Abstract
The development of entrepreneurship spirit among young people is instrumental in empowering and invigorating them to take up entrepreneurial activities and become entrepreneurs. Understanding the psychological motivations (behavioral intentions) for people to become entrepreneurs is essential for the development of requisite policy and for creating a sustainable environment for entrepreneurs to grow and survive. Grounded on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this paper examines the factors driving the entrepreneurial intentions of students by specifically examining how student internship motivations (SIM) moderate the impact of entrepreneurial attitude (EA), subjective norms (SN), perceived behavioral control (PBC), entrepreneurial education (EE), and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) on college students’ entrepreneurial intentions (SEI). A total of 478 valid responses gathered via a self-administered questionnaire from Chinese College students were analyzed with SPSS-26 by applying multiple linear regression analysis, moderation, and slope analysis. Results indicate that EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE positively influence college SEI. Most importantly, the moderation and slope analysis indicate that SIM significantly but negatively moderates the impact of EA, SN, PBC, and ESE on the entrepreneurial intentions of college students. SIM, however, failed to significantly influence the effect of EE on the SEI. The inferences (both academic and practical) of these discoveries for the development of sustainable entrepreneurial and internship programs are deliberated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Introduction
The psychological characteristics school of thought labels entrepreneurs as people having exceptional values, attitudes, and desires that drive them to undertake entrepreneurial ventures (Dinis et al. 2013; Yusof et al. 2007). Entrepreneurs and the enterprise activities they generate are critical to economic development, especially when it comes to the challenge of job creation for the youth. Entrepreneurship is thus a strategic approach to resolving the recurrent economic problems of poverty (Moradi et al. 2020). It is also conceptualized as the control and organization of means to construct a groundbreaking economic system for the reason of gain or growth under conditions of risk and insecurity (Dollinger et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2019). The description of entrepreneurship can further be put into three processes: first, the prelaunch or opportunity recognition stage, second the launch/development and implementation stage, where the needed resources are gathered to start the business and finally, the post-launch stage, where the entrepreneur manages the business to grow and survive (Gielnik et al. 2020).
Furthermore, entrepreneurship is deliberated as a means of creating a competitive advantage and thus recommended for all educational systems, especially higher educational institutions, since it empowers students to fish out opportunities, engage in innovation, take and manage risk, and organize and coordinate resources to achieve their entrepreneurial dreams (Garcez et al. 2022; Schimperna et al. 2021). Education in entrepreneurship becomes a fundamental basis for developing good entrepreneurship spirits since it provides activities purposed at developing the mindset, skill set, and enterprising or entrepreneurial people for business creation (Fauchald et al. 2022; Hardie et al. 2022). It has also been accentuated that entrepreneurial education (EE) is discernible by creativity, curiosity, and emotion, unitization of knowledge and skills to handle real challenges and opportunities leading to innovations and the establishment of businesses (Colombelli et al. 2022; de Sousa et al. 2022). Additionally, entrepreneurship is a form of premeditated conduct, and the intent regarding a behavior comprises the motivation and enthusiasm of people to undertake a course of action (Arjanto and Mustiningsih, 2022; Larsen, 2022). Thus, the desire of individuals to be an entrepreneur is motivated by several factors such as personal autonomy, wealth, and freedom, and one of the mechanisms for achieving these motivating factors (personal autonomy, wealth, and freedom) to becoming student entrepreneurs is through the active participation of students in internship programs. Thus, internships have become very common for tertiary education in many industrialized nations, which open doors for students to get job placement and entrepreneurial training experiences (Baert et al. 2021; Margaryan et al. 2022). Consequently, internship activities are powerful learning mechanisms to empower students to make adequate connections between classroom experience and the world of work knowledge (Di Meglio et al. 2022; Lee et al. 2022). This supplements the hands-on execution of professional knowledge learned from the college/university (McAlexander et al. 2022; Şekerci et al. 2021). Through internship programs, students can further learn good work habits and values that will be required for them to succeed at their place of work (Di Meglio et al. 2022; Odlin et al. 2022) and as aspiring entrepreneurs.
The purpose of this study is to interrogate the entrepreneurial intention of Chinese college students by experimenting with the moderating impact of student internship motivation (SIM) on entrepreneurial intentions based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) framework. The TPB framework is widely applied in psychology and other domains, such as management, education, occupational health, and environmental sciences, to predict and explain changes in human behavior (Ajzen, 2020; Sussman and Gifford, 2019). It provides a better realization of the objectives of this study, which specifically tests the moderating influence of SIM on the relationship between entrepreneurial attitude (EA), subjective norm (SN), perceived behavioral control (PBC), EE, entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) and student entrepreneurial intentions (SEI). Student internship programs are considered one of the modes by which students are empowered to learn how the real working environment operates and to build entrepreneurial competencies. More so, internship programs for students have become vital, especially given the better post-COVID-19 pandemic conditions (reduced infections and spread of the virus), which have led to fewer lockdowns and restrictions. In the periods of the pandemic, many companies and university institutions were severely impacted by the strict COVID-19 control and prevention measures forcing them to shut down fully or partially or move activities online (Babbar and Gupta, 2022; Quattrone et al. 2022). This disrupted internship programs around the world, including in China (Teng et al. 2021; W. Zhang et al. 2021a), and prevented schools and companies from collaborating to arrange for placement internships for college students. The current reduced levels of infections and spread of the virus, along with the regular COVID-19 nucleic acid testing among the people, have empowered governments to relax the COVID-19 control and preventive measures (Devi et al. 2022; Xavier et al. 2022). This relaxation of COVID-19 control and measures provides companies the opportunity to collaborate with educational institutions to organize effective internship programs for students. This on-site or in-person internship placement will yield more beneficial outcomes for students’ entrepreneurial ambition development than the virtual internship programs that were implemented during the heat of the COVID-19 lockdown and restrictions.
Mensah et al. (2021) argue that SIM is directly related to college students’ entrepreneurial intentions (SEIs). Apart from this validated impact of SIM on SEI, no study has tried to validate the moderating effect of student internship programs on the relationship between EA, SN, PBC, EE, ESE, and SEI. This study is novel in terms of providing a new research model to validate the moderating impact of SIM on SEI via EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE. The moderating construct has broadened the discussions from the narrower directional impact of SIM on entrepreneurial intention presented in Mensah et al. (2021) to the broader perspective it offers as a holistic approach to comprehending the importance of student internship activities on the development of entrepreneurial interests among students. This is a unique theoretical contribution to the entrepreneurship literature and provides practical guidance to the proper implementation of internship programs by universities to ensure that internship placement provides maximum benefits to students to get relevant job skills that match their course of study. For instance, researchers have shown that EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE are significantly related to SEI (Lv et al. 2021; Mbwambo and Magoma, 2022; Ngo et al. 2022; Yousaf et al. 2021). However, the studies cited above and others fail to consider how student internship activities can moderate the impact of these factors on the students’ intention to engage in entrepreneurial activities. Consequently, this study sets itself apart from other studies, as indicated above, through its theoretical contributions to the literature, which specifically examines the moderating influence of students’ internship activities on the interaction between EA, SN, PBC, EE, ESE, and SEI. The major theoretical contribution of this study shows that internship motivation (SIM) significantly but negatively moderates the impact of EA, SN, PBC, and ESE on the college SEI. SIM, however, failed to significantly influence the impact of EE on the SEI. It highlights a gap between existing EE and real entrepreneurship in China, which may cause a gap between students’ entrepreneurial intentions and activity. The main hypothesis of this research is that SIM moderates the impact of EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE on SEI.
The research is organized as outlined: research theoretical foundation and formation of hypothesis, model, methodology, results, and data analysis, discussions along with implications, conclusion, constraints, and future of the study.
Research theoretical foundation and hypothesis formation
Theory of planned behavior
Numerous concepts have been advanced to forecast and elucidate people’s behavior but all these theories have been applied mostly to understand individual adoption and utilization of new technological systems, except the TPB, which has been mainly utilized in entrepreneurial and entrepreneurship investigation. The TPB thus becomes the most suitable concept that applies to the setting of this paper since it empowers the better prediction of the EI behavior of the study as compared to the other competing theories.
The TPB is considered to have been developed from the theory of reasoned action (TRA) advanced by Ajzen (1985). The TPB integrates PBC as a precursor to behavioral intention (Ajzen, 2020; Ulker-Demirel and Ciftci, 2020). It proposes that the action and performance of people’s behavior are influenced by three key constructs attitudes toward the behavior, SN, and PBC (Ajzen, 1985). All these three factors culminate in the development of intent toward behavior which ultimately impacts consumer behavior (Ajzen, 1985, 2005). The TPB has been used extensively in diverse behavior studies ranging from utilization of drugs and reutilizing to decisions on kind of travel, from sex to customer conduct, and from the adoption of technology to protection of privacy (Ajzen, 2020). Furthermore, the TPB expands the nature of pure volition control indicated in the theory of reason of action (Ajzen, 2020). This is based on the adding of beliefs concerning the possession of required resources and opportunities for undertaking a given course of action (Chan et al. 2020; Yadav and Pathak, 2017). In other words, the more resources and chances that users believe they have, the better will be their professed behavior control over their conduct (Tan et al. 2017). TPB predicts two possible impacts of PBC on behavior. First, PBC has to do with motivational elements that have an indirect influence on behavior via intention (Verma and Chandra, 2018). Secondly, PBC deals with actual control and impacts directly on the association with behavior not mediated by intention (Gao et al. 2017; Verma and Chandra, 2018).
The utilization of TPB in this study is because it has been extensively applied and tested in multitudes of entrepreneurship studies, and thus its validity and reliability can be guaranteed. For instance, based on the TPB framework, it was discovered that philanthropical, biospheric, hedonic, and self-centered values have an indirect impact on sustainability-driven EI, which was in turn considered as the means of understanding attitudes towards sustainability of entrepreneurship and PBC (Yasir et al. 2021). The same work indicated that PBC and social norms drive the intent to become a sustainable entrepreneur (Yasir et al. 2021). Another research indicated that EE does not drive entrepreneurial intentions directly but is indirectly mediated by three constituents of TPB (personal attitude, SN, and PBC) and ESE (Maheshwari and Kha, 2022). Furthermore, in a related study, it was confirmed that SN was not a determinant of EI, perceived risks have a negative effect on PBC and male engineering students were found to have higher levels of EI than their female counterparts (Dao et al. 2021). Also, a study showed that the positive effect of attitude toward behavior and PBC on social entrepreneurship intentions was reinforced when students undertook entrepreneurship activities at the university and had non-business majors (Chang et al. 2022).
Furthermore, research grounded on the fundamentals of TPB demonstrates that ESE showed a positive and significant mediating effect on the interaction between EE and EI (Wang et al. 2023). The study also suggests that psychological capital positively moderated the influence of ESE on EI (Wang et al. 2023). Another study integrating the concepts of TPB, locus of control, and cyber EE showed that cyber entrepreneurship education (EE) had a positive moderating influence on the relationships between attitudes and intentions and between SN and intention (Tseng et al. 2022). It also demonstrates a negative moderating impact on the interaction between PBC and intention (Tseng et al. 2022). Again the study showed that cyber EE moderated positively the interaction between TPB reasoning concepts and cyber EI (Tseng et al. 2022). EE, in another study, was shown to be a significant mediator of the interaction between entrepreneurial motivation, family support, individual self-efficacy, and EI (Saoula et al. 2023).
Formation of hypothesis
Entrepreneurial attitude
Attitude is considered the propensity to take any action (positive or negative) towards or against something in a particular situation (Tiwari et al. 2017). Individual attitude is the totality of individual concepts and beliefs as well as the means of evaluating those belief systems (Gloss et al. 2017; Tiwari et al. 2017). It was highlighted that the conduct of a person is based on individual attitudes and beliefs, and this, in turn, shapes a person’s actions/behaviors (Schierjott et al. 2018; Tiwari et al. 2017). Attitude regarding conduct is well-defined as the magnitude to which a person undertakes a good or bad valuation of the conduct under consideration (Ajzen, 2020). An attitude thus can be said to be an evaluative response. An EA is an evaluative feeling of entrepreneurship that is based on the beliefs and assessment of entrepreneurs (Maydiantoro et al. 2021; Saleh et al. 2021). EAs are thus considered behavioral characteristics that can empower entrepreneurs to grow and be successful in their chosen businesses (Ewa and Łuczka, 2020; Saleh et al. 2021). Some of the characteristics of EAs are determination, strong work ethics, integrity, willpower, confidence, comprehensive alertness, realistic approach, adaptability and flexibility, passion, etc. Additionally, EAs may be developed based on the satisfaction of starting a business and the quality of life that comes with originating and growing your enterprise (Baluku et al. 2021; Maydiantoro et al. 2021). Consequently, students who demonstrate good standards of EAs will be in a better position to crave entrepreneurial activities. Various research studies have demonstrated that the growth of a strong EA is strongly associated with the behavioral intention to partake in entrepreneurial deeds (Lingappa et al. 2020; Maydiantoro et al. 2021; Rahman et al. 2022; Wach and Bilan, 2021). Consequently, H1 was proposed.
H1: EA has a positive influence on the EI of college students.
Subjective norms
SN is conceived as the observed social influence and forced to participate or not in a given conduct (Kashif et al. 2018; Taufique and Vaithianathan, 2018). SNs relate to how people think they will be perceived by people around them if they decide to undertake a particular course of action (Nisson and Earl, 2020; Sun et al. 2020). It comprises the social pressures from family, friends, and other important people in society that may force individuals to engage in a certain form of activity. Put together, the SN is the people’s discernment of how pressures society can influence them to perform or not undertake a course of behavior in a particular circumstance (La Barbera and Ajzen, 2020; Tiwari et al. 2017). Chinese society is endowed with collective cultural characteristics where social framework and foundation are the bedrock, and thus issues of SNs are dominant. Within Chinese society, friends, family, and other key actors in society influence individual choices and decision-making processes. Thus, it is, very vital to appreciate how SNs can influence individual Chinese students to undertake entrepreneurial activities/behaviors. Research has validated that SN has a direct link with EI (Attahiru et al. 2020; Lu et al. 2021; Rahman et al. 2022). H2 was accordingly projected.
H2: SN has a positive influence on the EI of college students.
Perceived behavioral control
PBC has to do with a person’s opinion of their capacity to participate in a course of action (Ajzen, 2002, 2020). Perceived behavior control deals with situations where people may not have the resources or absence whole volitional control over specific conduct of concern (Ajzen, 2020; Elie-Dit-Cosaque et al. 2011). The notion was presented in the TPB to house the non-control characteristics that are potentially inherent in all human behavior (Luan and Lin, 2020; Nayanajith and Damunupola, 2019). PBC potentially influences the intention of an individual to participate in any task or entrepreneurial activity (Rachbini, 2018; Vamvaka et al. 2020). Higher levels of perceived control empower and strengthen people’s intention to undertake a behavior and thus consolidate an upsurge in effort and determination (Ajzen, 2020; Yuriev et al. 2020). PBC provides vital information as to what control a person can demonstrate in a given situation and therefore can be used to predict behavior (Shan et al. 2020; Vamvaka et al. 2020). Students’ ability to demonstrate their competence in terms of control over their business decision process will be more likely to undertake entrepreneurial activities. Research has shown that PBC is connected positively with the behavioral intention to participate in entrepreneurial actions (Adhikusuma and Genoveva, 2020; Youssef et al. 2021). Accordingly, H3 was proposed.
H3: PBC has a positive influence on the EI of college students.
Entrepreneurship education
EE is considered as any form of pedagogic package or content/procedures of education to grow and mature individual entrepreneurial skills and attitudes (Jena, 2020; Linton and Klinton, 2019). It can take the form of a traditional or formalized system that teaches, trains, and enlightens students on the innovative steps to develop and own a business from conception to actualization (Barba-Sánchez and Atienza-Sahuquillo, 2018; Linton and Klinton, 2019). Educational institutions such as universities and colleges serve as a good environment for people to acquire quality entrepreneurship knowledge and skills for business development and self-employment (Linton and Klinton, 2019). Global University Entrepreneurial Spirit Students’ Survey (GUESSS) indicates that EE and the entrepreneurial environment existing at the university are major drivers of students’ EI and activities (Philipp et al. 2021). Additionally, EE components such as entrepreneurial skills, entrepreneurial learning, and entrepreneurial intention are considered to drive positively technology-based business development (Dana et al. 2021). EE that is directed and focused on developing people’s competence and skills is said to have yielded more influence on the tendency of students to develop a new enterprise/business (Ahmed et al. 2020; Nabi et al. 2017). It has been accentuated that for EE to have a maximum effect, it should concentrate on taking action, forecasting, and daring into unfamiliar prospects (Galvão et al. 2018; Ndofirepi, 2020). Delivering adequate EE at the university was shown to drive entrepreneurial behaviors since it impacts positively attitudes and skills that encourage entrepreneurial intentions among students (Nguyen and Duong, 2021). It was further elaborated that EI can be nurtured and enhanced via EE and that EE is significantly associated with entrepreneurial intention (Ramadani et al. 2022). Other past investigations have likewise confirmed that EE encourages the intention to participate in entrepreneurial undertakings and self-occupation intentions (Kisubi et al. 2021; T. Nuseir et al. 2020). This paper proposes that students who are exposed to good standards of EE and training will harbor the entrepreneurial intention to develop their businesses. Consequently, H4 was proposed.
H4: EE will positively influence the EI of college students.
Entrepreneurial self-efficacy
Self-efficacy is conceived as the individual dogmas concerning their competencies to show control over their standard of performance or function and over situations that concern their lives (Bandura, 1977). The notion of self-efficacy differs from PBC, which is based on the ability to undertake specific behavior (Ajzen, 2002). Perceived self-efficacy is the consistent confidence in a person’s abilities to form and implement actions needed to produce an expected outcome (Bandura, 1986; Lippke, 2020). The concern here is with control over the behavior itself, not with control over outcomes or actions (Ajzen, 2002). On the surface, PBC and self-efficacy sound similar (Ajzen, 2002), but scholars have provided empirical support to differentiate these two concepts. Self-efficacy is made up of internal control features like skills and knowledge, which reflect individual perceptions about the ease of use or struggle in executing a particular action or behavior (Vamvaka et al. 2020). ESE is the intensity of entrepreneurs’ self-assurance in their entrepreneurial competence and skill possessed to complete diverse entrepreneurial behavior and succeed (Li et al. 2020; Wei et al. 2020). Depending on environmental and individual factors, entrepreneurs can strengthen their capability to withstand and manage negative emotions and pressures within a given entrepreneurial setting (Wei et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2020). ESE can be acquired, modified, and improved to take advantage of any entrepreneurial venture. Students who demonstrate the ability of higher standards of self-efficacy in entrepreneurial activities are more susceptible to undertaking ventures in entrepreneurship. Past research has established that ESE is connected positively with EI (OK et al. 2020; Y. Zhang et al. 2021b). Accordingly, H5 was put forward.
H5: EE will positively influence the EI of college students.
Moderating the impact of SIM
The SIM construct utilized in this work seeks to describe the perception and intent of students concerning internship programs rather than the outcomes of the internship or undertaking of any actual internship programs. Student internship is an integral part of higher education, and students most often are encouraged by their institutions/universities to undertake internship work-related activities during school holidays. Internship for some universities and colleges is a vital and mandatory part of the student’s course of study and for graduation (Januszewski and Grzeszczak, 2021). Internships build and create a real working condition/space where learners can cultivate their minds and skills through practical experience (applied training) (Januszewski and Grzeszczak, 2021; Martín-Lara et al. 2019). Empowering students’ employability is one cardinal goal of students’ internship programs and activities. Internships are considered three-way cooperation among institutions of higher education, an employment place (company), and a student intern, which gives students the chance to apply classroom learning to a practical environment (Lei and Yin, 2019). These interactions enable the professional and personal development of students’ business desires and aspirations (Anjum, 2020). Furthermore, studies have experimentally proven a strong affirmative connection between student internship programs and the development of entrepreneurial intention among college students (Mensah et al. 2021; Yi, 2018; Zreen et al. 2019). Nevertheless, past and current literature has failed to test the moderating influence of SIM to moderate the impact of EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE on entrepreneurial intention. Thus, this paper advances that adequate student internship among university students can contribute to enhancing the predictive power of each of these constructs (EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE) on the student’s desire to take up entrepreneurial activities. Consequently, H6, H7, H8, H9, and H10 were proposed.
H6: SIM moderates the relationship between EA and the EI of college students.
H7: SIM moderates the relationship between SN and the EI of college students.
H8: SIM moderates the relationship between PBC and the EI of college students.
H9: SIM moderates the relationship between EE and the EI of college students.
H10: SIM moderates the relationship between ESE and the EI of college students.
Research model
The research model grounded on the research context and propositions advanced in the previous segment are presented in Fig. 1. SIM is projected to moderate the impact of EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE on student EI.
Research methodology
The methodological processes utilized to undertake this study are adequately explained in the sub-sections that follow, which pertain to instrument development, sampling technique, data analysis tools used, and checking of common method bias.
Instrument
Introducing students to entrepreneurship concepts early in their youth formation stages could be instrumental in developing their entrepreneurial behaviors. The placement of this study within the students’ domain is thus important which will provide vital empirical results to advance the importance of internship activities on self-employment and entrepreneurship development among students. To fully validate the proposed research conceptual framework of this work, a research (quantitative) questionnaire technique was designed to permit the data collection and subsequent analysis. The constructs in the instrument were picked from past literature after an extensive literature review but were restructured to reflect the contextual setting of this study. The items were adopted in this manner: EAs and entrepreneurial intention (Lu et al. 2021; Ozaralli and Rivenburgh, 2016), SNs (Muliadi and Mirawati, 2020), PBC (Ajzen, 1985; Vamvaka et al. 2020), EE (Liñán et al. 2011; Turker and Selcuk, 2009), ESE (Shahab et al. 2019), and SIM (Mensah et al. 2021). These variables were selected to create the research model (Fig. 1) investigated in this paper since it will empower the better achievement of the objectives (the moderating impact of SIM in the advancement of students’ entrepreneurial behavioral intentions) of the paper.
Each construct contained three questions and they were examined on a five (5) point Likert scale which ranged from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The number of questions per variable utilized in this current study was shortened to 3 items to improve the reliability of the items previously used (i.e., 5 items in Mensah et al. 2021) and also to obtain a better agile instrument that is easier and quicker to administer. The instrument contained two segments. The first segment contained material concerning the construct items under study in this paper, while the other part reflected the basic information about the respondents. The basic information included age, gender, education, future plans, and the school where the student studies. For the respondents to have a maximum appreciation of the questions posed in the instrument, the instrument was transformed from English into the Chinese Language. A back translation was further undertaken to ensure that there were no deviations and distortions from the original intended meaning of items in the questionnaire. Back translation is the conversion of a questionnaire back into the original language and comparison of the two (2) original-language varieties to detect inconsistencies (mistakes in the actual translation i.e., from the source into the targeted language) between these versions (Son, 2018; Yokokawa et al. 2022). We conducted a piloting and pre-testing study with 100 students to test the comprehensiveness of the questionnaire which is considered a good characteristic of a well-designed study. However, the outcomes of the pre-testing and piloting study were not incorporated into the ultimate results. Piloting and pre-testing provide valuable insights to researchers and, thus, provide fundamental settings for the major study (Lancaster et al. 2004; Van Teijlingen and Hundley, 2001). It outlines the early warning signs about the possible challenges with the proposed methods and instruments in terms of their appropriateness and applicability (Bjerre et al. 2018; Van Teijlingen and Hundley, 2001). Some of the reason driving the researchers to undertake pilot and pre-testing includes: designing and testing the acceptability of research instruments, determining the feasibility of the full-scale research, determining the logistical challenges using the proposed methods, collecting preliminary data, and the assessment of data analysis techniques (Mikuska, 2017; Van Teijlingen and Hundley, 2010). The outcome of the pretesting helped to reframe some of the questions and thus contributed to improving the content of the instrument. Ethical review and approval for this study was obtained as per institutional requirement. The researcher informed the participants that the involvement in the study was not mandatory (i.e., voluntary), and thus all the respondents participated in the survey of their own volition. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants, with special emphasis that no personal identifying information provided would be disclosed to any unauthorized third party and that the information provided was to be utilized for the purpose of this study alone. Thus, the confidentiality and anonymity of their information were guaranteed.
Sampling technique
The convenient sampling framework was applied as a sampling approach to collect data from the respondents. The convenient sampling technique is deliberated as a non-likelihood sampling system that targets a population that is easily accessible and reachable (proximity and time as well as the readiness to partake in the research) (Etikan et al. 2016; Stratton, 2021). It is a widely used approach due to its affordability, easiness, and ready population to draw from (Hu and Qin, 2018; Speak et al. 2018). The study population is college students who are undertaking various courses of study at the university (Jiangxi University of Science and Technology) in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, China. The questionnaire instrument was put online and the links were disseminated through social media systems such as WeChat and QQ. Social media was used since it provides easy access to respondents who are frequently (readily available) on social media (especially on WeChat). The data collection lasted for two (2) months (March to April 2022). A total of 478 valid responses were recorded and subsequently used for analyzing the data. The research decided to use the 478 samples acquired since it is more than the minimum sample of 380 required using the sample calculator (calculator.net, 2022) indicators of confidence internal level (95%), a margin of error (5%), population proportion (50%) and estimated population size of 30,000 students. This thus demonstrates the adequacy and representative nature of the samples of 478 used for the data analysis.
Data tools and analysis
We used the Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS-26) for data computation and analysis. Additionally, we used Hayes’s process program for SPSS—Model 1, slope analysis, and the Johnson–Neyman test for moderation analysis (Hayes, 2013). The other statistical tests were: descriptive statistics, scales reliability test, Pearson correlation, common method bias, and multiple linear regressions.
Common method bias (CMB)
To test the common method variance in this study, we applied Harman’s single-factor analysis to examine CMB, and if it exists due to self-reporting measures. Results indicate a total CMB of 20.824% extracted through Harman’s single-factor analysis, which is substantially lower than the recommended standard of 50% total variance. Additionally, Person correlation analysis indicates that there is no high bivariate correlation between constructs (r > 0.90) (Podsakoff et al., 2003) (see Table 1). Hence, CMB is not found in this study.
Demographics
This study analyzed 478 valid responses that included 271 female (56.7%) and 207 male (43.3%) students from Jiangxi University of Science and Technology in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, China. Majority of the students enrolled in undergraduate degrees (N = 289, 60.5%) and master’s degrees (N = 173, 36.2%) programs. Only 16 students (3.3%) were enrolled in Ph.D program. The population of this study is relatively young, as 325 respondents fall into the 18–21 years age bracket. In addition, 86 (18%) participants were aged between 22–25 years and 65 (13.6%) participants were aged between 26–30 years. Only 2 participants were above 30 years old. The majority of the respondents (N = 213, 44.6%) were sure (Yes very likely) to become an entrepreneur in the future. In addition, 156 respondents (32.6%) indicated that they were not sure about becoming an entrepreneur in the future. Only 69 (22.8%) participants indicated that they were not likely to be an entrepreneur in the future.
Results and data analysis
Descriptive statistics
Descriptive statistics comprising of means, standard deviations, and correlations of all the constructs of this study are presented in Table 1. The outcomes show that all variables i.e., EA, SN, PCB, EE, ESE, SIM, and SEI, are correlated positively with each other. The means and standard deviation of all variables are in the anticipated path of this work.
Reliability analysis
Grounded on previous studies, we run the reliability tests such as exploratory factor analysis by using the principle components analysis to extract the variable’s factor loadings. Composite reliability tests, Cronbach’s alpha, and average variance extracted (AVE) were also conducted to further validate the dependability of the variables in our work. Table 2 indicates that tests meet the required standard threshold values of construct factor loadings (<0.600), Cronbach alpha and composite reliability threshold values of 0.700, and AVE standard threshold value of <0.500 variance (Hair, 2011; Hair et al. 2010). Hence, the results demonstrate the construct reliability and validity in this study.
Regression Analysis
Multiple linear regression analysis was applied to test H1, H2, H3, H4, and H5. We hypothesized that EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE would positively influence college students’ EI. Results demonstrate that all the predictor variables i.e., EAs (β = 0.077, p < 0.05), SNs (β = 0.094, p < 0.05), PBC (β = 0.099, p < 0.001), EE (β = 0.114, p < 0.01), and ESE (β = 0.134, p < 0.001) have a significant positive impact on the college SEIs. Hence, the model significantly supports the H1–H5 (R2 = 0 0.157, p < 0.001) respectively (Table 3).
Moderation hypotheses analysis
To test hypotheses H6–H10, we used Hayes’s (2013) moderation process program for SPSS to examine the moderation effects of students’ internship motivation on the interaction between college students’ EA and EI; between college students’ SN and EI; between college students’ PBC and entrepreneurial intentions; between college students’ EE and EI; and between college students’ ESE and EI. Firstly, we selected Model 1 from the Hayes templates to observe the moderation effects of students’ internship motivation on the aforementioned relationship between independent variables and dependent variables. A bootstrapping procedure with 5000 samples (95% confidence level of confidence interval, and bias-corrected) was used for moderation analysis. Results indicate that SIM has a significant but negative moderating influence on the relationship between college students’ EA and EI (β = −0.1918, p < 0.01); between college students’ SNs and EI (β = −0.2432, p < 0.001); between college students’ PBC and entrepreneurial intentions (β = −0.1369, p < 0.01); and between college students’ ESE and entrepreneurial intentions (β = −0.1999, p < 0.01). However, we did not find any moderation influence of SIM on the relationship between college students’ EE and EI (β = −0.0089, p = n.g) (Table 4). Hence, results support H6–H8, and H10 but reject H9.
We also applied simple slope analysis to further understand the nature of moderating influence on the interaction between independent and dependent constructs, as displayed in Figs. 2–5. Figures 2–5 demonstrate that the lines are much steeper for low SIM, indicating that the impact of predictor variables (i.e., EA, SN, PBC, and ESE) on the outcome variable (SEI) is much higher as compared to the high SIM. It means that if the level of SIM increases, the strength of the interaction between independent variables (i.e., EA, SN, PBC, and ESE) and dependent variable (SEI) will be decreased.
To further demonstrate the results, we also applied the Johnson–Neyman test to identify the range of values of the moderator variable (SIM) in which the slope of the predictor’s variables (i.e., EA, SN, PBC, and ESE) is significant vs. non-significant at p < 0.05. Results reveal that the impact of SIM on the relationship between EA and SEI is significant till the value of SIM is increased to 3.9260 if the value increases further, there will be no moderating influence of SIM on the relationship between EA and SEI. Similarly, the moderating influence of SIM on the relationship between SN and SEI is significant till the value of SIM is increased to 3.8854, if the value increases further; there will be no moderating influence of SIM. The impact of SIM on the relationship between PBC and SEI is significant till the value of SIM is increased to 3.8864 and the moderating influence of SIM on the relationship between ESE and SEI is significant till the value of SIM is increased to 4.0357 if the value increased further, there will be no moderating influence of SIM.
Discussion
This paper examined the factors driving entrepreneurial behavior among college students. Entrepreneurship development, cultivation, and promotion among college students are crucial to sustainable job creation and reduction in the level of economic inequalities between generations. Student internships are thus one of the major mechanisms to promote and encourage students to take the path of spirited entrepreneurship and be involved in entrepreneurial undertakings. This paper specifically examines the role of SIM in moderating the impact of these factors (EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE) on entrepreneurial intention among university students. The outcomes have demonstrated that EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE were directly influential in driving students’ entrepreneurial intention behaviors. Additionally, the moderating analysis showed that SIM was significant in moderating the impact of EA, SN, PBC, and ESE on students’ entrepreneurial intention. However, SIM was not significant in moderating the influence of EE on college students’ EI.
The positive significant impact of EA on SEI is supported by previous literature that has also confirmed the positive effect of EA on EI (Barba-Sánchez et al. 2022; Cano et al. 2022; Wardana et al. 2021). This means that developing students’ mindsets and attitudes toward entrepreneurship can empower them to emulate how business people think and act, especially when it comes to identifying and taking advantage of opportunities. Thus, a good entrepreneurial mindset among students should make them see mistakes as a chance to get better. Activities that can help students build and acquire needed mindset and attitudes towards entrepreneurship include motivating students to take the path of project-based learning systems, encouraging students to think broadly, encouraging students to take bold actions, and constantly encouraging students to picture what they can achieve. The university environment, thus should be a good place to model students’ mindset set and attitudes toward entrepreneurship and once students have that concrete EA, it will have a subsequent impact on driving students to engage in entrepreneurial actions.
Furthermore, studies have also corroborated our findings that SN is significantly connected to EI (Contreras-Barraza et al. 2022; Ngan and Khoi, 2022; Su et al. 2021). This implies that the social environment in which students live or stay (grow in) and the nature of comments from people close to them, like family and friends, can either discourage or encourage them to engage in entrepreneurial behaviors. Expression of opinions and experiences of close friends, colleagues, and family members toward the activities of entrepreneurship, if positive and supportive, may motivate students to take the path of entrepreneurship, but if the other way round, it will demoralize them and drive away their interest in becoming entrepreneurs. Also, the direct impact of PBC on SEI is in line with studies that have empirically shown that PBC is directly related to EI (Che Nawi et al. 2022; Kim and Lim, 2022; Virasa et al. 2022). This means that when students are given the right education and training, they will develop the right PBC mechanisms to cultivate the entrepreneurial intention of managing their businesses. With adequate exposure either through the university environment or self-learning processes, students can develop the right PBC mechanisms (competencies) to be good and successful at becoming entrepreneurs. Our finding, however, contradicts research that revealed that there is no statistically significant connection between PBC and EI (Rahman et al. 2022).
Additionally, the significant influence of EE on SEI does support research findings that have validated that EE is significantly connected to EI (Alferaih, 2022; Paliwal et al. 2022; Uddin et al. 2022). It is thus imperative that universities and institutions put in the correct mechanisms to advance the nature and content of the EE and training programs executed at the university level for college students. Students must therefore see concrete values in these programs that seek to transform them into entrepreneurs. Also, EE should integrate traditional classroom teaching systems with entrepreneurial practice, which should serve as a basis to motivate the passion of learners to actively partake in EE. Teachers of EE should have higher professional qualities to offer high-quality EE to students. The quality of the support provided by universities to entrepreneurial teaching and practice among students, such as tax incentives, free offices, and funding can be fundamental to stimulating EI among students (Wang et al. 2023).
The direct influence of ESE on SEI is in agreement with studies that have demonstrated that indeed ESE is connected positively to EI (Colombelli et al. 2022; Gupta, 2022; Wu et al. 2022). This means the development of students’ self-efficacy in terms of entrepreneurship development should be a top priority for educational institutions since ESE is an undisputable ingredient for one to become a successful entrepreneur. The development of self-efficacy toward entrepreneurship can happen through dedicated education programs that can deliver performance accomplishments, vicarious knowledge, verbal encouragement, and physiological environments for students. The level of ESE displayed by students can influence the way they take business actions and continue to engage in the transformation of these ideas into profitable ones. That is a good level of ESE is fundamental for students to advance novel products and identify opportunities in the market; construct state-of-the-art systems, create investor confidence and lasting relationships, define the core purpose of their businesses, handle unexpected difficulties, and finally cultivate the required human capitals to succeed as entrepreneurs.
Furthermore, in terms of the moderating analysis of SIM, the findings have revealed SIM is significant in strengthening the predictive power of EA, SN, PBC, and ESE on entrepreneurial intention. This means that SIM when integrated or combined with adequate EA, SN, PBC, and ESE mechanisms could have a stronger influence on student’s EI. This does illustrate the power of student internship programs, if well managed and executed, can be utilized to encourage more students to take the path of entrepreneurship and to be entrepreneurs. Internship programs thus become an important vehicle to develop good entrepreneurial mindsets in students in areas such as the use of curiosity and innovation to find resourceful methods to handle difficult challenges; collaborate and work with teams effectively; and collect, analyze, and assimilate information properly. The study, however, demonstrated that SIM was not a significant moderator of the impact of EE on EI. It implies that the inclusion of SIM as the third construct between the interaction of EE and entrepreneurial intention does not add or strengthen the already established predictive influence of EE on EI. These results are unique and could not be compared with any previous literature since this is the first time that it has been empirically tested. These are the major contributions of this work to the entrepreneurship literature.
Conclusions and implications
This paper investigated the elements driving university students to take up entrepreneurial undertakings by specifically experimenting with how SIM moderates the impact of EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE on students’ EI. The study has confirmed that student EI is driven by factors such as EA, SN, PBC, EE, and ESE. The moderating analyses (the major novelty of this study) have revealed that SIM can help contribute to the impact of EA, SN, PBC, and ESE on SEIs. However, SIM does not contribute to the impact of EE on the cultivating of students’ EI. These results provide policymakers and practitioners, especially university authorities, to engage and collaborate with business sector industries to design quality student internship programs and policies that can encourage students to sign up for internship programs. This is vital since it can have an enormous impact on shaping their future entrepreneurial ambitions and becoming successful entrepreneurs.
Theoretical implications
The TPB has been utilized in many research works relating to entrepreneurial studies and thus provides a strong theoretical foundation for its application in this study. The integration of SIM in the framework of the TPB and the advancement of a model for testing provides a further theoretical basis for strengthening the theoretical fundamentals of TPB, especially in its application in entrepreneurial research. The integration has demonstrated that SIM strengthens the impact of EA, SN, PBC, and ESE on the student EI but fails to strengthen the impact of EE on EI. These empirical results, which are unique contributions of this paper and different from other studies (Tseng et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2023) that have also examined the moderating influence drivers on entrepreneurship behaviors, provide a theoretical basis for scholars to continue to authenticate our study model in connection to TPB.
Practical implications
First, the educational system should implement mechanisms that will empower students to build stronger EAs toward entrepreneurship. Attitude is everything for entrepreneurs and is the most fundamental for achieving business goals. Students should have the attitudes of a fighter, and change-makers and remain positive all the time even if things do not go as expected, which usually does not for new start-up businesses. Students should have attitudes that show perseverance, strength, and desire to accomplish business goals. Also, students can learn from experienced entrepreneurs, develop positive mindsets, have confidence in their abilities, and maintain self-discipline and dedication to their work if they are to demonstrate the EAs needed for their business motivation and development.
Second, the people around us can influence our perspective on entrepreneurship via the opinions and comments that are shared with us and with others. Since students are at their formative stage, any negative comments about becoming an entrepreneur may destroy their ambition to ever want to become an entrepreneur in the future. So the social environment in which students grow up must be devoid of any SNs or systems that may eat away their interest in entrepreneurship. Rather, university authorities, parents, family members, friends, and colleagues should share motivating stories about entrepreneurs and entrepreneurship with students, and this will ultimately heighten their curiosity in entrepreneurship and thus will be attracted to participate in entrepreneurial undertakings. Third, the university system should be a place that can develop students’ PBC toward entrepreneurship through the provision of quality entrepreneurial education to students. The quality of the education system in entrepreneurial education can empower students to appreciate the easiness or difficulty that comes with the business action or start-up they seek to grow. The school system can teach students how to manage their business through good management practices in functional business areas such as accounting, financing, human resource management, and tax systems. This then serves as a foundation for building students’ self-confidence and can-do attitudes toward their entrepreneurial business start-up decisions.
Fourth, SIM was demonstrated to strengthen the impact of EA, SN, PBC, and ESE on SEI, and this thus calls for university institutions to continue to devise innovative internship systems/programs for students. Internship programs complement student EAs, EE, and self-efficacy to drive EI. Internship programs allow students to get exposed to real-world settings and attain a competitive edge, especially when it comes to business start-up motivations. It also encourages them to select their chosen career path, solve problems independently, and recognize strengths and weaknesses in any endeavor. A well-executed university internship program can build student competencies and capacity in areas such as career and self-development, communication, critical thinking, leadership, professionalism, character growth/personal quality (like integrity, commitment, and self-motivation), and team and technology (including technical skills) hands-on training. All these are critical competencies that will prove useful to students as they engage in entrepreneurial activities. Consequently, University authorities are encouraged to connect with industry and business sectors to collaborate to design internship activities for students when they are on vacation. This can ensure that internship programs are executed based on some policy standards as follows: The internship program should provide an experience that ensures the application of knowledge acquired in class. The knowledge or skills acquired should be transferable to other work areas. There should be well-defined learning objectives connected to the practical agenda of the student’s academic work. Supervision should be undertaken by a professional with adequate expertise and educational background. There should be adequate resources, equipment, and facilities provided by host institutions that support student intern learning goals. Students should be exposed to staff meetings, opportunities to participate in project meetings, and other networking events during the internship. Establishments or institutions with more accreditations, like government and private sector agencies, should be given more priority to enable students to get certified in the course of the internship. Deliberations with host training companies for the chance to provide monetary incentives for services offered by interns. Coordinators for internship programs should provide a seminar to introduce students to correct workplace attitudes and behaviors prior to their placement. Implement a post-appraisal of business associates and interns.
Limitations and future research
In the elucidation and simplification of the findings of this paper, care should be exercised since the sample may not be representative, especially since it focuses on only Chinese students’ perspectives. It means that the methods, research model, and approach applied in this study may be simulated in other settings (other countries), but the findings may not necessarily conform to the outcomes and inferences of this study. Also, the issues driving the entrepreneurial intention among college students are diverse and no single study can assume to cover all the factors that influence it. Hence for future research, the factors of family background and government entrepreneurship policy and its impact on moderating the effect of EA, PBC, SN, EE, and ESE on student entrepreneurial intention should be investigated.
Data availability
The data used in this study is available upon request. Due to ethical considerations and commitment made to informed consent to protect the privacy, anonymity, and confidentiality of the participants, the data cannot be made publicly accessible. Interested individuals may submit a request for access to the dataset, which will be reviewed by the researchers to ensure compliance with ethical guidelines. This approach is implemented to safeguard the rights and anonymity of the participants and maintain the integrity of the research findings. Requests can be made by contacting Muhammad Khalil Khan.
References
Adhikusuma AD, Genoveva G (2020) The influence of entrepreneurial culture in Indonesia towards business students’ intention to be an entrepreneur. FIRM J Manag Stud 5(1):18–33
Ahmed T, Chandran V, Klobas JE, Liñán F, Kokkalis P (2020) Entrepreneurship education programmes: how learning, inspiration and resources affect intentions for new venture creation in a developing economy. Int J Manag Educ 18(1):100327
Ajzen, I (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In Action control. Springer, p 11–39
Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(4):665–683
Ajzen, I (2005). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. McGraw-Hill Education, UK
Ajzen I (2020) The theory of planned behavior: frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerg Technol 2(4):314–324
Alferaih A (2022) Starting a new business? Assessing University Students’ Intentions towards digital entrepreneurship in Saudi Arabia. Int J Inf Manag Data Insights 2(2):100087
Anjum S (2020) Impact of internship programs on professional and personal development of business students: a case study from Pakistan. Fut Bus J 6(1):1–13
Arjanto P, Mustiningsih M (2022) How principles develop entrepreneurship in school?: A literature review. RUSSELL J Educ Sci 1(1):1–24
Attahiru S, Olaoye M, Isyaku B, Abubakar M (2020) Assessment of relationship between subjective norms and entrepreneurship intention among students in Federal Polytechnic in Northern Nigeria. J Soc Polit Sci 3(1):176–180
Babbar M, Gupta T (2022) Response of educational institutions to COVID-19 pandemic: An inter-country comparison. Policy Fut Educ 20(4):469–491
Baert S, Neyt B, Siedler T, Tobback I, Verhaest D (2021) Student internships and employment opportunities after graduation: a field experiment. Econ Educ Rev 83:102141
Baluku MM, Onderi P, Otto K (2021) Predicting self-employment intentions and entry in Germany and East Africa: an investigation of the impact of mentoring, entrepreneurial attitudes, and psychological capital. J Small Bus Entrep 33(3):289–322
Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191
Bandura, A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice–Hall, New York
Barba-Sánchez V, Atienza-Sahuquillo C (2018) Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: the role of entrepreneurship education. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ 24(1):53–61
Barba-Sánchez V, Mitre-Aranda M, del Brío-González J (2022) The entrepreneurial intention of university students: an environmental perspective. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ 28(2):100184
Bjerre J, Rosenkranz SH, Christensen AM, Schou M, Jøns C, Gislason G, Ruwald A-C (2018) Driving following defibrillator implantation: development and pilot results from a nationwide questionnaire. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 18(1):1–10
calculator.net. (2022). Sample size calculator. https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html?type=1&cl=95&ci=5&pp=50&ps=30000&x=57&y=24. Retrieved 25 Nov 2022
Cano JS, Caro HK, Chioco AP, Fusingan RA, Matulac KA, Sabio ZJ, Pat-i RVD (2022) Entrepreneurial attitude and intention of ABM senior high school learners. Int J Multidiscipl 3(5):817–827
Chan DKC, Zhang L, Lee ASY, Hagger MS (2020) Reciprocal relations between autonomous motivation from self-determination theory and social cognition constructs from the theory of planned behavior: a cross-lagged panel design in sport injury prevention. Psychol Sport Exerc 48:101660
Chang Y-Y, Wannamakok W, Kao C-P (2022) Entrepreneurship education, academic major, and university students’ social entrepreneurial intention: the perspective of Planned Behavior Theory. Stud High Educ 47(11):2204–2223
Che Nawi N, Mamun AA, Hassan AA, Wan Ibrahim WSAA, Mohamed AF, Permarupan PY (2022) Agro-entrepreneurial intention among university students: a study under the premises of theory of planned behavior. Sage Open 12(1):21582440211069144
Colombelli A, Panelli A, Serraino F (2022) A learning-by-doing approach to entrepreneurship education: evidence from a short intensive online international program. Adm Sci 12(1):16
Contreras-Barraza N, Acuña-Duran E, Oyanedel JC, Salazar-Sepúlveda G, Vega-Muñoz A, Ariza-Montes A (2022) Well-being and entrepreneurship intention: an empirical study of new perspectives. Sustainability 14(7):3935
Dana L-P, Tajpour M, Salamzadeh A, Hosseini E, Zolfaghari M (2021) The impact of entrepreneurial education on technology-based enterprises development: the mediating role of motivation. Adm Sci 11(4):105
Dao TK, Bui AT, Doan TTT, Dao NT, Le HH, Le TTH (2021) Impact of academic majors on entrepreneurial intentions of Vietnamese students: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. Heliyon 7(3):e06381
de Sousa MM, de Almeida DAR, Mansur-Alves M, Huziwara EM (2022) Characteristics and effects of entrepreneurship education programs: a systematic review. Trends Psychol 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00197-0
Devi SA, Felix A, Narayanamoorthy S, Ahmadian A, Balaenu D, Kang D (2022) An intuitionistic fuzzy decision support system for COVID-19 lockdown relaxation protocols in India. Comput Electr Eng 102:108166
Di Meglio G, Barge-Gil A, Camiña E, Moreno L (2022) Knocking on employment’s door: internships and job attainment. High Educ 83(1):137–161
Dinis A, do Paco A, Ferreira J, Raposo M, Rodrigues RG (2013) Psychological characteristics and entrepreneurial intentions among secondary students. Educ Train 55(8/9):763–780
Dollinger MJ, Li X, Mooney CH (2010) Extending the resource-based view to the mega-event: entrepreneurial rents and innovation. Manag Org Rev 6(2):195–218
Elie-Dit-Cosaque C, Pallud J, Kalika M (2011) The influence of individual, contextual, and social factors on perceived behavioral control of information technology: a field theory approach. J Manag Inf Syst 28(3):201–234
Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat 5(1):1–4
Ewa G, Łuczka T (2020) Entrepreneurial attitudes of young women. Zesz Naukowe Politech Pozn Ser Org Zarz 75:99–113
Fauchald RN, Aaboen L, Haneberg DH (2022) Utilisation of entrepreneurial experiences in student-driven mentoring processes. Int J Manag Educ 20(2):100651
Galvão A, Ferreira JJ, Marques C (2018) Entrepreneurship education and training as facilitators of regional development: a systematic literature review. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 25(1):17–40
Gao L, Wang S, Li J, Li H (2017) Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to understand individual’s energy saving behavior in workplaces. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:107–113
Garcez A, Silva R, Franco M (2022) Digital transformation shaping structural pillars for academic entrepreneurship: a framework proposal and research agenda. Educ Inf Technol 27(1):1159–1182
Gielnik MM, Cardon MS, & Frese M (2020) The psychology of entrepreneurship: new perspectives. Routledge
Gloss A, Pollack JM, Ward M (2017) A risky shift? An exploration of the measurement equivalence of entrepreneurial attitudes and entrepreneurial orientation across socioeconomic gradients. J Bus Ventur Insights 7:32–37
Gupta RK (2022). Role of university entrepreneurial ecosystem and entrepreneurial self-efficacy in shaping entrepreneurial intention: a study of Indian students. In: Promoting entrepreneurship to reduce graduate unemployment. IGI Global, p 149–163
Hair JF (2011) Multivariate data analysis: an overview. In: Lovric M (ed) International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_395
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Babin BJ, & Black WC (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective (Vol. 7). In: Upper Saddle River. Pearson, NJ
Hardie BJ, Highfield C, & Lee K (2022) Listening to leaders: Investigating the role of the school leader in implementing entrepreneurship education. In: Handbook of research on educational leadership and research methodology. IGI Global, p 36–62
Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press
Hu Z, Qin J (2018) Generalizability of causal inference in observational studies under retrospective convenience sampling. Stat Med 37(19):2874–2883
Januszewski A, Grzeszczak M (2021) Internship of accounting students in the form of E-learning: insights from Poland. Educ Sci 11(8):447
Jena R (2020) Measuring the impact of business management Student’s attitude towards entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: a case study. Comput Hum Behav 107:106275
Kashif M, Zarkada A, Ramayah T (2018) The impact of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control on managers’ intentions to behave ethically. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 29(5-6):481–501
Kim Y-J, Lim J-Y (2022) Predictive models for nurses’ entrepreneurial intentions using comparison of competing models. Int J Env Res Public Health 19(10):6027
Kisubi M, Korir M, Bonuke R (2021) Entrepreneurial education and self-employment: does entrepreneurial self-efficacy matter? SEISENSE Bus Rev 1(1):18–30
La Barbera F, Ajzen I (2020) Control interactions in the theory of planned behavior: rethinking the role of subjective norm. Eur Jo Psychol 16(3):401
Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR (2004) Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract 10(2):307–312
Larsen IB (2022) Fostering an entrepreneurial mindset: a typology for aligning instructional strategies with three dominant entrepreneurial mindset conceptualizations. Ind High Educ 36(3):236–251
Lee J, Waung M, Beatty JE (2022) Internships and promises of diversity: how anticipatory psychological contracts shape employment intentions in the US. Int J Hum Resour Manag 33(17):3560–3590
Lei SA, Yin D (2019) Evaluating benefits and drawbacks of internships: perspectives of college students. Coll Student J 53(2):181–189
Li C, Murad M, Shahzad F, Khan MAS, Ashraf SF, Dogbe CSK (2020) Entrepreneurial passion to entrepreneurial behavior: Role of entrepreneurial alertness, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and proactive personality. Front Psychol 11:1611
Liñán F, Rodríguez-Cohard JC, Rueda-Cantuche JM (2011) Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education. Int Entrep Manag J 7(2):195–218
Lingappa AK, Shah A, Mathew AO (2020) Academic, family, and peer influence on entrepreneurial intention of engineering students. Sage Open 10(3):2158244020933877
Linton G, Klinton M (2019) University entrepreneurship education: a design thinking approach to learning. J Innov Entrep 8(1):1–11
Lippke S (2020) Self-efficacy theory. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1167
Lu G, Song Y, Pan B (2021) How university entrepreneurship support affects college students’ entrepreneurial intentions: an empirical analysis from China. Sustainability 13(6):3224
Luan C-C, Lin C-H (2020) Pursuing sustainability through perceived behavioral control: discussing distinct effects of self-consciousness and self-identity on anti-consumption. Xing Xiao Ping Lun 17(2):117–152
Lv Y, Chen Y, Sha Y, Wang J, An L, Chen T, Huang L (2021) How entrepreneurship education at universities influences entrepreneurial intention: mediating effect based on entrepreneurial competence. Front Psychol 12:655868
Maheshwari G, Kha KL (2022) Investigating the relationship between educational support and entrepreneurial intention in Vietnam: The mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy in the theory of planned behavior. Int J Manag Educ 20(2):100553
Margaryan S, Saniter N, Schumann M, Siedler T (2022) Do internships pay off? The effects of student internships on earnings. J Hum Resour 57(4):1242–1275
Martín-Lara M, Iáñez-Rodríguez I, Luzón G (2019) Improving the internship experience in the master of chemical engineering at the University of Granada. Educ Chem Eng 26:97–106
Maydiantoro A, Jaya MTB, Basri M, Yulianti D, Sinaga RM, Arif S (2021) The influence of entrepreneurial attitudes, subjective norms and self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intentions. J Manag Inf Decis Sci 24(S4):1–12
Mbwambo H, Magoma A (2022) Nexus between entrepreneurial motivation and entrepreneurial intention. Afr J Appl Res 8(1):240–252
McAlexander SL, McCance K, Blanchard MR, Venditti RA (2022) Investigating the experiences, beliefs, and career intentions of historically underrepresented science and engineering undergraduates engaged in an academic and internship program. Sustainability 14(3):1486
Mensah IK, Zeng G, Luo C, Xiao Z, Lu M (2021) Exploring the predictors of Chinese College students’ entrepreneurial intention. Sage Open 11(3):21582440211029941
Mikuska E (2017) The importance of piloting or pre-testing semi-structured interviews and narratives. Sage Publications Ltd
Moradi M, Imanipour N, Arasti Z, Mohammadkazemi R (2020) Poverty and entrepreneurship: a systematic review of poverty-related issues discussed in entrepreneurship literature. World Rev Entrep Manag Sustain Dev 16(2):125–152
Muliadi A, Mirawati B (2020) The effect of personal attitude and subjective norm on entrepreneurial interest of biology education students. J Penelit Pengkaj Ilmu Pendidik 4(3):342–351
Nabi G, Liñán F, Fayolle A, Krueger N, Walmsley A (2017) The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: a systematic review and research agenda. Acad Manag Learn Educ 16(2):277–299
Nayanajith G, Damunupola K (2019) Relationship of perceived behavioral control and adoption of internet banking in the presence of a moderator. Asian J Multidiscip Stud 2(2):30–41
Ndofirepi TM (2020) Relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial goal intentions: psychological traits as mediators. J Innov Entrep 9(1):1–20
Ngan NT, & Khoi BH (2022) AIC algorithm for entrepreneurial Intention in Covid19 pandemic. In: Decision sciences for COVID-19. Springer, p 183–193
Ngo TTA, Truong PT, Tran YL, Tran TV, Tran NT, Huynh AM, Huynh TT (2022) Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention of college students: an empirical study from Vietnam. J Asian Financ Econ Bus 9(5):147–156
Nguyen HT, Duong DC (2021) Dataset on the effect of perceived educational support on entrepreneurial intention among Vietnamese students. Data Brief 35:106761
Nisson C, Earl A (2020) The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. In Sweeny K, Robbins ML, Cohen LM (eds) The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057840.ch129
Nuseir TM, Basheer MF, Aljumah A (2020) Antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions in smart city of Neom Saudi Arabia: does the entrepreneurial education on artificial intelligence matter? Cogent Bus Manag 7(1):1825041
Odlin D, Benson-Rea M, Sullivan-Taylor B (2022) Student internships and work placements: approaches to risk management in higher education. High Educ 83(6):1409–1429
OK JW, Hyun BH, Chang ES, Yang JM (2020) A study on the effect of social support on entrepreneurial intentions and entrepreneurial behaviors: mediating effects of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Asia-Pac J Bus Ventur Entrep 15(1):151–165
Ozaralli N, Rivenburgh NK (2016) Entrepreneurial intention: antecedents to entrepreneurial behavior in the USA and Turkey. J Glob Entrep Res 6(1):1–32
Paliwal M, Rajak BK, Kumar V, & Singh S (2022) Assessing the role of creativity and motivation to measure entrepreneurial education and entrepreneurial intention. Int J Educ Managem (ahead-of-print)
Philipp S, Lea R, Thomas Z, Urs F, & Isabella H (2021) 2021 GUESSS Global Report: Insights From 58 Countries. https://www.guesssurvey.org/resources/PDF_InterReports/GUESSS_2021_Global_Report.pdf
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879
Quattrone F, Borghini A, Emdin M, Nuti S (2022) Protecting higher education institutions from COVID-19: Insights from an Italian experience. J Am Coll Health 70(5):1354–1355
Rachbini W (2018) The relationship of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control on halal food purchasing behavior in Jakarta. IOSR J Bus Manag 20(1):28–37
Rahman MM, Salamzadeh A, Tabash MI (2022) Antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions of female undergraduate students in Bangladesh: a covariance-based structural equation modeling approach. JWEE (1–2):137–153. https://doi.org/10.28934/jwee22.12.pp137-153
Ramadani V, Rahman MM, Salamzadeh A, Rahaman MS, Abazi-Alili H (2022) Entrepreneurship education and graduates’ entrepreneurial intentions: does gender matter? A multi-group analysis using AMOS. Technol Forecast Soc Change 180:121693
Saleh M, Manjunath K, Oaied MM (2021) Exploring entrepreneurial attitudes among youth in least developed countries: empirical evidence from Yemen. FOCUS 8(1):71–99
Saoula O, Shamim A, Ahmad MJ, & Abid MF (2023) Do entrepreneurial self-efficacy, entrepreneurial motivation, and family support enhance entrepreneurial intention? The mediating role of entrepreneurial education. Asia Pac J Innov Entrep (ahead-of-print)
Schierjott I, Brennecke J, Rank ON (2018) Entrepreneurial attitudes as drivers of managers’ boundary‐spanning knowledge ties in the context of high‐tech clusters. J Small Bus Manag 56:108–131
Schimperna F, Nappo F, Marsigalia B (2021) Student entrepreneurship in universities: the state-of-the-art. Adm Sci 12(1):5
Şekerci Y, Kahraman MU, ÇAKMAK A (2021) Internship experience in architecture and interior architecture departments from students’ point of views. Online J Art Design 9(2):172–188
Shahab Y, Chengang Y, Arbizu AD, Haider MJ (2019) Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intention: do entrepreneurial creativity and education matter? Int J Entrep Behav Res 25(2):259–280
Shan G, Yee CL, Ji G (2020) Effects of attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, customer value and accessibility on intention to visit Haizhou Gulf in China. J Market Adv Pract 2(1):26–37
Son J (2018) Back translation as a documentation tool. Transl Interpret 10(2):89–100
Speak A, Escobedo FJ, Russo A, Zerbe S (2018) Comparing convenience and probability sampling for urban ecology applications. J Appl Ecol 55(5):2332–2342
Stratton SJ (2021) Population research: Convenience sampling strategies. Prehosp Disaster Med 36(4):373–374
Su Y, Zhu Z, Chen J, Jin Y, Wang T, Lin C-L, Xu D (2021) Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention of university students in China: integrating the perceived university support and theory of planned behavior. Sustainability 13(8):4519
Sun S, Law R, Schuckert M (2020) Mediating effects of attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control for mobile payment-based hotel reservations. Int J Hosp Manag 84:102331
Sussman R, Gifford R (2019) Causality in the theory of planned behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 45(6):920–933
Tan C-S, Ooi H-Y, Goh Y-N (2017) A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia. Energy Policy 107:459–471
Taufique KMR, Vaithianathan S (2018) A fresh look at understanding Green consumer behavior among young urban Indian consumers through the lens of theory of planned behavior. J Clean Prod 183:46–55
Teng CWC, Lim RBT, Chow DWS, Narayanasamy S, Liow CH, Lee JJ (2021) Internships before and during COVID-19: experiences and perceptions of undergraduate interns and supervisors. High Educ Skills Work-Based Learn 12(3):459–474
Tiwari P, Bhat AK, Tikoria J (2017) The role of emotional intelligence and self-efficacy on social entrepreneurial attitudes and social entrepreneurial intentions. J Soc Entrep 8(2):165–185
Tseng TH, Wang Y-M, Lin H-H, Lin S-J, Wang Y-S, Tsai T-H (2022) Relationships between locus of control, theory of planned behavior, and cyber entrepreneurial intention: the moderating role of cyber entrepreneurship education. Int J Manag Educ 20(3):100682
Turker D, Selcuk SS (2009) Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students? J Eur Ind Train 33(2):142–159
Uddin M, Chowdhury RA, Hoque N, Ahmad A, Mamun A, Uddin MN (2022) Developing entrepreneurial intentions among business graduates of higher educational institutions through entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial passion: a moderated mediation model. Int J Manag Educ 20(2):100647
Ulker-Demirel E, Ciftci G (2020) A systematic literature review of the theory of planned behavior in tourism, leisure and hospitality management research. J Hosp Tour Manag 43:209–219
Vamvaka V, Stoforos C, Palaskas T, Botsaris C (2020) Attitude toward entrepreneurship, perceived behavioral control, and entrepreneurial intention: dimensionality, structural relationships, and gender differences. J Innov Entrep 9(1):1–26
Van Teijlingen E, Hundley V (2010) The importance of pilot studies. Soc Res Update 35(4):49–59
Van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V (2001) The importance of pilot studies. Soc Res Update 35(4):1–4
Verma VK, Chandra B (2018) An application of theory of planned behavior to predict young Indian consumers’ green hotel visit intention. J Clean Prod 172:1152–1162
Virasa T, Sukavejworakit K, Promsiri T (2022) Predicting entrepreneurial intention and economic development: a cross-national study of its policy implications for six ASEAN economies. Heliyon 8(5):e09435
Wach K, Bilan S (2021) Public support and administration barriers towards entrepreneurial intentions of students in Poland. Adm Manag Public 2021(36):67–80
Wang X-H, You X, Wang H-P, Wang B, Lai W-Y, Su N (2023) The effect of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: mediation of entrepreneurial self-efficacy and moderating model of psychological capital. Sustainability 15(3):2562
Wardana LW, Narmaditya BS, Wibowo A, Saraswati TT, Indriani R (2021) Drivers of entrepreneurial intention among economics students in Indonesia. Entrep Bus Econ Rev 9(1):61–74
Wei J, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J (2020) How does entrepreneurial self-efficacy influence innovation behavior? Exploring the mechanism of job satisfaction and Zhongyong thinking. Front Psychol 11:708
Wu J, Alshaabani A, Rudnák I (2022) Testing the influence of self-efficacy and demographic characteristics among international students on entrepreneurial intention in the context of Hungary. Sustainability 14(3):1069
Wu W, Wang H, Wei C-W, Zheng C (2020) Sharing achievement and social entrepreneurial intention: the role of perceived social worth and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Manag Decis 59(11):2737–2754
Wu YJ, Chen S-C, Pan C-I (2019) Entrepreneurship in the internet age: internet, entrepreneurs, and capital resources. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 15(4):21–30
Xavier CR, Oliveira RS, da Fonseca Vieira V, Rocha BM, Reis RF, de Melo Quintela B, Dos Santos RW (2022) Timing the race of vaccination, new variants, and relaxing restrictions during COVID-19 pandemic. J Comput Sci 61:101660
Yadav R, Pathak GS (2017) Determinants of consumers’ green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecol Econ 134:114–122
Yasir N, Mahmood N, Mehmood HS, Rashid O, Liren A (2021) The integrated role of personal values and theory of planned behavior to form a sustainable entrepreneurial intention. Sustainability 13(16):9249
Yi G (2018) Impact of internship quality on entrepreneurial intentions among graduating engineering students of research universities in China. Int Entrep Manag J 14(4):1071–1087
Yokokawa D, Shikino K, Kishi Y, Ikusaka M (2022) Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Japanese version of the INTERMED self-assessment questionnaire (IMSA) for patient-case complexity assessment. Int J Gen Med 15:6309
Yousaf U, Ali SA, Ahmed M, Usman B, Sameer I (2021) From entrepreneurial education to entrepreneurial intention: a sequential mediation of self-efficacy and entrepreneurial attitude. Int J Innov Sci 13(3):364–380
Youssef AB, Boubaker S, Dedaj B, Carabregu-Vokshi M (2021) Digitalization of the economy and entrepreneurship intention. Technol Forecast Soc Change 164:120043
Yuriev A, Dahmen M, Paillé P, Boiral O, Guillaumie L (2020) Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: a scoping review. Resour Conserv Recycl 155:104660
Yusof M, Sandhu MS, Jain KK (2007) Relationship between psychological characteristics and entrepreneurial inclination: a case study of students at University Tun Abdul Razak (Unitar). J Asia Entrep Sustain 3(2):1
Zhang W, Lu X (2021a) Impact of postgraduate student internships during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Front Psychol 12:1–8
Zhang Y, Trusty J, Goroshnikova T, Kelly L, Kwong KK, McGuire SJ, … Tang R (2021b) Millennial social entrepreneurial intent and social entrepreneurial self-efficacy: a comparative entrepreneurship study. Soc Enterp J 17(1):20−43
Zreen A, Farrukh M, Nazar N, Khalid R (2019) The role of internship and business incubation programs in forming entrepreneurial intentions: an empirical analysis from Pakistan. Cent Eur Manag J 27(2):97–113
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Dr. Juan Liang, Dr. Nan Zhu and Dr. Li Wei Lin for their thoughtful insight and discussion during the completion of this research paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
IKM and DSM: conceptualization, methodology, data collection, and draft write-up. MKK: data analysis, results interpretation, and proofreading/editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
This study did not involve any humans or animals for experimental purposes and is based on a survey-based opinion. Additionally, the research follows the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Business Administration, Fujian Jiangxia University.
Informed consent
The informed consent letter was distributed and obtained online along with questionnaires on social media systems (that is—WeChat and QQ) from the students of Jiangxi University of Science and Technology in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, China, between March and April 2022.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mensah, I.K., Khan, M.K. & Mwakapesa, D.S. Factors determining the entrepreneurial intentions among Chinese university students: the moderating impact of student internship motivation. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10, 752 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02275-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02275-9
- Springer Nature Limited