Skip to main content

Hymer’s Analysis of the Multinational Organization: Power Retention and the Demise of the Federative MNE

  • Chapter
Knowledge, Networks and Power
  • 1690 Accesses

Abstract

Although Hymer is acknowledged as the pioneer of modern analysis of the multinational enterprise (MNE) (Dunning, 1996; Pitelis, 2002), his analysis of the nature of the multinational as an emerging organizational form has not received the attention it merits. His insights on this issue are contained in writings which have attracted attention primarily for Hymer’s analysis of the impact of MNEs on the global division of labour and the generation of uneven development. His specifically organizational insights have not been salient in the discussion of his work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alorbi, K. (2003). The activities of UK multinationals in the US: A study of strategy and structure evolution. PhD Thesis, Department of Marketing, University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., & Forsgren, M. (2000). In search of centres of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review, 40(4), 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 979–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (1993). Beyond the M-form: towards a managerial theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. (2001). Strategy and management in MNE subsidiaries. In A. Rugman, & T. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. (1998). Multinational subsidiary evolution: capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., & Ridderstrale, J. (1999). Fighting the corporate immune system: A process study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations. International Business Review, 8, 149–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Felton, N., Nkosi, M., & Liere, J. (Eds.). (1979). The multinational corporation: A radical approach—Papers by Stephen Herbert Hymer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K., & Sugden, R. (1998). The essence of the modern corporation: Markets, strategic decision-making and the theory of the firm. The Manchester School, 66(1), 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y., & Prahalad, C. (1991). Managing the DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. (1996). The nature of transnational corporations and their activities. In J. Dunning (Ed.), Transnational corporations and world development. London: International Thompson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgard, A., & Sharma, D. (1997). Experiential knowledge and cost in the internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, A. (2000). The underpinning of ‘bureaucratic’ control systems: HRM in European multinationals. Journal of Management Studies, 37(4), 521–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., Holm, U., & Johansen, J. (1995). Division headquarters go abroad—A step in the internationalization of the multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren, M., Pedersen, T., & Foss, N. (1999). Accounting for the strength of MNC subsidiaries: The case of foreign-owned firms in Denmark. International Business Review, 2, 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganiza-tional network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 603–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S., & Nohria, N. (1997). The differentiated MNC: Organizing multinational corporations for value creation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, K., & Roberts, J. (2003). Repairing managerial knowledge-ability over distance. Organization Studies, 24(7), 1153–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, G. (1993). Assumptions of hierarchy and heterarchy, with applications to the management of the multinational firm. In S. Ghoshal, & E. Westney (Eds.), Organization theory and the multinational corporation. London: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, U., Johanson, J., & Thilenius, P. (1995). Headquarters knowledge of subsidiary network contexts in the multinational corporations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 1-2, 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1968). The large multinational ‘corporation’: An analysis of some motives for international integration of business. Revue Economique 6 (translated from the French by Nathalie Vacherot with an introduction by Mark Casson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1972). Is the multinational corporation doomed?. Innovation (28), 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1976). The international operations of national firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ietto-Gillies, G. (2002). Transnational corporations: Fragmentation amidst integration. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (2002). Control, performance and knowledge acquisition in large multinationals: Unilever in the United States. Business History Review, 37(3), 435–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., Labinaca, G., & Galigiuri, P. (2002). Getting along long distance: Understanding conflict in a multinational team through network analysis. Journal of World Business, 37(4), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1990). International sequential advantages and network flexibility. In C.A. Bartlett, Y. Doz, & G. Hedlund (Eds.), Managing the global firm. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 342–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W., & O’Sullivan, M. (2001). Maximising shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29(1), 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2001). The multinational firm: Organizing across institutional and national divides. In G. Morgan, P.H. Kristensen, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The multinational firm: Organizing across institutional and national divides. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Navarra, P. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, N., & Ghoshal, S. (1994). Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters—subsidiary relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6), 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P., Sutherland, D., & Zhang, J. (2002). The challenge of the global business revolution. Contributions to Political Economy, 21, 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J., & Weick, K. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A re-conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peoples, J., & Sugden, R. (2000). Divide and rule by transnational corporations. In C. Pitelis, & R. Sugden (Eds.), The nature of the transnational firm (2nd ed). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, A. (2004). Capital versus the districts: A tale of one multinational company’s attempt to disembed itself. Economic Geography, 80(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phene, A., & Almeida, P. (2003). How do firms evolve: The patterns of technological evolution of semiconductor subsidiaries. International Business Review, 12(3), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C. (2002). Hymer: Life and the political economy of the multinational corporate capital. Contributions to Political Economy, 21, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitelis, C., & Sugden, R. (1986). The separation ownership and control in the theory of the firm: A reappraisal. International Journal on Industrial Organization, 4, 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. (2000). The end of globalization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. (2003). Regional strategy and the demise of globalization. Journal of International Management, 9, 409–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A. (2005). The regional multinationals: MNEs and ‘global’ strategic management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & D’Cruz, J. (2000). Multinationals as flagship firms: Regional business networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W., & van Tulder, R. (1995). The logic of international restructuring. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sölvell, Ö., & Zander, I. (1998). International diffusion of knowledge: Isolating mechanisms and the role of the MNE. In A. Chandler, P. Hagström, & Ö Sölvell (Eds.), The dynamic firm: The role of technology, strategy, organization and regions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intra-organizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2), 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2001). World investment report 2001: Promoting linkages. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, M. (1991). A reassessment of Hymer’s contributions to the theory of the transnational corporation. In C. Pitelis, & R. Sugden (Eds.), The nature of the transnational firm. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, M., & Ghauri, P. (2004). Rethinking the relationship between transnational corporations and emerging economies: The relevance of the East Asian experience. In B. Parsad, & P. Ghauri (Eds.), Global firms and emerging markets in the age of anxiety. New York: Preager.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, M., & Otto, J. (2004). Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative performance. Journal of International Management, 10(2), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, M. (1974). Corporate ownership and control: The large corporation and the capitalist class. American Journal of Sociology, 79(5), 1073–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Mohammad Yamin and Mats Forsgren

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yamin, M., Forsgren, M. (2015). Hymer’s Analysis of the Multinational Organization: Power Retention and the Demise of the Federative MNE. In: Forsgren, M., Holm, U., Johanson, J. (eds) Knowledge, Networks and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137508829_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics