Abstract
This paper is concerned with the main statements of V.B. Sochava’s theoretical legacy which are currently central to the advancement of modern cultural geography. Among them are the geographical science studies: metageography and geographical tectology, structural-dynamical approach to culture and landscape, and the concept of the geosystem and its invariant. The study brings out the importance of systems approach to culture and landscapes as well as the significance of the theory of geosystems, a catalyst for the emergence of new cultural-geographical knowledge. The problem of geographical tectology as stated by V.B. Sochava is implemented by adjusting the methods and knowledge of related disciplines for the particular purposes of geographical investigation. An outline is given of the specific character of methodological development of cultural geography in circumstances where the postmodernism world outlook platform is dominant as well as of the “drift” of the interests of the scientific community from the material aspect of man–environment interaction to the postmodern “dematerialization” of social geography. These processes which are progressing more intensely in Western science have influence on national geocultural research. Furthermore, the key characteristics of postmodernization, i.e. recognition of the equivalence and uniqueness of cultural-geographical phenomena, the equality of research standpoints, and refusal from the search for a “metanarrative” unfairly push to the methodological periphery the issues related to evolution, hierarchy, and interobjective connections of culture and landscape. The dominant emphasis on the nonmaterial aspects of cultural-geographical phenomena and processes does not imply that their systems side has lost value. V.B. Sochava’s theoretical developments provide a meaningful potential source for a further advancement of cultural geography. Moreover, even the international science has recently shown an enhancement in the tendency toward the “restoration of materialism” in cultural geography. This paper is built upon an integral approach to demonstrate an avenue for a harmonious combination of the “material” and “nonmaterial” sides of the discipline.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Plyusnin, V.M. and Korytny, L.M., The 55th Anniversary of the V.B. Sochava Institute of geography SB RAS, Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2012, vol. 33, issue 4, pp. 263–269.
Lyubichankovskii, A.V., The Problems of Understanding Cultural Landscapes in Modern National Science, Vestn. Orenburg. Univer., 2007, no. 10, pp. 28–34 [in Russian].
Livinskaya, O.A., The Notion of Cultural Landscape in National Geography, Pskovskii Regionol. Zhurn., 2012, no. 14, pp. 120–128 [in Russian].
Stoddart, D.R., Geography and Ecological Approach: The Ecosystems as a Geographical Principle and Method, Geography, 1965, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 242–251.
Buttimer, A., The Practice of Geography, 1983, London; New York: Longman.
Sochava, V.B., Definition of Some Notions and Terms of Physical Geography, Dokl. Instituta Geografii Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka, 1963, issue 3, pp. 50–59[in Russian].
Sochava, V.B., An Introduction to the Theory of Geosystems, Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1978 [in Russian].
Bateson, G., Form, Substance and Difference, in Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology, Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 1972.
Vernadskii, V.N., Living Matter, Moscow: Nauka, 1978 [in Russian].
Soja, E., The Postmodernization of Geography: A Review, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 1987, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 289–293.
Tress, B., Tress, G. and Fry, G., Defining Concepts and the Process of Knowledge Production in Integrative Research, Chapter 2, in From Landscape Research to Landscape Planning: Aspects of Integration, Education and Application, B. Tress, G. Fry, G. Tress, and P. Opdam (Eds.), New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 13–26.
Hamnett, C., Contemporary Human Geography: Fiddling While Rome Burns? Geoforum, 2003, vol. 34, issue 1, pp. 1–3.
Czepczyński, M., Cultural Landscapes of Post-Socialist Cities: Representation of Powers and Needs, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Group, 2008.
Claval, P., New Strategies for Managing Landscapes and Strengthening Identities as Tools for a Sustainable Development, Proc. PECSRL–The Permanent European Conference for the Study of the Rural Landscape, 23rd Session: Landscapes, Identities and Development (Lisbon and Óbidos: September 1–5, 2008), 2008.
Anderson, B. and Tolia-Kelly, D., Matter(s) in Social and Cultural Geography, Geoforum, 2004, vol. 35, issue 6, pp. 669–674.
Bogdanov, A.A., General Organizational Science (Tectology), Pt. 2, 3rd Edition, Leningrad; Moscow: Kniga, 1927 [in Russian].
Sochava, V.B., Problems in Modern Theoretical Geography, in Harvey, D., Scientific Explanation in Geography, Moscow: Progress, 1974, pp. 471–481 [in Russian].
Spektor, I.R., Logical Problems in Geographical Science, Vestn. Mosk. Univer., Seriya Geogr., 1971, no. 1, pp. 28–36 [in Russian].
Smirnov, A.M., General Geographical Notions, Voprosy Geografii, 1971, sb. 88, pp. 29–75 [in Russian].
Gokhman, V.M., Gurevich, B.L. and Saushkin, Yu.G., Problems in Metageography, Voprosy Geografii, 1968, sb. 77, pp. 3–14 [in Russian].
Nikolaenko, D.V., Problemy v Metageografii (Problems in Metageography). URL: http://2dipru (Accessed 08.09.2015) [in Russian].
Zamyatin, D.N., Metageographical Axes of Eurasia, Polis. Politicheskie Issledovaniya, 2010, no. 4, pp. 22–47 [in Russian].
Metaphysics. New Philosophical Encyclopaedia. URL: http://iphrasru/elib/1869html (Accessed 07.24.2015) [in Russian].
Wilber, K., Introduction to Integral Theory and Practice: IOS Basic and the AQAL Map, AQAL: Journal of Integral Theory and Practice, 2006, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–40.
Flier, A.Ya., Culturology for Culturologists: Handbook for Master’s Degree Students and Postgraduates as well as Teachers of Culturology, Moscow: Aklademicheskii Proekt; Yekaterinburg: Delovaya Kniga, 2002 [in Russian].
Annenkov, V.V., Geography and Culture, Izv. Akad. Nauk, Seriya Geogr., 1998, no. 4, pp. 134–136 [in Russian].
Rubel, P. and Rosman, A., The Past and the Future of Anthropology, J. Anthropol. Res., 1994, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 335–343.
Barth, F., A Personal View of Cultural Problems and Priorities of Cultural and Social Anthropology, Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie, 1995, no. 3, pp. 40–49 [in Russian].
Lurye, S.V., Psychological Anthropology: History, Present, Future: Handbook for Higher Educational Establishments, Moscow: Akademicheskii Proekt; Yekaterinburg: Delovaya Kniga, 2003 [in Russian].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © M.V. Ragulina, 2016, published in Geografiya i Prirodnye Resursy, 2016, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 5-13.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ragulina, M.V. The scientific legacy of V. B. Sochava, and future prospects of cultural geography. Geogr. Nat. Resour. 37, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372816010017
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1875372816010017