Abstract
Minimally invasive esophagectomy is increasing performed for cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. This video demonstrates the setup and key steps for a robotic transhiatal esophagectomy with a cervical anastomosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Video
Minimally invasive approaches to gastroesophageal resection have been gaining favor over open techniques due to decreased complication rates in randomized trials1,2,3. The three major operations typically performed are Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis; McKeown esophagectomy with three-field dissection and cervical anastomosis; and transhiatal esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. The choice between these operations often depends on surgeon preference and patient factors.
Our preferred approach for most patients is minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy due to lower morbidity and mortality rates reported from single-institution series and national data4,5,6. However, for patients with pulmonary disease or active smoking, we utilize a minimally invasive transhiatal approach due to the ability to avoid entry into the right thorax and eliminate the need for single lung ventilation. Relative contraindications to a transhiatal approach are high body mass index, large mid-esophageal tumor, or bulky mediastinal nodal disease.
In the accompanying video, we present a robotic transhiatal esophagectomy with a side-to-side stapled cervical anastomosis. The abdominal dissection and conduit creation are performed in similar fashion to other approaches. The da Vinci Xi robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is used and allows for mediastinal dissection with relative ease, although care must be taken to avoid injury to mediastinal structures in a small space. The neck dissection is performed and connected with the mediastinal dissection so that the esophagus is completely mobilized. The specimen and conduit are extracted via the neck incision and a 60 mm side-to-side stapled anastomosis is created for reconstruction.
References
Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60516-9.
van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):621–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000003031.
Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(2):152–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1805101.
Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3182590603.
Kukar M, Ben-David K, Peng JS, et al. Minimally invasive ivor lewis esophagectomy with linear stapled anastomosis associated with low leak and stricture rates. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04320-y.
Raymond DP, Seder CW, Wright CD, et al. Predictors of major morbidity or mortality after resection for esophageal cancer: a society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery database risk adjustment model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(1):207–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.055.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
June S. Peng, Moshim Kukar, and Steven N. Hochwald declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 256587 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, J.S., Kukar, M. & Hochwald, S.N. Technique for Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 3037–3038 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08186-x
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08186-x