp. ISBN-13: 978-0199734825, ISBN-10: 0199734828
Gallé L. 1978. Data on the ecological energetics of Formica pratensis Retz. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the psammophile ecosystems of the Southern Hungarian Plain. Acta Biol. Szeged. 24 (1/4): 97–104.
Gallé L., Körmöczi L., Hornung E. & Kerekes J. 1998. Structure of ant assemblages in a middle-European successional sanddune area. Tiscia 31: 19–28.
Gallé R. & Torma A. 2009. Epigeic spider (Araneae) assemblages of natural forest edges in the Kiskunság Hungary. Commun. Ecol. 10 (2): 146–151. DOI: 10.1556/ComEc. 10.2009.2.2
Gallé R., Torma A. & Körmöczi L. 2010. Small-scale effect of habitat heterogeneity on invertebrate assemblages in Hungarian sandy grasslands. Pol. J. Ecol. 58 (2): 333–346.
Gerlach A., Russell D.J., Römbke J. & Brüggemann W. 2012. Consumption of introduced oak litter by native decomposers Glomeridae, Diplopoda. Soil Biol. Biochem. 44 (1): 26–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.006
Gibb H.2011. Experimental evidence for mediation of competition by habitat succession. Ecology 92 (10): 1871–1878. DOI: http://dx.doi.Org/10.1890/10-2363.1
Gibson C.W.D., Hambler C. & Brown V.K. 1992. Changes in spider (Araneae) assemblages in relation to succession and grazing management. J. Appl. Ecol. 29 (1): 132–142.
Gordon D.R. 1998. Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecol. Appl. 8 (4): 975–989. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0975:EOINIP]2.0.CO;2
Gratton C. & Denno R.F. 2005. Restoration of arthropod assemblages in a Spartina salt marsh following removal of the invasive plant Phragmites australis. Restor. Ecol. 13 (2): 358–372. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1526- 100X.2005.00045.x
Haacker U. 1968. Deskriptive, experimentelle und vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Autökologie rhein-mainischer Diplopoden. Oecologia 1 (1–2): 87–129. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377255
Hejda M., Pysek P., Pergl J., Sadlo J., Chytry M. & Jarosik V. 2009. Invasion success of alien plants: do habitat affinities in the native distribution range matter? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18 (3): 372–382. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00445.x
Herrera A.M. & Dudley T.L. 2003. Reduction of riparian arthropod abundance and diversity as a consequence of giant reed Arundo donax invasion. Biol. Invas. 5 (3): 167–177. DOI: 10.1023/A: 1026190115521
Hobbs R.J., Arico S., Aronson J., Baron J.S., Bridgewater P., Cramer V.A., Epstein P.R., Ewel J. J., Klink C.A., Lugo A.E., Norton D., Ojima D., Richardson D.M., Sanderson E.W., Val-ladares F., Vilà M., Zamora R. & Zobel M. 2006. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15 (1): 1–7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x
Hobbs R.J., Higgs E. & Harris J.A. 2009. Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24 (11): 599–605. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012
Hölldobler B. & Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 732 pp. ISBN: 0674040759, 9780674040755
Honek A. 1988. The effect of crop density and microclimate on pitfall trap catches of Carabidae, Staphylinidae (Coleoptera), and Lycosidae (Araneae) in cereal fields. Pedobiologia 32 (3–4): 233–242.
Hornung E. & Vajda Z. 1988. Age determination of Megaphyllum, unilineatum C. L. Koch 1838. Diplopoda: Julidae. Acta Biol. Szeged. 34: 173–176.
Jeanneret P., Schupbach B. & Luka H. 2003. Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98 (1–3): 311–320. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00091-4
Jimenez-Valverde A. & Lobo J.M. 2007. Determinants of local spider (Araneidae and Thomisidae) species richness on a regional scale: climate and altitude vs. habitat structure. Ecol. Entomol. 32 (1): 113–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00848.x
Korsós Z. 1991. Abundance and seasonal activity of millipedes in a dolomitic grassland community (Diplopoda), pp. 239–244. In: Merkl O. (ed.), Annales historico-naturales Musei nationalis hungarici, Tomus 83, Magyar Természettudományi Múzeum, Budapest.
Langellotto G.A. & Denno R.F. 2004. Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 139 (1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1497-3
Lawton J.H. 1983. Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28: 23–39. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.28.010183.000323
Lessard J.P., Dunn R.R. & Sanders N.J. 2009. Temperature-mediated coexistence in temperate forest ant communities. Insect. Soc. 56 (2): 149–56. DOI: 10.1007/s00040-009-0006-4
Loksa I. 1966. Die bodenzoozönologischen Verhältnisse der Flaumeichen-Buschwälder Südostmitteleuropas. Monographic der Flaumeichen-Buschwälder II. Verlag der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Budapest, 437 pp.
Malumbres-Olarte J., Vink C.J., Ross J.G., Cruickshank R.H. & Paterson A.M. 2012. The role of habitat complexity on spider communities in native alpine grasslands of New Zealand. Insect Conserv. Divers. 6 (2): 124–134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00195.x
Martius C, Höfer H., Garcia M.V.B., Römbke J., Forster B. & Hanagarth W. 2004. Microclimate in agroforestry systems in central Amazonia: does canopy closure matter to soil organisms? Agroforest. Syst. 60 (3): 291–304. DOI: 10.1023/B:AGFO.0000024419.20709.6c
Melbourne B.A. 1999. Bias in the effect of habitat structure on pitfall traps: an experimental evaluation. Aust. J. Ecol. 24 (3): 228–239. DOI: 10.1046/j. 1442-9993.1999.00967.x
Molnár N., Harkai A. & Setényi R. 2010. Spatial patterns of Aphis gossypii Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae populations feeding on milkweed Asclepias syriaca. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 45 (1): 71–80. DOI: 10.1556/APhyt.45.2010.1.4
O’Hara R.B. & Kotze D.J. 2010. Do not log-transform count data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1 (2): 118–122. DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00021.X
Öberg S., Ekbom B. & Bommarco R. 2007. Influence of habitat type and surrounding landscape on spider diversity in Swedish agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 122 (2): 211–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.034
Oksanen J., Blanchet G.F., Kindt R., Legendre P., O’Hara B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Stevens M.H.M. & Wagner H. 2011. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.17-11. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=veganpackage=vegan, (accessed 26.08. 2013.)
Paillet Y., Bergès L., Hjältén J., Ódor P., Avon C, Bernhardt-Römermann M., Bijlsma R.J., De Bruyn L., Fuhr M., Grandin U., Kanka R., Lundin L., Luque S., Magura T., Matesanz S., Mészáros I., Sebastiàn M.T., Schmidt W., Standovár T., Tóthmérész B., Uotila A., Valladares F., Vellak K. & Virtanen R. 2010. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: Meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv. Biol. 24 (1): 101–112. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x.
Pearson D.A. 2009. Invasive plant architecture alters trophic interactions by changing predator abundance and behaviour. Oecologia 159 (3): 549–558. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1241-5
Petillon J., Georges A., Canarda A., Lefeuvrec J.C., Bakkerd J.P. & Ysnel F. 2008. Influence of abiotic factors on spider and ground beetle communities in different saltmarsh systems. Basic Appl. Ecol. 9 (6): 743–751. DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2007.08.007
Pétillon J., Ysnel F., Canard A. & Lefeuvre J.C. 2005. Impact of an invasive plant Elymusathericuson the conservation value of tidal salt marshes in western France and implications for management: Responses of spider populations. Biol. Conserv. 126 (1): 103–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.003
R Development Core Team 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
Renault C.K., Buffa L.M. & Delfino M.A. 2005. An aphid-ant interaction: effects on different trophic levels. Ecol. Res. 20 (1): 71–74. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-004-0015-8
Ricciardi A., Hoopes M.F., Marchetti M.P. & Lockwood J.L. 2013. Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species. Ecol. Monogr. 83 (3): 263–282. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-0183.1
Rypstra A.L., Carter P.E., Balfour R.A. & Marshall S.D. 1999. Architectural features of agricultural habitats and their impact on the spider inhabitants. J. Arachnol. 27: 371–377.
Samways M.J., Caldwell P.M. & Osborn R. 1996. Groundliving invertebrate assemblages in native, planted and invasive vegetation in South Africa. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 59 (1): 19–32. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8809(96)01047-X
Savolainen R. & Vepsalainen K. 1988. A competition hierarchy among boreal ants–impact on resource partitioning and community structure. Oikos 51 (2): 135–155.
Scheidler M. 1990. Influence of habitat structure and vegetation architecture on spiders. Zool. Anz. 225 (5/6): 333–340.
Schirmel J. & Buchholz S. 2013. Invasive moss alters patterns in life-history traits and functional diversity of spiders and carabids. Biol. Invas. 15 (5): 1089–1100. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-012-0352-4
Schirmel J., Timler L. & Buchholz S. 2011. Impact of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) in acidic coastal dunes at the southern Baltic Sea. Biol. Invas. 13 (3): 605–620. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9852-2
Schlick-Steiner B.C., Steiner F.M., Moder K., Bruckner A., Fiedler K. & Christian E. 2006. Assessing ant assemblages: pitfall trapping versus nest counting (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect. Soc. 53 (3): 274–281. DOI: 10.1007/s00040-006-0869-6
Schmidt M.H., Roschewitz I., Thies C. & Tscharntke T. 2005. Differential effects of landscape and management on diversity and density of ground-dwelling farmland spiders. J. Appl. Ecol. 42 (2): 281–287. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01014.x
Siemann E. 1998. Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland arthropod diversity. Ecology 79 (6): 2057–2070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2057:ETOEOP]2.0.CO;2
Simberloff D. 2011. How common are invasion-induced ecosystem impacts? Biol. Invas. 13 (5): 1255–1268. DOI: 10.1007/s10 530-011-9956-3
Smith J., Chapman A. & Eggleton P. 2006. Baseline biodiversity surveys of the soil macrofauna of London’s green spaces. Urban Ecosyst. 9 (4): 337–349. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-006-0001-8
Smith R.A., Mooney K.A. & Agrawal A.A. 2008. Coexistence of three specialist aphids on common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca. Ecology 89 (8): 2187–2196. PMID: 18724729
Slobodchikoff C.N. & Doven J.T. 1977. Effects of Ammophila arenaria on sand dune arthropod communities. Ecology 58 (5): 1171–1175. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1936939
Southwood T.R.E., Brownand V.K. & Reader P.M. 1979. The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 12 (4): 327–348. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1979.tb00063.x
Standish R.J. 2004. Impact of an invasive clonal herb on epigaeic invertebrates in forest remnants in New Zealand. Biol. Conserv. 116 (1): 49–58. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00172-1
Stadler B. & Dixon A.F. 2005. Ecology and evolution of aphidant interactions. Annu Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 345–372. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175531
Stasiov S. 2009. Millipede Diplopoda communities in mixed oak–hornbeam forest stands–effect of selected site factors. Pol. J. Ecol. 57 (4): 785–792.
Stine R.A. 1995. Graphical interpretation of variance inflation factors. The American Statistician 49 (1): 53–56. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1995.10476113
Strong D.R., Lawton J.H. & Southwood R. 1984. Insects on Plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 313 pp. ISBN-10: 0674455134, ISBN-13: 978-0674455139
Styrsky J.D. & Eubanks M.D. 2007. Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274 (1607): 151–164. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3701
Toft R.J., Harris R.J. & Williams P.A. 2001. Impacts of the weed Tradescantia fluminensis on insect communities in fragmented forests in New Zealand. Biol. Conserv. 102 (1): 31–46. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00091-X
Topping C.J. & Sunderland K.D. 1992. Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat. J. Appl. Ecol. 29 (2): 485–491.
Török K., Botta-Dukat Z., Dancza I., Németh I., Kiss J., Mihaly B. & Magyar D. 2003a. Invasion gateways and corridors in the Carpathian basin: biological invasions in Hungary. Biol. Invas. 5 (4): 349–356. DOI: 10.1023/B:BINV.0000005570. 19429.73
Török K., Halassy M. & Szabó R. 2003b. Restoration strategy for endemic grasslands in a low productive region of Hungary, pp. 1132–1138. In: Allsopp N., Palmer A.R., Milton S.J., Kirkman.P., Kerley G.I.H., Hurt C.R. & Brown C.J. (eds), Proceedings of the VIIth International Rangelands Congress, 26th July–1st August 2003, Durban, South Africa, ISBN: 0-958-45348-9
Vanbergen A.J., Woodcock B.A., Watt A.D. & Niemela J. 2005. Effect of land-use heterogeneity on carabid communities at the landscape scale. Ecography 28 (1): 3–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03991.x
Vilà M., Espinar J.L., Hejda M., Hulme P.E., Jarošík V., Maron J.L., Pergl J., Schaffner U., Sun Y. & Pyšek P. 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 14 (7): 702–708. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
Vitousek P.M., D’Antonio C.M., Loope L.L., Rejmanek M. & Westbrooks R. 1997. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol. 21 (1): 1–16.
Voigtländer K. 2011. Preferences of common Central European millipedes for different biotope types Myriapoda, Diplopoda in Saxony-Anhalt Germany. Int. J. Myriapod. 6: 61–83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/ijm.6.2172
Wang C., Strazanac J. S. & Butler L. 2001. Association between ants Hymenoptera: Formicidae and habitat characteristics in oak-dominated mixed forests. Environ. Entomol. 30 (5): 842–848. DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-30.5.842
Wilkie L., Cassis G. & Gray M. 2007. The effects on terrestrial arthropod communities of invasion of a coastal heath ecosystem by the exotic weed bitou bush Chrysanthemoides monilifera ssp. rotundata L. Biol. Invas. 9 (4): 477–498. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-006-9055-z
Wise D.H. 1993. Spiders in Ecological Webs. University Press, Cambridge, 347 pp. ISBN: 0-521-32547-1
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Tibor Hartel and László Gallé for reading the early version of the manuscript and contributing with valuable comments. We also thank Tünde Csorba and Tamás Somogyi for their help in sorting the collected material. This research was supported by the European Union and the State of Hungary, co-financed by the European Social Fund in the framework of TÁMOP 4.2.4. A/2-11-1-2012-0001 ‘National Excellence Program’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallé, R., Erdélyi, N., Szpisjak, N. et al. The effect of the invasive Asclepias syriaca on the ground-dwelling arthropod fauna. Biologia 70, 104–111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0011
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0011