Abstract
In this research paper, we argue that the tendency of Information Systems (IS) researchers to work with a rather parsimonious set of research methods, notably those that follow the positivist tradition, demonstrates a significant degree of methodological exclusiveness. We contend that such an exclusive practice is both counterproductive to good IS research and unethical. Further, it severely and unreasonably limits the extent to which IS research and researchers can contribute to both pressing organisational problems and the scholarly literature. We synthesise our position in a set of four arguments that guide our discussion of the nature and consequences of methodological exclusiveness, as well as possible solutions. We end the paper with an exposition of steps that could be taken to address the current situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avison, D.E. and Myers, M.D. (1995). Information Systems and Anthropology: An anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture, Information Technology & People 8(3): 43–56.
Baskerville, R. (1999). Investigating Information Systems with Action Research, Communications of the AIS 2(19): 1–32.
Boland, R.J. and Day, W.F. (1989). The Experience of System Design: A hermeneutic of organizational action, Scandinavian Journal of Management 5(2): 87–104.
Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G. and Kock, N. (2004). Principles of Canonical Action Research, Information Systems Journal 14(1): 65–86.
Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G. and Ou, C.X.J. (2010). Knowledge Sharing in Professional Services Firms in China, in M.C. Lacity, L.P. Willcocks, and Y.Q. Zheng (eds.) China’s Emerging Outsourcing Capabilities: The services challenge London & New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, Chapter 7, pp. 165–183.
Dennis, A.R., Hilmer, K.M. and Taylor, N.J. (1998). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence, Journal of Management Information Systems 14: 61–68.
Galliers, R.D. (1991). Choosing information systems research approaches, in R.D. Galliers (ed.) Information Systems Research: Issues, methods and practical guidelines, Henley-on-Thames, UK: Alfred Waller, pp. 144–162.
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y. and Wei, K.K. (2005). Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An empirical investigation, MIS Quarterly 29(1): 113–143.
Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard — Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review 70(1): 71–79.
Kohli, R. and Kettinger, W.J. (2004). Informating the Clan: Controlling physicians’ costs and outcomes, MIS Quarterly 28(3): 363–394.
Landry, M. and Banville, C. (1992). A Disciplined Methodological Pluralism for MIS Research, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 2(2): 77–97.
Lee, A.S. (1989). A Scientific Methodology for Case Studies, MIS Quarterly 13(1): 33–50.
Lee, A.S. (1991). Integrating Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches to Organizational Research, Organization Science 2(4): 342–365.
Lee, A.S. (1994). Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation, MIS Quarterly 18(2): 143–157.
Lee, A.S. (2010). Retrospect and Prospect: Information systems in the last and next twenty five years, Journal of Information Technology 25(4): 336–348.
Lee, A.S. and Dennis, A.R. (2012). A Hermeneutic Interpretation of a Controlled Laboratory Experiment: A case study of decision making with a group support system, Information Systems Journal, doi:10.1111/j.1365–2575.2010.00365.x.
Mårtensson, P. and Lee, A.S. (2004). Dialogical Action Research at Omega Corporation, MIS Quarterly 28(3): 507–536.
Maznevski, M. and Chudoba, K. (2000). Bridging Space Over Time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness, Organization Science 11(5): 473–492.
Myers, M.D. (1995). Dialectical Hermeneutics: A theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems, Information Systems Journal 5(1): 51–70.
Myers, M.D. (1999). Investigating Information Systems with Ethnographic Research, Communications of the AIS 2(23): 1–19.
Orlikowski, W.J. (1993). Organizational Change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in system development, MIS Quarterly 17(3): 309–339.
Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying Information Technology in Organisations: Research approaches and assumptions, Information Systems Research 2(1): 1–28.
Ricoeur, P. (1981). The Model of the Text: Meaningful action considered as text, in J.B. Thompson (ed.) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–221.
Robey, D. (1996). Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, promise and respectability, Information Systems Research 7(4): 400–408.
Sen, A. (2000). Social Exclusion: Concept, applications, and scrutiny, Social Development Papers No. 1, Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank.
Stabell, C.B. and Fjelstad, O.D. (1998). Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: On chains, shops and networks, Strategic Management Journal 19(5): 413–437.
Vogel, D.R., Martz, W.N., Nunamaker, J.F., Grohowski, R.B. and McGoff, C. (1990). Electronic Meeting System Experience at IBM, Journal of Management Information Systems 6(3): 25–43.
Walsham, G. (1995). The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research, Information Systems Research 6(4): 376–394.
Ward, K.J. (1999). Cyber-Ethnography and the Emergence of the Virtually New Community, Journal of Information Technology 14(1): 95–105.
Zheng, Y. and Walsham, G. (2008). Inequality of What? Social Exclusion in the E-Society as Capability Deprivation, Information Technology and People 21(3): 222–243.
Zmud, R. (1996). Editor’s Comments: On rigor and relevancy, MIS Quarterly 20(3): xxxvii–xxxviii.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Journal of Information Technology (JIT)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G. (2015). Methodological practice and policy for organisationally and socially relevant IS research: an inclusive-exclusive perspective. In: Willcocks, L.P., Sauer, C., Lacity, M.C. (eds) Formulating Research Methods for Information Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509857_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137509857_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56112-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50985-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)