Abstract
Education is widely regarded as key to promoting social mobility in postindustrial societies. Most Western countries have invested massively in their educational systems over the course of the twentieth century, leading to significant expansions of the educational system’s secondary and tertiary sectors. Despite these historical developments, stratification scholars have demonstrated that, whereas lower-class students’ absolute chances of educational attainment have increased, their chances relative to higher-class students’ chances have improved only moderately in most Western countries (Breen et al., 2009). For example, among those born between 1954 and 1964 in such diverse countries as France, Germany, and Sweden, the educational prospects of those originating in the unskilled class are respectively roughly ten, nine, and six times worse than the prospects of those originating in the service class (Breen et al., 2009, p. 1510). These figures clearly show that, although variation between countries is substantial, educational inequalities persist in postindustrial society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnoldi J. (2009) Risk (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).
Benjaminsen, L. (2006) Chanceulighed i Danmark i det 20. århundrede [Inequality of Opportunity in 20th Century Denmark]. PhD Dissertation (Copenhagen: Department of Sociology).
Boudon, R. (1974) Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western Society (New York: Wiley).
Bourdieu, P. (1977) “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction.” In J. Karabel and A. H. Halsey (eds.), Power and Ideology in Education, pp. 487–510 (New York: Oxford University Press).
Breen, R. (1997) “Risk, Recommodification and Stratification.” Sociology, 31, 473–489.
Breen, R., and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997) “Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory.” Rationality and Society, 9, 275–305.
Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., and Pollak, R. (2009) “Nonpersistent Inequality in Educational Attainment: Evidence from Eight European Countries.” American Journal of Sociology, 114, 1475–1521.
Covington, M. V. (1992) Making the Grade: A Self-Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Esping-Andersen, G. (2004) “Untying the Gordian Knot of Social Inheritance.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 21, 151–138.
Gambetta, D. (1987) Were They Pushed or Did They Jump?: Individual Decision Mechanisms in Education (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Gamoran, A. (2010) “Tracking and Inequality: New Directions for Research and Practice.” In M. W. Apple, S. J. Ball, and L. A. Gandin (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Education, pp. 213–228 (New York: Routledge).
Hansen, E. J. (1995) En generation blevvoksen [A Generation Grew Up] (Copenhagen: SFI—The Danish National Centre for Social Research).
Heckman, J. J. (2006) “Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children.” Science, 312 (5782), 1900–1902.
Kerckhoff, A. C. (1977) “The Realism of Educational Ambitions in England and the United States.” American Sociological Review, 42, 563–571.
Kerckhoff, A. C. (2001) “Education and Social Stratification Processes in Comparative Perspective.” Sociology of Education, 74, 3–18.
Lareau, A. (2003) Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
Morgan, S. L. (2005) On the Edge of Commitment: Educational Attainment and Race in the United States (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
Oakes, J. (1985) Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
Ottosen, M. H. (2012) 15-åriges hverdagsliv og udfordringer: Rapport fra femte dataindsamling af forløbsundersøgelsen af bø rn født i 1995 [The Everyday Life and Challenges among 15-Year-Olds: Results from the Fifth Wave of the Danish Longitudinal Survey of Children] (Copenhagen: SFI—The Danish National Centre for Social Research).
Parsons, T. (1962) “Youth in the Context of American Society.” Daedalus, 91, 97–123.
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., and Court, J. H. (2004) Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 3: The Standard Progressive Matrices (San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment).
Van de Werfhorst, H. G., and Mijs, J. J. B. (2010) “Achievement Inequality and the Institutional Structure of Educational Systems: A Comparative Perspective.” Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 407–428.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Tea Torbenfeldt Bengtsson, Morten Frederiksen, and Jørgen Elm Larsen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karlson, K.B., Holm, A. (2015). The Risky Business of Educational Choice in the Meritocratic Society. In: Bengtsson, T.T., Frederiksen, M., Larsen, J.E. (eds) The Danish Welfare State. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137527318_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137527318_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57481-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52731-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)