Skip to main content

Abstract

The Uses of Space in Early Modern History argues for the fundamental importance of space in historical study. Space—by which I mean the emplacement, distribution, and connection of entities, actions, and ideas—has become an increasingly important topic in the humanities and social sciences. This volume shows how spatial approaches can be used to understand the societies, cultures, and mentalities of the past. The essays gathered here explore the uses of space in two respects: how spatial concepts can be employed by or applied to the study of history; and how particular spaces or spatial ideas were used for practical and ideological purposes during specific periods. All are grounded in specific case studies, but their procedures and focuses also suggest broader methodological and intellectual implications which resonate beyond those particular contexts. Some, for example, explore how domestic or religious ideologies structured, or were structured by, early modern social spaces and interactions. Others interrogate the political objectives and symbolic meanings integral to city design, or analyze the spatial strategies that define imperial space and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Paul Stock, “The Real-and-Imagined Spaces of Philhellenic Travel,” European Review of History—Revue européenne d’histoire 20, no.4 (2013): 527–528.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See the discussions in, for example, Diarmid A. Finnegan, “The Spatial Turn: Geographical Approaches in the History of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2008); Angelo Torre, “Un ‘tournant spatial’ en histoire? Paysages, regards, ressources.” Annales 63, no.5 (2008);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barney Warf and Santa Arias, eds., The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2009);

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ralph Kingston, “Mind Over Matter: History and the Spatial Turn.” Cultural and Social History 7, no.1 (2010);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malte Rolf, “Importing the ‘Spatial Turn’ to Russia: Recent Studies on the Spatialisation of Russian History,” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 11, no.2 (n.s.) (2010);

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard Wright, “What Is Spatial History?” (Stanford: Stanford University Spatial History Lab, 2010) https://web.stanford.edu/group/spatialhistory/media/images/publication/what%20is%20spatial%20history%20pub%20020110.pdf;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kathryne Beebe, Angela Davis, and Kathryn Gleadle, “Introduction: Space, Place and Gendered Identities: Feminist History and the Spatial Turn,” Women’s History Review 21, no.4 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See especially Joanna Guldi, What Is the Spatial Turn? (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Scholars Lab, 2010) http://spatial.scholarslab.org/spatial-turn/what-is-the-spatial-turn/;

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guldi, “Landscape and Place,” in Research Methods for History, ed. Simon Gunn and Lucy Faire (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012). See also

    Google Scholar 

  10. John Randolph, “The Space of Intellect and the Intellect of Space,” in Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History, ed. Darrin M. McMahon and Samuel Moyn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 212–231.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Leopold von Ranke, “Preface” to the first edition of Histories of the Latin and Germanic Peoples (1824), in Ranke, The Theory and Practice of History, ed. Georg G. Iggers, trans., Wilma A. Iggers (London: Routledge, 2011), 85–87.See also

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ranke’s “Introduction” to this work trans. Philip A. Ashworth (London: Bell, 1887), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guldi, “The Spatial Turn in History” (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Scholars Lab, 2010) http://spatial.scholarslab.org/spatial-turn/the-spatial-turn-in-history/index.html. See also

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bonnie G. Smith, “Gender and the Practices of Scientific History: The Seminar and Archival Research in the Nineteenth Century,” American Historical Review 100, no.4 (1995): 1166–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernand Braudel, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, trans. Siân Reynolds, abridged Richard Ollard (London: HarperCollins, 1992), xiv, x.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kristin Ross, The Emergence of Social Space (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1988; reprinted London: Verso, 2008), 86–87. See also

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kevin Archer, “Regions as Social Organisms: The Lamarckian Characteristics of Vidal de la Blache’s Regional Geography,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83, no.3 (1993): 498–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. See David N. Livingstone, “Environmental Determinism,” in Handbook of Geographical Knowledge, ed. John Agnew and David Livingstone (London: Sage, 2011), 368–380.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. For a useful bibliography see Simon Gunn, ““The Spatial Turn: Changing Histories of Space and Place,” in Identities in Space: Contested Territories in the Western City since 1850, ed. Simon Gunn and Robert J. Morris (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001), 1–14. See also Guldi, “Landscape and Place,” 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Barney Warf and Santa Arias, “Introduction: The Reinsertion of Space into the Social Sciences and Humanities,” in The Spatial Turn, ed. Warf and Arias, 3. Michel Foucault, “Of Other Spaces,” trans. Jay Miskowiec, Diacritics 16, no.1 (1986): 22–27;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Henri Lefebvre, The Production of Space, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. See also David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harvey, Paris: Capital of Modernity (London; Routledge, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  24. Edward Soja, Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory (London: Verso, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  25. Doreen Massey, Space, Place and Gender (Cambridge: Polity, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lynn Hunt “Introduction” to Lynn Hunt, ed., The New Cultural History (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989), 7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. See also Roger Chartier, “Intellectual History or Sociocultural History? The French Trajectories,” in Modern European Intellectual History: Reappraisals and New Perspectives, ed. Dominick LaCapra and Steven L. Kaplan (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982); Ralph Kingston, “Mind Over Matter,” 112.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See, for example, Andrew Scull, The Insanity of Place / The Place of Insanity: Essays on the History of Psychiatry (London: Routledge, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  29. George Chauncey, Gay New York: Gender, Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940 (New York: Basic, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  30. Robert Titler, Architecture and Power: The Town Hall and the English Urban Community, c. 1500–1640 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991);

    Google Scholar 

  31. W. J. T. Mitchell, Landscape and Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. B. Harley. “Text and Contexts in the Interpretation of Early Maps,” in J. B. Harley, The New Nature of Maps: Essays in the History of Cartography, ed. Paul Laxton, intro. J. H. Andrews (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Santa Arias, “Rethinking Space: An Outsider’s View of the Spatial Turn,” GeoJournal 75 (2010): 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arias, “Rethinking Space,” 31; David Harvey, Social Justice and the City (1973) (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, rev. edn. 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Richard Biernacki and Jennifer Jordan. “The Place of Space in the Study of the Social,” in The Social in Question: New Bearings in History and the Social Sciences, ed. Patrick Joyce (London: Routledge, 2002), 133, 140.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Barbara Mundy, The Mapping of New Spain: Indigenous Cartography and the Maps of the Relaciones Geográficas (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996), xiii–xvi.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Beat Kümin and Cornelie Usborne, “At Home and in the Workplace: A Historical Introduction to the ‘Spatial Turn,’” History and Theory 52 (2013): 317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kingston, “Mind Over Matter,” 113–114. See Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism, rev. edn. (London: Verso, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  39. Edward Said, Orientalism, rev. edn. (London: Penguin, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Steven Casey and Jonathan Wright, “Introduction,” to Mental Maps in the Early Cold War Era, 1945–68, ed. Steven Casey and Jonathan Wright (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. See, for example, Simon Schama, Landscape and Memory (London: HarperCollins, 1995);

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jay Winter, Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning: The Great War in European Cultural History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995);

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pamela K. Gilbert, ed., Imagined Londons (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  44. John Rennie Short, Making Space: Revisioning the World 1495–1600 (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Charles Withers, Placing the Enlightenment: Thinking Geographically about the Age of Reason (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2007), esp. 6–21.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Denis Cosgrove, Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape, rev. edn. (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1998), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  47. See also John Berger, Ways of Seeing (London: Penguin, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  48. See Stephen Daniels and Denis Cosgrove, “Spectacle and Text”: Landscape Metaphors in Cultural Geography,” in Place/Culture/Representation, ed. James Duncan and David Ley (London: Routledge, 1993), 57–77. For an overview see

    Google Scholar 

  49. Susanne Seymour, “Historical Geographies of Landscape,” in Modern Historical Geographies, ed. Brian Graham and Catherine Nash (Harlow: Pearson, 2000), 194.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Philip Ethington, “Placing the Past: “Groundwork” for a Spatial Theory of History,” Rethinking History 11, no.4 (2007): 475–476.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kingston, “Mind Over Matter,” 112–114; Lief Jerram, “Space: A Useless Category for Historical Analysis?,” History and Theory 52 (2013): 417. See also

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. David Matless, “An Occasion for Geography: Landscape, Representation, and Foucault’s Corpus,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10 (1992): 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Patrick Joyce and Tony Bennett, “Introduction: Material Powers”; and Chris Otter, “Locating Matter: The Place of Materiality in Urban History,” both in Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn, ed. Tony Bennett and Patrick Joyce (London: Routledge, 2010), esp. 5–8, 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  54. David N. Livingstone, Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  55. Daniel Brewer, “Lights in Space,” Eighteenth-Century Studies, 37, no.2 (2004): 184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Denis Cosgrove, The Palladian Landscape: Geographical Change and Its Cultural Representations in Sixteenth-Century Italy (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chandra Mukerji, Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997); Harvey, Paris, Capital of Modernity.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See Daniel Miller, “Materiality: An Introduction,” in Materiality, ed. Daniel Miller (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005), 3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  59. Peter J. Arnade, Martha C. Howell, and Walter Simons, “Fertile Spaces: The Productivity of Urban Space in Northern Europe,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 32, no.4 (2002): 516, 541. See also Otter, “Locating Matter,” 54.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Mike Crang, “Spaces in Theory, Spaces in History and Spatial Historiographies,” in Political Space in Pre-Industrial Europe, ed. Beat Kümin (Farnham: Ashgate, 2009), 264. See also

    Google Scholar 

  61. Crang, “Time: Space,” in Spaces of Geographical Thought, ed. Paul Cloke and Ron Johnson (London: Sage, 2005), 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Jerram, “Space,” 414. On materiality and causation in historical study see Frank Trentmann, “Materiality in the Future of History: Thing, Practice, and Politics,” The Journal of British Studies 48, no.2 (2009): 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Martina Löw, “The Constitution of Space: The Structuration of Spaces through the Simultaneity of Effect and Perception,” trans. Rhodes Barrett, European Journal of Social Theory 11, no.1 (2008): 43–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ross, Emergence of Social Space, 9. For some problems surrounding spatial and environmental determinism see: Gabriel Judkins, Marissa Smith, and Eric Keys, “Determinism within Human-Environment Research and the Rediscovery of Environmental Causation,” The Geographical Journal 174, no.1 (2008): 17–29;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. James M. Blaut, “Environmentalism and Eurocentrism,” The Geographical Review 89, no.3 (1999): 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. See Adrian Wilson and T. G. Ashplant, “Whig History and Present-Centred History,” The Historical Journal 31, no.1 (1988): 1–16;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Merritt Roe Smith and Leo Marx, Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  68. These questions are influenced by Jerram, “Space,” 418; Simon Gunn and Robert J. Morris, “Preface,” in Identities and Space, ed. Gunn and Morris, x; Gerd Schwerhoff, “Spaces, Places and the Historians,” History and Theory 52 (2013): 430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Paul Stock

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stock, P. (2015). History and the Uses of Space. In: Stock, P. (eds) The Uses of Space in Early Modern History. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490049_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490049_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50434-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49004-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics