Skip to main content

Gender and Space in Enlightenment Science: Madame Dupiéry’s Scientific Work and Network

  • Chapter
Domesticity in the Making of Modern Science

Abstract

‘Dear fellow chemist… I picture thee surrounded by papers and work’, Antoine-François Fourcroy wrote in 1799 to Mme Dupiéry.1 Who was this woman addressed by the well-known academician as a fellow chemist? What was she working on? And where did she work? So many questions raised by a single sentence by an eighteenth-century male savant, addressed to a woman of whom we know very little. How does this specific case fit the distinction between professional/institutional and amateur/domestic typical of how some modern historiography interprets the gendering of scientific knowledge? According to this dichotomized interpretation, women who took part in scientific endeavours are not considered producers of knowledge, but mere auxiliaries, supporting male savants from the domestic space where they seem confined, without entitlements to affiliations with learned, scientific institutions — these being the preserve of men of science. This assumed emphasis on exclusion from the institutional and professional sphere persisted, even amid women’s growing involvement in public scientific life during the Republic of Letters and the Enlightenment.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On these themes, see, for example, M. Terrall (1995) ‘Gendered Spaces, Gendered Audiences: Inside and Outside the Paris Academy of Sciences’, Configurations, 3, 207–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Noble (1993) A World without Women (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Cooper (2006) ‘Homes and Households’, in K. Park and L. Daston (eds) The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 3: Early Modern Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 224–37.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Findlen (1993) ‘Science as a Career in Enlightenment Italy: The Strategies of Laura Bassi’, Isis, 84, 441–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Cavazza (1997) ‘Minerva e Pigmalione: Carriere femminili nell’Italia del Settecento’, The Italianist, 17, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Mazotti (2007) The World of Maria Gaetana Agnesi, Mathematician of God (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Lilti (2005) Le monde des salons: Sociabilité et mondanité à Paris au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Fayard).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Mommertz (2005) ‘The Invisible Economy of Science: A New Approach to the History of Gender and Astronomy at the Eighteenth-Century Berlin Academy of Sciences’, in J.P. Zinsser (ed.) Men, Women, and the Birthing of Modern Science (DeKalb: Northern Illinois Press), pp. 159–78.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Terrall (2014) Catching Nature in the Act: Réaumur and the Practice of Natural History in the Eighteenth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Bret and B. Van Tiggelen (eds) (2011) Madame d’Arconville, Une femme de lettres et de sciences au siècle des Lumières (Paris: Hermann).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Fara (2004) Pandora’s Breeches: Women, Science & Power in the Enlightenment (London: Pimlico).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Hilaire-Pérez (2008) ‘Steel and Toy Trade between England and France: The Huntsmans’ Correspondence with the Blakeys (Sheffield-Paris, 1765–1769)’, Historical Metallurgy, 42, 127–47.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Goodman (2009) ‘Marriage Choice and Marital Success’, in D.I. Kertzer and M. Barbagli (eds) Family and State in Early Modern Times, 1500–1789 (New Haven: Yale University Press), pp. 26–61.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Ferland and C. Grenier (2013) ‘“Quelque longue que soit l’absence”: procurations et pouvoir féminin à Québec au XVIIIe siècle’, Clio, no. 37, 197–225.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Lémonon (2016) ‘Les femmes et la Philosophie Naturelle dans l’Europe des Lumières: architectes, ouvrières ou passeuses du savoir?’ PhD thesis, École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Centre Alexandre Koyré, Paris, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lalande (1786/1817) Bibliothèque universelle des dames Astronomie (Paris: Ménard et Desenne).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Lalande (1803) Bibliographie astronomique (Paris: Imprimerie de la République), p. 937.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Lalande (1785/1820) Astronomie des dames (Paris: Ménard et Desenne).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.C. Pecker and S. Dumont (eds) (2007) Lettres à Madame Du Pierry et au juge Honoré Flaugergues, Vol. 1: Lalandiana (Paris Vrin), UR 17.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Briquet (1804) Dictionnaire historique, littéraire et bibliographique des françaises et des étrangères naturalisées en France (Paris: Treutel and Wurtz), p. 397.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Alquié de Rieupeyroux (1893) Anthologie des femmes écrivains poètes etprosateurs depuis l’origine de la langue française jusqu’à nos jours (Paris: Bureau des causeries familiales).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Rébière (1897) Les femmes dans la science: Notes recueillies par (Paris: Nonie and Cie).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Ogilvie and J. Harvey (eds) (2000) The Biographical Dictionary of Women in Science: Pioneering Lives from Ancient Times to the Mid-20th Century, 2 Vols (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.P. Poirier (2002) Histoire des femmes de science en France (Paris: Pygmalion).

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Chazal (2006) Les femmes de sciences (Paris: Ellipses).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Dumont (2007) Un astronome des Lumières: Jérôme Lalande (Paris: Vuibert).

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Boistel, J. Lamy, and C. Le Lay (eds) (2010) Jérôme Lalande (1732–1807): Une trajectoire scientifique (Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Lamy (2005) ‘L’observatoire de Toulouse de 1733 à 1908: entre savoir et pouvoir’, Cahiers d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences, no. 54, 135–52.

    Google Scholar 

  29. L. Amiable (1897) Une loge maçonnique d’avant 1789: les Neuf S·urs (Paris: F. Alcan).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Du Pierry (1782) Explication des Tables de la durée du jour et de la nuit pour la latitude de Paris, pour chaque jour de l’année (Paris: Lottin).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Lalande (1783) Ephémérides des mouvemens célestes pour le Méridien de Paris, 8, 76–8 and iv.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Lalande (1784) ‘Ephémérides des mouvemens célestes pour le Méridien de Paris’, Journal des sçavans, December 1784, 812–14: 813.

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Euler (1786) Introduction à l’analyse des infiniments petits, trans. F. Pezzi (Strasbourg: Librairie Académique).

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Lalande (1789) ‘Tables des satellites de Saturne’, in P. Méchain (ed.) Connaissance des Tems…pour l’année commune 1791 (Paris: L’Imprimerie Royale), pp. 288–94.

    Google Scholar 

  35. A.F. Fourcroy (1786) Eléments d’histoire naturelle et de chimie (Paris: Cuchet), p. 369.

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. Dupiéry (1801) Table alphabétique et analytique des matières contenues dans les cinq tomes du Système des connaissances chimiques (Paris: Baudouin).

    Google Scholar 

  37. A.F. Fourcroy (1801) Système des connaissances chimiques et de leurs applications aux phénomènes de la nature et de l’art, 5 Vols. (Paris: Baudouin).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Société d’Émulation (1789) Tableau général des ouvrages lus dans les séances de la société d’émulation de Bourg en Bresse, depuis son établissement, en Janvier 1783, jusqu’au premier Janvier 1789 (Bourg: Louis-Hyacinthe Goyffron), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Lalande (1803) Bibliographie astronomique, p. 704.

    Google Scholar 

  40. P.-A. Latreille and J.B. Godart (eds) (1819) Encyclopédie méthodique: Histoire naturelle (Paris: Agassi), Vol. 9, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  41. F. Rivard (1797) Traité de la sphère et du calendrier, ed. J. Lalande (Paris: Guillaume).

    Google Scholar 

  42. P.A. Kidwell (1984) ‘Women Astronomers in Britain 1780–1930’, Isis, 75, 534–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. S. Shapin (1989) ‘The Invisible Technician’, American Scientist, 77, 554–63.

    Google Scholar 

  44. For an example, see P. Corsi (ed.) (2008) L’herbier de Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, Liasse no. 8, p. 8, http://www.lamarck.cnrs.fr/ (home page), date accessed 20 January 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  45. G. Aymonin (1981) ‘L’herbier de Lamarck’, Revue d’histoire des sciences, 34, 25–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. P. Bret (ed.) (2012), Oeuvres de Lavoisier: Correspondance, Vol. VII: 1792–1794 (Paris: Académie des sciences), p. 491.

    Google Scholar 

  47. K. Kawashima (2013) Emilie du Châtelet et Marie-Anne Lavoisier: Science et genre au XVIIIe siècle, trans. A. Lécaille-Okamura (Paris: Champion), pp. 288–9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. A.M. Quesnay de Beaurepaire (1788) Mémoires, statuts et prospectus concernant l’académie des sciences et beaux arts des Etats-Unis de l’Amérique, établie à Richmond capitale de la Virginie (Paris: Cailleau).

    Google Scholar 

  49. M. Riboux (1785) Eloge d’Agnès Sorel surnommée la Belle Agnès (Lyon: Faucheux).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Isabelle Lémonon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lémonon, I. (2016). Gender and Space in Enlightenment Science: Madame Dupiéry’s Scientific Work and Network. In: Opitz, D.L., Bergwik, S., Van Tiggelen, B. (eds) Domesticity in the Making of Modern Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492739_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137492739_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55902-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49273-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics