Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Institutional ontology for conceptual modeling

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Information Technology

Abstract

Conceptual models are intended to capture knowledge about the world. Hence, the design of conceptual models could be informed by theories about what entities exist in the world and how they are constituted. Further, a common assumption within the field of conceptual modeling is that conceptual models and information systems describe entities in the real world, outside the systems. An alternative view is provided by an ontological commitment that recognizes that the institutional world is constructed through language use and the creation of institutional facts. Such an ontological commitment implies that there is an institutional reality, which, to a great extent, is constructed using information infrastructures. Accordingly, conceptual models have not only a descriptive role but also a prescriptive one, meaning that modelers set up a framework of rules that restrict and enable people to construct institutional reality using information infrastructures. Understanding the prescriptive role of conceptual models may revive the area of conceptual modeling in the information systems research community. Reviving conceptual modeling through institutional modeling is motivated by the effect that implemented conceptual models have on information infrastructures and institutions. The purpose of this article is to propose an institutional ontology that can support the design of information infrastructures. The ontology is theoretically informed by institutional theory and a communicative perspective on information systems design, as well as being empirically based on several case studies. It is illustrated using a case study in the welfare sector. A number of guidelines for modeling institutional reality are also proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing Mystery: Empirical Matters in Theory Development, Academy of Management Review 32(4): 1265–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (2003). Speech Acts and Pragmatics, in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 147–167.

  • Barley, S.R. and Tolbert, P.S. (1997). Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links Between Action and Institution, Organization Studies 18(1): 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaney, M. (2016), Analysis, Summer 2016 edn, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

  • Bera, P., Krasnoperova, A. and Wand, Y. (2010). Using Ontology Languages for Conceptual Modeling, Journal of Database Management 21(1): 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berente, N. and Yoo, Y. (2012). Institutional Contradictions and Loose Coupling: Postimplementation of NASA’s Enterprise Information System, Information Systems Research 23(2): 376–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergholtz, M. and Eriksson, O. (2015). Towards a Socio-Institutional Ontology for Conceptual Modelling of Information Systems, in M. Jeusfeld and K. Karlapalem (eds.) Advances in Conceptual Modeling, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Cham: Springer, pp. 225–235.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. (2015). Form-ing Governance. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 9(1): 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies, P. (2016). Instituting Facts: Data Structures and Institutional Order, Information and Organization 26(1–2): 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boell, S.K. and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). What is an Information System?, in 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), ieeexplore.ieee.org, pp. 4959–4968.

  • Bowker, G. and Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting Things Out. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bricker, P. (2016). Ontological Commitment, Winter 2016 edn, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

  • Bubenko, Jr., J.A. (2007). From Information Algebra to Enterprise Modelling and Ontologies—A Historical Perspective on Modelling for Information Systems, in Conceptual Modelling in Information Systems Engineering, Berlin: Springer, pp. 1–18.

  • Bunge, M. (1977). Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World, Vol. 3, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Burton-Jones, A., Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P. and Weber, R. (2017). Assessing Representation Theory with a Framework for Pursuing Success and Failure, Management of Information Systems Quarterly 41(4): 1307–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M.C., Della Giusta, M. and Kambhampati, U.S. (2010). Formal and Informal Institutions and Development, World Development 38(2): 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J.P., Durand, R., Fiss, P.C., Lammers, J.C. and Vaara, E. (2015). Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis, Academy of Management Review 40(1): 10–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. and Hepp, A. (2016). The Mediated Construction of Reality, Wiley.

  • Date, C.J. (2003). An Introduction to Database Systems, 8th edn, Pearson.

  • DeVaujany, F.-X., Carton, S., Mitev, N. and Romeyer, C. (2014). Applying and Theorizing Institutional Frameworks in IS research: A Systematic Analysis from 1999 to 2009, Information Technology & People 27(3): 280–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, D. (2012). The Reality of Social Construction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Eriksson, O. (2000). Kommunikationskvalitet hos informationssystem och affärsprocesser, PhD thesis, Linköpings universitet.

  • Eriksson, O. (2015a). Studie av en samling offentliggemensamma digitala resurser: E-recept, in Swedish.

  • Eriksson, O. (2015b). Studie av en samling offentliggemensamma digitala resurser: Ladok, in Swedish.

  • Eriksson, O. and Agerfalk, P. (2010). Rethinking the Meaning of Identifiers in Information Infrastructures, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 11(8): 433–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, O. and Goldkuhl, G. (2015). Studie av en samling offentliggemensamma digitala resurser: Ekonomiskt bistånd, in Swedish.

  • Eriksson, O., Henderson-Sellers, B. and Agerfalk, P.J. (2013). Ontological and Linguistic Metamodelling Revisited: A Language Use Approach. Information and Software Technology 55(12): 2099–2124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evermann, J. and Wand, Y. (2005). Ontology Based Object-Oriented Domain Modelling: Fundamental Concepts, Requirements Engineeringv10(2): 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.G. (1975). Truth and Method, Seabury Press.

  • Geerts, G.L. and McCarthy, W.E. (2006). Policy-Level Specifications in REA Enterprise Information Systems, Journal of Information Systems 20(2): 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosain, S. (2004). Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(4): 151–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T.R. (1995). Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43(5): 907–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, reprint edn, Beacon Press.

  • Halpin, T. (2007). Fact-Oriented Modeling: Past, Present and Future, in J. Krogstie, A.L. Opdahl and S. Brinkkemper (eds.) Conceptual Modelling in Information Systems Engineering, Berlin: Springer, pp. 19–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin, T. (2016). Object-Role Modeling Workbook: Data Modeling Exercises Using ORM and NORMA, Technics Publications.

  • Hanseth, O. and Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design Theory for Dynamic Complexity in Information Infrastructures: The Case of Building Internet. Journal of Information Technology 25(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson-Sellers, B., Eriksson, O. and Agerfalk, P.J. (2015). On the Need for Identity in Ontology-Based Conceptual Modelling, in M. Saeki and H. Kohler (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2015), Vol. 27, Sydney, Australia: CRPIT, pp. 9–20.

  • Henderson-Sellers, B., Eriksson, O., Gonzalez-Perez, C. and Agerfalk, P.J. (2013). Ptolemaic Metamodelling?: The Need for a Paradigm Shift, in Progressions and Innovations in Model-Driven Software Engineering, IGI Global, pp. 90–146.

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K. and Lyytinen, K. (1995). Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Conceptual and Philosophical Foundations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K. and Lyytinen, K. (1996). Exploring the Intellectual Structures of Information Systems Development: A Social Action Theoretic Analysis, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 6(1): 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. (2006). What are Institutions? Journal of Economic Issues 40(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohfeld, W.N. (1913). Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, The Yale Law Journal 23(1): 16–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hruby, P. (2010). Model-Driven Design Using Business Patterns. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • IIC. (n.d.). Industrial Internet Consortium. Accessed: 2017-12-4.

  • Jacobson, I., Ericsson, M. and Jacobson, A. (1994). The Object Advantage: Business Process Reengineering with Object Technology (ACM Press), first edn, Addison-Wesley Professional.

  • Lindgren, R., Eriksson, O. and Lyytinen, K. (2015). Managing identity tensions during mobile ecosystem evolution. Journal of Information Technology 30(3): 229–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. (2000). Inference to the Best Explanation, in W. H. Newton-Smith (ed.) Companion to the Philosophy of Science, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 184–193.

  • Lukyanenko, R. and Parsons, J. (2011). Rethinking Data Quality as an Outcome of Conceptual Modeling Choices, in A. Koronios and J. Gao (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Quality 2011 (ICIQ 2011), Routledge, pp. 1–16.

  • Macfarlane, L., Ryan-Collins, J., Bjerg, O. and others. (2017). Making Money from Making Money, Technical Report.

  • Mantere, S. and Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in Organization Science, Academy of Management Review 38(1): 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, S.T. and Allen, G.N. (2014). Toward a Social Ontology for Conceptual Modeling, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 34(1): 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masolo, C. (2011). Levels for Conceptual Modeling, in Advances in Conceptual Modeling. Recent Developments and New Directions, Berlin: Springer, pp. 173–182.

  • Mignerat, M. and Rivard, S. (2009). Positioning the Institutional Perspective in Information Systems Research, Journal of Information Technology 24(4): 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, S.K., Rajapakse, J. and Weber, R. (2012). Ontological Clarity, Cognitive Engagement, and Conceptual Model Quality Evaluation: An Experimental Investigation, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13(9): 657–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSOE 2013. (n.d.). Riksnormen for forsörjningsstöd, in Swedish, http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/ekonomisktbistand/riksnormen. Accessed: 2017-12-4.

  • Ong, W. (2002). Orality and Literacy; The Technologizing of the Word, Routledge.

  • Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. (2001). Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the “IT” in IT Research—A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact, Information Systems Research 12(2): 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, J. and Li, X. (2007). An Ontological Metamodel of Classifiers and Its Application to Conceptual Modelling and Database Design, in C. Parent, K.-D. Schewe, V.C. Storey and B. Thalheim (eds.) Conceptual Modeling—ER 2007, Berlin: Springer, pp. 214–228.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Pishdad, A., Koronios, A., Reich, B.H. and Geursen, G. (2014). Identifying Gaps in Institutional Theory, in Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), ACIS.

  • Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 1 edn, University of Chicago Press.

  • SBVR 1.4. (n.d.). Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules. http://www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/1.4/index.htm. Accessed: 2017-12-4.

  • Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2001). Instituitions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (2003). Institutional Carriers: Reviewing Modes of Transporting Ideas Over Time and Space and Considering Their Consequences, Industrial and Corporate Change 12(4): 879–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language: 1st (First) Edition, reprint 1970 edn, Cambridge University Press.

  • Searle, J.R. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality, Free Press.

  • Searle, J.R. (2005). What is an Institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (2006). Social Ontology: Some Basic Principles, Anthropological Theory 6(1): 12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization (1st ed.). USA: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • SFS 1986:223. (n.d.). Forvaltningslag, in Swedish, http://www.notisum.se/rnp/sls/lag/19860223.HTM. Accessed: 2017-12-4.

  • SFS 1991:481. (n.d.). Folkbokföringslag, in Swedish, http://www.notisum.se/rnp/sls/lag/19910481.HTM. Accessed: 2017-12-4.

  • SFS 2001:453. (n.d.). Socialtjanstlag, in Swedish, https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/socialtjanstlag-2001453_sfs-2001-453. Accessed: 2017-12-4.

  • SFS 2008:975. (n.d.). ‘Om uppgiftsskyldighet i vissa fall enligt socialtjänstlagen, in Swedish', https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/forordning-2008975-om-uppgiftsskyldighet-i_sfs-2008-975. Accessed: 2017-12-4.

  • Shanks, G., Tansley, E. and Weber, R. (2003). Using Ontology to Validate Conceptual Models, Communications of the ACM 46(10): 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, G. and Weber, R. (2012). The Hole in the Whole: A Response to Allen and March, MIS Quarterly 36(3): 965–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOSFS 2013:1. (n.d.). Socialstyrelsens allmanna rådom ekonomiskt bistånd, in Swedish, https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/sosfs/2013-1. Accessed: 2017-12-4.

  • Stamper, R.K. (2001). Organisational Semiotics: Informatics Without the Computer? in K. Liu, R.J. Clarke, P.B. Andersen and R.K. Stamper (eds.) Information, Organisation and Technology, Information and Organisation Design Series, Berlin: Springer, pp. 115–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. and Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces, Information Systems Research 7(1): 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steimann, F. (2000a). On the Representation of Roles in Object-Oriented and Conceptual Modelling, Data & Knowledge Engineering 35(1): 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steimann, F. (2000b). On the Representation of Roles in Object-Oriented and Conceptual Modelling, Data & Knowledge Engineering 35(1): 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieu, L., Borgo, S. and Masolo, C. (2008). Artefacts and Roles: Modelling Strategies in a Multiplicative Ontology, in C. Eschenbach and M. Grüninger (eds.) Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press, pp. 121–134.

  • Wand, Y., Storey, V.C. and Weber, R. (1999). An Ontological Analysis of the Relationship Construct in Conceptual Modeling, ACM Transactions on Database Systems 24(4): 494–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wand, Y. and Wang, R.Y. (1996). Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations, Communications of the ACM 39(11): 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wand, Y. and Weber, R. (2002). Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling—A Research Agenda, Information Systems Research 13(4): 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wand, Y. and Weber, R. (2006). On Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modeling: A Response to Wyssusek, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 18(1): 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wand, Y. and Weber, R. (2017). Thirty Years Later: Some Reflections on Ontological Analysis in Conceptual Modeling, Journal of Database Management 28(1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (2003). Editor’s Comments: Still Desperately Seeking the IT Artifact, Management of Information Systems Quarterly 27(2): iii–xi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, R.J., de Jonge, W. and Spruit, P. (1995). Using Dynamic Classes and Role Classes to Model Object Migration, Theory and Practice of Object Systems 1(1): 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2004). Critical Discourse Analysis, in C. Seale, G. Gobo, J.F. Gubrium and D. Silverman (eds.) Qualitative Research Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwass, V. (1997). Foundations of Information Systems, Irwin/McGraw Hill.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics and Media, Uppsla University, Postbox 513, 751 20, Uppsala, Sweden

    Owen Eriksson

  2. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, DSV, Stockholm University, Postbox 7003, 164 07, Kista, Sweden

    Paul Johannesson & Maria Bergholtz

Authors
  1. Owen Eriksson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Johannesson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Bergholtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Owen Eriksson.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

A test database based on the models in Figures 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eriksson, O., Johannesson, P. & Bergholtz, M. Institutional ontology for conceptual modeling. J Inf Technol 33, 105–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-018-0053-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-018-0053-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation