Abstract
Researchers have noted that a certain group of states account for a disproportionate amount of conflict in the international system.1 These states are rivals, or long-standing enemies, addicted to reducing gains for the other side and apt to challenge the goals of their rival. We now know that rivals are highly dispute prone, experience frequent territorial disputes, and can disrupt international and regional power systems. Despite progress, current theories regarding the termination of rivalries appear incomplete because they ignore domestic factors and the “principal” rivalry concept. Our central premise in this chapter argues that theories of rivalry termination are underdeveloped and fail to account for the settlement of outstanding issues and sources of rivalry persistence at the domestic level of analysis. If both the issues at stake in a rivalry remain unsettled and perceptions continue to be adversarial, the rivalry situation will persist. If the rivalry situation persists, an important context that dictates foreign policy action is in operation. This provides the context for Russia’s use of new foreign policy tactics. Our argument is that the rivalry between Russia and US continues but has shifted in scope and fits with the reduced reliance on conventional forms of power.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Diehl, P. and G. Goertz. 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).
Thompson, W. 2001. “Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 45: 557–586.
Huth, P., D. Bennett, and C. Gelpi. 1992. “System Uncertainty, Risk Propensity, and International Conflict Among the Great Powers.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 478.
Senese, P. and J. Vasquez. 2008. The Steps to War: An Empirical Study (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Goertz, G. and P. Diehl. 1995. “The Initiation and Termination of Enduring Rivalries: The Impact of Political Shocks.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 30–52.
Goertz, G., B. Jones, and P. Diehl. 2005. “Maintenance Processes in International Rivalries.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(5): 742–769.
McGinnis, M. and J. Williams. 1989. “Change and Stability in Superpower Rivalry.” American Political Science Review 83: 1101–1123.
Bennett, D.S. 1998. “Integrating and Testing Models of Rivalry Duration.” American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1200–1232.
Cioffi-Revilla, C. 1998. “The Political Uncertainty of Interstate Rivalries: A Punctuated Equilibrium Model” in P. Diehl, ed. The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).
Eckstein, H. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science” in Handbook of Political Science, Volume 7, F. Greenstein and N. Polsby, eds. (Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing).
Valeriano, B. 2003. Steps to Rivalry: Power Politics and Rivalry Formation. PhD Dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Chapter 7.
Thompson, W. 1995. “Principal Rivalries.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 39(2): 195–223.
Rogov, S. 1999. “Russia and the United States at the Threshold of the Twenty-First Century.” Russian Social Science Review 40(3): 12–49.
George, A. L. and A. Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: Mass., MIT Press).
Mayers, T. 1991. Understanding Weapons and Arms Control: A Guide to the Issues (Washington, D.C.: Brassey’s).
Midlarsky, M., J. Vasquez, and P. Gladkov, eds. 1994. From Rivalry to Cooperation: Russian and American Perspectives on the Post-Cold War Era (New York: HarperCollins College Publishers).
Levy, J. 1994. “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping the Conceptual Minefield.” International Organization 48(2): 279–312.
Adomeit, H. 1998. “Russian National Security Interests” in R. Allison and C. Bluth, eds. Security Dilemmas in Russia and Eurasia (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs).
Kubicek, Paul. 1999. “Russian Foreign Policy and the West.” Political Science Quarterly 114(4): 547–568.
Vasquez, J. 1994. “Building Peace in the Post-Cold War Era” in M. Midlarsky, J. Vasquez, and P. Gladkov, eds. From Rivalry to Cooperation: Russia and American Perspectives on the Post-Cold War Era (New York City: Longman Publishers).
Mansbach, Richard W. and John A. Vasquez. 1981. In Search of Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Nygren, Bertil. 2008. The Rebuilding of Greater Russia: Putin’s Foreign Policy towards the CIS Countries (New York: Routledge).
Way, Lucan. 2008. “The Real Causes of the Color Revolutions.” Journal of Democracy 19(3): 55–69.
Cornell, Svante and Frederick Starr, eds. 2009. The Guns of August 2008: Russia’s War with Georgia (New York: ME Sharpe).
Chamerlain-Creanga, Rebecca and Lyndon K. Allin. 2010. “Acquiring Assets, Debts and Citizens: Russia and the Micro-Foundations of Transnistria’s Stalemated Conflict.” Demokratizatsiya 18 (4).
Tsygankov, Andrei P. 2010. Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity of National Identity (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 2nd Edition).
Protsyk, Oleh and Benedict Harzl, eds. 2013. Managing Ethnic Diversity in Russia (London: Routledge).
Solana, J. 1999. “NATO’s success in Kosovo.” Foreign Affairs 78(6): 114–120.
Mendeloff, D. 2008. “Pernicious History as a Cause of National Misperceptions: Russia and the 1999 Kosovo War.” Cooperation and Conflict 43(1): 31–56.
Russett, B. and Stam, A. 1998. “Courting Disaster: An Expanded NATO vs. Russia and China.” Political Science Quarterly 113(3): 361–382.
Vasquez, J. 1993. The War Puzzle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Holsti, Ole R. 1992. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus Mershon Series: Research Programs and Debates.” International Studies Quarterly 36(4): 439–436.
Page, Benjamin I. and Robert J. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42(3): 427–460.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce and Randolph M. Siverson. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review 89(4): 841–855.
Mor, Ben D. 1997. “Peace Incentives and Public Opinion: The Domestic Context of Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Peace Research 34(2): 197–215.
Colaresi, Michael. 2005. Scare Tactics: The Politics of International Rivalry (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press).
Goertz, Gary, Bradford Jones, and Paul F. Diehl. 2005. “Maintenance Processes in International Rivalries.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(5): 742–769.
Klein, James P., Gary Goertz, and Paul F, Diehl. 2006. “The New Rivalry Dataset: Procedures and Patterns.” Journal of Peace Research 43(3), 331–348.
Maness, Ryan C. and Brandon Valeriano. 2012. “Russia and the Near Abroad: Applying a Risk Barometer for War.” Journal of Slavic Military Studies 25 (2).
Ziegler, Charles E. 2009. “Russia and the CIS in 2008.” Asian Survey 49(1): 135–145.
Monaghan, Andrew. 2012. “The Vertikal: Power and Authority in Russia.” International Affairs 88(1): 1–16.
Nygren, Bertil. 2008. “Putin’s Use of Natural Gas to Reintegrate the CIS Region.” Problems of Post-Communism 55(4): 3–15.
Spyer, Jonathan. 2007. “Europe and Iraq: Test Case for the Common Foreign and Security Policy.” Middle East Review of International Affairs 11 (2): Article 7.
Mankoff, J. 2009. Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics (Lanham, M.D.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Brandon Valeriano and Ryan C. Maness
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maness, R.C., Valeriano, B. (2015). Rivalry Persistence and the Case of the United States and Russia: From Global Rivalry to Regional Conflict. In: Russia’s Coercive Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137479440_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137479440_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-69370-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47944-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)