Abstract
From the very outbreak of hostilities Britons were exposed to the contesting notions of political unity and political autonomy that were embedded in the rhetoric explaining the Civil War. British correspondents and envoys reported from America and, throughout the war, Northern and Southern agitators worked indefatigably in Britain to convey their respective — naturally conflicting — ideas about the issues.1 Accordingly, as historians have already pointed out, Britons could and did draw parallels between the war in the United States and the questions that it raised about nationalism and British affairs.2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See for example: R.J. M. Blackett, Divided Hearts, Britain and the American Civil War (Baton Rouge, 2001), pp. 128–37.
Joseph Hernon, Celts, Catholics & Copperheads: Ireland Views the American Civil War (Columbus, 1968), pp. 90–1
D. P. Crook, ‘Portents of War: English Opinion on Secession’, Journal of American Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2 (1971), pp. 176–7
Duncan Andrew Campbell, English Public Opinion and the American Civil War (London, 2003), p. 99.
Brian Jenkins, Irish Nationalism and the British State, From Repeal to Revolutionary Nationalism (Montreal, 2006), pp. 40–2
S. J. Connolly, Divided Kingdom: Ireland, 1630–1800 (Oxford, 2008), pp. 484–93.
Linda Colley, ‘Britishness and Otherness: An Argument’, The Journal of British Studies, Vol. 31, No. 4 (October 1992), p. 314.
R. V. Comerford, The Fenians in Context: Irish Politics and Society, 1848–82 (Dublin, 1985), pp. 68–116
Owen McGee, The IRB: The Irish Republican Brotherhood, from the Land League to Sinn Féin (Dublin, 2005), pp. 24–33.
Roy Foster, Modern Ireland, 1600–1972 (London, 1989), pp. 289–317 and 390–5
Nancy J. Curtin, The United Irishmen: Popular Politics in Ulster and Dublin, 1791–1798 (Oxford, 1994), pp. 13–37.
Mitchell Snay, Fenians, Freedmen, and Southern Whites: Race and Nationality in the Era of Reconstruction (Baton Rouge, 2007), pp. 65–76.
Susannah Ural Bruce, The Harp and the Eagle: Irish-American Volunteers and the Union Army, 1861–1865 (New York, 2006), p. 54.
W. E. Gladstone in the House of Commons on 30 March 1868, in: Isaac Butt, Ireland’s Appeal for Amnesty: A Letter to the Right Honourable W. E. Gladstone, M.P. Bristol Selected Pamphlets (1870), p. 22.
K. R. M. Short, The Dynamite War, Irish-American Bombers in Victorian Britain (Bristol, 1979), pp. 1–7
Niall Whelehan, ‘“Cheap as Soap and Common as Sugar”: The Fenians, Dynamite and Scientific Warfare’, in: Fearghal McGarry and James McConnel, (eds), The Black Hand of Republicanism, Fenianism in Modern Ireland (Dublin, 2009), p. 107.
David Sim, ‘Filibusters, Fenians, and a Contested Neutrality: The Irish Question and U.S. Diplomacy, 1848–1871’, American Nineteenth Century History, Vol. 12, No. 3 (2011), p. 275.
For the lack of organization and discipline see: Shin-Ichi Takagami, ‘The Fenian Rising in Dublin, March 1867’, Irish Historical Studies, Vol. 29, No. 115 (May 1995), pp. 340–62
Phillip E. Myers, Caution and Cooperation: The American Civil War in British-American Relations (Kent, OH, 2008), pp. 1–7.
For an account of the raids see: Hereward Senior, The Fenians and Canada (Toronto, 1978), pp. 81–135
Duncan Andrew Campbell, Unlikely Allies: Britain, America and the Victorian Origins of the Special Relationship (London, 2007), pp. 176–87.
Matthew Kelly, ‘Dublin Fenianism in the 1880s: “The Irish Culture of the Future”?’, The Historical Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3 (September 2000), pp. 729–50.
Isaac Butt, Home Government for Ireland: Irish Federalism!: Its Meaning, Its Objects, and Its Hopes (Dublin, 1870), p. 76.
Brent E. Kinser, The American Civil War in the Shaping of British Democracy (Farnham, 2011), p. 2.
George C. Herring, From Colony to Superpower, U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776 (Oxford, 2008), pp. 265–98.
Duncan Bell, The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900 (Princeton, NJ, 2007), pp. 231–57.
Hugh Tulloch, ‘Changing British Attitudes towards the United States in the 1880s’, The Historical Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4 (December 1977), pp. 825–40.
John R. Neff, Honoring the Civil War Dead: Commemoration and the Problem of Reconciliation (Lawrence, 2005), pp. 161–2.
Peter Parish, ‘Abraham Lincoln and American Nationhood’, in: Susan-Mary Grant and Peter J. Parish, (eds), Legacy of Disunion: The Enduring Significance of the American Civil War (Baton Rouge, 2003), p. 117.
W. E. Gladstone, Speeches on the Irish Question in 1886 (Edinburgh, 1886), p. 66.
E. L. Godkin, ‘American Home Rule’, in: W. E. Gladstone et. al., Handbook on HomeRule, Being Articles on the Irish Question (London, 1887), p. 5.
Joseph Chamberlain, Home Rule and the Irish Question: A Collection of Speeches Delivered Between 1881 and 1887 (London, 1887), pp. 60–1.
James Bryce, The American Commonwealth (London, 1888), p. 340.
Howard Jones, Union in Peril: The Crisis over Britain’s Intervention in the Civil War (London, 1992), pp. 183–5.
The Duke of Argyll, ‘English Elections and Home Rule’, The North American Review, Vol. 155, No. 429 (August 1892), p. 129.
Karen Stanbridge, ‘Nationalism, International Factors and the “Irish Question” in the Era of the First World War’, Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 11 No. 1 (2005), pp. 25–31
Adrian Gregory, ‘“You Might As Well Recruit Germans”: British Public Opinion and the Decision to Conscript the Irish in 1918’, in: Adrian Gregory and Senia Paseta, (eds), Ireland and the Great War: A War to Unite Us All? (Manchester, 2002), pp. 113–29
Michael Lallan, The Resurrection of Ireland, The Sinn Tein Party, 1916–1923 (Cambridge, 1999), pp. 3–76.
Arthur Griffith, The Resurrection of Hungary, A Parallel for Ireland (Dublin, 1918, 3rd ed.), pp. 9–12.
Michael Davitt, The Tall of Feudalism in Ireland, or the Story of the Land League Revolution (London, 1904), p. 198.
Gladstone, ‘A Vindication ol Home Rule, a Reply to the Duke ol Argyll’, The North American Review, Vol. 155, No. 431 (October 1892), pp. 385–91.
For the Duke ol Argyll’s arguments see: The Duke ol Argyll, ‘English Elections and Home Rule’, The North American Review, Vol. 155, No. 429 (August 1892), p. 129.
Alan O’Day, ‘Media and Power: Charles Stewart Parnell’s 1880 Mission to North America’, in: Hiram Morgan, (ed.), Information, Media and Power Through the Ages: Papers Read before the 24th Irish Conference of Historians, held at University College Cork, 20–22 May, 1999 (Dublin, 2001), pp. 216–17.
Mary N. Harris, ‘Irish Americans and the Pursuit ol Irish Independence’, in: Matjaz Klemencic and Mary N. Harris (eds), European Migrants, Diasporas and Indigenous Ethnic Minorities (Pisa, 2009), pp. 135–8
Francis M. Carroll, ‘The American Commission on Irish Independence and the Paris Peace Conference ol 1919’, Irish Studies in International Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1985), pp. 103–18.
John Devoy, Recollections of an Irish rebel (Shannon, 1969 [1929]), p. 451.
David T. Gleeson, The Irish in the South, 1815–1877 (Chapel Hill, 2001), pp. 121–
For the Irish in the North see: Martin W. Ölele, True Sons of the Republic: European Immigrants in the Union Army (Westport, 2008), p. 34
William L. Burton, Melting Pot Soldiers: The Union’s Ethnic Regiments (New York, 1998), pp. 112–60.
Kevin Kenny, ‘“Freedom and Unity”: Lincoln in Irish Political Discourse’, in: Richard Carwardine and Jay Sexton (eds), The Global Lincoln (New York, 2011), pp. 157–71.
Philip Whitwell Wilson, The Irish Case Before the Court of Public Opinion (New York, 1920), p. 112.
George Creel, Ireland’s Tight for Treedom: Setting Torth the High Lights of Irish History (New York, 1919), p. 14.
On the Irish legacy ol heroism in the U.S. see: Craig A. Warren, ‘“Oh, God, What a Pity!”: The Irish Brigade at Fredericksburg and the Creation of Myth’, Civil War History, Vol. 47, No. 3 (September 2001), pp. 193–221.
Anders Stephanson, Manifest Destiny: American Expansionism and the Empire of Right (New York, 1995), pp. 67–100 and 112–20.
James McPherson, The Mighty Scourge: Perspective on the Civil War (Oxford, 2007), p. 99.
Barry Schwartz, Abraham Lincoln in the Post-Heroic Era: History and Memory in Late Twentieth-Century America (Chicago, London, 2008), p. 14.
David Franklin, ‘Bigotry in ‘Bama: De Valera’s Visit to Birmingham Alabama, April 1920’, History Ireland, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Winter, 2004), p. 33.
Richard B. Finnegan, ‘Irish-American Relations’, in: William Crotty and David E. Schmitt, (eds), Ireland on the World Stage (Harlow, 2002), p. 95
F. M. Carroll, American Opinion and the Irish Question, 1910–23: A Study in Opinion and Policy (Dublin, 1978), pp. 162–6.
Bernadette Whelan, United States Foreign Policy and Ireland: From Empire to Independence, 1913–29 (Dublin, 2006), pp. 277–8
Seán Cronin, Washington’s Irish policy 1916–1986: Independence, Partition, Neutrality (Dublin, 1987), pp. 12–19.
Michael Hopkinson, ‘President Woodrow Wilson and the Irish Question’, Studia Hibernica, No. 27 (1993), pp. 89–111.
Christine Kinealy, War and Peace, Ireland since the 1960s (London, 2010), p. 41.
Copyright information
© 2015 Nimrod Tal
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tal, N. (2015). The War and the Political Debate about Ireland. In: The American Civil War in British Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137489265_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137489265_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-57389-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48926-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)