Skip to main content
  • 167 Accesses

Abstract

Given their overwhelming presence in colonial Australia and Canada, the most pervasive impact on national cultural values appears to have come from the Anglo-Celtic Catholic and Protestant communities, whose impact on the evolution of national values, culture, and national character was profound. As the contribution of the Irish Catholic sensibility to Australian irreverence, rebelliousness, and egalitarianism—or desire for flatter hierarchies—is evident in such Australian practices as “knocking,” “cutting down tall poppies,” and even the social phenomenon of “mateship”—features of Australian culture absent in Canada—the significant number of Irish Catholics in Australia is the critical factor that guided Australian culture in a different direction compared to Canada where Irish Catholics, as a percentage of the Canadian population, did not possess the same cultural force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. John Higley, Desley Deacon, and Don Smart, Elites in Australia (London, UK: Routledge, 1979), 77.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Encel, Equality and Authority: A Study of Class, Status and Power in Australia (Melbourne, VIC: Cheshire, 1970), 178–79.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John Porter, The Vertical Mosaic: An Analysis of Social Class and Power in Canada (Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 1965), xii–xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wallace Clement, “John Porter and the Development of Sociology in Canada,” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 18, no. 5 (1981): 584.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace Clement, “Elites,” in The Canadian Encyclopedia: Year 2000 Edition, ed. James H. Marsh (Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart, 1999), 755–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. It is useful to note that, in Australia, the definition and requirements of social status had changed from England. The social distinction most accessible to the would-be colonist was that of developing into a “gentleman.” As Australian historian John Hirst notes, gentlemen wore distinctive dress of “frockcoat, top hat, kid gloves” and were publicly recognized by other gentlemen; they were saluted by policemen, addressed by the title “Esquire” in formal correspondence, and workers were expected to address them as “Sir.” While the traditional English standard of a “gentleman” reflected one’s connections to a good family and ownership of lands, in Australia, observes Hirst, “the balance changed. The core of true gentlemen was small and not self-sustaining; the claimants at the edges numerous. There were enough true gentlemen to retain the rank’s traditional prestige, but too few, owning too few resources, for the traditional criteria to maintain a commanding influence.” Hirst points out, “Everyone in the colonies—including those with the best claims to be gentlemen—was closely involved in money-making. This was traditionally forbidden to the English gentleman, who could invest his fortune to advantage but was essentially a man of leisure, not preoccupied with money matters.” Hence, the status of a “gentleman” was held by anyone in a certain position of the occupational hierarchy or who possessed independent means. John Hirst, “Egalitarianism,” in Australian Cultural History, ed. S.L. Goldberg and F.B. Smith (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peter C. Newman, The Canadian Establishment: Volume One (Toronto, ON: Penguin, 1999), 386.

    Google Scholar 

  8. James L. Heap, “Conceptual and Theoretical Problems in the Vertical Mosaic,” Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology 9, no. 2 (1972): 176–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. John Porter, “Conceptual and Theoretical Problems in the Vertical Mosaic: A Rejoinder,” Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology 9, no. 2 (1972): 188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peter C. Newman, “Business Elites,” in The Canadian Encyclopedia: Year 2000 Edition, ed. James H. Marsh (Toronto, ON: McClelland & Stewart, 1999), 334.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graham Maddox, “The Australian Labor Party,” in Political Parties in Australia, ed. Graeme Starr, Keith Richmond, and Graham Maddox (Richmond, VIC: Heinemann Educational Australia, 1978), 168–69.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Russel Ward, The Australian Legend (Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press, 1958), 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robert A.J. McDonald, Making Vancouver: Class, Status, and Social Boundaries, 1863–1913 (Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 1996), 233.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freda Hawkins, Critical Years in Immigration: Canada and Australia Compared, 2nd ed. (Montreal, QC & Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1991), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peter C. Newman, The Canadian Establishment, Volume Two: The Acquisitors (Toronto, ON: Penguin, 1999), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Henderson, Ninety Years in the Master’s Service (Edinburgh, UK: Andrew Elliott, 1911), 222;

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.T. Reilly, Fifty Years in Western Australia (Perth, WA: Sands and McDougall, 1908), 31;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Douglas Pike, Paradise of Dissent (London, UK: Longmans Green, 1957), 492;

    Google Scholar 

  19. Walter W. Phillips, Defending “A Christian Country”: Churchmen and Society in New South Wales in the 1880s and After (St. Lucia, QLD: University of Queensland, 1981), 17;

    Google Scholar 

  20. quoted in Hans Mol, The Faith of Australians (Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 1985), 165.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richard N. Spann, “The Catholic Vote in Australia,” in Catholics and the Free Society: An Australian Symposium, ed. H. Mayer (Melbourne, VIC: Cheshire, 1961), 123;

    Google Scholar 

  22. H.Y. Tien, Social Mobility and Controlled Fertility (New Haven, CT: College and University Press, 1965), 65; quoted in Mol, Faith ofAustralians, 166.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.E.N. Twopenny, Town Life in Australia (London, UK: Elliott Stock, 1883), 116–17, quoted in Mol, Faith ofAustralians, 166.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Seymour Martin Lipset, “Social Class” in Social Stratification: Canada, ed. James E. Curtis and William G. Scott (Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall, 1973), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  25. K.S. Inglis, “Religious Behaviour,” in Australian Society: A Sociological Introduction, ed. A.F. Davies, and S. Encel, 2nd ed. (Melbourne, VIC: F.W. Cheshire, 1970), 440.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Patrick O’Farrell, The Catholic Church and Community: An Australian History, 3rd rev. ed. (Kensington, NSW: New South Wales University Press, 1992), 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michael Hogan, The Sectarian Strand: Religion in Australian History (Ringwood, VIC: Penguin, 1987), 138–39.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patrick Ford, Cardinal Moran and the A.L.P. (Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne University Press, 1966), 280–81.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paul Smyth, “Reclaiming Community? From Welfare Society to Welfare State in Australian Catholic Social Thought,” Australian Journal of Politics and History 49, no. 1 (2003): 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A.E. Cahill, “Cardinal Moran’s Politics,” The Journal of Religious History 15, no. 4 (1989): 525–31. Quoted in Smyth, “Reclaiming Community?” 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Arthur J. Wolak

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolak, A.J. (2015). Class and Identity. In: The Development of Managerial Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137475633_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics