Abstract
The question of what it means to be a ‘critical’ scholar is heatedly contested, both within academia and without. This ‘state of the field’ article reviews and explores recent debates on this issue within international politics. In particular, it focuses on claims that critical approaches to knowledge are, in their received forms, inadequate and must, therefore, be supplemented, restrained, or otherwise transformed. Four such ‘post-critical’ schools of thought are distinguished: reflexivist, reformist, reactionary, and restitutive. A range of works from fields such as security studies, narrative politics, decolonisation, and political theory are explicated, interrelated, and contextualised. Overall, this review makes the case that, while a concept such as ‘being critical’ cannot and should not be strictly bounded, this category has expanded to the point of seeming almost all-encompassing. The meaning of the category itself is thus brought into question, raising not only narrowly academic questions but also broadly political ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abrahamsen, R. (2016). Power. In A. N. Mhurchú & R. Shindo (Eds.), Critical imaginations in international relations (pp. 153–165). London, New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319–363.
Agathangelou, A. M. (2016). Bruno Latour and ecology politics: Poetics of failure and denial in IR. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 321–347.
Ahmad, I. (2017). Religion as critique: Islamic critical thinking from Mecca to the marketplace. New York: University of North Carolina Press.
Ahmed, N. (2021). ‘“Free Speech” Czar role linked to toby young’s free speech union and US right-wing funding network’. Byline Times, 16 February 2021. https://bylinetimes.com/2021/02/16/free-speech-czar-role-linked-to-toby-youngs-free-speech-union-and-us-right-wing-funding-network/.
Alejandro, A. (2021). Reflexive discourse analysis: A methodology for the practice of reflexivity. European Journal of International Relations, 27(1), 150–174.
Amoore, L., & de Goede, M. (2008). Risk and the war on terror. London: Routledge.
Aradau, C., & Huysmans, J. (2019). Assembling credibility: Knowledge, method and critique in times of “post-truth.” Security Dialogue, 50(1), 40–58.
Ashley, R. K. (1989). Living on border lines: Man, poststructuralism, and war. In J. Der Derian & M. J. Shapiro (Eds.), International/intertextual relations: Postmodern readings of world politics (pp. 259–321). Lexington: Lexington Books.
Ashley, R. K., & Walker, R. B. J. (1990). Speaking the language of exile: Dissident thought in international studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 259.
Associated Press. (2020). ‘Trump orders crackdown on federal antiracism training, calling it “Anti-American”’. The Guardian, 5 September 2020, sec. US news. http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/04/trump-antiracism-training-white-privilege-critical-race-theory.
Austin, J. L. (2019a). Towards an international political ergonomics. European Journal of International Relations, 25(4), 979–1006.
Austin, J. L. (2019b). A parasitic critique for international relations. International Political Sociology, 13(2), 215–231.
Austin, J. L., Bellanova, R., & Kaufmann, M. (2019). Doing and mediating critique: An invitation to practice companionship. Security Dialogue, 50(1), 3–19.
Bargués-Pedreny, P. (2019). From critique to affirmation in international relations. Global Society, 33(1), 1–11.
Barkin, J. S., & Sjoberg, L. (2015). Calculating critique: Thinking outside the methods matching game. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(3), 852–71.
Barkin, J. S., & Sjoberg, L. (2019). International relations’ last synthesis? Decoupling constructivist and critical approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baser, B., Akgönül, S., & Öztürk, A. E. (2017). “Academics for peace” in Turkey: A case of criminalising dissent and critical thought via counterterrorism policy. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 10(2), 274–296.
Beardsworth, R. (2017). Towards a critical concept of the statesperson. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(1), 100–121.
Behr, H. (2017). Conditions of critique and the non-irreversibility of politics. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(1), 122–140.
Behr, H., & Williams, M. C. (2017). Interlocuting classical realism and critical theory: Negotiating “divides” in international relations theory. Journal of International Political Theory, 13(1), 3–17.
Bencherif, A., & Vlavonou, G. (2021). Reflexive tension: An auto-ethnographic journey through the discipline of international relations in western academic training. African Identities, 0, 1–20.
Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial Studies, 17(2), 115–121.
Boggs, A., & Mitchell, N. (2018). Critical university studies and the crisis consensus. Feminist Studies, 44(2), 432–463.
Booth, K. (1997). Security and self: Reflections of a fallen realist’. In K. Krause & M. C. Williams (Eds.), Critical security studies: Concepts and cases (pp. 83–119). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Brenner, N. (2009). What is critical urban theory? City, 13(2–3), 198–207.
Burgess, J. P. (2019). The insecurity of critique. Security Dialogue, 50(1), 95–111.
Capan, Z. G. (2017). Decolonising international relations? Third World Quarterly, 38(1), 1–15.
Clift, B., Kristensen, P. M., & Rosamond, B. (2020). Remembering and forgetting IPE: Disciplinary history as boundary work. Review of International Political Economy, 10, 1–34.
Connolly, W. E. (2013). The fragility of things: Self-organizing processes, neoliberal fantasies, and democratic activism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Conway, P. R. (2020a). The folds of coexistence: Towards a diplomatic political ontology, between difference and contradiction. Theory, Culture and Society, 37(3), 23–47.
Conway, P. R. (2020b). On the way to planet politics: From disciplinary demise to cosmopolitical coordination. International Relations, 34(2), 157–179.
Conway, P. R. (forthcoming). ‘Radicalism, respectability, and the colour line of critical thought: An interdisciplinary history of critical international relations’.
Coole, D. (2013). Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism: Thinking with new materialisms in the political sciences. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 451–469.
Cox, Robert W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–55.
Crenshaw, K. (2001). The first decade: Critical reflections, or a foot in the closing door critical race studies. UCLA Law Review, 49(5), 1343–1373.
Dauphinee, E. (2019). Narrative and inquiry in international politics’. In J. Edkins (Ed.), Routledge handbook of critical international relations (pp. 114–25). London; New York: Routledge.
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2001). 2017. Critical race theory: An introduction (3rd ed.). New York University Press.
Devetak, R. (2018). Critical international theory: An intellectual history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edkins, J. (2019). Change and the politics of certainty. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Felski, R. (2015). The limits of critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fox News. (2020). ‘Critical race theory has infiltrated the federal government | Christopher Rufo on fox news’. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBXRdWflV7M.
Fraser, N. (1985). What’s critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. New German Critique, 35, 97–131.
Garcia, N. M., López, N., & Vélez, V. N. (2018). QuantCrit: Rectifying quantitative methods through critical race theory. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 149–157.
de Goede, M. (2020). Engagement all the way down. Critical Studies on Security, 0, 1–15.
Hamati-Ataya, I. (2013). Reflectivity, reflexivity, reflexivism: IR’s “reflexive turn”—and beyond. European Journal of International Relations, 19(4), 669–694.
Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning and black study. Wivenhoe: Minor Compositions.
Haslanger, S. A. (2012). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. New York: Oxford University Press.
HC Deb. (2020). Black History Month. UK Parliament: Hansard. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2020-10-20/debates/5B0E393E-8778-4973-B318-C17797DFBB22/BlackHistoryMonth#contribution-C8980402-C448-4265-B82A-F3A465E34808.
Henderson, E. A. (2005). Not letting evidence get in the way of assumptions: Testing the clash of civilizations thesis with more recent data. International Politics, 42(4), 458–469.
Henderson, E. A. (2017). The revolution will not be theorised: Du Bois, Locke, and the Howard School’s challenge to white supremacist IR theory. Millennium, 45(3), 492–510.
Hodder, I. (Ed.) (1989). The meanings of things material culture and symbolic expression. London: Routledge.
Holm, N. (2020). Critical capital: Cultural studies, the critical disposition and critical reading as elite practice. Cultural Studies, 34(1), 143–166.
Inayatullah, N., & Dauphinee, E. (Eds.) (2016). Narrative global politics: Theory, history and the personal in international relations. London: Routledge.
Jackson, R. (2016). To be or not to be policy relevant? Power, emancipation and resistance in CTS research. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 9(1), 120–125.
Jamin, J. (2018). Cultural marxism: A survey. Religion Compass, 12(1–2), e12258.
Jenkins, S. (2020). ‘Cynical theories by Helen Pluckrose and James Lindsay Book Review’. TLS, 2 October 2020. https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/cynical-theories-helen-pluckrose-james-lindsay-book-review/.
Kamola, I. (2020). ‘IR, the critic, and the world: From reifying the discipline to decolonising the University’. Millennium, August, 0305829820937063.
Kessler, O. (2016). The failure of failure: On constructivism, the limits of critique, and the socio-political economy of economics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(3), 348–69.
Kim, A. (2014). The vicissitudes of critique: The decline and reemergence of the problem of capitalism. Constellations, 21(3), 366–381.
Koddenbrock, K. J. (2015). Strategies of critique in international relations: From Foucault and Latour towards Marx. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 243–266.
Kulkarni, S. (2021). ‘Modi Govt has mounted biggest attack yet on academic freedom with its diktat on international webinars’. The Indian Express, 11 February 2021. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/narendra-modi-academic-freedom-universities-webinars-7184744/.
Kurki, M. (2011). The limitations of the critical edge: Reflections on critical and philosophical IR scholarship today. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(1), 129–46.
Kurowska, X. (2020). Interpreting the uninterpretable: The ethics of opaqueness as an approach to moments of inscrutability in fieldwork. International Political Sociology, 14(4), 431–446.
Lagerspetz, M. (2020). ‘“The grievance studies affair” project: Reconstructing and assessing the experimental design’. Science, Technology, and Human Values, May, 0162243920923087.
Lather, P. (1991) 2017. ‘Post-critical pedagogies: A feminist reading’. In (Post)critical methodologies: The science possible after the critiques: The selected works of patti lather (pp. 97–111). London; New York: Routledge.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
Lave, R., Biermann, C., & Lane, S. N. (Eds.) (2018). Palgrave handbook of critical physical geography. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Leese, M., Lidén, K., & Nikolova, B. (2019). Putting critique to work: Ethics in EU security research. Security Dialogue, 50(1), 59–76.
Levine, D. J. (2013). Why Hans Morgenthau was not a critical theorist (and why contemporary IR realists should care). International Relations, 27(1), 95–118.
Lindsay, J. (2020a). The truth about critical methods. New Discourses. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSHL-rSMIro.
Lindsay, J. (2020b). ‘Spot on! ...’ Tweet. @ConceptualJames. 6 July 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20210205113741/https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1280310286663237632.
Lindsay, J. (2021a). ‘If you didn’t know ...’ Tweet. @ConceptualJames. 13 January 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20210324145446/https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1349370680857518082.
Lindsay, J. (2021b). ‘Israel is given ...’ Tweet. @ConceptualJames. 2 February 2021. https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1356399225030979584.
Lindsay, J. (2021c). ‘This is why ...’ Tweet. @ConceptualJames. 24 March 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20210325123203/https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1374846075400491010.
Linklater, A. (1982). Men and citizens in the theory of international relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan Limited.
Linklater, A. (2004). Norbert Elias, the “civilizing process” and the sociology of international relations. International Politics, 41(1), 3–35.
Lisle, D., & Johnson, H. L. (2019). Lost in the aftermath. Security Dialogue, 50(1), 20–39.
Lumina, I. (2019). Who owns critical thinking? Islam and critical scholarship beyond eurocentric frameworks. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 20(4), 489–491.
Mandelbaum, M., Kristensen, A. M. F., & Athanassiou, C. (2016). De/Re-constructing the political: How do critical approaches to “security” frame our understanding of the political? Critical Studies on Security, 4(2), 133–136.
Marlière, P. (2021). ‘“Islamo-Leftism”: Macron’s Witch Hunt against critical academics’. CounterPunch, 25 February 2021. https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/02/25/islamo-leftism-macrons-witch-hunt-against-critical-academics/.
McLaren, P. (1988). Schooling the postmodern body: Critical pedagogy and the politics of enfleshment. Journal of Education, 170(3), 53–83.
Meghji, A. (2021). ‘Just what is critical race theory, and what is it doing in british sociology? From “BritCrit” to the Racialized Social System Approach’. The British Journal of Sociology.
Michelsen, N. (2020). ‘What is a minor international theory? On the limits of “critical international relations”’. Journal of International Political Theory.
Mill, J. S. (1859) 2003. In D. Bromwich, G. Kateb, and J. B. Elshtain (Eds.), On liberty. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Minkowitz, D. (2019). ‘Why racists (and liberals!) keep writing for “Quillette”’, 5 December 2019. https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/quillette-fascist-creep/.
Mitchell, A. (2019). Can international relations confront the cosmos? In J. Edkins (Ed.), Routledge handbook of critical international relations (pp. 51–64). London, New York: Routledge.
Morabito, A. (2021). ‘“Woke” majors could be in trouble under Florida Bill’. Campus Reform, 23 March 2021. https://campusreform.org/article?id=16961.
Muldoon, J. (2019). ‘Academics: It’s Time to get behind decolonising the curriculum’. The Guardian, 20 March 2019, sec. Education. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/mar/20/academics-its-time-to-get-behind-decolonising-the-curriculum.
Murphy, M. P. A. (2020). ‘Quantising post-critique: Entangled ontologies and critical international relations’. Millennium, December, 0305829820971709.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2020). The cognitive empire, politics of knowledge and African intellectual productions: Reflections on struggles for epistemic freedom and resurgence of decolonisation in the twenty-first century. Third World Quarterly, 0, 1–20.
Nietzsche, F. W. (1887). 2006. In K. Ansell-Pearson (Ed.), On the genealogy of morality. (Carol Diethe, Trans). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812026.
Nwanevu, O. 2020. ‘The willful blindness of reactionary liberalism’. The New Republic, 6 July 2020. https://newrepublic.com/article/158346/willful-blindness-reactionary-liberalism.
Onishi, N., & Méheut, C. (2021). ‘Heating up culture wars, France to scour universities for ideas that “corrupt society”’. The New York Times, 18 February 2021, sec. World. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/18/world/europe/france-universities-culture-wars.html.
Poonkham, J. (2018). Why is there no Thai (critical) international relations theory? Great debates revisited, critical theory, and dissensus of IR in Thailand. In C. Thalang, S. Jayanama, & J. Poonkham (Eds.), International relations as a discipline in Thailand: Theory and sub-fields. London: Routledge.
Prozorov, S. (2019). How to criticize without ever becoming a critic. In J. Edkins (Ed.), Routledge handbook of critical international relations (pp. 23–33). London; New York: Routledge.
Qureshi, A. (Ed.) (2020). I refuse to condemn: Resisting racism in times of national security. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ravecca, P., & Dauphinee, E. (2018). Narrative and the possibilities for scholarship. International Political Sociology, 12(2), 125–138.
Riley, C. L. (2020). ‘Liz Truss doesn’t know about Foucault, but she also doesn’t care’. The Guardian, 19 December 2020, sec. Opinion. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/dec/19/liz-truss-foucault-rightwing-zombie-postmodernism.
Roach, S. C. (Ed.) (2020). Handbook of critical international relations. New York: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Romano, A. (2020). ‘How being “woke” lost its meaning’. Vox, 9 October 2020. https://www.vox.com/culture/21437879/stay-woke-wokeness-history-origin-evolution-controversy.
Rufo, C. F. (2021). ‘The goal is to ....’ Tweet. @realchrisrufo. 15 March 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20210316084919/https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1371541044592996352.
Rutazibwa, O. U. (2020). Hidden in plain sight: Coloniality, capitalism and race/ism as far as the eye can see. Millennium, 48(2), 221–241.
Sablan, J. R. (2019). Can you really measure that? Combining critical race theory and quantitative methods. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 178–203.
Sachs, J. (2021). ‘Supporters of anti-woke laws haven’t thought it through’. Arc Digital, 5 March 2021. https://arcdigital.media/supporters-of-anti-woke-laws-havent-thought-it-through-5a061cd24fca.
Sachs, J. A. (2019). ‘Campus free speech, under threat from the right’. Medium. 3 September 2019. https://arcdigital.media/campus-free-speech-under-threat-from-the-right-8d4a8506a056.
Salter, M. B. (2007). On exactitude in disciplinary science: A response to the network manifesto. Security Dialogue, 38(1), 113–122.
Salter, M. B., Cohn, C., Neal, A. W., Wibben, A. T. R., Peter Burgess, J., Elbe, S. et al. (2019). Horizon scan critical security studies for the next 50 years. Security Dialogue, 50(4_Suppl), 9–37.
Schindler, S. (2020). The task of critique in times of post-truth politics. Review of International Studies, 1–19.
Schindler, S., & Wille, T. (2019). How can we criticize international practices? International Studies Quarterly, 63(4), 1014–1024.
Schmid, D. (2018). The poverty of critical theory in international relations: Habermas, Linklater and the failings of cosmopolitan critique. European Journal of International Relations, 24(1), 198–220.
Scott, D. (2017). Stuart Hall’s voice: Intimations of an ethics of receptive generosity. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
Shilliam, R. (2013). Intervention and colonial-modernity: Decolonising the Italy/ethiopia conflict through psalms 68:31. Review of International Studies, 39(5), 1131–1147.
Shilliam, R. (2017). Race and revolution at Bwa Kayiman. Millennium, 45(3), 269–292.
Shilliam, R. (2020). Race and racism in international relations: Retrieving a scholarly inheritance. International Politics Reviews, 8(2), 152–195.
Siddiqui, U. (2021). Muslim Austrian academic shares tale of gunpoint raid’. Al Jazeera English, 4 March 2021. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/4/muslim-professor-reveals-raid-in-austria.
Sjoberg, L. (2019). Failure and critique in critical security studies. Security Dialogue, 50(1), 77–94.
Solomon, Ty., & Steele, B. J. (2017). Micro-moves in international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations, 23(2), 267–291.
Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason. London: Harvard University Press.
Stengers, I. (2015). In catastrophic times: Resisting the coming barbarism. London: Open Humanities Press.
Stokes, D. (2019). ‘Universities should resist calls to “Decolonise the curriculum”’. The Spectator, 18 February 2019. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/universities-should-resist-calls-to-decolonise-the-curriculum-.
THE. (2009). ‘Most cited authors of books in the humanities, 2007’. Times Higher Education (THE), 26 March 2009. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/most-cited-authors-of-books-in-the-humanities-2007.
Toros, H. (2016). Dialogue, praxis and the state: A response to Richard Jackson. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 9(1), 126–130.
Truss, L. (2020). ‘Fight for fairness’. December 17. https://web.archive.org/web/20201217144124/https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/fight-for-fairness.
Van Milders, L., & Toros, H. (2020). Violent international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 26(1_Suppl), 116–39.
Visoka, G. (2018). Critique and alternativity in international relations. International Studies Review, September.
Walker, P. (2019). ‘Tory MP criticised for using antisemitic term “Cultural Marxism”’. The Guardian, 26 March 2019, sec. News. http://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/mar/26/tory-mp-criticised-for-using-antisemitic-term-cultural-marxism.
Wang, E. (2018). ‘From Hungary to Brazil, gender studies programs are increasingly under attack’. Jezebel, 5 Dec 2018. https://jezebel.com/from-hungary-to-brazil-gender-studies-programs-are-inc-1830885743.
Weber, M. (2014). Between “isses” and “oughts”: IR constructivism, critical theory, and the challenge of political philosophy. European Journal of International Relations, 20(2), 516–543.
Whitworth, S. (1989). Gender in the inter-paradigm debate. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 18(2), 265–72.
Wight, C. (2020). ‘Critical dogmatism: Academic freedom confronts moral and epistemological certainty’. Political Studies Review, August.
Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2015). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. London: Routledge.
Younis, M. (2020). ‘“The fish rots from the head”’. London Review of Books, 13 November 2020. https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2020/november/the-fish-rots-from-the-head.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Conway, P.R. Critical international politics at an impasse: reflexivist, reformist, reactionary, and restitutive post-critique. Int Polit Rev 9, 213–238 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41312-021-00111-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41312-021-00111-3