INTRODUCTION

Sulfates in the global atmosphere directly and indirectly impact the radiation regime of the atmosphere and climate (Kulmala et al., 2000; Andreae et al., 2005). More than a half of them are formed in the process of sulfur dioxide oxidation in the atmosphere (in particular, in the droplet phase). These heterophase intracloud reactions of sulfur dioxide oxidation play an important part in the self-purification of the atmosphere (acid rains, etc.) (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). The formation of sulfates in cloud droplets is associated mainly with the H2O2 and O3 uptake from the air (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). Along with this, dark (nonphotochemical) mechanisms of sulfate formation in droplets are also considered (Warneck et al., 1996; Zheng et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Xie et al., 2019). They include understudied catalytical routes of SO2 oxidation by molecular oxygen in the presence of transition metal (TM) ions (Alexander et al., 2009). The contribution of these processes to the formation of sulfates in the global atmosphere remains unclear, however. Their underestimation in the global SO2 distribution in the atmosphere was reported in (Feichter et al., 1996, Fomba et al., 2013) and other works. In opposition to this, in (Berglen, 2004), it was reported with the use of the OsloCTM2 model that the time of SO2 oxidation in catalytic processes amounted to about 50 days, which indicated their insignificant role in the atmosphere. In recent years, reports about episodes of the anomalously rapid production of sulfates generated in catalytic processes (tens of µg m–3 h–1) in atmospheric aerosol became more frequent (Zheng et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Xie et al., 2019). In (Alexander et al., 2009), their formation in the global atmosphere was considered using the GEOS-Chem three-dimensional model involving laboratory modeling data on kinetics of catalytic processes in solutions (in what follows, in bulk conditions/experiments). For TM ions in (Alexander et al., 2009), the most active ones in their series were considered: Mn2+ and Fe3+ ions (Coughanowr and Krause, 1965; Ibusuki and Takeuchi, 1987; Martin and Good, 1991; Grgić et al., 1991; Berglund et al., 1993). However, the calculated concentrations of SO2 and sulfates in (Alexander et al., 2009) turned out to be several times higher when compared to monitoring data (Harris et al., 2013). We emphasize that the mechanism of catalytic transformations of SO2 in droplets was not considered in an explicit form in GEOS-Chem, WRF-Chem (Wang et al., 2016; Grell et al., 2005), or in other atmospheric models. Instead of this, empirical expressions obtained for rates of catalytic reactions in bulk experiments at separate (wMn, wFe) or joint (wMn_Fe, mol L–1 s–1) finding of ions of these metals were used (Ibusuki and Takeuchi, 1987). Such an approach made it possible to reduce computational resources, but meets serious objections (Ermakov and Purmal, 2002; Ermakov, 2022). The possibility that the catalytic action of TM ions can be activated by an uptake of H2O2 from air and, in the daytime, OH and HO2 radicals, or by the absorption of the Sun’s radiation was also left out of accounts (Warneck et al., 1996; Herrmann et al., 2000). The aim of this work is, based on results of our investigations of the mechanism of catalytic reactions with the participation of TM ions (Ermakov and Purmal, 2002; Eremina et al., 2017) and using data of field experiments (Laj et al., 1997, Sedlak et al., 1997; Harris et al., 2013), reveal features of the dynamics of such processes in cloud droplets in the atmosphere.

PRELIMINARIES

The predominant participation of processes in the droplet phase with the participation of hydrogen peroxide and ozone in oxidation of sulfur dioxide (up to ≈80%) is indicated by the results of 3D modeling (OsloCTM2, NCAR CCM3, GLOMAP, and others) of the global distribution of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere. The participation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in sulfur dioxide oxidation in cloud droplets is directly pointed by data of the Great Dun Fell campaign (the United Kingdom) (Laj et al., 1997; Sedlak et al., 1997). In those experiments, it was reported about the correlation between the increment of the sulfate and dissolved H2O2 concentrations normalized to the concentration of the tracer (\({\text{Na}}_{{{\text{aq}}}}^{{\text{ + }}}\) ions). At the same time, it was also noted that concentrations of valence forms of iron ions (Fe2+/Fe3+) in droplets varied with the compositional range of air or changes in the time of day (insolation level), which indirectly says about the participation of metal ions in catalytic transformations of SO2 (Behra et al., 1990).

The involvement of TM ions in the formation of sulfates in the atmosphere is directly indicated by monitoring data on the isotopic composition of atomic oxygen (Δ17O) in them in hardly deliquesced aerosol particles (McCabe et al., 2006). Data of field monitoring experiments on the isotopic composition of sulfur atoms (Δ34S) in sulfur dioxide and sulfates in cloud droplets in the background region in the Febuko and Hill Cap Cloud Thuringia campaigns (HCCT-2001 and HCCT-2010) also serve as a corroboration (Harris et al., 2013). Southwest winds in mountains of Thuringian Forest, passing through three weather stations, cross the mountain system from southeast to northwest, which is often accompanied by the formation of orographic clouds over Schmücke (937 m above sea level). The Goldlauter upwind station (605 m above sea level) is located about 3 km southwest of the Schmücke station; the downwind Gehlberg station (732 m above sea level) is about 3 km northeast of Schmücke. The samples for the analysis of sulfur isotopes in HCCT-2010 were taken both for cases of cloud appearance and in the cloudless period. The HCCT-2010 data directly indicate that the main part of sulfates in cloud droplets in some episodes is formed just with the participation of TMs.

Note that monitoring of the isotopic composition of reagents and products with the aim of revealing the nature of sulfate formation in the atmosphere has a history. For example, in (Gröner and Hoppe, 2006; Winterholler, 2008), it was reported about differences in the content of 34S in SO2 and sulfates in air. They indicate isotopic fractionation in the process of conversion SO2\({\text{SO}}_{4}^{{2 - }}\) in the atmosphere. These differences are discernible when comparing data about the isotopic composition of sulfur dioxide and sulfates, both in background and in urbanized regions. The isotopic fractionation in the process of conversion SO2\({\text{SO}}_{4}^{{2 - }}\) is also observed in data of laboratory experiments. For example, when SO2 is oxidized in solutions containing H2O2 or O3, enrichment of the sulfate with the 34S isotope is observed; the isotopic composition of sulfur dioxide that passed through the solution, on the contrary, is enriched with the light 32S isotope. In contrast to this, when SO2 is oxidized by molecular oxygen, the formation of sulfates depleted in the 34S isotope is observed (Harris et al., 2012a). In this process, SO2 is enriched with the 34S isotope, which allows one also to differentiate the channels of sulfur dioxide oxidation in cloud droplets. For example, at T ≈ 293 K, the changes found in laboratory conditions in the relation between the contents of the heavy 34S and light 32S isotopes (Δ34S) when sulfur dioxide was oxidized by H2O2, O3, and molecular oxygen, according to (Harris et al., 2012a), were as follows: \({{\alpha }_{{{\text{aq}}\_{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\)\({{\alpha }_{{{\text{aq}}\_{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{3}}}}}}}\) = 1.0167 and αaq_R = 0.9894, respectively. Here, R serves as a notation for the process of SO2 oxidation by molecular oxygen with the participation of free radicals (R).

MONITORING DATA AND THEIR ANALYSIS

H2O2 and O3 in Sulfur Dioxide Oxidation

The observation of Δ34S when the SO2 impurity (≈0.1 ppb) passes a cloud from the upwind to the downwind side showed that the participation of H2O2 and O3 in oxidation of sulfur dioxide predominate only in the first (nighttime) episode (Harris et al., 2013). In the second nighttime episode (FCE 11.2) and third episode (FCE 11.3), combining the night and day, data of Δ34S monitoring in sulfur dioxide evidence about the decisive participation of molecular oxygen in oxidation of the SO2 impurity (Harris et al., 2013). Below, we consider data of the nighttime episode (FCE 11.2). Choosing them excludes from the consideration the influence of processes of daytime OH radical uptake from gas on the depth of SO2 oxidation, as well as processes of their generation during photolysis in droplets of H2O2 and others.

The time-averaged (≈7 h) change in the isotopic composition of sulfur atoms in the sulfur dioxide impurity that passed (dw) through the cloud at T ≈ 280 K and relative air humidity close to 100% corrected for dilution of air masses between control points (experiments with the SF6 tracer) amounted to Δ34Sdw = 0.04558. At the same time, monitoring of Δ34S in sulfur dioxide coming from the upwind side (upw) yields Δ34Supw = 0.044. This is an indication of the enrichment by the heavy 34S isotope in the fraction of the sulfur dioxide impurity that passed through the cloud (McCabe et al., 2006; Alexander et al., 2009); the enrichment demonstrates the participation of molecular oxygen in SO2 oxidation in droplets. Indeed, the expected change in Δ34S under the same conditions when sulfur dioxide is oxidized by hydrogen peroxide (≈0.01 ppb (Harris et al., 2013)) would be accompanied by \({{\Delta }^{{34}}}{{{\text{S}}}_{{{\text{dw}}\_{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) = Δ34Supw exp((\({{\alpha }_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\)–1)ln(f)) = 0.04257 (McCabe et al., 2006; Alexander et al., 2009), which is lower than in SO2 coming from the upwind side. A comparison of Δ34Sdw and \({{\Delta }^{{34}}}{{{\text{S}}}_{{{\text{dw}}\_{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) shows that hydrogen peroxide in fact does not participate in sulfur dioxide oxidation in the nighttime episode FCE 11.2. However, the causes of H2O2 inertness in the episode FCE 11.2 remain unclear in view of high solubility of hydrogen peroxide and its pronounced reactive capacity in regard to components of SO2 dissolved in droplets (Herrmann et al., 2000). Ozone uptaken from air also does not participate in SO2 oxidation in this episode. This is caused by low concentrations of the \({\text{SO}}_{3}^{{2 - }}\)anion at pH 3.8—the dissolved sulfur dioxide component that is active for ozone, as well as by low solubility of O3 (Herrmann et al., 2000). Summarizing, one may state that sulfur dioxide conversion detected by the change in the isotope composition in droplets of the nighttime cloud (FCE-11.2) is implemented exclusively by molecular oxygen and with the participation of free radicals in the process.

Insignificant Role of NO3

Along with the generation of the latter in processes with the participation of iron ions and components of dissolved SO2 (van Eldik et al., 1992), one should also reckon with the uptake of nighttime NO3 radicals and gaseous molecules of H2O2 by droplets. The low reactive capacity of NO3 in regard to SO2, CO, H2S, etc., differs them from daytime OH radicals. At night time, [NO3], even over the background area, can reach values which are two or three orders higher than [OH] in the daytime (≈2 × 106 cm–3 (Mauldin et al., 1997; Herrmann et al., 2000)). The reaction of electron transfer from \({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\) (a component of dissolved SO2) to NO3 (NO3 + \({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\)\({\text{NO}}_{3}^{ - }\) + \({\text{SO}}_{3}^{ - }\) + H+) (Berdnikov and Bazhin, 1970), on the contrary, is fast, which indicates a potentially fast initiation in droplets. To estimate the NO3 participation in this process, it is necessary, however, to reckon with the competition of NO3 formation/consumption in the gas and with the process of their drag to the droplet phase. The key factor is the competition of two processes: the decomposition of particles N2O5(g) (N2O5(g) + M → NO3(g) + NO2(g), τd) and their dissolution (τdis) terminating with rapid hydrolysis: N2O5(aq) + H2O → \({\text{NO}}_{{{\text{2(aq)}}}}^{ - }\) + \({\text{NO}}_{{{\text{3(aq)}}}}^{ - }\) + \({\text{2H}}_{{{\text{(aq)}}}}^{ + }.\) Here, (g) and (aq) show that the considered components belong to the gas and condensed phases. For small droplets, the dissolution of N2O5(g), i.e., the “useless” death of NO3(g), turns out to be prevailing. The following droplet size is critical: rcr ≥ 3α ϖ L/4 τdis ≥ 4 µm. Here, α is the accommodation coefficient (3.7 × 10–3 (Herrmann et al., 2000)); ϖ is the average thermal velocity of N2O5(g) molecules, cm/s; and L is the volume content of condensed moisture in the air, cm3(aq)/cm3(gas). In this regard, we note that studying samples of condensation nuclei and condensed moisture in the cloud with the use of scanning electron microscopy, nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry, and other methods in (Harris et al., 2013) showed that catalytic oxidation occurred exclusively on deliquesced particles of coarsely dispersed mineral aerosol of natural origin. It turned out that these particles served as sources of TM ions in droplets in the FCE-11.2 episode, which was also corroborated by the results of recent independent observations of their leaching (Harris et al., 2012b). However, since the fraction of the condensed moisture content on these particles (≥3 µm) does not exceed 1% of the total water content of the cloud (Harris et al., 2013) (see the solid line 1 in Fig. 1), the role of NO3 in the initiation of the catalytic reaction of SO2 oxidation seems negligible.

Fig. 1.
figure 1

Effect of the volume fraction of moisture in particles of an orographic cloud at pH ≈ 3.8, T = 280 K, and \({{P}_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}}}}}\) ≈ 0.1 ppb (the HCCT-2010 campaign) on the relation of concentrations of Mn2+ and S(IV) ions (the left axis) and rate wMn_Fe of the catalytic reaction of sulfur dioxide oxidation in droplets (the right axis).

Decisive Role of Molecular Oxygen in the Formation of Sulfates

Hydrogen peroxide molecules uptaken from the air also can participate in acceleration of catalytic conversion SO2\({\text{SO}}_{4}^{{2 - }}\) in the cloud, which also favors the increase in the initiation rate of the catalytic reaction (H2O2 + Fe2+ → OH (Herrmann et al., 2000)). However, the data of our calculations with the use of the reduced (shortened) mechanism (the CHEMWG model (Laj et al., 1997)) did not corroborate this hypothesis. Their results showed that the major part of H2O2 in droplets is consumed in the reaction with components of dissolved SO2, and the reaction \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) + Fe2+\({\text{SO}}_{4}^{ - }\) ((9), see Table 1) serves as the main channel of radical generation (Herrmann et al., 2000). This result also agrees with data of independent calculations of the dynamics of atmospheric chemical reactions in the background area (Tilgner et al., 2013) using the full CAPRAM 3.0i mechanism, but it contradicts the data presented above about the nonparticipation of H2O2 in SO2 oxidation in FCE-11.2 (Harris et al., 2013). Summarizing, we come to the conclusion that the decisive role in the formation of sulfates in the nighttime episode FCE-11.2 belongs to reactions of radicals and molecular oxygen in droplets and that the use of the quantity αaq_R for calculations of Δ34S is correct. Turning to the increase in Δ34S in sulfur dioxide observed in this episode FCE-11.2, we have Δ34Sdw_R = Δ34 Supw exp((αaq_Fe – 1) ln(f)) = 0.045. Here, according to data (Harris et al., 2012a), it is taken that αaq_R = αaq_Fe = 0.9894 and f = 0.13 (Harris et al., 2013). The quantity Δ34Sdw_R calculated here agrees reasonably well with data of field measurements (0.0458) and indicates an almost 100% conversion SO2\({\text{SO}}_{4}^{{2 - }}\) in the cloud along the catalytic route with the participation of molecular oxygen and transition metal ions.

Table 1.   Mechanism of sulfite oxidation catalysis by manganese ions (μ ≈ 0)

Estimates of the Liquid-Phase Oxidation Rate

As emphasized above, the fraction of moisture in which the catalytic reaction proceeds does not exceed 1% on deliquesced particles of coarsely dispersed mineral aerosol (see the solid line in Fig. 1). This means that the process of SO2 oxidation on these particles should proceed very rapidly, which is supposedly corroborated by the value reported in (Harris et al., 2013) for the coefficient of reactive SO2 uptake by droplets (\({{\gamma }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) = 0.1). For the catalytic reaction rate on the gaseous phase basis by these data, we have WS(VI)_atm. = \({{\gamma }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\)[SO2]\({{\varpi }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) 3L/4r, where r is the radius of deliquesced particles and \({{\varpi }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) is the average speed of SO2 molecules, cm/s. Here, S(IV) ≈ SO2(aq) + \({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\) is the total content (mol/L) of dissolved sulfur dioxide components at pH ≈ 3.8. Taking according to data of this publication r ≈ 5 µm and L ≈ 4 × 10–9 (4 × 10–9 m3 (aq)/m3 of air), we find L/r ≈ 8 × 10–6 cm–1 and WS(VI)_atm. ≈ 108 cm–3 s–1. For the SO2 lifetime in the atmosphere in regard to the reactive intake by droplets, we have \({{\tau }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) = [SO2]/WS(VI)_atm. ≈ 70 s. The value of \({{\tau }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) calculated in this way points to extremely high activity of Mn/Fe ions, but it turns out to be about four orders less than that taken from (Berglen et al., 2004). For the rate of the reaction in the droplet phase, according to data on \({{\gamma }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) (Harris et al., 2013), we have wS(VI)_atm._aq = WS(VI)_atm. 106/NaL 103 ≈ 7 × 10–5 mol L–1s–1, where Na is the Avogadro number and 106 and 103 are the dimension factors, cm3/m3 and L/m3. Such a high rate of liquid-phase oxidation at relatively low concentrations of Mn/Fe and low content of SO2 raises doubts. The following is a calculation of the quantity wS(VI)_atm._aq; it relies on the results of direct experiments on the dynamics of the catalytic reaction in bulk conditions. For this purpose, we use the known expression for the catalytic reaction rate: wMn_Fe = kMn_Fe [S(IV)] (Ibusuki and Takeuchi, 1987). Here, kMn_Fe = 3.7 × 107 [Mn(II)][Fe(III)]/(10–pH)–0.74 s–1 is the observed reaction rate constant. The concentrations of Mn/Fe ions in droplets are found by data about their content averaged over the episode: 0.24 and 4 ng/m3, respectively. The content of condensed moisture on large particles, in accordance with (Harris et al., 2013), is taken to be equal to 1% of its total content (3.7 × 10–4 cm3/m3), i.e., ≈4 × 10–6 L/m3 (see Fig. 1). At T ≈ 280 K and pH 3.8 (≤4.2 (Ibusuki and Takeuchi, 1987)), we have from this kMn_Fe ≈ 3 × 10–2 s–1 and wMn_Fe = kMn_Fe [S(IV)] ≈ 3 × 10–9 mol L–1 s–1. The value of wMn_Fe calculated by data of bulk experiments on the gaseous phase basis is much less than the WS(VI)_atm. presented above, which calls into question not only the value of the reactive coefficient of SO2 uptake (Harris et al., 2013). The value of wMn_Fe exceeds the rate of SO2 oxidation with the participation of hydrogen peroxide: \({{w}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) = \({{k}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\)[H2O2][\({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\)] ≈ 10–9 mol L–1 s–1, although, in contradiction to what was said in (Harris et al., 2013), it indicates the potentially significant participation of hydrogen peroxide in oxidation of \({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\) in this episode. Here, \({{k}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) = 7.45 × 107 × 10–pH L mol–1 s–1 is the rate constant of the reaction H2O2 + \({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\) (Betterton and Hoffman, 1988) in the expression for \({{w}_{{{{{\text{H}}}_{{\text{2}}}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\), and [H2O2] and [\({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\)] are the concentrations of hydrogen peroxide and component of diluted SO2 in cloud droplets.

Influence of Other Transition Metals

The discussed contradictions between catalytic reactivity of Mn/Fe ions according to monitoring data on the oxidation depth by Δ34S and results of studying the reaction kinetic in bulk conditions were successfully removed in (Harris et al., 2013) by involving catalytic reactions of SO2 oxidation with the participation of ions of other TMs detected in cloud droplets (Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Ti, V, and Cr). In this way, up to ∼60% of sulfur dioxide oxidated in the cloud were “bound.” For the rate of the catalytic process with the participation of these TM ions, we have wTM = 0.6 wS(VI)_atm._aq ≈ 4 × 10–5 mol L–1 s–1. Hence, for the observed process rate constant, we find kobs = wTM/[\({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\)] ≈ 400 s–1; for the squared sum of multiplied concentrations of TM ions in the expression for wTM, we have (Σ[TM])2 = kobs/(3.7 × 107(10–pH)–0.74) ≈ 2 × 10–8 mol2/L2. Taking into account the droplet phase content on large particles (Harris et al., 2013) and the quantity (Σ[TM])2 we found, we come to the conclusion that the total TM content in the atmosphere exceeds their analytical value (≈6 ng/m3) by two orders of magnitude. Note that the estimates of (Σ[TM])2 involved the value of kMn_Fe at T = 298 K. At T = 280 K, which corresponds to conditions of field experiments, the value of this rate constant becomes lower almost by an order of magnitude. The use of the expression for wMn_Fe in calculations of wTM also raises doubts. In this regard, we note that the observed catalysis of oxidation of sulfur dioxide solutions by Ni(II) and V(II) ions, e.g., according to data of (Brandt and Elding, 1998), is fully caused by contamination of nickel and vanadium preparations by iron impurities. The effect of added copper ions in this reaction manifests itself to an important degree only in far fewer acid solutions (pH 6) (Grgić et al., 1991). As for catalysis by Cr ions at the considered values of pH (≈3.8), it is also impossible (Brandt and Elding, 1998).

The Effect of Enhancement of the Pairwise Action of Mn/Fe Ions

What is the real reason for the considered discrepancy between data of field experiments on the dynamics of the conversion SO2\({\text{SO}}_{4}^{{2 - }}\) in Δ34S and results of experiments on kinetics of the catalytic reaction with the participation of Mn/Fe ions in bulk conditions (Ibusuki and Takeuchi, 1987; Martin and Good, 1991)? It is a lack of knowledge about the mechanism of the catalytic action of the pair of these ions and, as a result, the incorrect use of the expression taken from the literature (Ibusuki and Takeuchi, 1987) for wMn_Fe in calculations of the SO2 oxidation rate in the droplet phase of the cloud. Our consideration of the action mechanism of these metal ions shows that the effect of enhancement of their pairwise action (synergism) is related to enhancement of the catalytic action of iron ions by manganese ions (Ermakov and Purmal, 2002; Eremina et al., 2017). The apparent activity of manganese ions, which are not active in themselves (Ermakov and Purmal, 2002), is caused by acceleration of slow stages of the chain continuation (3a, 3b; see Table 1), as well as by the shift of the distribution of impurity iron ions with respect to the charge forms ([Fe(III)]/[Fe(II)]) for the catalytically active form Fe(III)—the participant of the reaction initiation (see reaction (1) in Table 1).

In (Ermakov and Purmal, 2002; Eremina et al., 2017), in the framework of the mechanism of the catalytic process with the participation of Mn/Fe ions presented in Table 1, a quantitative agreement was successively achieved for almost all available experimental data on the physical modeling of catalytic oxidation of sulfur dioxide in bulk experiments in the presence of iron and manganese ions. However, the results of new experiments on laboratory modeling of the dynamics of the catalytic reaction in deliquesced aerosol particles remained unexplainable. The experiments were carried out in smog chambers and pointed to anomalously high WS(VI)_atm. (Wang et al., 2016; Liu et al, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). An important feature of these experiments is the large excess of manganese ions over the S(IV) content in droplets (α = [Mn2+]/[S(IV)] \( \gg \) 1). For example, in the investigations (Zhang et al., 2021), experiments for pH ≤ 1.5 were carried out at α ≈ 106.

Branching Regime of Catalysis

Recently, in (Ermakov et al., 2023), we reported about a new (branching) regime of S(IV) oxidation catalysis by manganese ions. The regime is implemented in conditions of the excess of metal ions over S(IV). As it turned out, the decisive role in the dynamics of the process in this regime was played by chain branching with the participation of manganese ions and an intermediate product \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) generated in the course of the reaction (see reaction (14) in Table 1).

Instead of one active center \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) lost in the branching reaction, there appear two new chain carriers: Mn(III) and \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{ - }.\) The increase in their generation rate due to that is accompanied by an increase in the concentrations of chain carriers and \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) and, along with that, an increase in wMn_Fe. A parallel reaction \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) + \({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\) + H+\({\text{2HSO}}_{4}^{ - }\) + H+ (see reaction (6) in Table 1) competes with the consumption of \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) in the chain branching.

Under the predominance of the first one (α \( \gg \) 1 and pH > 3), the process of SO2 oxidation goes into the branching regime, which is accompanied by the experimentally observed (Wang et al., 2016; Liu et al, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021) rise in wMn_Fe with an increase in [Mn2+] and pH. On the contrary, under the predominant proceeding of reaction (6), i.e., under conditions of low α and small pH, branching of the chains \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) + Mn2+ turns out to be suppressed. As a result, instead of the rise in wMn_Fe, a constancy of wMn_Fe with an increase in manganese ions is observed with an increase in (Mn2+) observed in (Wang et al., 2016; Liu et al, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021) in experiments carried out in smog chambers and in bulk experiments at α ≤ 1 and low pH (≤3) (Coughanowr and Krause, 1965; Berglund et al., 1993). Summarizing, we conclude that the transition of the catalytic reaction to the branching regime is regulated by the acidity of droplets and by the ratio of concentrations of Mn and S(IV) ions in them. The transition to the branching regime with an increase in pH requires lower and lower α (Ermakov et al., 2023), which is related to the decrease in the rate of the reaction \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) + \({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\) + H+ with a decrease in acidity of droplets.

The Role of the Excess of Mn/Fe Ions

The preceding sheds light on causes of the rapid oxidation of sulfur dioxide in condensed moisture on the surface of large particles (Harris et al., 2013), despite its small volume fraction on these particles in the episode FCE-11.2. We recall that TM dissolution in moisture that coats the particles was considered in (Harris et al., 2013) as the only reason of catalytic SO2 oxidation. The dissolution of TMs is undoubtedly necessary for the implementation of the catalytic reaction. However, using data about the dynamics of the catalytic reaction with the participation of Mn/Fe ions (Ibusuki and Takeuchi, 1987) allows one to associate with this process not more than a few percent of the observed SO2 conversion. In this regard, it was erroneously proposed to widen the circle of catalytic reactions with the participation of ions of other TMs that were also observed in large particles of coarsely dispersed mineral aerosol, although the data available in the literature do not corroborate these assumptions. Number concentrations of such particles and, as a result, the low content of condensed moisture on their surface (generally, its content in the cloud) turn out to be no less important than the dissolution of TMs contained in large particles of coarsely dispersed mineral aerosol. As a result, the concentration of manganese ions in droplets on these particles noticeably exceeds the concentration of S(IV) (α \( \gg \) 1, see the dashed line 2* in Fig. 1). In combination with the not too low pH level in droplets (3.8), this excess of metal ions over S(IV) seemingly provides the transition of the reaction into the branching regime (Ermakov et al., 2023), which is accompanied by deep and rapid self-purification of air coming to the cloud from SO2 in the episode FCE-11.2.

Role of Conditions of Catalytic Reaction Proceeding

As an illustration of the differences in the reaction dynamics when the catalytic reaction goes from the chain nonbranching regime into the branching regime, Fig. 2 shows the dependence of wMn_Fe on pH according to data of laboratory experiments with aerosol particles (Wang et al., 2016; Liu et al, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021) (see the dots). Calculations of wMn_Fe by data of different experiments (see the curve) were carried out with allowance for the recalculation of concentrations of manganese ions and S(IV) in particles to common concentration conditions (T = 298 K, μ ≈ 5 mol/L, the condensed moisture content of 100 and 300 µg/m3, pH 0–4, \({{P}_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}}}}}\) = 40 ppb, and [Mn2+] = 40 ng/m3), where μ is the ionic strength. It is seen that the experimental data in general follow the behavior of the calculated curve and point to correctness of the considered mechanism of the catalytic reaction in the branching regime. It follows from data of Fig. 2 that a close to saturation wMn_Fe ≈ 10–7 mol L–1 s–1 is observed at pH < 1.5. Under these conditions, the catalytic reaction proceeds in the chain nonbranching regime (Ermakov et al., 2023), because the rate of reaction (6) exceeds manifold the rate of chain branching (14) (see Table 1). With a decrease in acidity of particles, wMn_Fe increases by several orders of magnitude. Such a pronounced influence of the decrease in acidity of the solutions on wMn_Fe is explained by suppression of the negative influence of reaction (6) and the transition of the reaction into the branching regime.

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Dependence of the rate wMn_Fe of sulfur dioxide oxidation on pH under common concentration conditions (T = 298 K, μ ≈ 5 mol/L, and L ≈ 3 × 10–10 (≈300 µg/m3), \({{P}_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{2}}}}}\) = 40 ppb, and the concentration of manganese ions is 40 ng/m3) according to (Wang et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021); see the dots. The solid curve is the calculated data.

ON THE DYNAMICS OF SO2 OXIDATION IN CLOUD DROPLETS

We meet attributes of SO2 oxidation in the droplet phase in the branching regime in the real atmosphere when we consider monitoring data on the aerosol haze that envelops Beijing and other cities of southeast China in winter (Zheng et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016; Xie et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020). The particle concentration level PM2.5 monitored every hour approaches ≈900 µg/m3 (Liu et al., 2020). At the same time, despite the low insolation and low concentrations of SO2 oxidants in the atmosphere (O3 ≤ 1 ppb), as well as extremely low moisture content in the particles (100÷300 µg/m3), an unprecedently high rate of sulfate formation in haze particles is observed (WS(VI)_atm. ∼ tens of µg m–3 h–1) (Wang et al., 2016; Liu et al, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). Apparently, we meet a similar reaction regime in the episode FCE-11.2 in the HCCT-2010 campaign. This regime is implemented not in all droplets in the cloud, but only in their small fraction, including large particles of coarsely dispersed mineral aerosol as condensation nuclei.

As was pointed out above, the reaction rate we calculated using the empirical expression (Ibusuki and Takeuchi, 1987) at the condensed moisture content in the air (3.7 × 10–4 L/m3), T ≈ 280 K, and pH ≈ 3.8 (≤4.2) is wMn_Fe ≈ 3 × 10–9 mol L–1 s–1. This value of the reaction rate is shown by dashed line 2 in Fig. 1. At the same time, it was noted in (Harris et al., 2013) that this value does not exceed 3% of the observed sulfur dioxide oxidation rate calculated by data on Δ34S in sulfur dioxide. Hence, for the observed reaction rate we have \(w_{{{\text{Mn}\_\text{Fe}\_\text{obs}}}}^{*}\) ≈ 30 wMn_Fe ≈ 2 × 10–7 mol L–1 s–1 (see the dashed line 2* in Fig. 1). Previously, in (Ermakov et al., 2023), we presented an analytical expression for the observed reaction rate constant in the branching regime \(k_{{{\text{Mn}\_\text{Fe}}}}^{*}.\) As applied to conditions of the field experiments under consideration, the numerical value of this rate constant is \(k_{{{\text{Mn}\_\text{Fe}}}}^{*}\) = 7 × 105 L mol–1 s–1. For the reaction rate in droplets in the branching regime (Ermakov et al., 2023), we finally find \(w_{{{\text{Mn}\_\text{Fe}}}}^{*}\) ≈ 2 kMn_Fe [Mn2+][\({\text{HSO}}_{3}^{ - }\)] ≈ 2 × 7 × 105 1.2 × 10–6 10–7 ≈ 1.7 × 10–7 mol L–1, which in essence reproduces the abovementioned value of wMn_Fe_obs. Here, 1.2 × 10–6 and 10–7 are the concentrations of manganese ions and S(IV), mol/L, respectively. Attention is attracted by the fact that the concentration of iron ions—a participant of initiation of reaction (1) (see Table 1)—is absent in the expression for \(w_{{{\text{Mn}\_\text{Fe}}}}^{*}\). This fact means that iron ions in the branching regime manifest themselves only at the stage of generation of primary chain carriers (\({\text{SO}}_{3}^{ - }\)) (1) (see Table 1). However, the following increase in their concentration is fully determined by the dynamics of the chain branching reaction (14). The value of \(w_{{{\text{Mn}\_\text{Fe}}}}^{*}\) that we found makes it possible to estimate the real coefficient of reactive SO2 uptake by the droplet phase on the surface of large particles: \({{\gamma }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) = \(4w_{{{\text{Mn}\_\text{Fe}}}}^{*}\)Nar/3 × 103 [SO2] \({{\varpi }_{{{\text{S}}{{{\text{O}}}_{{\text{2}}}}}}}\) ≈ 3.2 × 10–4, which agrees, e.g., with data (Pozzoli et al., 2008). Here, 103 cm3/L is a dimension factor.

Within the framework of the proposed mechanism of the reaction, the nonparticipation of hydrogen peroxide in sulfate formation in condensed moisture on the surface of large particles becomes clear. The reason for this is the many times higher rate of the catalytic reaction in the branching regime as compared to that with the participation of hydrogen peroxide (by a factor of ≈102); see dashed lines 2 and 2* in Fig. 1. The unexpressed role of the catalytic process in other nighttime episode FCE-7.1 also becomes clear. The investigations of (Harris et al., 2013) pointed to the significantly lower efficiency of large particle activation in this episode and a noticeably lower content of moisture in them, which apparently restrained the leaching of TM ions from particles. A natural explanation can be also found for the larger values of wMn_Fe in the droplet phase which are revealed in comparable concentration conditions as compared to those observed in bulk experiments enhanced sulfate formation. In (Angle et al., 2021), their difference was attributed to the formation of specific zones in the droplets (“surface effects and potentially aerosol pH gradients”). In (Lee et al., 2019), the generation of small quantities of hydrogen peroxide (≈10–6 mol/L) during droplet spraying in laboratory conditions was discussed as the cause of this phenomenon. In (Hung et al., 2018), the acceleration of the catalytic reaction in droplets was associated with acceleration of the initiation process caused by the generation of \({\text{SO}}_{3}^{ - }\) radicals due to the surface reaction. The above is contrary to results of our data comparison in (Ermakov et al., 2023) about the reaction kinetics in bulk experiments [14], [15] and in small immobile droplets (Barrie and Georgii, 1976; Kaplan et al., 1981) at pH ≤ 3 and α < 250. It pointed to close wS(VI) in these experiments and, therefore, the identity of the mechanism of S(VI) formation at given pH and α.

In reality, the observed acceleration of the catalytic generation of sulfates in droplets as compared to bulk experiments under comparable conditions is caused by the closeness to constancy of the concentrations of components of dissolved SO2 and the intermediate product \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) in droplets in the course of the reaction. In contrast to bulk experiments, the constancy of S(IV) concentration in aerosol particles sustains the rapid uptake of SO2 from the gas (Wang et al.; 2016; Liu et al, 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). Owing to the high rate of chain branching, the concentration of the intermediate product \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) in droplets turns out to be much higher even than the level of [S(IV)] (Ermakov et al., 2023). The excess of the sulfur dioxide oxidation rate in the droplet phase as compared to bulk conditions is related just to the conjugation of these two physicochemical processes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, by means of the example of data on the dynamics of sulfur dioxide oxidation in an orographic cloud, the specificity of this process in the droplet phase in the presence of transition metal ions is considered. An analysis of these field data shows that the rapid experimentally observed oxidation of sulfur dioxide in cloud droplets is implemented mainly on deliquesced particles of coarsely dispersed mineral aerosol subjected to active leaching of Mn/Fe ions. The decisive role in rapid self-purification of the air coming to the cloud from SO2 is played here by the transition of the catalytic reaction to the branching oxidation regime. Iron ions provide the initial initiation of the catalytic process and the reaction of chain branching with the participation of manganese ions and the intermediate product \({\text{HSO}}_{5}^{ - }\) leads to the appearance of two new chain carriers: Mn(III) and \({\text{SO}}_{4}^{ - }\). The increase in the rate of their generation due to this is accompanied by an increase in concentrations of the chain carriers. In combination with the favorable level of acidity of condensed moisture on the surface of large particles of coarsely dispersed mineral aerosol, this provides the rapid oxidation of sulfur dioxide despite the extremely low volume fraction of the condensed moisture occupied by droplets on the surface of large particles in the cloud. Thus, droplets of different fractions in the cloud turn out to be unequal for catalytic intracloud processes not only due to differences in their sizes. The results obtained in this work indicate the significance and potential abundance of catalytic processes of SO2 oxidation in the global atmosphere and point to the necessity of taking them into account when considering the budget of sulfates in the atmosphere and their influence on the climate.