Skip to main content

The Model Migrant and Multiculturalism: Analyzing Neoliberal Logics in US Sanctuary Legislation

  • Chapter
Migration Policy and Practice

Abstract

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a US public interest nonprofit organization, in a 2013 publication warned of the “dangerous trend” of “immigrant sanctuary” policies “sweeping the country” (FAIR 2013, 1). The policies to which FAIR refers are described as “sanctuary legislation,” local immigration policies, resolutions and/or ordinances that counter exclusionary state or federal legislation. These local policies contain a variety of stipulations, which include providing public services to residents irrespective of migration status, refusing to comply with federal law enforcement mandates, addressing place-based discrimination experienced by migrants, critiquing unequal power relations that produce migration flows and declaring a place a sanctuary. The locales that have enacted sanctuary legislation are known collectively as “sanctuary cities” or counties. The FAIR report notes that the community costs purportedly associated with unauthorized migration far surpass the possible benefits afforded through providing sanctuary. In an effort to showcase the geographic spread of this expanding “threat,” the authors of the report detail the FAIR-defined immigrant sanctuary policies evident in 103 cities, towns and counties across the United States (FAIR 2103, 1–2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A Council Resolution Concerning the Promotion of Community Safety and Trust Between Baltimore City Residents and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, Res 11–0298R, Baltimore City Council. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Watsonville Requesting Suspension of Random Detentions and Arrests of Residents in the City of Watsonville by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Directing the Mayor to Send Copies of Resolution to State and Federal Representatives and to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Res 98–07, Watsonville City Council. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • A Resolution Opposing Federal Legislation that Encourages Local Enforcement of Civil Immigration Laws, Res 30672, Seattle City Council. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Administrative Code Chapter 12H: Immigration Status, San Francisco City Council, § 12H.2. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). 2010. “Criminalizing Undocumented Immigrants.” Accessed December 14, 2014. http://aclu.org/files/assets/FINAL_crimin-alizing_undocumented_immigrants_issue_brief_PUBLIC_VERSION.pdf.

  • An Ordinance Reaffirming and Strengthening the City of Takoma Park’s Immigration Sanctuary Law, Ord 2007–58, Takoma Park City Council. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, Paul. 2006. “DeStefano to Immigrants: We’re Not The Feds.” New Haven Independent. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://newhavenindependent.org/index. php/archives/entry/destefano_to_immigrants_were_not_the_feds/.

  • Calling for Comprehensive Immigration Reform and for Reaffirmation of the City’s Commitment to Humane and Just Treatment of Immigrants and Their Families, Res 11-R-08, Evanston City Council. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbado, Devon. 2005. “Racial Naturalization.” American Quarterly 57(3): 633–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsen, Laura. 2007. “Return to Sender.” CounterPunch. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://counterpunch.org/2007/03/01/return-to-sender/.

  • City of Madison, WI. 2014. “Racial Equity and Social Justice Initiative.” Accessed December 14, 2014. http://www.cityofmadison.com/mayor/priorities/racial-equity.cfm.

  • City of Seattle, WA. 2014. “Race and Social Justice Initiative.” Accessed December 14, 2014. http://www.seattle.gov/rsji.

  • Code of Ordinances Chapter 44, St. Paul City Council, § 44.03. 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Participation in Local Government and Local Law Enforcement, Hamtramck City Council, § 38.005–38.006. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, Nicholas. 2004. “The Legal Production of Mexican/Migrant ‘Illegality’.” Latino Studies 2(2): 160–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Disclosure of Status Information: Policies and Procedures, General Order 06–2, New Haven Police Department. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Editorial. 2013. “A Voice for the Goose: Life is Hard in the Shadow of the District.” Accessed December 14, 2014. http://washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/21/a-voice-for-the-goose/.

  • Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). 2013. Sanctuary Policies Across the US. Washington, DC: FAIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 1995. “False Antitheses.” In Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange, edited by Seyla Benhabib, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell and Nancy Fraser, 59–74. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Charles R. 2005. “Neoliberal Multiculturalism: The Remaking of Cultural Rights and Racial Dominance in Central America.” PoLAR 28(1): 10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Paul. 2011. “Oakland Police: Controversial History Sets Tone for City’s Discord.” The Guardian. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://theguardian.com/world/blog/2011/oct/26/oakland-police-department-black-community.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, Steve. 2007. “Takoma Park Stays Immigrant ‘Sanctuary’.” The Washington Post. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/29/AR2007102902241.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, Deborah. 2008a. “Probes of Legal Status a No-No?” Chicago Tribune. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2008–01–11/news/0801110039_1_immigration-status-immigration-reduction-illegal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, Deborah. 2008b. “Immigration Controversy Roils Evanston City Council.” Chicago Tribune. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2008–03–15/news/0803140512_1_immigration-status-illegal-immigration-immigration-advocates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, Serin and Charlotte Morse. 2015. “Framing Immigrant Sanctuaries in the US: Encounters with the Ordinary and Extraordinary.” Unpublished manuscript. Available upon request.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inquiries into Immigration Status, Directive D02–45, Seattle Police Department. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanstroom, Daniel. 2007. Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, Wendy. 2000. “Neoliberalism: Policy, Ideology, Governmentality.” Studies in Political Economy 63: 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, Heather. 2007. “Oakland to Remain Immigrant Sanctuary.” Oakland Tribune. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://origin.insidebayarea.com/timesstar/localnews/ci_5754706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melamed, Jodi. 2006. “The Spirit of Neoliberalism: From Racial Liberalism to Neoliberal Multiculturalism.” Social Text 24(4_89): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Katharyne. 2004. “Geographies of Identity: Multiculturalism Unplugged.” Progress in Human Geography 28(5): 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Dawn. 2008. “Opposition to Evanston ‘Sanctuary City’ Resolution.” Accessed December 14, 2014. http://evanstonnow.com/government/dawn-mueller/blog-entry/2008/02/18/opposition-to-evanston-sanctuary-city-resolution.

  • National Immigration Forum. 2007. “Immigration Law Enforcement by State and Local Police.” Accessed December 14, 2014. http://observatoriocolef.org/_admin/documentos/Backgrounder-StateLocalEnforcement.pdf.

  • National Immigration Forum. 2014. “Secure Communities.” Accessed September 28, 2014. http://weareoneamerica.org/sites/weareoneamerica.org/files/NIF%20Fact%20 Sheet%20Secure_Communities.pdf.

  • Navarrette, Ruben. 2014. “Minds Need to be Open on Immigration.” Accessed December 14, 2014. http://recordnet.com/article/20140904/News/140909844.

  • Nicholls, Walter. 2014. “Between Punishment and Discipline: Comparing Strategies to Control Unauthorized Immigration in the United States.” Citizenship Studies 18(6/7): 579–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O-16 Original Order of May 8, 2006, Cambridge City Council. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, Sophie. 1990. “The Origins of a Political Trial: The Sanctuary Movement and Political Justice.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2(2): 381–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policy for Responding to ICE Detainers, Ord 11-O-73, Cook County Board of Commissioners. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, Eileen (ed.). 2007. The Public Sanctuary Movement, A Historical Basis of Hope: Oral Histories, Book I. San Francisco, CA: Sanctuary Oral History Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reaffirming Berkeley as a City of Refuge, Res 63,711 N.S., Berkeley City Council. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resolution (1) Calling on the Federal Government to Impose a Moratorium on Federal Immigration Raids and to Adopt Fair Comprehensive and Humane Federal Immigration Reforms, (2) Affirming that Oakland is a City of Refuge for Immigrants and (3) Declaring the City’s Policy against Local Enforcement of Civil Immigration Laws while Permitting Cooperation with Federal Agents in Situations Involving Public and Serious Crimes, Res 80584, Oakland City Council. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resolution Declaring Cook County a “Fair and Equal County for Immigrants,” Res 07-R-240, Cook County Board of Commissioners. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resolution Declaring the City of Albuquerque an Immigrant-Friendly City; Establishing City of Albuquerque Policies Regarding Immigrants and Their Families, Regardless of Immigration Status; Establishing a City of Albuquerque Immigrant Resource Program; and Providing an Appropriation, Council Bill F/S R-151, Albuquerque City Council. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resolution Denouncing Tactics Used by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency to Intimidate Oakland Residents Including Placement of Field Agents, Vehicles and Conducting Surveillance at or Near School Campuses and Re-affirming the City’s Declaration as a City of Refuge, Res 81310, Oakland City Council. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resolution from Alderpersons Castro, James, M. Smith, Colon, Bauer, Santiago, K. Jones, Rodriguez and Perez Calling Upon the Administration of Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy to Refuse to Honor Administrative Detainers Issued Under the Secure Communities Program Except in the Case of a Person who has been Identified as a Confirmed Match in the FBI’s Terrorist Screening Database or Convicted of a Serious Violent Criminal Offense and Requesting the Assistance

    Google Scholar 

  • of the Connecticut Congressional Delegation and the Mayor in Reviewing and Educating Residents about the Impact of the Program, Res LM-2011–0330, New Haven City Council. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resolution Reaffirming the City of Davis as a City of Sanctuary, Res 07–162, Davis City Council. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resolution Regarding Actions within Hightstown Borough by the United States Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Res 2005–66, Hightstown Borough Council. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgley, Jennifer. 2008. “Cities of Refuge: Immigration Enforcement, Police, and the Insurgent Genealogies of Citizenship in U.S. Sanctuary Cities.” Urban Geography 29(1): 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgley, Jennifer. 2012. “The City as a Sanctuary in the United States.” In Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Movements, edited by Randy K. Lippert and Sean Rehaag, 219–231. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bill. 2011. “Group Rates Evanston Tops in Addressing Immigrant Issues.” Accessed September 28, 2014. http://evanstonnow.com/story/government/bill-smith/2011–01–31/group-rates-evanston-tops-in-addressing-immigrant-issues.

  • Sullivan, Laura. 2009. “Enforcing Nonenforcement: Countering the Threat Posed to Sanctuary Laws by the Inclusion of Immigration Records in the National Crime Information Center Database.” California Law Review 97(567): 567–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tramonte, Lynn. 2011. Debunking the Myth of ‘Sanctuary Cities’: Community Policing Policies Protect American Communities. Washington, DC: Immigration Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, James. 2005. “Sanctuary Cities, States Undermining the American Republic.” The Social Contract Spring: 192–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, Ronald and Steven Tuch. 2006. Race and Policing in America: Conflict and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welcome to Dayton: Immigrant Friendly City. 2011. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://welcomedayton.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Welcome-Dayton-immigrant-friendly-report-final.pdf.

  • Wheelwright, Tess. 2006. “Immigrants Flee Raid Meant To Help Them.” New Haven Independent. Accessed December 14, 2014. http://newhavenindependent.org/index. php/archives/entry/immigrants_flee_raid_meant_to_help_them/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukich, Grace. 2013a. “Constructing the Model Immigrant: Movement Strategy and Immigrant Deservingness in the New Sanctuary Movement.” Social Problems 60(3): 302–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukich, Grace. 2013b. “‘I Didn’t Know if this was Sanctuary’: Strategic Adaptation in the US New Sanctuary Movement.” In Sanctuary Practices in International Perspectives: Migration, Citizenship, and Social Movement s, edited by Randy Lippert and Sean Rehaag, 106–118. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Harald Bauder Christian Matheis

Copyright information

© 2016 Harald Bauder and Christian Matheis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Houston, S.D., Lawrence-Weilmann, O. (2016). The Model Migrant and Multiculturalism: Analyzing Neoliberal Logics in US Sanctuary Legislation. In: Bauder, H., Matheis, C. (eds) Migration Policy and Practice. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503817_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137503817_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56677-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50381-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics