INTRODUCTION

The CuO/CeO2 catalysts have a high activity in the reaction of selective oxidation of CO with oxygen in excess of hydrogen at low temperatures. After modifying and adapting to industrial conditions of H2 purification from CO, they can replace expensive systems containing Pt, Pd, Ir, Rh, and Ru, which will reduce the cost of this process [1]. High purity of hydrogen with a CO concentration lower than 10 ppm is necessary for the generation of power energy by the oxidation of H2 by oxygen in air in platinum-containing fuel cells. In the future, such an efficient and environmentally friendly way to generate power energy can be used in car manufacturing and heat power industry for domestic household [2, 3].

The activity of the CuO/CeO2 catalyst in the oxidation of CO by oxygen in a hydrogen-containing mixture is explained by a synergistic effect of interaction between CuO and CeO2 oxides, which are more easily reduced and oxidized than each of them separately [3, 4]. To increase the catalyst selectivity in CO oxidation in the presence of hydrogen, an important task is to shift the temperature range of the maximum CO conversion toward low temperatures. It can be solved by modifying copper sites with metal ions with suitable redox properties [5] or by improving the properties of the support by adding other oxides to CeO2 [6].

Thus, it is known from [7] that the introduction of zirconium into the structure of cerium oxide, Ce1– x-ZrxO2 solid solutions with a stable structure and a certain crystallite size are formed. Compared with CeO2, they have redox properties combined with high thermal stability, the ability to accumulate and evolve oxygen, and also provide a high dispersity of the deposited metal on the surface. The literature data on the efficiency of copper-containing СuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 catalysts for the reaction of selective oxidation of CO are controversial and differ depending on the content of zirconium ions in the samples and methods of support preparation [811]. Of greatest interest are the works [8, 10], which reported the activity of СuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 and CuO(5%)–CeO(47.5%)–ZrO2(47.5%) catalysts comparable with and even higher than that of CuO/CeO2.

In [1214], we studied the low-temperature oxidation of CO by oxygen in a hydrogen-containing mixture on СuO/CeO2 and CuO/ZrO2 catalysts with different contents of deposited copper oxide and showed that the conversion of CO to CO2 reaches 98.5% at 150°C on the sample (5–6.4)% СuO/CeO2 and is lower than 87% at 160°С in the presence of 5%CuO/ZrO2. We also found that the activity of CuO/ZrO2 depends on the phase composition of the support. Thus, copper oxide on the tetragonal-phase ZrO2(t) is much more active than on the monoclinic-phase ZrO2(m) both in adsorption and in the selective oxidation of CO. Although the amount of chemisorbed CO at 20°C on the 5%CuO/ZrO2(t) sample was the same as that on 5%CuO/CeO2, its activity in CO oxidation in the presence of hydrogen was lower. Samples 5%CuO/CeO2, 5%CuO/ZrO2, and 5%CuO/Zr0.5Ce0.5 prepared by the microemulsion method with a crystallite size d = 5 nm, were less active than the crystallites of the same composition with d = 15–20 nm prepared by the pyrolysis of nitric acid salts.

In this work, we carried out a detailed study of the effect of Ce and Zr ions in the structure of the CeO2 and ZrO2 supports of copper-containing catalysts on the activity and selectivity in the oxidation of CO by oxygen in the presence of hydrogen has been carried out.

EXPERIMENTAL

Ce1– xZrxO2 supports with х = 0, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, and 1 were synthesized by the Pechini method according to [15]. The resulting powders were impregnated at 20°C by a solution of copper nitrate Сu(NO3)2 3H2O in such a concentration that the CuO content of the final product was 5 wt %. Upon impregnation the samples were dried in air by increasing the temperature to 500°С with a rate of 10°С/min, and then kept 500°C for 1 h.

The specific surface area of the samples (Ssp) was determined by the BET method of low-temperature argon adsorption. XRD patterns were recorded on a DRON-3M instrument (Burevestnik, Russia) in the range of 2θ angle from 8° to 90°. The phase composition and lattice parameters were found by comparing the obtained diffraction patterns with JCPDS data [16]. The average crystallite size was estimated using the Debye–Scherer formula for the line with the maximum intensity. The average value of the unit cell parameter was determined from the lines of XRD pattern of the sample [17].

The oxidation of CO by oxygen in the excess of hydrogen was carried out on a flow-type setup. A sample (a mixture containing 50 mg of catalyst powder and 70 mg of a quartz powder with a fraction of 0.10–0.25 mm) was placed in a quartz reactor (a tube with an inner diameter of 3 mm) and calcined in a flow of oxygen at 500°C for 20 min. Then, the reactor was cooled to 40°C and the oxygen flow was replaced with the reaction mixture 98 vol % H2 + 1 vol % CO + 1 vol % O2. The mixture was fed into the reactor at a rate of 20 mL/min. The catalyst activity was evaluated by the conversion of CO to CO2 at different temperatures. The temperature was increased in a stepwise manner with temperature increments of 20°C. The reaction products were separated on columns with 13X molecular sieves and silica gel and detected using a thermal conductivity detector on a Kristall 2000M chromatograph (Khromatek, Russia).

The interaction of samples with hydrogen were studied by TPR-Н2 in a flow of the 6% Н2 mixture with Ar (30 mL/min) when heating the sample at a rate of 5°С/min from 30 to 700°С. The sample (100 mg) was placed in a U-shaped reactor, calcined in a flow of oxygen at 500°С for 10 min, cooled to 30°С, and then replaced the flow of oxygen by a hydrogen mixture and recorded a TPR-Н2 profile using the thermal conductivity detector. The amount of consumed hydrogen was determined from the TPR-Н2 peak area comparing it with the corresponding value obtained for the reference (NiO).

Carbon oxide adsorption and oxidation was studied by TPD CO in a vacuum. The sample (100 mg) was preliminarily vacuumed at 20°C, heated at 500°С and a residual pressure of 10–4 Pa for 1 h, and then oxygen was fed into the reactor to a pressure of Р = 3 × 102 Pa. The reactor was allowed to stay for 20 min, and then it was cooled to room temperature and vacuumed. Hereafter, the resulting catalyst is called oxidized. After that, CO was adsorbed on it at Р = 3.3 × 103 Pa and 20°C for 10 min, the gas was evacuated for 20 min, and TPD CO profiles were recorded under constant vacuum conditions at a sample heating rate of 10°C/min. The change in pressure in the TPD CO profile reflects the temperature dependence of the desorption rate w. The pressure was recorded with an automated Pirani pressure gauge [18]. In order to isolate the peaks of CO desorption and oxidation product (CO2) desorption in the TPD spectrum, carbon dioxide was frozen in a U-shaped trap placed between the sample and the gauge and cooled with liquid nitrogen. Such a technique made it possible to record the profiles of the joint CO + CO2 desorption and separate CO desorption. The subtraction of the second profile from the first one made it possible to obtain the profile of CO2 desorption. The amount of desorbed CO2\(\left( {{{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}} \right)\) was determined from the CO2 pressure of after it was thawed out, and the amount of desorbed CO (Ndes.CO) was calculated using the balance equation: Ndes.CO = Nads.CO\({{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) = \({{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{CO + C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\)\({{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}.\) When performing the calculations, we proceeded either from a known amount of adsorbed CO (Nads.CO), or from the total amount of desorbed gas \({{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{CO + C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) found in a separate TPD experiment in a closed reactor without evacuation. The accuracy of \({{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{CO + C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) and Nads.CO determination corresponded to the accuracy of gas pressure measurement and was 20%.

Gaseous CO and O2 prepared according to the procedures described in [19] were used in adsorption studies. To eliminate uncontrolled impurities, they were introduced onto the sample through a trap cooled with liquid nitrogen.

RESULTS

Sample Characterization

Figure 1 show XRD patterns of synthesized Ce1xZrxO2 samples. It can be seen from XRD patterns 14 that the samples have a cubic (c) modification [20]. As the zirconium content of samples increases, the reflections shift to large values of the 2θ angles due to a decrease in the lattice parameter a (Å) of the cubic unit cell. In samples with x = 0, 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, the lattice parameters are 5.41, 5.37, 5.30, and 5.15 Å, respectively. Figure 2 shows the dependence of the cell volume а3 on x, which has a linear form. According to [2022], the values of cell parameters and the linear dependence of its volume on x confirm the formation of solid solutions with a cubic modification. XRD pattern 5 corresponds to zirconium oxide consisting of a mixture of monoclinic and tetragonal phases (m + t).

Fig. 1.
figure 1

XRD patterns of СeO2 (1), Сe0.8 Zr0.2O2 (2), Сe0.5Zr0.5O2 (3), Сe0.2 Zr0.8O2 (4) and ZrO2(m + t) (5) samples.

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Dependence of the unit cell volume on the Zr4+content of Ce1– хZrхO2 and 5%СuO/Ce1– хZrхO2 solid solutions.

It follows from Table 1 that Ce1– xZrxO2 samples have Ssp ≈ 30–60 m2/g and a crystallite size of 7–13 nm. The deposition of copper oxide leads to a decrease in the specific surface are of solid solutions by 25–50% but does not affect the size of crystallites. The XRD patterns of 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 samples coincide with those of Ce1– xZrxO2 supports. The absence of CuO reflections on them indicates its high dispersion. The interaction of copper oxide with the support does not change the unit cell parameters of the supports (Fig. 2); therefore, the deposition of copper oxide on the Ce1– xZrxO2 supports probably reduces their porosity.

Table 1.   Characteristics of samples

The effect of zirconium content on the properties of oxygen in Ce1– xZrxO2 and in copper-containing sites of 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 catalysts was studied using the TPR-H2 method.

Temperature-Programmed Reduction of Ce1 – xZrxO2 and 5%CuO/Ce1 – xZrxO2 Samples by Hydrogen

Figure 3 shows the TPR-H2 profiles of preliminarily oxidized Ce1– xZrxO2 samples. Profile 1 of cerium oxide is complex and has peaks of hydrogen absorption with maxima at 360 and 510°С. According to [22], they are due to the reduction of nonstoichiometric oxide СeOx. The total amount of absorbed hydrogen per square meter of oxide \(({{N}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}})\) was determined as the amount of absorbed hydrogen for 1 g of the catalyst divided by the value of its specific surface area. As can be seen from Table 1, for CeO2, it is 0.08 × 10–4 mol/m2 and is close to the stoichiometric amount of oxygen ions on the surface, 0.1 × 10–4 mol/m2. This fact suggests that, hydrogen is oxidized by surface oxygen in the temperature range 300–600°C since the oxidation of hydrogen by oxygen from the bulk of CeO2 oxide occurs at Т > 700°C. In profiles 2 and 3 of samples Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 and Ce0.5Zr0.5O2, the peak maxima are observed at higher temperatures (550 and 570°С), and the amount of hydrogen absorbed by the samples increases to 0.26 × 10–4 and 0.18 × 10–4 mol/m2, respectively. In this case, surface and near-surface oxygen of solid solutions participate in the reaction [23, 24]. Profile 4 of sample Сe0.2Zr0.8O2 contains peaks at 375 and 540°C. The total amount of hydrogen absorbed by this sample is close to the amount of oxygen ions on the surface, and the area of the first peak (and, therefore, the amount of hydrogen) is larger than the second one. The high-temperature peak at 540°C can be associated with the absorption of hydrogen in the surface layer. The nature of the peak at 375°C is unclear. A similar peak was observed in [14] in the TPR-H2 profile of the Сe0.5Zr0.5O2 sample with a crystallite size of ~5 nm. The authors explained its presence by lowering the energy of oxygen binding to the surface due to a decrease in the size of crystallites. The absence of hydrogen absorption peaks in profile 5 for ZrO2 indicates the high strength of the oxygen bond in it. The absorption of hydrogen by zirconium oxide at 730°C was noted in [25].

Fig. 3.
figure 3

TPR-Н2 profiles for СeO2 (1), Сe0.8 Zr0.2O2 (2), Сe0.5 Zr0.5O2 (3), Сe0.2 Zr0.8O2 (4), ZrO2 (5) samples.

TPR-H2 curves of the 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 samples in Fig. 4 do not contain peaks present in the support profiles. This suggests that the peaks on these profiles are associated with the reduction of copper oxide. The overall amounts of 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 absorbed in TPR experiments for hydrogen are compared in Table 1 with the amount of hydrogen Nr calculated according to the reaction CuO + Н2 = Cu0 + Н2O under the assumption that all copper cations in the oxidized samples are in the Cu2+ state [26, 27]. It is seen from the \({{{{N}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{{N}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}} {{{N}_{{\text{p}}}}}}} \right. \kern-0em} {{{N}_{{\text{p}}}}}}\) ratio that the amounts of samples with x = 0–0.5 are greater than the amount of hydrogen needed to reduce copper oxide in them. Excessive absorption of H2 indicates the reduction of copper oxide together with supports. For 5%CuO/ZrO2 and 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 samples, similar values of \({{N}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) and Nr were obtained, which indicate the preferential reduction of copper oxide in them.

Fig. 4.
figure 4

TPR-Н2 profiles for 5%CuO/СeO2 (1), 5%CuO/Сe0.8Zr0.2O2 (2), 5%CuO/Сe0.5Zr0.5O2 (3), 5%CuO/Сe0.2Zr0.8O2 (4), 5%CuO/ZrO2 (5), CuO (6) samples.

In profile 1 of the 5%CuO/CeO2 sample, there are two peaks with maxima at 145 and 180°C, which are lower than the reduction temperature of the CuO(m) phase (320°C, profile 6). They are attributed to the reduction of two forms of highly dispersed CuO oxide according to [2832]. According to [9], only CuO can be reduced at 145°C, and CuO together with CeO2 can be reduced at 180°C. A decrease in the reduction temperature of the interacting CuO and CeO2 oxides in comparison with those for these oxides separately (maximum at T > 300°C) is due to the synergistic effect. The low-temperature reduction by hydrogen atoms of the support, which is inactive in H2 adsorption at 180°C, occurs more easily with their spillover from copper, which is formed at 145°C [28].

In the profiles 2 and 3 of the 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 samples with х = 0.2 and 0.5, peaks of hydrogen absorption are separated and shift toward higher temperatures relative to the peaks in profile 1. Thus, in the 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 sample, two forms of copper oxide are reduced by hydrogen with maxima on the TPR-Н2 curves at 163 and 268°С (profile 2). The authors of [9, 33] believe that the first form is the result of the strong interaction of highly dispersed CuO and support, and the second form corresponds to particles of the CuO phase that are weakly bound to the surface. In the 5%CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 sample, these two forms of copper oxide are reduced at 194 and 370°С (profile 3). An increase in the reduction temperature can be associated with increasing copper oxide particle size with a decrease in the surface area of the samples upon supporting CuO (Table 1). To check this assumption we studied the 5%CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 sample with Ssp = 65 m2/g in which support—a solid solution of Ce0.5Zr0.5O2—was prepared by coprecipitation of salts according to the method [33]. The TPD-Н2 profile for this sample was not different from profile 3. On the other hand, profiles 2 and 3 for 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 and 5%CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 samples with close Ssp (29 and 27 m2/g, respectively) are different. Therefore, specific features of CuO reduction in the 5%CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 and 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 catalysts are not related to the values of their specific surface area and depend on their structural properties, which change depending on the composition of cations in the solid solution. This makes it possible to assume that an increase in the reduction temperature from 163 to 194°С with an increase in the zirconium content of the 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 sample is due to the strengthening of its interaction with supports. The reduction of the 5%CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5 sample at ~370°С can be due to particles of the Cu2O phase [30] and support (see Fig. 3).

For the 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2(c) catalyst in which NZr > NCe, the temperature of copper oxide reduction decreases (profile 4). There are three peaks on the TPD-Н2 curve for this sample. Peaks with maxima at 149 and 175°С correspond to the reduction of CuO clusters and a peak at 240°С, to the particles of the CuO phase [13, 34]. In profile 5 of the 5%CuO/ZrO2(m + t) sample at 172°С, clusters if copper oxide on the ZrO2(t) crystallites are reduced, and a peak at 340°С refers to copper oxide reduction in ZrO2(m) [13].

The presented data show that hydrogen is more easily oxidized by oxygen in the near-surface layer of the Ce1– xZrxO2 solid solutions than by oxygen from the bulk of CeO2 oxide. For the 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 (х = 0–0.5) samples, a synergistic effect is observed, which weakens with increasing x: the temperature of the joint reduction of copper oxide and supports increases with increasing Zr cation content of the support. At х > 0.5, the synergistic effect is negligible. In these cases, the reduction temperature of copper oxide depends on the specific features of its interaction with the surface of crystallites of different phase composition in the Ce0.2Zr0.8O2(c) and ZrO2(m + t) samples.

CO Oxidation by Oxygen in the Excess of Н2 on 5%CuO/Ce1 – xZrxO2

Figure 5 shows the dependences of CO conversion to CO2 (γ) on temperature T for the 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 catalysts in hydrogen containing mixture CO + O2 + Н2 It is seen that for 5%CuO/CeO2, the conversion of CO increases from 0 to a maximum value of γmах = 98–100% with changing temperature from 40 to 120°C (curve 1). A conversion of 100% is preserved at 120–160°С and then decreases to 70% at 220°С. Similar γ(T) dependences are observed for other samples (curves 25). It follows from data presented in Fig. 5 that, with an increase in the fraction of Zr in the catalysts from 0.2 to 1, the reaction temperature increases with a simultaneous decrease in the conversion. The γmах(T) dependence on the Zr content of the catalyst makes it possible to construct the following activity series: 5%CuO/CeO2 (100%, 120–160°С) > 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 (98%, 160°C) > 5%Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (92%, 160°С) > 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 (87%, 160°C) > 5%CuO/ZrO2 (67%, 180°С).

Fig. 5.
figure 5

Temperature dependence of the CO conversion into CO2 on temperature for 5%CuO/СeO2 (1), 5%CuO/Сe0.8Zr0.2O2 (2), 5%CuO/Сe0.5Zr0.5O2 (3), 5%CuO/Сe0.2Zr0.8O2 (4), 5%CuO/ZrO2 (5) samples.

Simultaneously with the CO conversion, the conversion of O2 was measured. The dependences of the conversion of CO and O2 on temperature for the 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/ZrO2 samples are compared in Fig. 6. Thus, on the 5%CuO/CeO2 sample, the oxidation of CO begins at 60°C. When the temperature rises to 120°C, the reaction occurs with 100% selectivity, since under these conditions the ratio of the amounts of CO and O2 molecules consumed corresponds to their ratio obtained from the reaction equation CO + 0.5O2 → CO2 (compare Fig. 6, curves 1 and 1'). At 100–120°C, oxygen absorption slows down with a decrease in the CO content of the stream. At 120°С, the O2 conversion is 50% at a CO conversion close to 100%. When the temperature rises to 160°C, the O2 conversion increases due to the participation of oxygen in hydrogen oxidation, and the CO conversion remains unchanged and is 100%. At T ≥ 160°C, oxygen from the mixture is completely consumed by two reactions. Under these conditions of the competition for oxygen, the conversion of CO decreases to 70% (220°C) due to the increasing rate of oxygen consumption in the reaction with hydrogen relative to the rate of its consumption in the reaction with carbon dioxide.

Fig. 6.
figure 6

Temperature dependence of the CO (1, 2) and O2 (1', 2') conversion for 5%CuO/СeO2 (1, 1') and 5%CuO/ZrO2 (2, 2') samples.

In the case of the 5%CuO/ZrO2 sample, the reactions of CO and H2 oxidation begin almost simultaneously, since at the initial stage of the process (100–140°C) oxygen consumption is higher than that spent on CO oxidation (compare Fig. 6, curves 2 and 2'). Due to the higher rate of oxygen consumption in the oxidation of hydrogen than in the oxidation of CO at 160–220°C, the conversion of CO to CO2 reaches only 67% at 180°C and then decreases to 20% at 220°C. That is, in the entire temperature range 100–220°C, the selectivity to the formation of CO2 is below 100%.

Thus, an increase in the content of Zr cations in CeO2 lowers the activity of 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 catalysts in CO oxidation by oxygen in the excess of hydrogen: the temperature of the onset of the reaction increases, the conversion of γmax decreases with a shift of the corresponding temperature toward higher temperatures. The drop of activity is due to the competition for oxygen in CO and H2 oxidation reactions. The lowest activity was observed for the 5%CuO/ZrO2(m + t) catalyst. When modifying the ZrO2 structure by a small amount of cerium, the activity of 5%CuO/Ce02Zr08O2 catalyst increases from 67% (180°C) to 87% (160°C).

The activated nature of the reaction of selective oxidation of CO may be due to the transformation of surface intermediates formed during the adsorption of CO and O2. To determine their nature, the forms of CO adsorption, their thermal stability, and the effect of oxygen adsorption on them were studied.

CO Oxidation by Oxygen from the Catalyst and Oxygen Adsorbed on 5%CuO/Ce1 – xZrxO2

Figure 7 shows the TPD CO curves for the oxidized 5%CuO/Ce1– хZrхO2 samples after CO is adsorbed on them at Р = 3.3 × 103 Pa for 10 min and evacuated for 20 min at 20°C. Profiles 15 are formed during desorption of CO and CO2 from the sites of adsorption and oxidation, respectively.

Fig. 7.
figure 7

TPD CO profiles for 5%CuO/СeO2 (1), 5%CuO/Сe0.8Zr0.2O2 (2), 5%CuO/Сe0.5Zr0.5O2 (3), 5%CuO/Сe0.2Zr0.8O2 (4), 5%CuO/ZrO2 (5) samples.

Data on the amount of CO and CO2 molecules desorbed per square meter of the sample, and temperatures Тmах corresponding to the maximum rates of gas desorption are presented in Table 2. Based on the results obtained earlier in [26, 27], it can be assumed that profiles 1 and 5 for 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/ZrO2 samples are formed by the decomposition of one and two types of linear carbonyl complexes Cu+–CO with CO desorption and bridge mono- and bidentate carbonate complexes with CO2 desorption in different specific temperature regions. Profiles 24 of the 5%CuO/Ce1– хZrхO2 samples with х = 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 are similar to TPD CO profiles 1 and 5. Therefore, these catalysts form the same carbonyl and carbonate structures as 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/ZrO2. The close temperature regions of CO and CO2 desorption and the values of Tmax in profiles 4 and 5 indicate that carbonyl and carbonate structures are identical in 5%CuO/ZrO2 and 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2. Identical carbonyls of two types are also found in 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2, 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2, and 5%CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 samples (profiles 13). This is not the case of carbonates, since the parameters of CO2 desorption profiles (Тmах, desorption range ∆T, and the amount of desorbed molecules) for these samples differ when the content in zirconium supports changes, which affects the properties of surface oxygen involved in the formation of carbonate structures.

Table 2. TPD CO characteristics

The effect of oxygen adsorption on the properties of carbonyl and carbonate complexes was studied. Figure 8 shows the TPD CO + O2 profiles. They were obtained after the adsorption of oxygen (P = 3 × 102 Pa, T = 20°C, τads = 10 min) on samples with CO previously adsorbed on them under the conditions described above. The comparison of profiles in Figs. 7 and 8 and data in Tables 2 and 3 shows that, after O2 adsorption, the amount of desorbed CO decreases, and the desorbed CO2 increases in the respective temperature ranges. That is, CO of carbonyl complexes is oxidized by adsorbed oxygen to form carbonates, the decomposition temperature of which is lower than the decomposition temperature of carbonates at the oxidation sites. The highest efficiency of the oxidation of CO in carbonyl complexes during oxygen adsorption is observed on the 5%CuO/CeO2 sample. For it, as can be seen from Table 3, the ratio n of the amounts of desorbed CO in TPD CO and TPD CO + O2 experiments is 4.5. For samples with x = 0.2–1, it ranges from 1.75 to 2.4.

Fig. 8.
figure 8

TPD CO + O2 profiles for 5%CuO/СeO2 (1), 5%CuO/Сe0.8Zr0.2O2 (2), 5%CuO/Сe0.5Zr0.5O2 (3), 5%CuO/Сe0.2Zr0.8O2 (4), 5%CuO/ZrO2 (5) samples.

Table 3.   TPD CO + O2 characteristics

On the 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 catalysts, part of the CO molecules in carbonyl complexes is oxidized by oxygen to CO2 (2.7 × 1019 g–1) followed by its desorption at room temperature. The desorption of CO2 is negligible in the case of samples with х ≥ 0.5 (0.47 × 1019 g–1). Treatment of samples with 5%CuO/Ce1– хZrхO2 with adsorbed CO with oxygen also lowers the decomposition temperature of surface carbonates at the oxidation sites by ~50°C. This agrees with the data of [26], where it was shown that, on the oxidized surface of 5%CuO/CeO2, the decomposition temperature of carbonates in CO2 is lower than on the reduced one. Therefore, the combined oxidation of carbonyls and the catalyst occurs during oxygen adsorption.

Thus, carbonyl and carbonate complexes are formed at room temperature on the 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 samples during CO adsorption at the sites of adsorption and oxidation. Their thermal stability and amount depend on the zirconium content of CeO2. Carbonyls are oxidized to carbonates in the course of oxygen adsorption at 20°C. The decomposition temperature of these carbonates is lower than that of carbonates at the oxidation sites. In the 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 samples, oxygen oxidizes CO of carbonyl complexes to CO2 even at room temperature. In parallel with the oxidation reaction of carbonyls to carbonates, the oxidation of catalysts takes place, which leads to a decrease in the temperature of decomposition of carbonates on them into CO2 at the oxidation sites.

DISCUSSION

CO Adsorption and Oxidation Sites on the 5%CuO/Ce1 – xZrxO2 Samples

We found earlier [12, 13] that with a copper oxide content of 0.5–15% for CuO/CeO2 and CuO/ZrO2 samples, the maximum number of CO chemisorption sites and active sites in selective CO oxidation is achieved at a CuO concentration of ~5%. The particles of the CuO phase and the CuOm oxo complexes in the above processes are inactive. Therefore, the participation of these particles in reactions with 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 is also unlikely. Highly dispersed copper oxide is present in all samples. Depending on the properties of the support, its temperature of reduction by hydrogen varies in the range of 145–194°C (Fig. 4). In this temperature region, various forms of CuO can be reduced: copper oxide, which strongly interacts with the support; small two- and three-dimensional copper oxide clusters, which weakly interact with the support; solid solutions; interstitial or substitution defects in the support lattice [28, 31].

We believe that, in the 5%CuO/CeO2, 5%CuO/Cе0.8Zr0.2O2, and 5%CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 samples, the low-temperature peaks at 145, 163, and 194°С refer to the reduction of high-dispersity copper oxide, which strongly interacts with the supports [33, 35]. The reduction temperature of this form of CuO depends on the content of zirconium cations in the support and is not associated with changes in the specific surface areas of the samples. An increase in the temperature can be explained by an increase in the strength of oxygen binding in CuO upon its interaction with zirconium cations. This is supported by the fact that, on the surface of CeO2 and ZrO2, the binding strength of charged oxygen forms and with Zr4+ cations is higher than with Сe4+ [36]. The above form of copper contains active oxygen on the interface between dimers or small CuO clusters with a support in –Cu–O–Ce– structures [11, 35]. This type of oxygen is associated with the low-temperature oxidation of CO on 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/Cе0.8Zr0.2O2 [28].

The activity of the 5%CuO/ZrO2(m + t) sample in CO chemisorption at 20°С and in low-temperature oxidation of CO is associated with CuO oxide on ZrO2(t) crystallites, since CuO on ZrO2(m) is inactive in these reactions [13]. The authors of [37] believe that on the surface of the oxide ZrO2(t) (the tetragonal phase in the sample was stabilized by the introduction of Y ions), oxygen vacancies (V) are present. Their interaction with oxygen of СuO clusters (–V–O2––Cu2+–) lowers the binding energy of oxygen with the copper cation and thus increases the reactivity of oxygen in the oxidation of CO compared with oxygen of the CuO phase. Apparently, the active oxygen of the above-mentioned copper-containing sites on the crystallites of the tetragonal ZrO2 phase of is responsible for the adsorption and oxidation of CO on 5%CuO/ZrO2(m + t). Active oxygen is involved in the reduction of CuO clusters with hydrogen at 170°C (Fig. 4).

In the 5%CuO/Ce02Zr08O2(c) profile, three forms of CuO are reduced by H2 at 140, 175, and 240°C. The main peaks at 175 and 240°С are close to those on the profile for 5% CuO/ZrO2(t) and correspond to the recovery of clusters and particles of the CuO phase. The peak at 140°С is probably associated with the ‒Cu–O–Ce– structure, since the peak at this temperature is on the TPR-H2 curve of the 5%CuO/CeO2. Therefore, in the 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2(c) catalyst, active adsorption and CO oxidation sites are formed during the interaction of CuO clusters and vacancies on the surface of ZrO2 crystallites. The introduction of Ce cations in a low concentration into the support structure (when their amount is for times smaller than the number of Zr cations) stabilizes the cubic structure of zirconium oxide, which corresponds to that for nonstoichiometric ZrO1.87(c) with a lattice parameter of 5.15 Å and a high content of oxygen vacancies [16]. This may contribute to an increase in the number of –V–O2––Cu2+– sites in the catalyst 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2(c), and, consequently, its activity in adsorption and CO oxidation as compared with 5%CuO/ZrO2(m + t). The stabilization of zirconium oxide structure by Ce cations was reported in [7].

In oxidized 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 samples, the oxidation sites Cu2+O2– contain the structures with active oxygen discussed above. During the adsorption of CO on them, complexes are formed during the transfer of oxygen atoms from Cu2+O2– to the created carbonate structures. In this reaction, part of the Cu2+ copper cations is reduced to Cu+ adsorption sites located near oxygen vacancies formed. Such a mechanism for the formation of CO adsorption sites was studied on the 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/ZrO2 samples in [26, 27] and is valid for copper-containing catalysts prepared on the basis of solid solutions, since the observed patterns of CO and CO2 desorption for the 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 samples with x = 0.2 and 0.8 coincide with those for 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/ZrO2.

The efficiency of the formation of adsorption complexes at 20°C in catalysts can be judged by the ratio of the number of deposited copper cations \({{N}_{{{\text{C}}{{{\text{u}}}^{{{\text{2 + }}}}}}}}\) to the value \({{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{CO + C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}},\) of the total number of desorbed CO + CO2 molecules for the samples. Table 2 shows that this ratio varies from 3 to 7 depending on the catalyst. For 5%CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2, 5%CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2, and 5%CuO/ZrO2(m + t) samples, there are on average five to seven Cu+2 cations per adsorbed CO molecule. For 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 samples, the efficiency is higher, since the ratio is 3–4. The low efficiency of copper oxide in the formation of CO complexes may be due to the high oxygen binding strength in the CuO-phase particles and the lack of the access of CO molecules to copper oxide located inside the three-dimensional CuO structures or solid solution formed by copper oxide with a support.

Carbon monoxide in Cu+–CO complexes is oxidized when oxygen is adsorbed to carbonates (Fig. 8). They decompose with CO2 desorption at a lower temperature than carbonates at the oxidation sites, which allows us to consider them as intermediates in the reaction of selective oxidation of CO with oxygen in a hydrogen-containing medium. The participation of strongly bound carbonates on the oxidation sites that decompose at T > 200°C in the reaction of low-temperature CO oxidation is unlikely.

On the Mechanism of CO Oxidation by Oxygen in the Presence of Hydrogen on 5%CuO/Ce1 – xZrxO2 Samples at Low Temperatures

In the series of studied 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 catalysts, the 5%CuO/CeO2 sample has the highest activity in the reaction of the selective oxidation of CO with oxygen in the excess of hydrogen. With an increase in the zirconium ion content of catalysts, the temperature of the onset of the reaction increases due to an increase in the strength of the oxygen bond in CuO [38]. A decrease in γmах with increasing temperature corresponding to the maximum conversion can be explained by the competition for oxygen of the oxidation reactions of CO and H2 (Fig. 6). Copper oxide is reduced by hydrogen. It reduces the number of CO chemisorption sites, which, according to [12], leads to a decrease in the CO conversion.

The route of CO–Сu+ oxidation during oxygen adsorption plays a key role in the reaction of low-temperature oxidation of CO with oxygen in the presence of hydrogen on CuO/CeO2 catalysts. This is indicated by the correlation between the catalyst activity in the oxidation of CO and the concentration of Cu+ cations in it [4] and the overlap of the temperature ranges of CO conversion (40–160°C) and the decomposition of carbonates at the Cu+ adsorption sites (30–150°C) (Figs. 6 and 8). In the range from 100 to 220°C, the oxidation of CO with oxygen from oxidation sites also contributes to the conversion due to a decrease in the decomposition temperature of carbonates at these sites by 50°C during oxygen adsorption.

The activated nature of the reaction is due to the conversion of carbonates to CO2, because the chemisorption of CO with the formation of carbonate and carbonyl complexes, the oxidation of carbonyl complexes and catalyst by oxygen occur at 20°C.

A similar mechanism for the oxidation of CO to CO2 on 5%CuO/ZrO2 was considered in [13]. In contrast to 5%CuO/CeO2, due to the higher strength of oxygen binding in carbonate complexes on the 5%CuO/ZrO2(t) sample, the oxidation of CO by the catalyst oxygen and gas phase oxygen under isothermal conditions takes place at a higher temperature: 100–220°С. The activity of the 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2(c) sample (γmах = 87% at 160°С) is higher than that of 5%CuO/ZrO2(m + t) (γmах = 67% at 180°С). This is probably due to the increase in the number of oxygen vacancies on the surface of the ZrO2(c) oxide involved in the formation of active oxygen in CuO. Excess vacancies are formed when the cerium cations stabilize the nonstoichiometric cubic structure of zirconium oxide.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 catalysts were synthesized on the basis of CeO2, ZrO2, and solid solutions Ce1– xZrxO2 with х = 0.2–0.8 using the Pechini method.

A synergistic effect is observed in the 5%CuO/Ce1– x-ZrxO2 samples with х = 0, 0.2, and 0.5: with an increase in the concentration of zirconium cations in them, the temperature of copper oxide and support reduction by hydrogen increases. The synergistic effect is small in the case of 5%CuO/Ce02Zr08O2 and 5%CuO/ZrO2: the reduction temperature of copper oxide in them depends on the specific features of its interaction with the surface of crystallites of different phase composition.

Highly dispersed copper oxide is present in 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 catalysts. In strong interactions with supports, it forms active oxygen, which is involved in the chemisorption of CO and the low-temperature oxidation of CO in the presence of hydrogen.

The activity of 5%CuO/Ce1– xZrxO2 catalysts in the reaction of CO oxidation decreases with increasing zirconium content: the temperature of the onset of the reaction increases, γmax decreases with a shift in temperature corresponding to the maximum conversion to the high temperature region. The decrease in the activity of 5%CuO/CeO2 during the modification of CeO2 with Zr cations is due to the increase in the strength of oxygen binding in the copper-containing sites. The modification of ZrO2 with cerium cations increases with the maximum conversion from 67% at 180°C to 87% at 160°C on the 5%CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 sample as a result of an increase in the amount of oxygen vacancies involved in the formation of active oxygen in CuO.

Taking into account the properties of CO complexes formed on copper-containing oxidation and adsorption sites and interactions of complexes with adsorbed oxygen, their participation in the low-temperature oxidation reaction in hydrogen on 5%CuO/CeO2 and 5%CuO/ZrO2 catalysts was considered.

ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTATION

d size of particles

c cubic modification of samples

n amount of CO desorbed in TPD CO and TPD CO + O2 experiments

Nads. CO amount of adsorbed CO

Ndes. CO amount of desorbed CO

\({{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) amount of desorbed CO2

\({{N}_{{{\text{des}}{\text{.}}\,{\text{CO + C}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) overall amount of desorbed gas

\({{N}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) overall amount of adsorbed hydrogen per square meter of the oxide

Nr amount of hydrogen calculated by the reaction CuO + Н2 = Cu0 + Н2O

Ssp specific surface area

TPD temperature-programmed desorption

TPR-Н2 temperature-programmed reduction

Тmах temperature corresponding to the maximal rate of desorption

V oxygen vacancies

w desorption rate

ZrO2(m) monoclinic phases of ZrO2

ZrO2(t) tetragonal phase of ZrO2

γmах maximal conversion of CO