1. INTRODUCTION

Like yttrium–aluminum Y3Al5O12 (YAG) garnets, yttrium YAlO3 monoaluminates are synthesized from the Y2O3 yttrium oxide and the Al2O3 aluminum oxide taken in proportions of 1 : 3 and 1 : 1, respectively. When doped by rare-earth (RE) ions, both materials meet the requirements of quantum electronics as active laser media and have a high mechanical strength, a good thermal conductivity, a high transparency, and a good combination of spectral properties [1].

YAG single crystals are cubic and optically homogeneous. Therefore, YAG:Re (Re = rare-earth metal) was used to fabricate polycrystalline ceramics, the efficiency of which is comparable with that of single crystals and some their mechanical properties exceed those of single crystals [2]. The monoaluminates have the orthorhombic lattice with parameters a = 0.5179 nm, b = 0.5329 nm, and c = 0.77370 nm and are biaxial. The monoaluminate-based laser rods along axis b can be used for powerful amplification at a low threshold and along the c axis, for weak amplification and energy accumulation in the Q-switch mode [3].

The neodymium-doped monoaluminates [4] have good laser characteristics, which can be comparable with those of YAG:Nd. They can assimilate a higher activator concentration as compared to YAG single crystals [5]. On the other hand, aluminates suffered from a number of uncontrollable defects, which restricted their competition with YAG. Like YAG:Re, the YAlO3:Re contains fragments of Re3Al and Al3Re layers [1], and the Re–Al distance in both layers corresponds to this distance in oxides. The processes of defect formation in YAlO3:Re and YAG:Re during their synthesis from oxides are thought to be similar. The nonstoichiometry of a solid-solution composition is usually related to the possibility of substitution of yttrium and RE ions for the Al sites (in YAG, in the octahedral surrounding of oxygen) [6].

Unlike YAlO3 and YAlO3:Nd, YAlO3:Er single crystals are nontransparent at photon energy ν > 35 000 cm–1 [8], which is likely to be related to the defects of color center formation. The spectrum of additional absorption after γ irradiation of YAlO3:Er differs substantially from that of YAlO3:Nd, which is likely to be caused by a change in the defect subsystem during the Y3+ ↔ Er3+ substitution [7].

We could expect the appearance of immiscibility regions in YAlO3:Er single crystals; however, X-ray diffraction analysis did not reveal such heterogeneities. However, the NMR investigations [8] of the YAlO3:Er solid solutions synthesized by directional solidification found their tendency toward clustering with the formation of various phase microregions.

The purpose of this work is to analyze the low-temperature specific heat and the kinetic characteristics of thermal-frequency phonons in the helium-temperature range and to study the structure of the solid solutions in the YAlO3:Er aluminates synthesized by directional solidification.

2. EXPERIMENTAL

Monoaluminate Y1 –xErxAlO3 (x = 0.07, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.45) solid-solution samples were studied by the following three techniques.

The temperature dependences of specific heat c(T) were investigated on a PPMS-9 + Ever-Cool-II (Quantum Design) device in a zero magnetic field in the temperature range 1.9–220 K.

The method of analyzing the transport of nonequilibrium phonons (NPs) in the diffusion mode in single crystals was described in detail in [9]. This method is based on heating a metallic (Au) NP injector film by a short (shorter than 100 ns) current pulse to temperature Th such that ΔT = ThT0T0. The phonons are weakly nonequilibrium and the sample has the thermostat temperature. As a result, we can study the temperature dependences of NPs by changing thermostat temperature T0. NP pulses are recorded by a broadband superconducting bolometer (Sn) on the sample face that is opposite to the injector. The excess of the bolometer temperature over the equilibrium temperature is described by the solution to the nonstationary diffusion equation

$$\Delta T(t) \propto {{t}^{{ - 1/2}}}\exp \left( { - \frac{{{{L}^{2}}}}{{4D(T)t}}} \right),$$
(1)

where L is the sample length along the NP propagation. The measurements were carried out within the linear segment of the bolometer characteristic, where S ∝ ΔT. We measured the time of recording the maximum signal (tm(T)), which is uniquely related to diffusion coefficient D(T), tm = L2/2D (“plane” geometry). Under elastic (Rayleigh) scattering conditions, according to Eq. (1) we have D(T) = D0(T) = (1/3)\({{{v}}^{2}}\)τ0T–4 (\({v}\) = 5.4 × 105 cm/s is the polarization-averaged velocity of sound, τ0 is the elastic scattering time), and the trailing edge of the signal to be recorded is S(t) ∝ t–1/2. When measuring the time sct3 characteristics, we were able to avoid the necessity of bolometer calibration during comparison measurements.

Taking into account the inelastic phonon–phonon processes induced by the anharmonicity of a crystal lattice can change an NP distribution and affect the result of measuring tm. Only decay processes among the three-phonon processes can be effective at the helium temperatures [10]. In a one-dimensional case, diffusion length lph during the life of a phonon with respect to the lattice-anharmonicity-induced decay is

$${{l}_{{{\text{ph}}}}}(\omega ) = \sqrt {{{D}_{0}}(\omega ){{\tau }_{{{\text{ph}}}}}(\omega )} ,$$
(2)

where τph(ω) is the inelastic phonon–phonon scattering time with respect to spontaneous decay. As will be shown below, the typical value D0 ≈ 105 cm/s2 corresponds to the phonon lifetime with respect to elastic scattering (τ0 = 10–7–10–6 s).

The theoretical estimation of τph(ω) [11] for thermal-frequency phonons at the helium temperatures and the experimental observation at T = 3 K [12] give τph(ω) = 10–3–10–2 s. This finding allowed one to exclude the influence of lattice-anharmonicity-induced inelastic scattering in samples of length L < 1 cm. NP scattering in this case is only determined by the structural features of the material. This method can be informative for analyzing the elastic phonon scattering induced by the difference between the ion masses at substitution sites [13] and the low-energy Schottky-like excitations induced by magnetic ion–ion interaction [9]. Taking into account the inelastic processes of trapping–reemission by two-level systems (TLSs) can retard the arrival of the signal maximum and elongate its trailing edge. The phonon range (lR) and range time (τR) with respect to scattering (trapping) by TLS can be estimated from the diffusion theory equation

$${{l}_{R}} = \sqrt {{{D}_{0}}{{\tau }_{R}}} \geqslant L,$$
(3)

which is similar to Eq. (2).

Nanometer-scale images of the cleavage surfaces of samples were studied at room temperature with a P4-SPM-MTD scanning probe microscope operating in the tapping mode of atomic force microscopy (AFM). Commercial silicon rectangular SC12 cantilevers were used. Using sequential double scanning of each row and detecting a relief in the first pass and a lateral force distribution in the second pass, we were able to obtain a microtopographic image and local physicomechanical characteristics (in particular, friction forces) of the same region on the sample surface. The differences between the physicomechanical properties of different regions manifested themselves in the form of bright and dark spots in AFM images in the friction force mode. The largest scanning area was 7 × 7 μm2.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Figure 1 shows the temperature dependences of the specific heat of some Y1 –xErxAlO3 solid solutions at low temperatures. The specific heat at the helium temperatures is seen to be determined by low-energy excitations. The energy of the lowest excited level of the 4I15/2 multiplet of the Er3+ ion in YAlO3:Er is about 51 K (28 K in YAG:Er); that is, the energies in both cases are too high to explain the detected features.

Fig. 1.
figure 1

(Color online) Temperature dependences of the specific heat of the Y1 –xErxAlO3 solid solutions at various x (indicated at the curves) and (solid line) Y2.4Er0.6Al5O12.

Similar dependences were observed earlier in some single crystals of Er-containing solid solutions, namely, YAG:Er [14], TmAG:Er [15], and GGG:Er [16]. As was shown in [9], the low-energy excitations in YAG:Er are caused by the Kramers nature of the Er3+ ion, when the degeneracy of the ground level can be removed in a “zero” applied magnetic field due to the interaction of the magnetic moments of neighboring ions. As was shown in [14], the ground level splitting energy in YAG:Er in the solid solution concentration range under study is Δ = 1 K. Figure 1 shows the dependence of 20% YAG:Er (Y2.4Er0.6Al5O12). Note that the C(T) dependences of the same Er contents in both materials are close at the helium temperatures, which indicates common nature of the low-energy excitations in them.

The main mechanism of elastic scattering of thermal-frequency phonons in substitutional solid solutions is scattering by the mass “defect” of the ions at substitutional sites, Y3+ ↔ Re3+. The efficiency of this scattering mechanism can be accurately calculated in cubic solid solution single crystals and was comprehensively studied in YAG:Re in [13].

Figure 2 shows the concentration dependence of the elastic scattering in YAG:Re solid solutions at T = 3.4 K, which is normalized by the sample length squared in the direction of thermal pulse propagation (data were taken from [13]). The dashed lines at the top of Fig. 2 depict the concentration dependence with allowance for the contribution of the inelastic scattering by TLS in YAG:Er [17]. Figure 2 also shows the concentration dependences of YAlO3:Re (Re = Lu, Er) single crystals. The increase in the data obtained for YAlO3:Er at concentrations of 7% and 10% points to an increase in the elastic scattering rather than to scattering by TLS. This finding allows us to assume that the excess of tm/L2 for YAlO3:Er in Fig. 2 over the rate of increase of scattering by the mass defect can be related to an additional mechanism of scattering by structural defects, which are inherent in solid solutions. The data obtained for YAlO3:Lu are well approximated by the tm/L2 calibration curve, and the phonon scattering is only determined by the difference between the masses at substitutional sites Y ↔ Re, as in YAG:Re.

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Concentration dependence of the elastic scattering in the YAG:Re and YAlO3:Re solid solutions at T = 3.4 K normalized by the sample length squared.

Figure 3 demonstrates the difference between the experimental dependences obtained for the 7% compositions YAG:Er and YAlO3:Er. Effective trapping and reemission during the phonon–TLS interaction in YAG:Er retard and broaden the signal maximum in YAG, and only elastic scattering is present in the YAlO3:Er sample. The scattering by TLS in YAlO3:Er manifests itself only in the samples with 45% impurity.

Fig. 3.
figure 3

NP signals at various temperatures in samples (a) YAG:Er 7%, L = 0.68 cm and (b) YAlO3:Er 7%, L = 0.76 cm at various temperatures.

Figure 4 shows the trailing edges of the detected signals in the YAlO3:Er samples of all concentrations under study at T = 3.8 K in the log–log coordinates. Curves 14 are smoothed for clarity. The signal is elongated only in the samples with 45% impurity, which indicates effective NP scattering by TLS. For the other concentrations, the decay of the trailing edge has the form S(t) ∝ t–1/2, as would be expected for elastic phonon scattering in classical diffusion. This finding means that the phonon range with respect to trapping by TLS in these samples is lR > L and τR is longer than that in the YAG:Re samples of analogous concentrations [9] by several times. In other words, the phonon scattering by TLS in aluminates with 7% and 10% erbium at the helium temperatures cannot compete with more effective elastic scattering.

Fig. 4.
figure 4

Time dependences of the trailing edges of the detected signals in Y1 – xErxAlO3 samples in the log–log coordinates: (1) x = 0.45, T = 3.85 K; (2) x = 0.45, T = 3.4 K; (3) x = 0.2, T = 3.4 K; (4) x = 0.1, T = 3.4 K; and (5) x = 0.07, T = 3.4 K. The straight line corresponds to the relation St–1/2.

Figure 5 shows the temperature dependences of diffusion coefficient D(T). When the temperature (phonon energy) increases, the dependences of a number of compositions change from Rayleigh (proportional to T–4) to geometric (independent of T). The temperature dependences of this scattering can be described by the formula D = AD0 + B [18], which corresponds to nonresonance scattering by structural heterogeneities (e.g., foreign-phase inclusions). Here, the first term,

$$A = \frac{9}{2}{{\left( {\frac{x}{{1 - x}}} \right)}^{2}}$$

(where x = ρ1\({v}_{1}^{2}\)0\({v}_{0}^{2}\); ρ0 and ρ1 are the densities of the base and additional phases, respectively; \({{{v}}_{0}}\) and \({{{v}}_{1}}\) are the polarization-averaged velocities of sound in the base and additional phases, respectively) describes the Rayleigh scattering and is determined by all defects in the system, which can be considered as point defects in the long-wavelength limit. This estimate was made on the assumption of the presence of two phases, namely, YAlO3 and Y1 –xErxAlO3. The second term,

$$B = \frac{2}{3}\frac{{{{{v}}_{0}}R}}{c}$$

is determined by geometric scattering by inclusions of size R ≥ λ and volume fraction c. Estimation demonstrates that the phonon wavelength is λ ~ 30–40 nm (c ≈ 0.1) at T = 3 K (where scattering by heterogeneities is “turned on”).

Fig. 5.
figure 5

(Color online) temperature dependences of diffusion coefficient D(T) for some samples: (△) Y0.8Er0.2AlO3, (○) Y0.93Er0.07AlO3, (★) Y0.9Er0.1AlO3, (▽) Y0.85Er0.15AlO3, (◻) Y0.55Er0.45AlO3, and (×) Y0.8Lu0.2AlO3 synthesized by the Czochralski technique. (solid line) Relation DT–4 and (dashed lines) approximation by the formula D = AD0 + B.

The solid line in Fig. 5 corresponds to the relation D(T) ∝ T–4 in the Y0.8Lu0.2AlO3 sample synthesized by the Czochralski technique, and this relation only reflects the elastic diffusion scattering by the ion mass defect Y3+ ↔ Lu3+ at substitutional sites.

Therefore, the results presented above demonstrate that, in the helium temperature range in the absence of the inelastic phonon–phonon interaction induced by lattice anharmonicity in YAlO3:Er solid solution single crystals, the scattering of thermal-frequency phonons is caused by elastic scattering by ion substitutional sites and nanostructural heterogeneities in a solid solution when the average heterogeneity size is comparable with phonon wavelength λ or exceeds it. The separation into RE-ion-lean and RE-ion-rich regions at a retained homogeneous structure of a solution was observed in the YAG:Er and YAG:Ho single crystals synthesized by directional solidification [19].

AFM investigation of the cleavage surfaces of the Y1–xErxAlO3 solid solution single crystals revealed nanoregions with different physicochemical characteristics. The structure consists of alternating bands of different brightness 20–100 nm wide depending on the doping element concentration. Figure 6 shows a friction force image of Y0.8Er0.2AlO3.

Fig. 6.
figure 6

(Color online) AFM images of a cleavage of the Y0.8Er0.2AlO3 single crystal: (a) relief mode image and (b, c) friction force mode image. The scale in (c): 100 nm on axes x and y and 0.01 nA on axis z.

Since polar surface probes (silicon oxide) were used, the decrease in the capillary forces indicates a decrease in the polar surface and an increase in the hydrophobic behavior. Obviously, the surface of the erbium-rich phase has a higher chemical activity.

The dependence of the friction forces on the scanning speed was studied in the range 0.9–45 μm/s. An increase in the scanning speed weakly affected the contrast of regions with weak changes in the chemical composition. Local regions with the same crystal structure but different RE element contents can be reliably distinguished in smooth low-roughness surfaces (root-mean-square roughness Sq < 5 nm).

Therefore, the specific features of the low-temperature specific heat are shown to be caused by the low-energy excitations of the Er3+ ion, which are related to the Kramers nature of the ion. Specifically, the degeneracy of the ground level can be removed in a zero applied magnetic field due to the interaction of the magnetic moments of neighboring ions. The ground level splitting energy in YAlO3:Er in the solid solution concentration range under study is Δ < 1 K.

The longer thermal-frequency phonon range in the helium temperature range with respect to TLS trapping (lR > L) in the samples under study makes it possible to estimate the kinetic characteristics of elastic scattering correctly.

The possibility of phase separation in the structure of the solid solution follows from the data on the phonon kinetics in the helium temperature range and from the AFM studies of the cleavage surfaces of the Y1 –xErxAlO3 solid solution single crystals synthesized by directional solidification. Based on the dependences shown in Fig. 5, we can expect that a change in the solid solution concentration changes both the size and the concentration of the phase heterogeneities in YAlO3:Er. On a macrolevel, the solid solution remains homogeneous.